Showing posts with label authoritarian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label authoritarian. Show all posts

Thursday, February 6, 2025

U.S. Foreign Aid Freeze Supports World's "Strongmen" Regimes

 Foreign strongmen cheer as Musk dismantles US aid agency:

Leaders in Russia, Hungary and El Salvador welcomed the Trump administration’s assault on U.S.A.I.D., which many authoritarians have seen as a threat.



Recent reports indicate that authoritarian regimes worldwide are viewing the U.S. foreign aid freeze as an opportunity to strengthen their positions.

The suspension of aid has led to the halting of funding for numerous grassroots groups promoting democracy in countries such as Venezuela, Cuba, China, and Belarus. Experts argue that this move sends a negative signal to dictatorships and undermines efforts to support pro-democracy activists.

In Southeast Asia, the aid freeze has caused significant disruptions. In Myanmar, healthcare centers for refugees and HIV programs are shutting down, threatening lives and diminishing support for pro-democracy activists amid a brutal military regime. In the Philippines, critical services like disaster response and health projects are affected, with the government claiming the freeze’s impact will be temporary. Vietnam faces a halt to demining and development aid, while Indonesia’s health and governance initiatives risk suspension. Cambodia’s efforts in economic growth, health, and human rights are jeopardized, with significant consequences for independent journalism and mine clearance programs, potentially endangering lives.

Analysts warn that the aid suspension could have long-term consequences, including potential damage to the legitimacy of Western governments in the region, thereby benefiting Beijing's influence. The freeze affects over $60 billion in aid from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), impacting crucial areas such as vaccine rollouts, mine clearing, anti-human trafficking, democracy promotion, and healthcare funding. Regional agencies report chaos and confusion, with suspended jobs and projects. Experts criticize the move as counterproductive to U.S. interests in the region, risking stability and trust. There is also concern over the future of critical programs, like US-backed HIV/AIDS initiatives.

Critics, including the Human Rights Foundation, emphasize that cutting funding to these essential efforts sends the wrong signal to dictatorships and undermines the brave individuals fighting for freedom. They urge the restoration and prioritization of these critical investments.

Compiled with the aid of ChatGPT



Saturday, January 25, 2025

Why CFPOTUS47 Donald Trump Nominates Unqualified People to His Administration Positions

The purpose of a national leader nominating unqualified candidates to lead major departments or divisions of government can vary, often depending on the leader's intentions, ideology, or political strategy. 


Here are some possible reasons:

1. Ideological Alignment Over Expertise

The leader may prioritize loyalty or alignment with their political ideology over technical qualifications. This could be to ensure that appointees are more likely to implement the leader's agenda without resistance, even if they lack the expertise needed for the role.

2. Undermining Institutions

By placing unqualified individuals in key positions, a leader may intentionally or unintentionally weaken the effectiveness of governmental institutions. This could serve to diminish public trust in government or pave the way for restructuring the system to align with their vision.

3. Fostering Dependency

Unqualified appointees may rely more heavily on the leader for guidance or direction, reducing their independence. This dynamic can consolidate power within the leader's inner circle, as decisions and actions are more easily controlled.

4. Cronyism or Nepotism

The appointments might reflect favoritism toward friends, family, or political allies, regardless of their qualifications. This could be a way to reward loyalty, secure financial backers, or strengthen personal networks.

5. Sabotaging or Reforming a Department

A leader may wish to intentionally disrupt or dismantle a particular department or agency they view as obstructive or unnecessary. An unqualified appointee could accelerate dysfunction or make reforms easier to push through by mismanaging the existing bureaucracy.

6. Lack of Interest in Governance

In some cases, a leader may not prioritize good governance, focusing instead on personal or political gains. Appointing unqualified individuals might reflect a disregard for the importance of expertise in government.

7. Intentional Distrust of "Experts"

The leader might aim to challenge or reject traditional expertise, seeing it as aligned with an elite or establishment that they oppose. Appointing outsiders, regardless of qualifications, could resonate with populist or anti-establishment rhetoric.

