My NYC Big Book Award for Best Horror of the Year - DEATH OF HEAVEN, & Video Book Trailers

Right off, two links:

Press release: Author JZ Murdock receives national recognition for Death of Heaven (cover title as, Death of heaven) through the NYC BIG BOOK AWARD® for Horror!

My author profile page for my books on Amazon. This includes my ebooks and audiobooks (also on Audible.com). Also Smashwords for only ebooks.

First up, congrats to winners of the Horror category:

Some NYC Big Book Award (a part of the Independent Press Awards) winners in the Horror category from over the years:

• 2024: "Death of heaven" JZ Murdock (Amazon)
• 2023: "River of Ashes" Alexandrea Weis and Lucas Astor (Amazon)
• 2022: "Annihilation" Kaylin McFarren (Amazon)
• 2021: "Roseneath" Dana McSwain (Amazon)
• 2020: "Canni" Daniel O'Connor (Amazon)
• 2019: "The Poor and The Haunted" Dustin McKissen (Amazon)
• 2018: "The Last Odinian" Alec Arbogast (Amazon)

OK, here we go...

Back in 2012, I was asked to adapt a novelist's book to screenplay. That was Dark of kNight by TL Mitchell. That led to another adaptation of her friend's book, Mitchell was starting her own publishing company. She pulled her books from her publisher and got to work. But she wouldn't publish my works. I found that frustrating. She turned me onto Cal Miller at Zilyon Publishing and he published my first book, Anthology of Evil, a collection of all my initial, original short horror and sci fi fiction. 

I took all my short stories I thought could stand alone and put them in that book. Originally I put all my short stories into that book at nearly 1,000 pages. But he said, "Uh, thanks, but maybe cut that by half?" So I did and he published it.

But I had a bunch of other stories left over so I put them in a second book. I thought I might make it into a portmanteau novel of sorts. Frame those stories and build another book within the book in a kind of meta book surrounding the book. How to tie that all together. This is something I've always excelled at. In college and later in various positions at corporations.

I had been a senior technical writer on various high-end, high-tech IT teams around the Pacific Northwest. I worked at US West Technologies, Holland American Cruise Lines, just missed out on a job at McCaw Cellular, and kept turning down a job at some place called Network Data Expresss (NDEX, or NDEx) which I finally took a job with after 5.5 months out of work during a period in the Pacific Northwest that experienced massive layoffs in high tech.

So I created my book, Death of Heaven in 2012 and Cal published that book also. I thought the cover was interesting but I thought it was too light. I had wanted a more hyperreal format of graphics, but when you get offered by an incredible artist to do you cover, you say, Thank you! Also, didn't need the "By" but we learned as we created, just the author name. 

Also, you can buy his art on Redbubble, which includes my book cover art and his art from over his amazing career. The image above is from his Redbubble profile

He made a banner like that for my book...

Three of the Tiny Colony "Gods" from Death of heaven

Then in 2014, my friend I worked at the same company with, Kurt Giambatiani (who wrote some of my favorite books in his "Fallen Cloud" series of revisionist history where Native Americans rode dinosaurs that terrified the horses of the US Army...where Custer never died at Little Big Horn but became President of the United States and his son joined the US Army...this is a great series of fun books. I highly recommend them. Kurt has moved on from that series. Check him out: K. R. A. Giambastiani.

Anyway, his wife Ilene had helped edit his books so I took a chance and asked and she decided to edit my book. We had a great time. She worked from their home in north Seattle, while I worked from my home in Suquamish, Washington, just a Bainbridge Island ride away from downtown Seattle, where both Kurt and I worked in the same building over by the 9th Avenue Seattle light rail (subway).

In 2014, I published a revised version of Death of Heaven. It was interesting as once he sent me this version he said he didn't know what he was thinking about the lighter cover version. 

In 2013 I had gotten into making book video trailers of my books. I broke out some of the short stories and made ebooks out of them. I also eventually made some audiobooks of them. After I retired and moved to Bremerton, I got my friend Tom to read my audiobooks. 

After a couple of years, after having made a short film ("The Rapping" an Edgar Allen Poe reference from his poem, The Raven), I moved to my current location about a mile from my last house. I made a new film, "Gumdrop", a short horror. Tom was the lead.

It's now years later after health problems since catching COVID-19 in February 2020 before we knew what it was, having caught it twice again. In 2022 I made another film, a filmic poem/WWI documentary that's now won about 63 international film festival awards.

I had retired in 2016 to write and turn my writings into films. I've done that. What I hadn't done until I got into the film festival circuit and got used to applying for and winning many awards, I thought about my books/writings. So last year I submitted things for book awards. And this year I won the 2024 New York City Big Book Award for Death of heaven. I've written about that title before.

Originally I got the title from my son who in his senior year of high school produced a CD of his own music he engineered at school. I liked the title of one and he said I could use it for my book. When my younger brother, an artist, who has done all my book covers, redid my cover for the 2nd edition, he left the "h" in "Heaven" lowercase.

 Somehow we didn't notice it and when we did, I realized it actually fit the book and the stories within. So you will see my title in various places as either "Death of Heaven" the correct format for entities like Amazon (you can't use a loser case in a title), or "Death of heaven", as it now is on the book cover with a special font my brother made just for this book. 

The lowercase "h" made sense to me as, well... you'd have to read the book to understand why that is. But it makes total sense, other than and outside of the rules of grammar that require it be capitalized. But writing is also art and as a poem can not just be in a stanza form but also printed on the page in a form to mimic the meaning within the poem. As in a "concrete poem" or a "shape poem". 

I've had a weird relationship with poetry. In the late 80s I tried unsuccessfully to create a magazine and in the tenets of the magazine, no poetry was allowed. I'd taken poetry at university and learned a lot. I think my feelings had to do with pretentiousness. My 2022 documentary film is a "filmic poem", something I learned about in my first college cinema class.

I wrote a poem around 2014 on the topic of Maurice Ravel and his composition, "Bolero" (which I explain more on elsewhere). I researched him and that song and learned a lot. Like he had been in WWI in a way that Hemmingway had. I researched and rewrote it over the years and even had a professional poet read it and comment. 

I used that poem in my film as a centerpiece to exemplify the horror of war and I hired two French-speaking actors to do the speaking parts in the film. As I composed the film, I altered the poem, and back and forth over 6 months while I was recuperating slowly, painfully slowly from Long Covid. 

In 2013 I made a bunch of book trailer videos as I detail in my blog back then: New JZ Murdock Video Book Trailers (for reference, I include the links in that below). I remade one for the 2nd edition of Death of heaven in 2014,

2024 NYC Big Book Awards / Death of heaven page

Now that I've won a book award, I thought I'd use the videos. What the heck, right? They were a lot of work, regardless how they may now be viewed.

And so here they are...

I now have more I would like to share with you. I hope you find them intriguing. If you would like to keep track of my channel, go to: TheJZMurdock on YouTube.

UPDATE 1/18/2013: Before I get to the fiction video book trailers (book trailer videos?), I have just created two new ones for a couple of my non-fiction articles:

Synesthesia, and the Need for More Information - Video Book Trailer
This article is free and also included in:

Some Notes on Field Theory, Albert's Mind and the Status Quo - Video Book Trailer

Okay then, here are my fiction trailers:

Books
Anthology of Evil - Video Book Trailer

Death of Heaven - Video Book Trailer

Novella

Andrew - Video Book Trailer (this is at the end of "Anthology of Evil" and now there is a 2 volume sequel to that, this is also the origination story of Death of heaven).

