Manufacturing Nostalgia: Why Trump's Industrial Revival Is an Economic Illusion

 How do we explain Trump’s push to make America a manufacturing country again when we long planned to be a service economy—and automation is set to take most manufacturing jobs anyway?

Donald Trump Patron Saint of Economic Collapse

Trump’s push to "make America a manufacturing powerhouse again" is based on nostalgia for an era that no longer exists rather than economic reality. Here’s why:

1. The U.S. Shifted to a Service Economy for a Reason

   • Since the late 20th century, the U.S. intentionally transitioned to a service-based economy (finance, tech, healthcare, entertainment) because manufacturing labor is cheaper overseas and services generate more wealth in a developed nation.
   • Manufacturing jobs peaked in the 1970s and have steadily declined, not just because of outsourcing, but also because of automation and efficiency improvements.

2. Manufacturing Jobs Aren't Coming Back in Large Numbers

   • Even when Trump imposed tariffs to bring back U.S. manufacturing, companies didn’t massively rehire workers—instead, they invested in automation to keep costs low.
   • The industries that did return (like steel) saw only short-term gains, and many of those jobs disappeared again due to trade wars and global competition.

3. Robots and AI Are the Future of Manufacturing

   • Even if factories return, they won’t create millions of blue-collar jobs—they’ll use automation, AI, and robotics to cut labor costs.
   • Example: Modern car plants use a fraction of the workers they did decades ago, with robots doing much of the assembly work.

4. The Real Economic Future Is in Innovation, Not Nostalgia

   • The strongest job growth today is in AI, software development, healthcare, and renewable energy, not traditional factory work.
   • If the goal is long-term economic strength, focusing on education, R&D, and advanced technology makes more sense than trying to recreate a 1950s-style industrial economy.

Trump's "manufacturing revival" is mostly a political slogan that appeals to nostalgia but ignores economic reality. The real battle isn’t bringing back old factory jobs—it’s preparing for a future where automation and AI dominate.

Even if President Trump achieves favorable outcomes in his trade disputes, the broader consequences may include increased consumer prices, economic growth challenges, and strained international relations.

While intended to protect domestic industries, tariffs often lead to higher costs for imported goods, which can be passed on to consumers. This results in increased prices for everyday items, affecting household budgets.

PBS

Furthermore, trade tensions can disrupt global supply chains, leading to reduced efficiency and higher production costs for businesses. This economic uncertainty may dampen investment and slow overall economic growth.

Reuters

The imposition of tariffs has also led to retaliatory measures from trading partners, affecting U.S. exports and potentially resulting in job losses in export-dependent industries. Studies have estimated significant job losses due to these trade policies.

Brookings Institution

Even if specific trade disputes are resolved favorably, the broader implications of such protectionist policies may include economic challenges, higher consumer prices, and strained international relationships.

FYI, there have been multiple reports of attacks on Tesla dealerships and vehicles in recent months. These incidents appear to be part of a broader protest movement against Tesla's CEO, Elon Musk, particularly in response to his political affiliations and actions within the Trump administration.

America should be moving toward a future-focused economy that prioritizes innovation, adaptability, and workforce development rather than clinging to outdated industrial models. Here’s the ideal direction:

1. Embrace Automation & AI—But Prepare the Workforce

• Instead of resisting automation, we should invest in AI and robotics while ensuring workers are trained for high-tech jobs in maintenance, programming, and oversight.
• Expand vocational training, apprenticeships, and STEM education to help workers transition from traditional manufacturing to advanced tech fields.

2. Strengthen the Service & Knowledge Economy

• The biggest drivers of economic growth are healthcare, software, AI, finance, biotech, and renewable energy—sectors that require skilled labor and continuous innovation.
• Investing in education, R&D, and digital infrastructure will keep America competitive.

3. Reshore Critical Industries, But Smartly

• Instead of forcing mass manufacturing back, focus on reshoring key industries (like semiconductors, green energy, and medical supplies) using automation and high-skilled labor to remain cost-effective.
• Partner with allies and trading partners to ensure supply chain security without unnecessary trade wars.

4. Prioritize Green Energy & Sustainability

• The future economy will be shaped by renewable energy, battery technology, and climate adaptation industries—not coal and oil.
• Investing in solar, wind, and electric vehicles creates sustainable, high-paying jobs and reduces dependence on foreign energy sources.