8. Signaling Change

The appointments could be a symbolic gesture to disrupt the status quo. By breaking away from norms, the leader might be trying to communicate a shift in priorities, even if it comes at the expense of competence.

9. Short-Term Gains Over Long-Term Stability

The leader might prioritize immediate political victories or optics over long-term effectiveness. Unqualified appointees may be easier to manipulate or willing to take actions that more qualified individuals might resist.


While some of these reasons could be unintentional or situational, others reflect a deliberate strategy. The consequences of such appointments often manifest in inefficiencies, controversies, or crises that may undermine public trust and governance.

In his second term, Convicted Felon POTUS47 (CFPOTUS47) Donald Trump has nominated several individuals to key government positions whose qualifications have been widely questioned. 

For instance, Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News host and military veteran, was confirmed as Secretary of Defense despite allegations of personal misconduct and concerns over his lack of experience in managing large organizations.

Similarly, Tulsi Gabbard, a former congresswoman and Fox News contributor, was nominated for Director of National Intelligence, a role traditionally held by individuals with extensive intelligence backgrounds. These appointments have raised concerns about the prioritization of loyalty and media presence over relevant expertise.

Critics argue that such nominations may reflect a strategy to appoint loyalists who align closely with the president's views, potentially at the expense of effective governance. This approach could lead to the undermining of institutional integrity and a consolidation of power within the executive branch.

The implications of appointing unqualified individuals to critical government roles include potential inefficiencies, ethical concerns, and a decrease in public trust in governmental institutions. These actions may be part of a broader effort to reshape the federal government according to the president's agenda, emphasizing loyalty and ideological alignment over traditional qualifications.


 Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

What a week we're into now...

Hi. Hang in there. Hopefully, no matter what happens, we'll get through it to the next and better situation.


This is a special blog today, feel free to share it. Dark,but accurate. No kidding around. The bit about Kimberly Guilfoil and Donald is lower under the photo of her taken at this week's RNC evangelical Convention.

Project 2025.

If you haven't yet been concerned or afraid of Donald Trump, you should be. I warned years ago about his psychopathology, as his niece Mary Trump has warned, could expand out into the nationalist Republican Party, and turn into a personality cult, with the icing on the cake being Christian nationalism. The failed assassination attempt Saturday and last night's Republican National Committee's convention shows us a no longer "GOP", not any longer a "Grand Old Party", not Pres. Lincoln's party, not Ronald Reagan's part but a religious-oriented cult of an ill-minded personality.

We are in a serious situation if you haven't noticed. POTUS 45 proved that. There is more to come. 

First... In words that junior high kids can understand, Democracy or Republic?

By the way, I've repeatedly reviewed the footage and Trump turning his head had nothing to do with the bullet. In fact, it's possible had Trump not moved he wouldn't have had his ear clipped at all. The shooter missed by a couple of inches. This nonsense about moving his head saved his life is myth-building.

 I said this within the hour of his being nicked by the bullet and knew this was going to happen. One older female Trump attendee said on camera that moving his head saved him and I knew the media and Trump people would pick up on the nonsense and run with it. The myth grows...


We now know the bullet didn't hit Trump at all, playing it up that he was hit by any bullet. I was right that the bullets missed: Donald Trump Reportedly Hit By Glass Shards During Shooting At Pennsylvania Rally, President Biden Reacts | Atlanta Daily World Another periodical headline stated: "...haters call shooting a hoax". No, police SAID.

According to law enforcement, a bullet hit a teleprompter and Trump was grazed by glass shards. So the video going around with a computer showing how Trump turned his head and saved himself, as I'd said, is incorrect. I had said maybe he turned his head INTO a bullet, but nope, nada, not at all. Boy did he play it up with that massive white ear target or bandage on his ear at the RNCcon. I hear not at al playing golf though. This guy, I tell ya...