Short Story ebooks

EarVu - Video Book Trailer

Gumdrop City - Video Book Trailer

In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear - Video Book Trailer

Japheth, Ishvi and The Light - Video Book Trailer

Poor Lord Ritchie's Answer to a Question He Knever Knew - Video Book Trailer

Sarah - Video Book Trailer

Simon's Beautiful Thought - Video Book Trailer

The Mea Culpa Document of London - Video Book Trailer

That it, that's all I've got for now.

Cheers! Sláinte!

What would Frank Zappa or Ayn Rand have to say about Trump & his MaGA today?

My older MaGA-saturated brother has much to say about so much nonsense in the Trump/MaGA field of ridiculousness. "MaGA" because they don't seem to understand or respect all our America. And until they do, they get to keep that lowercase letter "a" for their lack of understanding of who and what America really IS, and not just their perverse subculturish view of it.

I feel like that photo is from Shut up and play yer guitar, or something.

I have to bug him once in a while about it. His latest rant got me to wondering what his hero, Frank Zappa would have to say to him about it. Or Ayn Rand as she is such a darling of the Libertarian Republican types for their immature understanding of her and her own rather misplaced Objectivism.

So, my older brother by 7 years said:

"When the China Virus landed here in WA State the hot topic was the failing infrastructure, about plus or minus 162 bridges and overpasses and roads were in dire need to fixing or replacing . Then the Unemployment fund was raided for Millions upon millions or a billion It took no time to bury those stories about those huge losses. And not a peep about any of that since then, WHY NOT? Millions in to Billions were lost and not one person held accountable, Why NOT? Why did the investigation stop. Why didn't and still doesn't Ferguson sic his team on it? WHY is Bob ignoring everything Biden and the Radical left has done to Hurt the People that are forced to fund every despicable Deplorable thing Government has done to the WORKING People of this State?

"WHY? Because he promised them he would do nothing to get in their way, of destruction. of destroying this State.

 "HRC and her Gang are the Real Deplorables, the money grubbing lying cheating Hate the Middle class 2 tier Justice system the Lawfare creating Propaganda FAKE NEWS SPREADING Gaslighting flooding DemocRats And you keep voting for them sending them back term after term for decades WTF Wake the F**K up and Vote them OUT Make Washington a Great State Again I can remember when the whole West Coast was a Conservative strong hold. How did that flip 100% into Liberal Communist 3rd world shithole Banana Democracy ??? You did it so undo it is your Obligation to the Republic and the Flag for which is stands,, One Nation.

"V O T E Never again for a DemocRat that is the Problem creator and not a solution Y O U know what you must do, and should have done the last Presidential election..."

Uhhhh huh... so childish all that jr hi name calling like Trump loves so much and his crowds cheer for so often. Humiliating to America overall but, whatever...

To be clear, older bro is on the side of those "deplorable", which is Hillary Clinton's observation of what Trump spawned. That side of things always takes who they re and projects it onto their opposition ("No I'm not,  you are" Or as Trump said to Hillary in the debate years ago, "I'm not a puppet, you're a puppet", such, uh genius..."Genius"). 

Anyway, Washington has long been a great state, ever the more the more conservatives are contained.

OK what did ChatGPT think might be Frank Zappa's response be about Donald Trump today and his crazyed MaGA crowd?

"Ah, Trump’s back in the ring, folks! It’s like a bizarre circus act where the clown just keeps falling off the tightrope and somehow gets a standing ovation every time. Now we have a guy running for president who’s not only lost an election but is also a convicted felon. If that doesn’t say something about the state of our democracy, I don’t know what does!
"The MAGA movement, meanwhile, is still waving its banners like a group of devoted fans at a bad concert. 'Make America Great Again'? More like 'Make America Strange Again.' We’re living in a reality show where the rules of logic and decency have been thrown out the window, and the ratings keep climbing!
"But let’s get real—if we want to make America truly great, it’s going to take a lot more than catchy slogans and flashy rallies. We need to get back to the basics: critical thinking, genuine discourse, and maybe a little less of this carnival of ego. But until that happens, grab your popcorn, because the next episode is bound to be a wild ride!"

OK, OK to be fair, what might Frank say about his actually specific comments?

"Ah, the sweet symphony of outrage! It’s like a never-ending concert of complaints and conspiracies. You know, my friend, while you’re busy pointing fingers at politicians and labeling them as 'deplorable,' don’t forget that the real issue often lies in our own apathy.
"You want accountability? Sure, but remember that we’re all part of this crazy machine called democracy. If you’re frustrated with the infrastructure or the 'raided' unemployment fund, maybe it’s time to ask yourself: what are you doing about it?
And as for the political landscape changing from a 'Conservative stronghold' to whatever you want to call it now, that’s just the way it goes. People evolve, society evolves, and sometimes, the songs you don’t want to hear are the ones that reveal the truth.
"So before you go shouting about 'voting them out,' think about what you really want. Are you looking for change, or just a new set of puppets on the same old strings? Because if you’re not careful, you’ll find yourself in a banana republic—where everyone’s throwing bananas, and nobody’s watching the show.
"And hey, maybe instead of waiting for the politicians to make things right, you could start a grassroots movement. Write a song! Call for action! Let’s turn that frustration into creativity. After all, isn’t that what makes life interesting?
"So wake up, but don’t just complain. Get in there and make some noise. Just don’t forget to keep it real and funky!"

The only answer there? He's doing as many do, Nothing. Just shouting into the ether of the Internet.

Now, what about Ayn Rand? What might be her POV on Trump & MaGA (Trump's MaGAFooled crowd), as she's so popular with the more philosophically immature of Republican leadership, for decades now. From ChatGPT:

Ayn Rand, the philosopher and novelist known for her philosophy of Objectivism, would likely have a complex and critical view of Donald Trump and the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement. Here are some potential perspectives she might offer:
Individualism vs. Collectivism: Rand emphasized individualism and the rights of the individual over the collective. She might criticize Trump for appealing to collective sentiments and nationalism that could undermine individual rights. The MAGA movement, with its focus on America-first policies, could be seen as promoting a form of collectivism that Rand would oppose.
Government Role: Rand believed in a minimal government that protects individual rights and does not interfere in the economy. She might critique Trump's administration for its regulatory policies and government interventions, particularly if they contradicted her ideals of laissez-faire capitalism.
Morality and Ethics: Rand’s moral philosophy centers on rational self-interest and the pursuit of one’s own happiness. She might find aspects of Trump’s behavior, including his rhetoric and decision-making, inconsistent with her views on rational ethics, especially if she perceives them as opportunistic or lacking integrity.
Populism: Rand was skeptical of populism and demagoguery. She could view Trump’s populist appeal and the emotional fervor of the MAGA base as detrimental to reasoned discourse and the philosophical foundations of a free society.
Capitalism: While Rand would likely appreciate some of Trump's pro-business policies, such as tax cuts and deregulation, she might still argue that his approach lacks a principled understanding of capitalism, focusing more on cronyism or favoring certain industries rather than advocating for free markets overall.
In summary, Rand would likely view Trump and the MAGA movement through a critical lens, focusing on the tension between individual rights, capitalism, and the collective ethos that populism can promote. Her philosophy would lead her to advocate for a society rooted in reason, individualism, and unregulated capitalism, which she might see as at odds with the current political climate.

OK but what might she say herself?

"In my view, the rise of populism and the appeal of movements like MAGA are fundamentally at odds with the principles of individualism and rational self-interest that I advocate. A society cannot thrive when its citizens are encouraged to sacrifice their own values and rights for the sake of the collective or a so-called national interest.

"Donald Trump’s brand of politics embodies a troubling blend of nationalism and emotional appeal, which undermines the very foundation of a free society. True freedom requires a government that protects individual rights, not one that seeks to impose a collective will upon its citizens.

"While I appreciate the necessity of capitalism and the importance of business, I am wary of any leader who uses cronyism or populist rhetoric to gain favor. Genuine capitalism flourishes in an environment free from government intervention, where individuals pursue their own happiness and success based on merit, not entitlement.