5. Support Small Businesses & Entrepreneurship

• Rather than just propping up mega-corporations, policies should make it easier for startups and small businesses to thrive through better access to funding, reduced red tape, and fairer tax policies.
• Encourage innovation by incentivizing research, patents, and new tech development.

6. Improve Infrastructure & Digital Connectivity

• A modern economy needs modern infrastructure—high-speed internet, updated transportation systems, and smart cities.
• Expanding broadband to rural areas ensures that economic growth isn’t limited to major metropolitan hubs.

The Bottom Line

America shouldn’t try to recreate a 1950s-style economy but instead prepare for a tech-driven, globally connected future. The focus should be on innovation, adaptability, and workforce development—not outdated nostalgia.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

"In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear" by JZ Murdock - Part II, Analysis of Relationships

This is a continuation of the recent blog on this story: Art Imitates Life: How a 1990 Dystopian Sci-Fi Tale Mirrors Today

The story "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear" (audiobook) is a dystopian science fiction narrative that explores complex themes surrounding memory, identity, and the implications of technological advancements. 

The main character, Peter, undergoes a significant transformation, gaining extraordinary cognitive abilities such as perfect recall and enhanced processing power due to experiments with specialized crystalline compounds. This transformation allows him to transcend normal human capabilities, positioning him as potentially the perfect human being mentally.

However, this extraordinary change raises profound questions about what it means to be human and the nature of self-identity, particularly as Peter's physical appearance and essence begin to shift, making him seem alien to his friend George. George primarily represents the emotional and psychological struggles that arise from Peter's transformation, grappling with feelings of inadequacy and the fear of losing his friend to this new identity.

Overall, the story delves into the intersection of memory and technology, illustrating how these themes affect human relationships and self-perception as characters navigate the ramifications of such radical evolution in cognitive and physical attributes. The poignant contrast between Peter's technological ascendance and George's human experience highlights the narrative’s exploration of identity and the effects of technological progress on our understanding of ourselves.

The relationship between George and Peter, compounded by the enigmatic presence of the woman, illustrates a complex interplay of psychological, moral, and societal degradation. As George becomes physically installed in the "nest"—a space that symbolizes Peter's control and transformation—he experiences a profound disconnect from reality due to Peter's radical alterations and the conditions surrounding them. This transformation is not just personal but reverberates through society, challenging George's understanding of normalcy.

Within this "nest," Peter revels in his newly acquired abilities, showcasing a vision of himself as an evolved being, capable of extraordinary cognitive feats. He boasts about his enhanced capabilities, claiming to possess "thrice the parallel processing power of any processor on this planet" and highlighting his perfect recall and accelerated information intake. 

This elevation suggests that society is not only accepting but potentially revering Peter, thrusting George into a confusing spectacle where he increasingly struggles to assert his own perspectives. His dependency on Peter grows, making him an observer in a situation that demands active engagement.

The woman’s role complicates matters further; while she appears to comply with the desires of Peter and George, George discerns her disingenuousness. He perceives her as a figure capable of psychologically damaging both men, propelling them into a spiral of moral chaos. 

This dynamic generates an environment of manipulation, fostering George’s feelings of inadequacy as he watches the superhuman narrative shaped by Peter, further marginalizing him in the unfolding drama. The woman's ambiguous intentions imply that her presence could be toxic, leading both to question their own morality and ethical standing amidst the bizarre evolution of their shared reality.

George's hope for external intervention—someone to recognize this toxic environment and alleviate the suffering caused by the woman—underscores the helplessness felt in the face of their decline. This yearning reflects a desperate desire to reclaim agency and moral clarity, suggesting that the chaos around them is systemic rather than merely personal. 

The interplay of these elements—Peter's transformation, the woman's insidious influence, and George's psychological unraveling—creates a narrative steeped in questions of identity, morality, and the unsettling acceptance of a distorting reality that he cannot fully control.

Thus, the examination of these relationships illustrates how external influences, particularly from seemingly agreeable figures, can leave individuals enmeshed in cycles of moral degradation and confusion, ultimately transforming their capacity for rational thought and ethical action.