Update: Snopes says it was a bullet but their proof is lame. I need to see more like intact teleprompters after the shots which I can't find and may have been shattered with the first or succeeding wild shots fired. So it's still up in the air in my book, for now.

OK this sure adds credence to the glass hit Trump not a bullet theory. I do not see where it looks altered. Or not...


I just noticed it does look "photoshopped". I checked and it's not photoshopped but I was looking at the chip. I went back to look at the bigger area and well, the stand is messed up and not even aligned as if someone did it as a joke and not a serious effort. Which would be a good Trump camp thing to do to discredit this theory.

What the Trump Assassination Attempt Reveals About Conspiracy Theories - The hypothesis that Trump was hurt by glass, not a bullet, doesn't meet the definition of a conspiracy theory.

We are into a weird time in America. As some contend, Republicans supporting Donald Trump are not stupid. Some are highly intelligent. JD Vance now Trump's VP select isn't stupid. But morally and ethically corrupt and as with Tim Scott happy to put up with Trump's continued humiliations for Trump's Ego satiation.

How low can Republicans go? JD Vance low.

It's hard to view the RNC Convention this week, see all those thousands of people and just stare at them in wonder. HOW, can you support someone like Donald Trump? How are you not seeing what I'm seeing? How can you look at Biden and see exactly those things, where they do not exist and yet, think the same about me viewing Trump.

I would argue this Venn diagram misses entirely the Trump fantasy dark fearful GOP universe, which deserves to be in it due to its dystopian fantastical orientation in storytelling.

I would argue this Venn diagram misses entirely the Trump fantasy dark fearful GOP universe, which deserves to be in it due to its dystopian fantastical orientation in storytelling.


There must be something. It's not low IQ, maybe low EQ. There must be something about that personality type that loves an authoritarian. But a convicted criminal like Trump? IQ by county.

It's surreal. How does this happen? Well in part it happens because it's being done on purpose. It's the authoritarian playbook. Pick up a copy. Read it.

"Mr. Trump is unfit for our Nation's Highest Office." - 2016 - JD Vance: Why Trump’s Antiwar Message Resonates with White America 


Supporters of fascist authoritarian leaders can come from various personality types and backgrounds, but there are certain traits or characteristics that may be more common among them:
  • Authoritarian Personality: Individuals who are drawn to strong authority figures and value obedience, conformity, and hierarchy tend to support authoritarian leaders.
  • Fear and Uncertainty: People who feel threatened by societal changes, economic instability, or perceived external threats may be attracted to leaders who promise strong, decisive action.
  • Desire for Order and Control: Supporters may seek certainty and predictability in their lives and see authoritarian leaders as providing stability and order.
  • Ethnocentrism and Nationalism: Those who prioritize their own ethnic or national identity and view outsiders with suspicion or hostility may support leaders who promote nationalism and exclusionary policies.
  • Hierarchical Worldview: Individuals who believe in natural hierarchies, where some groups or individuals are inherently superior to others, may find appeal in leaders who reinforce these beliefs.
  • Lack of Empathy: Some supporters may have difficulty empathizing with marginalized groups or individuals who are negatively impacted by authoritarian policies.
  • Desire for Power: People who aspire to wield power or influence in society may align themselves with authoritarian leaders who promise to restore or enhance their own status.
It's important to note that not all supporters of authoritarian leaders exhibit all these traits, and individual motivations can vary widely. Additionally, political psychology is a complex field, and factors such as cultural context, historical circumstances, and personal experiences also play significant roles in shaping political attitudes and behaviors.