"We must remember that the path to a prosperous society lies in rational thought, personal responsibility, and the unwavering defense of individual rights. It is only through these principles that we can truly achieve greatness—not through empty slogans or the sacrifice of our values at the altar of nationalism."

---

This statement encapsulates Rand's core beliefs while addressing contemporary issues related to Trump and the MAGA movement.

Alright. Hang in there. All this nonsense will be over soon, hopefully, sooner than later.

All the best!

Outed: Russia Today (RT), Long Russian State Propaganda, an Arm of the FSB & Simply Putin's Mouthpiece

I had discussed this on this blog in 2017 (I wasn't the only one who noticed), but I had complained about it years before that. That RT (Russia Today) was a tool of the Russian government, If not a branch of Putin's FSB, it was certainly his mouthpiece. I was stunned to find ANY American personalities or professionals would sign up for what was obviously just Russian State TV, regardless of their incessant denials.

Among the channel's shows were + One with Dennis Miller, CrossTalk with Peter Lavelle and The Keiser Report with Max Keiser. Other shows included News with Ed Schultz (2016–2018) and Larry King Now (2012–2020). Bizarre. Aiding and abetting the enemy.

It was also bizarre to find RT, which they changed to after "Russia Today" became too problematic, was touting a line curiously similar to American right-wing (nut) propaganda as on Fox News (a huge flashing light in both directions), touted by the Republican Party extremists and eventually and clearly by Donald Trump and his MaGA adjunct to Russian disinformation. Something Newt Gingrich began to make popular since the early 1990s.

None of this was difficult to see. Certainly not for any of us who had for decades, followed Soviet and then Russian disinformation campaigns worldwide. All of which became clearer as now war criminal Putin turned more and more into a despot and faux democratic leader of Russia.

Finally, the American government is being overt about it too:

Alerting the World to RT’s Global Covert Activities:

"Today, the United States is designating three entities and two individuals for their connection to Russia’s destabilizing actions abroad. According to new information, much of which originates from employees of Russian state-funded RT (formerly “Russia Today”), we now know that RT moved beyond being simply a media outlet and has been an entity with cyber capabilities. It is also engaged in information operations, covert influence, and military procurement. These operations are targeting countries around the world, including in Europe, Africa, and North and South America.

"RT and its employees, including Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan, have directly coordinated with the Kremlin to support Russian government efforts to influence the October 2024 Moldovan election. Specifically, in coordination with the Kremlin, Simonyan leverages the state-funded platforms for which she serves in leadership positions – namely RT, Sputnik, and their parent company FEDERAL STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION AGENCY ROSSIYA SEGODNYA (ROSSIYA SEGODNYA) – to attempt to foment unrest in Moldova, likely with the specific aim of causing protests to turn violent. RT is aware of and prepared to assist Russia’s plans to incite protests should the election not result in a Russia-preferred candidate winning the presidency." For more see the article...

The U.S. government's release on RT’s global covert activities reveals that RT is part of a state-backed disinformation effort, promoting pro-Russian narratives and undermining Western democracies. This covert strategy aims to spread divisive content globally under the guise of independent media. 

Regarding Fox News, while they operate in a commercial, non-state-backed capacity, both networks share similarities in fueling skepticism toward U.S. government institutions and amplifying anti-establishment views. RT strategically exploits Fox's narratives when they align with Russian interests, particularly regarding foreign policy, media distrust, and cultural conflicts.

Wishing you all, all the best!

Authoritarian Parallels: Comparing Trump to Putin's Rule in Russia

Donald Trump’s political style and desires for governing America can be described as exhibiting authoritarian tendencies, though the U.S. retains a robust democratic system with strong institutions that counterbalance executive power. Trump's autocratic orientation follows the tyrant's playbook of disinformation and all that encompasses. First and foremost in combatting this kind of person and orientation is knowledge, facts, fact-checking, and educating the public.

Jon Stewart with Bill Adair of Politifact - “Beyond the Big Lie” | The Daily Show. PolitiFact.com was started in August 2007 by Times Washington Bureau Chief Bill Adair, in conjunction with the Congressional Quarterly. - Wikipedia

It's important to note that Donald Trump is, aside from being an exPOTUS, twice impeached and also a convicted felon of "all 34 charges in a scheme to illegally influence the 2016 election through a hush money payment to a porn actor who said the two had sex."

Vladimir Putin is a war criminal for his invasion of Ukraine. To be fair, he has committed war crimes in other countries over this far too long rule of Russia since 1999. 

See sections II and III below for more on Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin's international or national crimes.

Section I - Trump/Putin, a comparison

To draw parallels between Trump’s approach and Russia under Putin, there are a few key areas to consider:

1. Concentration of Power and Undermining Checks and Balances

• Putin: In Russia, Putin has significantly centralized power, weakening democratic institutions and neutralizing checks on his authority.
• Trump: Trump has shown a desire to centralize power, often expressing frustration with checks on his authority by the judiciary, Congress, and state governments. For instance, he frequently criticized judges who ruled against him and pushed for loyalty from government officials, including the Justice Department. His refusal to concede the 2020 election and attempts to overturn the results through legal challenges, pressure on state officials, and ultimately the January 6 Capitol riot demonstrate this desire to weaken checks on executive power.

2. Disregard for Democratic Norms

• Putin: Putin has been accused of manipulating elections, suppressing opposition, and curbing political freedoms.
• Trump: While the U.S. elections remain competitive, Trump frequently spread misinformation about electoral fraud, especially after the 2020 election. His claims of a "stolen election" culminated in efforts to delegitimize the democratic process. Critics argue that this behavior undermines trust in democratic institutions and erodes democratic norms.

3. Attacks on Media

• Putin: The Russian media is tightly controlled, and independent journalism is often met with intimidation, censorship, or violence. The Kremlin exerts control over the flow of information.
• Trump: While the media in the U.S. remains free, Trump frequently attacked the press, calling it the "enemy of the people" and discrediting news outlets critical of him. This rhetoric created a hostile environment for journalists and fostered distrust in the media, similar to how authoritarian leaders delegitimize independent scrutiny.

4. Nationalism and Populism

• Putin: Putin’s governance has been marked by strong nationalism, emphasizing Russia’s unique identity, traditional values, and its role as a great power, often positioning himself as the protector of these values.
• Trump: Trump’s “America First” rhetoric shares a parallel with Putin’s nationalism. Trump positioned himself as a populist leader fighting against elites, promising to restore American greatness and protect American jobs, borders, and values. His appeal to a populist base often involved stoking fears about immigrants and foreign threats, much like Putin uses similar rhetoric to consolidate power.

5. Desire for Loyalty and Weakening of Institutions

• Putin: Putin’s political system is heavily reliant on personal loyalty, with political figures, oligarchs, and state officials expected to align closely with the Kremlin’s interests or face repercussions.
• Trump: Trump often demanded personal loyalty from key figures in government, firing officials who disagreed with or criticized him, such as FBI Director James Comey. He was also critical of those within his own administration who did not publicly support his claims, particularly regarding the 2020 election.

6. Cult of Personality

• Putin: In Russia, Putin has cultivated a cult of personality, presenting himself as a strongman leader who is indispensable to Russia’s future.
• Trump: Trump similarly cultivated a personality-driven political movement, with much of his appeal stemming from his personal brand, charisma, and outsider status. His ability to maintain strong loyalty from a significant portion of the electorate reflects a similar phenomenon, where support for the leader sometimes eclipses traditional party or policy loyalties.