The "nest" serves as a potent symbol within the narrative, fundamentally representing both control and transformation for the characters George and Peter. It illustrates the profound changes that Peter undergoes as a result of his experiments and the subsequent shifts in their relationship dynamics. Within this environment, Peter is not merely transformed physically; he is elevated to an almost otherworldly status wherein he embodies the ultimate "ultra-Human" being, boasting "thrice the parallel processing power of any processor on this planet". This metamorphosis reflects how technological advancements can reshape identity and capabilities, pushing the boundaries of what it means to be human.

George, however, experiences a contrasting reality within the nest. As Peter revels in his enhanced abilities, George finds himself increasingly marginalized and disconnected from the evolving situation. He watches Peter transform and elevate himself, which compels George into a role of subordination and observation. This shift solidifies Peter's control over the narrative, leaving George straddling a line between admiration and existential anxiety about his own significance and agency in a rapidly changing framework.

The nest symbolizes not only Peter’s newfound power but also the insidious nature of control exerted over George. It becomes a space—both physical and psychological—where George's autonomy is undermined, encapsulating his helplessness against the evolving intellectual and social landscape that Peter embodies. George’s dependency on Peter grows, as he reflects on the contrast between Peter's magnificent evolution and his own feelings of inadequacy and insignificance.

Moreover, the presence of the woman, who appears compliant but fundamentally disingenuous, exacerbates George's sense of disempowerment. Her influence further manipulates the dynamics, as George perceives her ability to inflict psychological damage, complicating their situation and magnifying his struggle for moral clarity amidst their decline. George's longing for external intervention reflects a desperate hope to reclaim his agency and recognize the toxic environment orchestrated by the interplay of Peter's transformation and the woman's facade.

Ultimately, the nest encapsulates the transformative journey of Peter and George, highlighting the themes of control, identity, and morality. Peter’s ascension illustrates the intoxicating nature of power gained through unprecedented transformation, while George’s plight serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of such evolution on personal autonomy and ethical grounding. The interconnectedness of these elements reveals the broader implications of transformation and control within the narrative, prompting reflection on the costs that accompany such profound changes.

The narrative surrounding George, Peter, and the woman within the "nest" operates as a compelling allegory for contemporary society, particularly in the context of the United States today. The profound transformation of Peter, who evolves into an ultra-human with extraordinary capabilities, symbolizes the impact of technological advancement and the quest for power that often accompanies it. By boasting traits such as "thrice the parallel processing power of any processor on this planet," Peter represents how society may glorify individuals who harness technological or intellectual superiority to control the narrative and those around them.

Conversely, George embodies the struggle of the average individual navigating a rapidly transforming landscape in which they often feel marginalized and powerless. As Peter revels in his transformation, George becomes increasingly aware of his dependency and feels trapped within Peter's sphere of influence, illustrating the psychological toll such situations can exact on individuals who find themselves sidelined. This reflects a broader societal commentary on how advancements can elevate certain individuals or groups while leaving others feeling inadequate and disconnected.

Furthermore, the woman's ambiguous involvement demonstrates the complexities of interpersonal dynamics in society. Though she appears to be a compliant figure, her disingenuousness and potential for manipulation underline how relationships can become toxic, leading to moral degradation and confusion for both Peter and George. This interplay echoes current societal concerns about authenticity and the influence of social dynamics on personal identity and moral standings.

The nest itself acts as a microcosm of society, where the interplay of power, transformation, and dependency reveals systemic issues that resonate in real life. George's yearning for external relief highlights the struggles faced by many in society who seek recognition and support amidst chaotic changes and escalating pressures. 

The allegory suggests that just as George grapples with his lack of agency while being engulfed by Peter's enhanced power, contemporary society faces challenges with individuals and institutions exerting disproportionate control, often at the expense of broader ethical considerations and personal autonomy.

In sum, this narrative not only critiques the dynamics of control and transformation but also serves as a reflection of contemporary American society, where the balance of power, the impact of technology, and the nature of human relationships remain contentious and complex issues.

Real-world examples illustrating the themes of power dynamics and technological advancement, as depicted in the allegory of George and Peter, can be observed in various contemporary contexts.

Firstly, the rise of big data and facial recognition technology exemplifies how advancements can lead to control over individuals and societal structures. The narrative touches upon how Peter, through technological superiority, embodies "the Big Data Cyber Deity," showcasing how data-driven systems can recognize and manage social interactions, oftentimes at the expense of individual privacy and autonomy. This reflects real-world concerns about surveillance capitalism, where entities wield significant power over the populace through the collection and manipulation of personal data.