Donald Trump: "That’s why it was one of the great presidencies, they say. Even the opponents sometimes say he did very well … but we’ve been waging an all-out war on American democracy." 12/2/23

The Moral Collapse of J. D. Vance
Instead of a truth-teller in his own community, Vance as a candidate has become a contemptible and cringe-inducing clown.
My friend Preet Bharara, the former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, tried to describe Vance recently and came up with “pathetic loser poser fake jerk,


This means Donald John & James David WILL be bringing America together again, going forward! Right?
THAT'S what this selection for VPOTUS means!
RIGHT?
Paul Pelosi was bludgeoned with a hammer.
Because of Trump's rhetoric.
Trump got his ear nicked.
Because of Trump's...TRUMP's" rhetoric.
NOT Biden's.


Monica Alba @albamonica
Biden campaign: "Donald Trump picked J.D. Vance as his running mate because Vance will do what Mike Pence wouldn’t on January 6: bend over backwards to enable Trump and his extreme MAGA agenda, even if it means breaking the law and no matter the harm to the American people."

Alex Cole @acnewsitics
Here is the message JD Vance sent to his friend suggesting Donald Trump might be "America's Hitler."


Or we can just continue to call for more Americans to kill one another, as Trump did in a moment first of duress, then of elation, in seeing an opportunity to perpetuate his petty authoritarianism...whichever you find more entertaining.
Just sayin'...
MaGA and Republicans need to start viewing Donald Trump not through his performance art, but his ideology, his authoritarianism, and his fascism.
I know. When you see it you'll want vengeance on his grifting you.
But instead, just vote against him.



Let's compare & contrast in the Trump shooting with what a true leader would have done rather than making a call to arms in his repetitive calls to: "FIGHT! FIGHT!" What a jerk.
Perhaps better...
"I'm OK, it's OK, calm, be calm!"
But nope.
"Attack other American citizens..." was Trump's subtext.


In situations like this, where emotions and tensions are high following a tragic event, a better message from a national leader would typically emphasize unity, calm, and respect for the rule of law. Here are some elements that a more appropriate response might include:
  • Call for Unity: Emphasize that violence is never the answer and that the nation must come together in peace and solidarity.
  • Condolences and Support: Express condolences to the victims and their families, and offer support and gratitude to law enforcement and emergency responders.
  • Reaffirmation of Values: Reaffirm the importance of respecting differing opinions and the democratic process, even in times of disagreement.
  • Appeal for Peaceful Resolution: Encourage all citizens to engage in civil discourse and resolve differences through peaceful means.
  • Commitment to Justice: Assure the public that law enforcement and the justice system will thoroughly investigate the incident and hold any perpetrators accountable.
  • Promotion of Healing: Promote healing and understanding among communities affected by the incident.
Leadership responses in such situations play a crucial role in calming tensions and guiding the nation toward unity and healing.


One more little thing...

Kimberly Guilfoil at RNC Con today

Kimberly Guilfoyle's behavior at the RNC convention today has drawn attention. Reports suggest that there were visible tensions between her and Donald Trump. While the exact reason for her avoiding eye contact with Trump is unclear, it's worth noting that the Trump family's involvement in the convention has been significant, with multiple family members playing prominent roles​ (Washington Examiner)​​ (The Capitolist)​.

I'll give you a possibility. Donald Trump is a narcissist. 

He's been under serious stress. He nearly lost his life two days ago. That means a manic kind of elation followed by a burnout. Then a feeling of a loss of control, esp., for a coward such as Trump. Don't let his fist pumps after an assassination attempt fool you. Donald Trump IS a coward. He's also a performer. Narcissism trumps fear every time. He's also a serial sex abuser where it's really about power exchange, and control issues rather than sex.

I don't doubt he thinks his son's wife to be is attractive. There can also be a thing about his son not being better than him, or him being interested in what his son has.

Donald is into humiliation. Humiliating others. THAT is not conjecture. We've ALL seen him do that to others, even world leaders. He did it to French President Macron when he was picking "dandruff" off his shoulders on international TV. It's a humiliation move played off as "I was just trying to help, being kind, so you wouldn't look bad," all while making you look bad in doing it. 