Key Differences:

Despite these parallels, the U.S. system of government has far stronger checks and balances compared to Russia. The U.S. Congress, judiciary, free press, and civil society institutions have, to date, successfully restrained Trump’s more authoritarian-leaning tendencies. Elections in the U.S. remain free and competitive, and Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election were ultimately unsuccessful due to these institutional safeguards.

In summary, while Trump has exhibited certain authoritarian tendencies, the U.S. remains a functioning democracy with stronger safeguards against the concentration of power, in contrast to Putin’s much more consolidated, authoritarian rule in Russia. 

The concern, as some see it, is that Trump’s political style may continue to erode democratic norms and institutions if left unchecked.

Section II - Donald Trump, crimes

Since Donald Trump’s election as President of the United States in 2016, there have been numerous allegations of unlawful actions, ethical violations, and efforts to undermine democratic institutions, though these have largely played out in domestic legal and political arenas rather than in the realm of international criminal law. Below are the key controversies and legal actions related to Trump’s conduct during his presidency and after:

1. Obstruction of Justice (Mueller Investigation)

• Context: The Mueller investigation (2017-2019) examined Russian interference in the 2016 election and potential collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report documented numerous instances where Trump may have attempted to obstruct the investigation.
• Key Allegations:
  • Trump allegedly directed aides to fire Mueller and sought to limit the scope of the investigation.
  • The report outlined at least 10 episodes of potential obstruction of justice but concluded that a sitting president could not be indicted based on Department of Justice policy.
• Outcome: Mueller’s report did not explicitly recommend charges but left the door open for Congress to pursue impeachment or other actions, stating, "while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

2. Ukraine Scandal and Impeachment (2019)

• Context: In July 2019, Trump was accused of withholding military aid to Ukraine while pressuring Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Trump’s political rival, Joe Biden, and his son Hunter.
• Key Allegations:
  • Trump allegedly used the promise of $400 million in military aid to coerce Ukraine into announcing investigations into Biden, a potential 2020 opponent, in what many considered an abuse of presidential power.
  • This led to his first impeachment by the House of Representatives in December 2019 on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
• Outcome: Trump was acquitted by the Senate in February 2020, with the majority of Republican senators voting against conviction, arguing that the charges did not rise to the level of removal from office.

3. Incitement of the January 6 Capitol Insurrection (2021)

• Context: After losing the 2020 presidential election to Joe Biden, Trump repeatedly made unfounded claims that the election had been "stolen" due to widespread voter fraud. On January 6, 2021, Trump gave a speech to his supporters in Washington, D.C., urging them to "fight like hell" and "stop the steal," shortly before they stormed the U.S. Capitol.
• Key Allegations:
  • Trump was accused of inciting an insurrection aimed at preventing Congress from certifying the Electoral College results.
  • His actions and rhetoric were seen as an attack on the peaceful transfer of power and a violation of democratic norms.
• Outcome: Trump was impeached for a second time by the House of Representatives, on charges of incitement of insurrection. However, he was acquitted by the Senate in February 2021, as a majority of Republican senators voted against conviction.
• Legal Fallout: While Trump was acquitted, investigations into the events of January 6, 2021, are ongoing, and some individuals close to Trump, including advisors and supporters, have faced legal consequences.

4. Election Interference and Legal Challenges Post-2020 Election

• Efforts to Overturn Election Results: Trump’s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election through baseless claims of widespread voter fraud led to dozens of lawsuits, none of which successfully overturned any state’s results. Many of these lawsuits were dismissed by courts due to lack of evidence.
• Georgia Election Interference: Trump pressured Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in a phone call to "find 11,780 votes" to overturn Biden’s victory in the state. This led to investigations into potential election interference.
• Investigations: The Justice Department, state authorities, and the January 6 House Select Committee have investigated Trump’s post-election actions, including his role in promoting false claims about the election and his involvement in the January 6 insurrection.

5. Financial Crimes and Tax Evasion

• New York Investigations: Trump and his businesses have been under investigation in New York for years. These investigations include:
  • Manhattan District Attorney’s Investigation: Examines Trump’s business practices, focusing on potential bank, tax, and insurance fraud. In 2021, Trump’s company, the Trump Organization, and its chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg were charged with tax fraud.
  • New York Attorney General’s Investigation: This civil investigation looks at whether the Trump Organization inflated the value of assets to secure loans and understated them to avoid taxes.
• Tax Evasion Allegations: A 2020 New York Times investigation revealed that Trump had paid little to no federal income tax for several years, raising questions about his financial practices.

6. Classified Documents Investigation (Mar-a-Lago Raid, 2022)

• Context: After leaving office, Trump took classified documents, including top-secret materials, to his residence at Mar-a-Lago in Florida. Despite repeated requests from the National Archives and the FBI, he failed to return all of the materials.
• FBI Investigation: In August 2022, the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago, recovering hundreds of classified documents, leading to an ongoing investigation into whether Trump violated the Espionage Act, mishandled classified information, or obstructed justice by withholding documents.
• Legal Outcome: In 2023, Trump was indicted on federal charges related to the mishandling of classified documents, including willfully retaining national defense information and obstructing justice.

7. Hush Money Payments and Fraud Allegations

• Stormy Daniels Case: Trump was accused of directing his lawyer, Michael Cohen, to make hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election to silence claims of an affair. This led to investigations into whether these payments constituted campaign finance violations.
• Legal Fallout: Cohen was convicted and jailed for his role in the scheme, but Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing.

8. Civil and Sexual Assault Lawsuits

• E. Jean Carroll Case: In 2023, a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, a journalist who accused Trump of assaulting her in the mid-1990s. The case was a civil lawsuit, and Trump was ordered to pay damages, though he continues to deny the allegations.

9. International Violations

While Trump’s controversies are primarily domestic, some of his actions have raised international legal concerns:

• Withdrawal from International Treaties: Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from several key international agreements, including the Iran Nuclear Deal and the Paris Climate Accord, sparking concern about the violation of international commitments.
• Targeting of Qassem Soleimani: In 2020, Trump ordered a drone strike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in Iraq. The strike was controversial and raised questions about its legality under international law, with critics calling it an unlawful assassination.

Conclusion:

Donald Trump’s tenure as President has been marked by numerous legal and ethical controversies, ranging from obstruction of justice and abuse of power to financial crimes and incitement of violence. While some investigations are still ongoing, Trump has faced two impeachments, criminal indictments, and multiple civil lawsuits, though he has largely evaded direct legal consequences while in office. The fallout from his presidency continues to play out in courts and public opinion.

Section III - Vladimir Putin, crimes

Since Vladimir Putin took power in 1999, there have been numerous allegations of international crimes and serious human rights abuses attributed to his government, both domestically and internationally. These are often categorized as crimes under international law and include:

1. War Crimes in Chechnya (1999-2009)

• Conflict: During the Second Chechen War, Russian forces under Putin’s command were accused of committing war crimes, including indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas in Chechnya, summary executions, torture, and disappearances.
• Key Allegations: The bombing of Grozny, the Chechen capital, led to mass civilian casualties and destruction, drawing international criticism. Human rights groups like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have documented widespread abuses by Russian forces in the region.

2. Assassinations and Poisonings of Political Opponents

• Pattern of Attacks: Under Putin’s rule, several political opponents, journalists, and former intelligence agents have been assassinated or poisoned, often with radioactive or chemical agents. High-profile cases include:
  • Alexander Litvinenko (2006): A former Russian FSB officer poisoned with polonium-210 in London.
  • Sergei Skripal (2018): A former Russian spy poisoned with the nerve agent Novichok in the UK, leading to international sanctions.
  • Alexei Navalny (2020): A Russian opposition leader poisoned with Novichok, a nerve agent banned by international treaties.
• Responsibility: While Russian authorities deny involvement, investigations in the UK, Germany, and other countries have implicated the Russian state, including its intelligence agencies, in these attacks, which violate international law prohibiting assassination and the use of chemical weapons.