Moreover, the phenomenon of social media platforms illustrates the power dynamics at play, as individuals gravitate towards influential figures who harness technological capabilities to sway public opinion. Just as Peter's elevated status impacts George's sense of agency, influencers and powerful figures on these platforms can marginalize ordinary users, leading to feelings of inadequacy and disconnection in a society increasingly driven by online personas. The comparison highlights how technological advancement can create hierarchies that profoundly affect interpersonal dynamics and individual self-worth.

Additionally, the narrative's emphasis on the "rent in space" caused by experimentation parallels the repercussions societal experimentation can have, particularly in the realms of social engineering and policy. The researchers' acknowledgment of having created a "rent" without full understanding mirrors the unintended consequences of technological advancements that have historically reshaped societies, such as artificial intelligence or genetic engineering. In these cases, the rapid pace of development often leaves ethical considerations behind, similar to how Peter's transformation prioritizes power over moral grounding.

Finally, the interactions between George, Peter, and the woman serve as a microcosm for societal relationships tainted by the quest for power. The woman's compliant façade parallels relationships in various sectors—political, corporate, and personal—where individuals may appear subservient while actually manipulating outcomes for their benefit, echoing the toxic dynamics observed in contemporary organizational behavior. This highlights how personal relationships can become fraught with power struggles that affect morale and ethical boundaries.

In summary, the themes of power dynamics and technological advancement illustrated through the allegory resonate with real-world examples involving surveillance technologies, the influence of social media, the consequences of rapid societal experimentation, and the complexities of interpersonal relationships in power-laden contexts.

In the narrative surrounding George and Peter, the characters represent contrasting societal roles that highlight the dynamics of power and status in contemporary America.

Peter embodies the archetype of the elite or the 'elevated' class, having undergone a transformation that grants him extraordinary abilities and an enhanced status, akin to a technological superbeing. His transformation, where he claims to possess "thrice the parallel processing power of any processor on this planet" and "perfect recall," positions him as a figure of advancement and superiority within society. 

This elevation reflects how individuals with access to cutting-edge technology and intellectual resources can ascend to positions of power, often being viewed as 'heroes' or innovators. Peter's journey illustrates the glorification of success driven by technological prowess, paralleling contemporary societal trends where tech giants and influential innovators dominate the cultural narrative.

Conversely, George represents the struggling middle or lower class, a character grappling with the implications of Peter's transformation on his own life. As he observes Peter's changes and revels in his new form, George's reaction oscillates between awe and terror, reflecting feelings of powerlessness amidst Peter's elevated state. George's experience is symbolic of the average individual who often finds themselves overshadowed and marginalized in the face of rapid advancements and societal shifts dictated by a select few. This dynamic mirrors contemporary societal issues where a significant portion of the population may feel disenfranchised, as decisions made by the elite (those like Peter) often dictate the course of their lives without regard for their input or challenges.

Moreover, George's realization of his dependency on Peter serves to illustrate the psychological impact of such power imbalances. His struggle to maintain balance in a relationship with someone who represents a new societal elite reflects broader societal concerns about dependency and agency. As Peter confidently declares, "This is my life!" in response to George's worries about the implications of his transformation, it suggests a stark reality where individual agency is often subjugated by the whims of those in positions of power.

In essence, George and Peter serve as representations of distinct societal roles in America: Peter as the empowered, tech-savvy elite driving change and innovation, and George as the relatable, grounded individual struggling to navigate a world increasingly influenced by the advancements and aspirations of the powerful. This dichotomy captures the tension between advancement and displacement, showcasing the moral and ethical implications of such disparities.

Compiled with aid of My Reader AI

Our Internet Today... and Yesterday

Nuts. I'm not 100% loving Facebook, but it's nice nationally and internationally to have a platform from which to easily and at least somewhat usefully do so. To do what? All that Facebook kind of stuff. Obviously.

Graphic from ITPulse

I started on the internet back in the late 80s.

I was involved in it, took classes in it, worked in IT (Internet, intranet technologies and...information technologies) in a variety of ways, jobs, levels and orientations.

It's amazing to see how far we've come. For that matter, how far I've come, as I've retired from IT and now am a full time author and filmmaker with at least ons screenplay in hopefully the right hands in Hollywood.