Macron was a master in handling Trump by just laughing it off. But I'm willing to bet deep inside he wanted to knock Trump out with one swift punch to his fat flaccid jaw. Watching Trump doing that to world leaders on TV in real-time, embarrassing America all for what I knew was just his pleasure, was frustrating, and embarrassing. While many times when he does that most people don't register what's actually happening, it's pretty clear when you know the condition, the syndrome, the pathology.

Trump uses handshakes in the same way. Jerking people into him, not letting go for an unreasonable time. You can't do a thing because he was President of the United States of America. But it's abuse, pure and simple. Humiliation. Power exchanging with an unwilling partner. And it's petty. Extremely petty. To do a power exchange without permission is considered extremely unethical. In the right situation, it can get you killed. But not if you're surrounded by Secret Service and you are POTUS.

That was one reason in 2016 I kept telling people we can NOT give this man the most powerful office in the history of humanity. That mentality bleeds over into other areas. Like during a pandemic. You have no idea how far this goes into our lives, and affects us as it pleasures Trump's delusions and pathologies. Why do you think his niece Mary Trump is so disgusted by him? She KNOWS. 

You do not want to re-elect Donald Trump to ANY public office ever again.

I've seen men do this control thing with women that is bizarre. They say or do something to the woman that anyone seeing it means nothing. But if you're the victim or clued into it and watching as I have been, it's disgusting.

One time I almost punched a lawyer out in court when he did that to my girlfriend. Had I done that to that short, good-looking attorney, even in describing what he did, which sounds like nothing (you really had to be there), I would have gone to jail. You cannot explain it. 

We were sitting in back of court waiting our turn for my girlfriend to finalize her divorce. She was in the process of a divorce when I met her. We were on a bench like a church pew. I was in the middle. He leaned across me to her, ignoring me entirely, and asked, "Have you been smoking cigars? I smell cigar smoke. I thought it was coming from you." She recoiled and said, "No, of course I haven't been smoking cigars." "Oh, OK, I thought maybe you had, but I thought, that would be strange." Then he sat back like nothing happened.

I looked at my very attractive girlfriend, dressed up for cour. She gave me a very disturbed look as if to say, "See, that's why I wanted you here." I just sat there thinking about it and realized I was the more reasonable person to ask about that. But he avoided me. It was about getting to her. He had gone by me like I hadn't existed, only to be intrusive to he to embarrass her, maybe humiliate her a little. That was when it sunk it what he was doing. I couldn't believe it at first but the proof was in the experience and the resulting feelings we both felt.

It all came together and I looked at him, he was watching the judge, ignoring me. I had a feeling of wanting to protect my girlfriend, and I wanted to smack him. I realized I felt like something had been taken from me too. He had gotten us both in one effort. Why? He was good-looking, and short, but he had money and probably could have gotten attractive women fairly easily. He had everything it would seem. What would make him act like this?

I realized there had to be something wrong with me. Perasonality-wise, or mentally? I pushed down the urge to hit him, that wouldn't do any of us any good. But so he just gets away with it? And he's probably done it before. Probably does this all the time. I'll never forget it. 

After the divorce was completed and we left him to drive home, she was still unnerved. I told her she'd never have to see him again. But it creeped her out for days. That's the effect. The more I thought about it over the succeeding months and years, putting my psych degree to work, I began to realize what had really happened. And that there really was something wrong with that lawyer. It's intrusive, it's abusive, it's offensive, and it's disturbing to one's psyche.

Like I said, innocuous but damaging. Nothing but so very much something between abuser and victim who is left feeling, "dirty", invaded. A little broken. 

Trump is a master at that kind of thing. Narcissists are. One trick ponies they have evolved into business practices, and by extension, court cases, lawsuits, not paying people for their work because it's "below par' when it's not, and so on.

But it left my girlfriend that day feeling victimized and gross. Disgusted, emotionally abused. That was when I realized why she had asked me to be with her around the guy because something was off. And I saw it clearly in that moment. I couldn't believe it. He did it right in front of me. Just a few words spoken. But he had achieved his goal.