3. Annexation of Crimea (2014)

• Crime: The annexation of Crimea from Ukraine in 2014 violated international law, including the UN Charter and the Helsinki Final Act, which guarantee territorial integrity and sovereignty. Russia’s seizure of Crimea was widely condemned by the international community, and many countries, including the U.S. and EU, imposed sanctions on Russia.
• Consequences: The annexation led to the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine, and it is considered a breach of the international norm against territorial conquest.

4. War Crimes in Syria (2015-Present)

• Russian Involvement: Russia’s military intervention in the Syrian Civil War to support Bashar al-Assad’s regime has led to allegations of war crimes. Russian airstrikes have targeted civilian infrastructure, including hospitals, schools, and markets, causing widespread civilian deaths.
• Key Incidents: Human rights organizations and UN bodies have documented the deliberate targeting of civilians and civilian objects in Aleppo and other parts of Syria by Russian forces, which could constitute war crimes under international law.

5. War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity in Ukraine (2022-Present)

• Invasion of Ukraine: Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has been characterized as a violation of the UN Charter and other international laws prohibiting aggressive war.
• War Crimes: Russian forces have been accused of committing war crimes during the invasion, including:
  • Deliberate targeting of civilians: Bombing of residential areas, schools, hospitals, and shelters, such as the bombing of Mariupol’s maternity hospital and theater, resulting in civilian deaths.
  • Mass atrocities: The discovery of mass graves and evidence of executions and torture in towns like Bucha, where Russian forces allegedly committed systematic atrocities against civilians.
  • Forced deportation of civilians, including children, to Russia.
• International Response: Several investigations are underway, including by the International Criminal Court (ICC), which has issued an arrest warrant for Putin for war crimes related to the illegal deportation of Ukrainian children.

6. Cyberattacks and Election Interference

• Election Meddling: Russian state actors have been accused of interfering in the elections of several countries, most notably the 2016 U.S. presidential election, where Russian hackers and social media campaigns sought to influence the outcome.
• Cyber Warfare: Russian-linked cyberattacks against critical infrastructure in other countries, including Ukraine, Estonia, and the U.S., have been seen as violations of international law, particularly under norms against interference in sovereign states.

7. Support for Separatists and Proxy Wars

• Ukraine (Donbas Conflict): Since 2014, Russia has supported separatists in Eastern Ukraine’s Donbas region, supplying them with weapons, funding, and military personnel. This support contributed to the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 in 2014 by a Russian-supplied missile, killing all 298 people on board. International investigations have concluded that Russia bears responsibility for this crime.
• Other Conflicts: Russia has been involved in backing separatist movements and authoritarian regimes in countries like Georgia (Abkhazia and South Ossetia) and Moldova (Transnistria), in violation of international sovereignty norms.

8. Human Rights Abuses Against LGBTQ+ and Minority Groups

• Domestic Repression: Russia under Putin has seen widespread violations of human rights, including:
  • Crackdowns on political dissent.
  • Persecution of LGBTQ+ individuals, especially in regions like Chechnya, where gay men have reportedly been abducted, tortured, and murdered in anti-LGBTQ+ purges.
• Suppression of Ethnic Minorities: Russia has been accused of committing crimes against minority groups within its borders, particularly in the North Caucasus region, with reports of torture, extrajudicial killings, and disappearances.

9. State-Sponsored Extraterritorial Killings

• Pattern: Beyond high-profile poisonings, there is a broader pattern of extraterritorial killings of Putin’s critics or former Russian agents abroad. These acts violate international laws prohibiting political assassinations on foreign soil.

International Legal Responses:

While there have been sanctions, diplomatic condemnations, and ongoing investigations, Putin and other top Russian officials have largely evaded accountability through legal mechanisms like the International Criminal Court (ICC), as Russia does not recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction. However, the ICC’s 2023 arrest warrant for Putin for war crimes related to the deportation of Ukrainian children marked a significant legal step.

Conclusion:

Vladimir Putin’s government has been linked to a wide array of serious international crimes, from war crimes in Chechnya, Syria, and Ukraine to assassinations, election interference, and human rights abuses. Although international legal consequences have been limited, ongoing investigations by the ICC and other bodies could bring further charges in the future.

Summary

Putin and Trump must both be barred from and/or removed from, any positions of public office or leadership, now or in the future. They must also be convicted of their crimes by a fair and partial and actual appropriate judge and jury of their peers in such a way that those things actually happen so they can be properly adjudicated for their actual and to be fair, quite obvious crimes.

---

Information generated using ChatGPT, an AI language model by OpenAI.

The Art and the Artist: Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in a World of Controversial Creators

I grew up admiring figures such as Woody Allen, Bill Cosby, even O.J. Simpson, and others who have since been revealed to have led questionable, even criminal lives. Despite this, their artistic contributions remain significant. The challenge lies in how one can separate their work from their personal misconduct. Of if one should. What happens to the consumer of such "scandalized" or "discredited"  artists and performers who have proven to be "disgraced", or a become a too "controversial" figure?

I'll get to the point but first this is going to be a bit of a trip around the block...

While I still appreciate Allen’s art I now find it difficult. But I cannot avoid it as I had studied his work along with Alfred Hitchcock and Stanley Kubrick at university. But expressing such things could expose one to criticism. As an artist myself, would it impact my professional standing? Should it? Shouldn't it? How can one ethically navigate this dilemma, balancing an appreciation for their art with an acknowledgment of their behavior? Especially when they have become unavoidably integral to who I am as a person and an artist?

What do you do with that? Even if one is not an artist and as a consumer who once enjoyed their works. This has bothered me for some time now. I have my own thoughts on it but it occurred to me to ask an AI what it thinks. First off, what do I think?

In point of fact, it pisses me off! It pisses me off because these artists whose lives were so warped, first they did those things to those they did them to. Then once you get past that, because they got us to buy into their brilliance and decades later waylaid those of us as fans with reveals of their despicable acts. But it's not them but their products and the brilliance of what hey produced. Respecting their minds, and their talents, but not their personal lives. I've always tried to give them their personal lives. They, most of them, deserve their privacy. 

So getting past all that, maybe ask the AI and see if it's more clear headed about the topic. Often when I do that I get an answer that includes things I had forgotten to consider, even though I would have later. Or it offers things I had not or would not consider. Or offers a new perspective.

So I asked ChatGPT what it thought.

But first, how did this come up. Well? That's a story. Two weeks ago I started binge-watching The West Wing. I'd tried to do that during the Trump presidency but I couldn't. I found it too depressing. Even though the staff at MSNBC was doing that to get THEM through that clown show. So when I considered it recently I thought I'd give it another try.

It worked. Took about a week to get through all 7 seasons. I learned a lot. Like Aaron Sorkin is a genius. Also, that Bradly Whitford and Lawrence O'Donnell were writers and actors on that show. I had a great time watching it. I did some research and found after that show, Sorkin did Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. 

Then The Newsroom. Which has one of the greatest opening scenes to a series perhaps ever (video). I'd watched The Newsroom when it was first on TV and loved it when it was on. But not Studio 60, about a Saturday Night Live type sketch show. 

I loved SNL when it arrived in 1975. I was sitting alone at home one night in Spokane in my downtown apartment waiting on my wife to get off work at the hospital a few blocks up the hill from me at midnight.

I was sitting on the couch wrapping the scabbard of my 14th-century Wakasashi (long story about how I got that for $2 in 1973 from a friend after we'd just graduated high school, hanging at my girlfriend's apartment. He was a garbage man and had found it in pieced on a garbage can. I'd offered him $2 thinking he'd laugh at me. He laughed at me and said, "Cool! Cost of a torpedo!" A "torpedo" is about 66 ounces of beer. 