I even wrote a short sci fi story about America, the internet and media titled, In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear. It is recently available as of June 2018 as an audiobook as well as ebook. It was my first fiction sold to a horror quarterly back in 1990 and is the first story in my book of my older sci fi and horror fiction, Anthology of Evil. I have a sequel coming out of my newer writings, many of which have been published in magazines or anthologies with other authors.

Graphic from Zcorum

This Internet today is simply not what we wanted, in what we're seeing today. Like the Internet of things. Though it has surpassed the imagination of what many of us has conceived. We had wanted an internet free for everyone, where information was free to all... and open.

Much has even disappeared from online, or has become a fee based access situation. Overall, the Internet has benefited us all, if only we can get back some of our original orientation, if only we could counter some of the for profit issues and get back to the betterment of humanity.

At first for us it was, "information is free!" It should be Free! "The Internet is for Humanity!" Not big money! Not big business. Certainly not for Russia to alter our national elections!

Back in the 80s, if someone tried to sell something in the newsgroups back then in the beginning, or the middle, the late 80s, where we had mostly text based newsgroups, FTP, Telnet, Gopher, whatever text based stuff, they were crushed. Ostracized.

When the graphical internet, the World Wide Web, WWW, what came to be known as the internet as the dark parts sunk into the dark web...money started creeping its way in. A few of us pushed to keep it out until (I for one) realized that it was far bigger than us and far too powerful (money's like that) and that it could serve a good purpose. But then would obviously take a darker course. Simply because...it's inevitable.

Eventually I got it, as did others, but it worried me\us.

 I learned, I got educated about it, I took many classes. I worked in IT. First as a technical writer, then deeper and deeper into the mechanics of it all. Which led as it has to, to security. Something I'd been into before at a more physical level.

Graphic from Latest Internet News

I had stumbled into something awesome. Something that led to Internet security people and police as well as intelligence people at all levels and the government. Something I was headed into before. The great Soviet had died but that education and those skills were all still relevant.

Now here we are. We need a place for everyone to use. Not fractured, but cohesively. Not to polarize, but to feel to feed ourselves intellectually and other ways. To share with like, but also unlike minds.

We need this. It protects us. It also attacks us. Sometimes from those we elect or pay to protect us. Openness, transparency. THAT protects us. That and being able to share and openly so.

I don't care if it's Facebook or not. Or as I proposed in my above mentioned story, In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear, where the United Nations builds its own "Facebook" social media platform. Using experts from around the world to build it, all the best minds. It replaces Facebook. Everyone the world over uses it.

Photo from Daily Maverick

So that when any dictator or government shuts its people off from it, the UN pays attention, and immediately sends in moderators, "blue hats", to protect the people and stop more abuse as we've seen so much through the end of the last century and the beginning of this new one.

It became what it could become, as with Facebook or Twitter in the Arab Spring, or other national travesties. I had done my best back in 2011 to support that movement in Egypt and some did use my blog back then for updates to information their government was trying hard to keep them from. It was a hopeful time, that devolved into mediocrity, much as America has with the election of Donald Trump as president.

Before Facebook it was MySpace, which has changed into a music platform. Before that, there were others. Before that there were the BBSs, the Bulletin Board Systems you used a modem to dial your phone and PC up to.

Before that...well, it's been around for a while. This ability to communicate world wide. In the late 1960s when I was in jr. high and had a radiotelegraph license and could run a ham radio. I talked to other countries and wrote it all down as is normal procedure for hamm operations.

Before that it was telephones and before that, the telegraph. Although that technology was by a select few of trained and paid individuals, a kind of subculture grew up around it and telegraph stations across the nation. There are even very interesting books on that culture.

But we don't do that anymore. Though, we kind of do. Don't we? Everything now is recorded and saved, somewhere. And, we need that. For history, for our protection. For our coming together. For humanity growing closer, rather than continuing to take advantage of those less knowledgeable, less powerful, less whatever. But we're seeing humanity growing more apart. Why? We need to work on that, and turn things around, to be sure.

In that way we can make those others and ourselves, more than. Not less. Because as we're seeing, too many are trying to make us all, less than we can be. I'd really prefer to be more, for us ALL to be more than we are. Even if I don't always win. Even if I don't become rich. Even if I can't, have everything.

Graphic from WordlessTech

Just enough really is enough. That alone, would make me happy. For us all to better ourselves and come together. To be more informed, more aware, more proactive. More caring for all others as well as ourselves.

Especially if those around me, are happy too.