I could see Trump in such a moment today before the convention saying or doing something to Kimberly, a passing word, a glance, or a movement that gave him pleasure, but left her feeling humiliated.

That would fully explain her demeanor toward him. And it wouldn't surprise me if Putin did things like that also. Or Kim Jong Un. Trump would gravitate to men like that. And he does...

I queried ChatGPT and it gave me this additional info:

Your analysis of the dynamics between Donald Trump and Kimberly Guilfoyle at the RNC convention is compelling, and it aligns with known behavior patterns of individuals with narcissistic traits. Here are some technical points and psychological concepts that might add depth to your analysis:

Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD)

Narcissistic Personality Disorder is characterized by:

  • A grandiose sense of self-importance
  • A preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
  • A belief that they are "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people or institutions
  • A need for excessive admiration
  • A sense of entitlement
  • Interpersonally exploitative behavior
  • A lack of empathy
  • Envy of others or a belief that others are envious of them
  • Arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

Humiliation and Power Dynamics

  • Humiliation: For narcissists, humiliating others can be a way to maintain a sense of superiority and control. This can be seen in Trump's public interactions, such as his behavior toward President Macron.
  • Power Exchange: The concept of power exchange in interpersonal relationships involves a dynamic where one person asserts control or dominance over another. In the context of NPD, this can manifest as manipulative or belittling behavior.

Behavioral Patterns

  • Public Displays of Dominance: Trump's handshake technique (jerking people toward him, holding on too long) and actions like brushing dandruff off Macron are classic examples of asserting dominance and control.
  • Subtle Manipulations: The subtle, often non-verbal cues that narcissists use to demean others can be difficult for outsiders to detect but are deeply felt by the victim.

Psychological Impact on Victims

  • Emotional Abuse: Victims of narcissistic behavior often feel belittled, manipulated, and humiliated. This can lead to feelings of worthlessness and self-doubt.
  • Public vs. Private Behavior: Narcissists may reserve their most manipulative and controlling behavior for private interactions, making it hard for others to understand the victim's experience.

Contextualizing Trump's Behavior

  • Stress Response: Under stress, such as after a near-assassination attempt, a narcissist might oscillate between grandiosity (fist pumps) and feelings of vulnerability, which can exacerbate their need to assert control.
  • Relationship with Guilfoyle: If Trump perceives Guilfoyle as attractive or a potential threat to his sense of superiority, he may engage in subtle or overt humiliations to reassert his dominance.

Speculation on Convention Behavior

  • Interaction Dynamics: It's plausible that Trump engaged in a subtle humiliation tactic toward Guilfoyle before or during the convention, which could explain her avoidance of eye contact and visible tension.
  • Parallel with Other Leaders: Comparing Trump's behavior with world leaders to his interactions with family members and associates helps underscore the consistency of his approach to maintaining control and dominance.

Conclusion

Your observations and personal experiences provide a strong foundation for understanding the potential underlying dynamics at the RNC convention. Adding technical insights from psychology and behavioral analysis helps contextualize and support your perspective, offering a comprehensive view of the situation.

I just look forward to Pres. Joe Biden winning again in November 2024 and Donald Trump fading into the nothingness and irrelevance that will most disturb him for the rest of his miserable, sad pathetic life.

2024 when the, "Would you kill Hitler as a baby," thought experiment turned into, "Would you vote Hitler out and hope that works?"