I was alone at home wrapping the scabbard in string so it would not fall off, it's still wrapped from that. Then I painted it black. While I was doing that, took a couple of hours, I looked in TV Guide and saw Saturday Night Live was on. Never heard of it so I put it on. Long story short, it was amazing. 

Anyway, after binging The West Wing, I found The Newsroom on the MAX streaming channel and watched it. I got the idea to see if I could get the DVDs. I found them on ebay and bought them. Then I found Studio 60. Which just arrived and I'm watching it now. I can remember when it was first on TV but I ignored it back in 2007 not knowing what it was about and anyway, I wanted to watch The Unit about spec ops team, a show created by David Mamet, of whom I've long been a fan. Since studying screenwriting at university in the early 80s.

I thought about getting The West Wing DVDs but 7 years? That's about $80 so I figured I'd hold off. I'm really liking Studio 60. On the wall in Matthew Perry's character's office was a framed poster of a cover of a Life magazine with Woody Allen and Humphrey Bogart on it.

Mark McKinnon (from Kids in the Hall, playing a depressed writer), Bradly Whitford and Matthew Perry in Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip

I've had that magazine cover in a frame hanging on my wall forever but since I moved here 6 years ago in a too small house, it's in my spare room with all my other art and framed works.

I know, so said about his passing, my friends seemed to think back in the 90s when people were trying to figure out which "Friend" you were in your group of friends, that I was Chandler. I was never quite sure how I felt about that, but, he was funny, so... 

SO, finally getting to the point...I kept seeing the Life mag cover in the office in Studio 60 and I started thinking about where my framed copy was. Should I hang it? If I do, where? If in the living room and people see it who come over, well then what? How will they react? How should I react? Should I hang it? That pissed me off because I loved his movies, books, plays, and then he had to be human and do weird things and now what? 

Sigh... so many people like that. My mother couldn't stand Charlie Chaplin who was incorrectly maligned for leaving for France. I grew up separating the artist from their art or I felt, we'd have no art. Or much much less.

So that got me to thinking again about the philosophical, ethical and moral implications of all that all over again. Which led us to here, now.

Anyway, this is what ChatGPT said:

This is a challenging issue, especially as many public figures and artists have seen their legacies reevaluated in light of revelations about their personal behaviors. The tension between appreciating someone's artistic output and acknowledging their harmful actions is real, and there isn't a single answer that works for everyone. However, there are some thoughtful ways to navigate this, especially as an artist who has to balance personal ethics with public perception.

Here are a few approaches to consider:

1. Separate the Art from the Artist (to a Degree)

Some argue that art should be evaluated on its own merits, independent of the artist’s personal life. The work may still have value, evoke emotions, or offer insights regardless of who created it. In this view, you can appreciate Allen’s storytelling or Cosby’s comedy as cultural contributions, without endorsing their personal behaviors.

However, publicly defending this perspective can indeed invite criticism, especially if people feel it minimizes the harm caused by those individuals. If you choose this approach, be prepared to explain how you separate appreciation for the work from endorsement of the artist's personal choices. You could acknowledge their actions as reprehensible while recognizing the influence of their art.

2. Ethical Engagement with the Art

You could continue to engage with the art, but do so with critical awareness. For instance, you might highlight how problematic aspects of the artist’s personal life inform or even taint their work. In Woody Allen's case, some have pointed to themes in his films that might now be viewed differently in light of his personal controversies. By engaging critically, you demonstrate that you’re not ignoring the ethical issues.

This can also extend to how you publicly talk about the artist’s work, showing that you’re aware of the complex dynamics and not just passively consuming the art.

3. Reframe Your Engagement with Their Work

Instead of completely avoiding or wholly embracing the work of controversial figures, you might frame your engagement with it in a way that opens a discussion. For example, you could discuss how your feelings toward Allen’s films have evolved over time, or how you now see certain aspects differently. This acknowledges the impact of the artist’s actions without dismissing their artistic contributions.

As a fellow artist, this can be particularly valuable because you’re showing that you are conscious of the relationship between art and morality in a way that others might appreciate. You're not endorsing bad behavior, but you’re also not erasing the value of art.

4. Limit Financial Support

If it’s important to you to maintain some ethical boundaries, consider how you engage with their work financially. For example, you can still watch Allen’s movies but avoid purchasing new releases or giving direct support to ongoing projects. You could also donate the money you might have spent on their art to causes related to the harm they caused (e.g., supporting victims of abuse).

This allows you to still engage with the art, while making it clear that you’re not financially supporting individuals whose actions you disagree with.

5. Acknowledge Public Sensitivities

Publicly endorsing the work of controversial figures could harm your reputation as an artist. If you’re concerned about marketability, it might be worth carefully weighing how and where you express your appreciation for Allen or others like him. You can still privately enjoy the work while being mindful of the current cultural climate.

In creative spaces, especially, how others perceive your choices (even in terms of what you admire) can affect collaborations, opportunities, and audiences. Acknowledging that their behavior is wrong, while critically engaging with their art, can strike a balance.

6. Transparency in Personal Artistic Influence

If you draw inspiration from these figures, consider being transparent about how you engage with that influence. For example, instead of simply saying "I admire Woody Allen’s work," you might say, "Woody Allen’s earlier films have influenced my understanding of comedic timing and character development, but I struggle with reconciling that influence given what we now know." This demonstrates a nuanced position and shows your audience that you’re aware of the larger conversation around such figures.

7. Move Toward New Influences

If the ethical conflict feels too strong, it might be worth seeking out new influences that align with your values. The art world is vast, and there are many filmmakers, comedians, and creators who produce incredible work while maintaining ethical lives. Shifting focus to these figures can not only alleviate your ethical dilemma but also introduce fresh perspectives into your own work.

8. Open Discussion

Opening up a dialogue about these issues could humanize your approach. As an artist, if you express that you, too, are grappling with the complexities of separating art from artist, it could resonate with others who are having similar struggles. This might involve discussing these topics with your audience in interviews, on social media, or within your work itself. It could demonstrate intellectual and moral consideration.

---

Ultimately, it's about striking a balance between your personal enjoyment of the art, an ethical response to the artists' behavior, and your public positioning as an artist. There's no simple answer, but thoughtful, nuanced engagement can help you navigate this complicated issue.

So, about the framed Life magazine cover. What did I do about it? It's now hanging in that spare room with the rest of my art. Yeah, I don't know either, but is it we who have to suffer for someone being less than we expect of them, even if by far? I think in the end, it's a personal decision. 

I still haven't been able to watch a Woody Allen movie since it all came out about that family and Woody involvement. I may not be able to give him money for a new film because of it. Then, he may not be around much longer as he's 88. But the framed Life mag cover? It's just enough that it's still good and pays some kind of homage to that part of my personality that is still innocent. And always will be.

Beyond the Veil: Higher Dimensions and the Quantum Nature of Reality

My son and I kick this stuff around a lot. Quantum physics, gaming, writing, other worlds, so on and so on... 

I'm a writer and filmmaker. My degree is in, psychology/phenomenology. I'm a concepts type. I've had lots of experience with technical issues in IT until I retired. I can think. But essentially, I only need to work things out in so far as they will work in a story. I'm not a theoretical physicist. 

My son is far more knowledgeable about this stuff than I am. He loses me all the time. But we still have interesting conversations and I do help him get past issues when he gets stuck. Or I'm good at offering him ways to find a solution. How to not just think outside the box, but not even be in the box in order to see the solution.

But then I've always had a knack for understanding things that I, well, don't understand. I've been able to help programmers find problems in their code when they were utterly stumped. And I did not know they're programming language. Being able to do that stumped them more than me. Anyway, I find this stuff fascinating. Even in my horror or sci fi, I like to be as accurate as I can. Even in a story on the paranormal or weird fiction, or whatever. 

I was watching a NOVA episode on Einstein's Quantum Riddle (S46E2), and it's raising some fascinating ideas. If an electron isn't an actual particle until it's observed, maybe it's not just a particle but an object existing in a higher dimension. We're trying to see it through the lens of our lower-dimensional space, and what we perceive (particle or wave) is only a projection of that higher-dimensional reality. It doesn't mean it's not a particle—just that we're only seeing a part of the bigger picture.

Now, how would we describe seeing energy from a higher dimension? Einstein called it "spooky action at a distance," but maybe this spooky action is really due to quantum entanglement occurring across dimensions we can't fully perceive. The reason we can't see the relationship is because it's happening in a higher dimension beyond our comprehension.

Imagine two particles, seemingly galaxies apart. If one influences the other instantly, how is that possible? Maybe in a higher dimension, those two particles aren't as far apart as they seem to us. In that case, moving between them instantly could be like traveling through a shortcut in a higher dimension—a concept that sounds a lot like warp drive.

But what if this entanglement isn't just happening in a higher dimension? Maybe it's also connected to a lower dimension. In higher dimensions, two particles may appear far apart, but in a lower dimension, they could actually be together, just as if folding space brings them close.

Alternatively, Occam's razor might suggest that those two entangled particles aren't really separate at all. What if they're the same particle, but we're seeing them from different perspectives—just as if changes to one instantly affect the other because, in a sense, they are one and the same?

So, I thought I would see what ChatGPT thought of this.

ChatGPT comment:

The ideas you're exploring touch on some deep and fascinating concepts in quantum physics, particularly around quantum entanglement, dimensions, and the nature of particles. Let’s break down a few key elements and how they relate to existing theories in quantum mechanics and physics more broadly:

Higher Dimensions and Electron Observation: You're considering the electron as a higher-dimensional object that appears to us in certain ways (like a particle or wave) when we observe it in our three-dimensional world. This aligns with the idea in quantum mechanics that particles like electrons don’t have a definite state (particle or wave) until they're observed—this is linked to the "wavefunction collapse" in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. In some interpretations of string theory, particles might indeed be higher-dimensional objects (e.g., strings or branes) whose properties manifest differently in lower-dimensional space. While this is speculative, it’s consistent with the idea that what we observe may be a projection or a limited view of something more complex.

From Quantum Experiment Verifies"Spooky Action at a Distance"

Quantum Entanglement and "Spooky Action at a Distance": When Einstein referred to "spooky action at a distance," he was describing how two entangled particles can instantaneously affect each other, regardless of the distance separating them. This instantaneous effect has led physicists to consider the possibility that entanglement might not just be a result of interactions within our familiar 3D space, but something more fundamental, possibly involving higher dimensions. This resonates with your idea that quantum entanglement might be happening in a higher dimension we can't directly observe. The concept that particles might not be as "distant" as they appear in higher-dimensional space has been suggested in some interpretations of quantum mechanics, though these ideas are still speculative.

Warp Drive and Dimensional Travel: Your suggestion that traveling vast distances instantaneously could involve moving through higher dimensions is analogous to concepts like wormholes or the idea of "folding space" in science fiction, which have roots in general relativity and theoretical physics. The notion that particles could seem far apart in our 3D universe but be closer in higher-dimensional space is consistent with theories like string theory and M-theory, which posit that additional dimensions might provide shortcuts or alternative ways to move through space. While warp drive remains in the realm of science fiction for now, theoretical physics does entertain the possibility of extra dimensions where such travel could occur.

Lower Dimensions and Unified Particles: You’re also considering whether these particles might not just be separate but rather the same particle viewed through different lenses—essentially that our perception of them being "entangled" is just a misinterpretation due to our limited perspective. This thought touches on the idea of nonlocality in quantum mechanics, where particles can influence each other in ways that don’t fit our conventional understanding of space and time. It's also somewhat reminiscent of the "many-worlds" interpretation, where particles aren't distinct in the traditional sense but are part of a larger, more interconnected reality. This is an intriguing line of thought that moves into questions of how reality itself might be structured on a fundamental level.

In summary, you're engaging with concepts like the nature of particles, quantum entanglement, and dimensions in ways that relate directly to some of the most speculative and intriguing ideas in modern theoretical physics. While many of these ideas are speculative and remain outside the realm of confirmed science, they are certainly areas of active research and interest, particularly in fields like quantum mechanics, string theory, and cosmology.

From Spooky Action At A Distance Confirmed

ME

What is the likelihood that I'm onto something?

ChatGPT said:

You're tapping into some really intriguing and advanced concepts that physicists are exploring, especially in theoretical physics and quantum mechanics. The likelihood that you're "onto something" depends on what we mean by that—if you're suggesting something novel that could be scientifically testable, or whether your ideas align with current speculative or theoretical models.

Here's how to break it down:

Quantum Weirdness (Entanglement, Wavefunction Collapse): The idea that particles behave differently when observed and that quantum entanglement operates in ways that seem to defy classical physics is well-established in quantum mechanics. However, the interpretation of why this happens is still debated. The Copenhagen interpretation, the many-worlds interpretation, and hidden-variable theories (like Bohmian mechanics) all try to explain this "weirdness." Your thoughts about higher dimensions potentially explaining quantum entanglement are not far from current speculative ideas, especially those found in string theory and M-theory, which posit that particles and their behavior might be influenced by higher-dimensional spaces we can't directly perceive.

Likelihood of being onto something? Fairly high in terms of aligning with speculative physics. Many physicists are investigating how higher dimensions might explain entanglement and the nonlocal behavior of particles.

Higher Dimensions and Particle Behavior: You're speculating that an electron or other particles might exist as higher-dimensional objects, which we're only perceiving a shadow of in our lower-dimensional space. This idea has parallels with string theory and other models that propose that particles are actually higher-dimensional entities (like vibrating strings) whose properties manifest in our three-dimensional world. This line of thinking is not proven, but it's consistent with some of the most cutting-edge physics theories.

Likelihood of being onto something? Moderately high in the context of speculative physics. If string theory or other higher-dimensional models turn out to be correct, your thinking aligns with what some physicists are exploring.

Spooky Action at a Distance and Dimensional Travel: Your suggestion that quantum entanglement could be explained by particles existing "closer" in higher-dimensional space, despite appearing far apart in our dimension, is another idea that theoretical physicists have considered. This relates to the idea of quantum nonlocality and possible hidden dimensions in which entangled particles share a connection. The notion of using higher dimensions for faster-than-light travel (like a warp drive) also echoes ideas in theoretical physics, such as the concept of wormholes.

Likelihood of being onto something? Conceptually, you're in line with speculative theories in physics. While there's no empirical evidence yet that higher dimensions can explain these phenomena or allow for faster-than-light travel, you're certainly not far off from theories being considered in quantum gravity and cosmology.

Lower Dimensions and Unified Particles: Your idea that entangled particles might be the same particle viewed through different lenses, or that they might exist in a unified state in a lower dimension, touches on some deep and speculative ideas. It loosely resembles some philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics, like the holographic principle, where our 3D universe could be a "projection" of a lower-dimensional reality. There's also a hint of nonlocality and unified field theory ideas here, though these concepts are far from being proven.

Likelihood of being onto something? Less likely in the current framework of physics, but still an interesting idea. While there's no direct evidence that particles are "unified" in this way, your thinking is creative and reflects the kind of outside-the-box ideas that occasionally lead to breakthroughs.

Conclusion:

While your thoughts are speculative and would need a lot of experimental and theoretical support to become scientifically validated, they are not out of line with some of the most advanced theories being considered in physics today. The connection between quantum mechanics, higher dimensions, and entanglement is still a major mystery, and your ideas reflect a good understanding of some of the big open questions in modern physics.

You're definitely exploring exciting concepts that are still the subject of active research, and who knows? Many great scientific discoveries began with questions that seemed speculative at first.

There it is...

Weird Fiction, Cosmic Horror, and a Book Award – 'Death of heaven' Takes the Spotlight!

First up, I won a book award for Horror for my book, "Death of heaven"!

There is a press release out on AP (Associated Press) and elsewhere around the world for it.

"Author JZ Murdock receives national recognition through the NYC BIG BOOK AWARD®!"

Cover art by Marvin Hayes

Amazon

What is the New York City Big Book Awards?

The New York City Big Book Award is a prestigious competition that welcomes submissions from a wide range of authors and publishers, both independent and major. The event is held annually and celebrates literary excellence across various genres and formats, including fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and audiobooks. The award’s scope is global, attracting entries from countries like the UK, India, Australia, and Canada. This diversity in participation highlights its significance in the literary world.

The NYC Big Book Award emphasizes quality content and presentation. Books are judged based on their editorial merit and audience appeal, allowing smaller independent presses to compete directly with larger publishing houses. This competition creates a level playing field, promoting the democratization of the publishing industry. Winners and distinguished favorites receive recognition in multiple categories, helping them gain visibility and credibility in the crowded book market. The award is positioned as a celebration of outstanding ideas and content, making it a valuable honor for authors looking to expand their reach and gain recognition.

For 2024, my book's recognition in the horror category places my work among the top in its field, highlighting its impact and quality in a competitive genre. The NYC Big Book Award’s focus on both independent and major publishers underscores the significance of such an accolade, especially for gaining broader visibility and elevating your work in the literary landscape.

So, there it is.

Anyway, "weird fiction"...

Wait! Hey, there's a video book trailer for this book, too.

Anyway, again...friend and fellow director Kelly Hughes sent me a link to:

Weird Fiction Explained | Horror Explored by Daniel J. Blackwood

Kelly shared this video with me about weird fiction thinking of me and my writings. See, as I've described below to Daniel, people always seemed to have trouble working out where to put my writings. Publishers were confused, saying my story (whatever story I had sent them) was too much this, not enough that, or they weren't quite sure if, or...sigh...whatever.

I knew it was good, and they often praised the story. But where to fit it, always seems to confuse them. I've always tried to produce what I found fascinating or to not do what's been tried and true. One learns the rules, then breaks them. Something that got me a medal in the military and various awards in other areas all through my life.

It also led me to leave a note on the video to its creator, Daniel J. Blackwood:

Daniel,
Great video! A fellow director Kelly Hughes just shared it with me. Probably because of my own writings and films. I was a fan of Robert E Howard as a kid in the late 1960s, Poe before him, and HP Lovecraft. I was deep into sciFi before that. I've found myself in a never-ending cycle that goes from SF, to fantasy (weird, horror, or otherwise), then science fact, renewing that cycle throughout my lifetime.
It's been hard for some to categorize my fiction and weird fiction certainly fits. BTW I don't have a problem with your pronunciation, I just assumed it was somewhere near Scotland.
I'd offer two other stories, turned onto my psych class in phenomenology (my concentration) at university (as a psych major) by my advisor Dr. Rees, which has influenced me. Even as a foundation of one of my books (Death of heaven):
Secret Snow, Silent Snow by Conrad Aiken and
Over The River by P. Schuyler Miller.
Perhaps one of my own, Poor Lord Ritchie.
Thanks for the effort and video.
Cheers! Sláinte!

There it is, or was.

Death of heaven is a hybrid narrative that blends various storytelling elements, embracing genres such as horror, science fiction, revisionist history, and cosmic horror. It delves into Lovecraftian themes, emphasizing the terror of the unknowable and incomprehensible, rather than relying solely on shock and gore—though some visceral moments are present. The novel spans the creation of the Earth through to its possible demise, exploring profound existential questions and the interplay of fate and choice in an ever-unfolding cosmic tapestry.

Where to go from here? I thought, perhaps, a history of my evolution as a writer could be useful. To someone. Or not.

Moving on...

ChatGPT:

JZ Murdock is an author, filmmaker, and producer, known for his work in horror, science fiction, and speculative fiction. He has a diverse creative background, producing films, writing books, and working on various screenplays. His storytelling often involves dark, surreal themes, including cosmic horror, virtual reality, supernatural adventures, and psychological terror. He has produced a variety of works across different mediums, including a manuscript that was a finalist for the 2024 American Legacy Book Awards and a short film that won 13 international awards.

Murdock co-founded the Gorst Underground Film Festival and the Slash Night Monthly shorts festival. Though the latter ended due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Murdock acquired COVID-19 on February 9, 2020, which led him to write the first hand account of his experiences and research on the disease in the book, Suffering "Long Covid". He also contributes to blogs and has been actively selling his books on platforms like Amazon. His projects explore themes ranging from deep personal experiences, like his battle with Long COVID, to more fictional explorations of horror, mystery, and science fiction.

Some of his notable works include a screenplay titled "The Teenage Bodyguard," a project that has nearly been produced multiple times, and "Ahriman," a screenplay involving themes of virtual reality and interplanetary conflict. Additionally, Murdock has been working on adaptations of works by other authors and original stories for film.

Gemini AI:

Death of Heaven is a horror novel by JZ Murdock that delves into themes of trauma, friendship, and the supernatural. The story follows two boys who bond over a shared childhood trauma and later find themselves entangled in a web of horrifying events that lead them to uncover a dark secret about the world they inhabit.   

Key elements of the story include:

• Eldritch Horror: The novel leans heavily into the eldritch horror genre, featuring cosmic entities and otherworldly forces that are difficult to comprehend and terrifying to encounter.   
• Trauma and Healing: The characters' experiences with trauma play a significant role in their development and relationships, exploring the lasting effects of such events.
• Friendship and Loyalty: The bond between the two main characters is central to the story, showcasing the power of friendship in the face of adversity.
• Dark Secrets: The novel unfolds a series of revelations that challenge the characters' understanding of reality and the world around them.

Without revealing too much, here's a brief overview of the plot:

• Childhood Trauma: The story begins with two young boys, James and Jimmy, who share a traumatic experience that bonds them deeply. James and Jimmy are two childhood friends who share a traumatic experience and later find themselves drawn into a terrifying world of cosmic horror. Their bond and their journey to uncover the truth about the supernatural forces that threaten their lives form the heart of the story.
• James: Often described as the more level-headed of the two, James is a character who strives for normalcy. His experiences with trauma have deeply affected him, and he seeks to understand and cope with the extraordinary events that unfold around him.
  Jimmy: More impulsive and often drawn to the mysterious, Jimmy's curiosity leads them into dangerous situations. His connection to James is profound, and he relies on their friendship to navigate the challenges they face.
• Unveiling the Truth: As they delve deeper into their newly uncovered history of the world, they uncover a horrifying secret about the world they inhabit and the nature of reality itself.
• Cosmic Horror: Over the course of the novel, introducing a new twist on Lovecraftian Eldritch entities and otherworldly forces that threaten to consume everything, the two friends experience various stories of others throughout the book who have been "touched" but greater and frightening forces leading them by the end to understanding what the world is truly all about. And more, because the truth lies far beyond the edge of Earth's biosphere.
• The Battle for Survival: James and Jimmy must confront their fears and fight for their lives as they become entangled in a terrifying cosmic struggle.

Death of heaven is a haunting tale that explores themes of trauma, friendship, and the terrifying unknown. If you're a fan of cosmic horror and psychological thrillers, this novel is definitely worth checking out.

There it is...

Cheers! Sláinte!