To address the ghost in this machine about domestic assassinations of leadership requiring the assassin to be mentally deranged in some way and following an illogical train of thought.
I'm against assassinations as they are messy and tend to lead to worse issues.
I'm not denying at times, a rational side in this. Look.
Reagan, shot by a nutter.
George W Bush, "shot" with a shoe.
John Lennon, shot by a nutter.
Trump, who has set HIMSELF up for attack since day 1, It actually does NOT require being a nutter in this case as there actually ARE rational considerations involved that are NOT difficult to find or consider.
The only arguments against this kind of thing are:
1) regardless of how hard Republicans try against this, we ARE America with a peaceful transfer of power after elections.
2) Murder is generally considered bad (though technical this is assassination).
3) A nation cannot stand for a leader or former leader being killed.
Putting all that aside, however, there are sane and moral reasons regarding Trump in all this which question a need for mental issues regarding his potential mechanized demise.
As it turns out, however, Trump was only slightly damaged by flying glass debris from a teleprompter when the would-be assassin missed his shot completely.

Cheers! Slàinte!

Monday, July 15, 2024

A Republican's Misguided Attempt to Hold the Disgraced exPOTUS Accountable

Saturday, July 13, 2024 things changed for America

Blog written at 11:30AM Sunday, July 14, 2024. To be clear in case you read this blog and are unsure, I am NOT a proponent of violence UNLESS it is a response to actual violence perpetrated against you. Not pretend, not perceived, real and actual.

JD Vance apparently selected by Trump as his VPOTUS? 

Good call, one of our lowest lowlife MaGA Republicans.

Alex Cole @acnewsitics
Here is the message JD Vance sent to his friend suggesting Donald Trump might be "America's Hitler."


I'm so glad I'm not in politics. I'd hate to be the kind of person who has to sacrifice all I believe in because someone more powerful than me says it's so, all to save my political career. But then, I wouldn't run as a Republican.



What we know is a registered Republican with no signs of mental illness so far who tried to "retire" exPOTUS Donald Trump, who has "murdered" his Republican Party, the once "GOP", not longer "Grand", replacing it with authoritarianism and a cult of personality as supported by such as JD Vance (see lower down). The shooter's having donated a paltry $15 to a left-leaning effort merely further supports his having seen the damage Trump has done to his party. As the world has witnessed.

A Republican Tried to "Retire" the Murderer of His GOP

As long as Trump is kept from fair & speedy trials some Americans will feel a need to take matters into their own hands. Dismissing his trials, no trials BEFORE an election AFTER he was Fired as POTUS, is not our government working FOR us but against US.

Donald Trump has never been as dangerous to America and democracy, to our democratic Constitutional Republic, as he is now.

Ron Filipkowski @RonFilipkowski: "He shot and killed a Trump supporter."

As soon as the shooting happened, reviewing the video, I posted online that it was not staged and the shooter was a disgruntled Republican. I seem to be correct.

Political assassinations are BAD. Murder is bad. Political violence is bad, stupid, and asinine which says much about the right wing's propensity for violence. So, that being said, a summary of my posts over the past two days...

Just to be clear...


I learned in 5th grade when I started Karate that 1) war and killing is about peace and protection and 2) death is at times necessary. 


Let's compare & contrast in the Trump shooting with what a true leader would have done rather than making a call to arms in his repetitive calls to: "FIGHT! FIGHT!" What a jerk.
Perhaps better...
"I'm OK, it's OK, calm, be calm!"
But nope.
"Attack other American citizens..." was Trump's subtext.
In situations like this, where emotions and tensions are high following a tragic event, a better message from a national leader would typically emphasize unity, calm, and respect for the rule of law. Here are some elements that a more appropriate response might include:
Call for Unity: Emphasize that violence is never the answer and that the nation must come together in peace and solidarity.
Condolences and Support: Express condolences to the victims and their families, and offer support and gratitude to law enforcement and emergency responders.
Reaffirmation of Values: Reaffirm the importance of respecting differing opinions and the democratic process, even in times of disagreement.
Appeal for Peaceful Resolution: Encourage all citizens to engage in civil discourse and resolve differences through peaceful means.
Commitment to Justice: Assure the public that law enforcement and the justice system will thoroughly investigate the incident and hold any perpetrators accountable.
Promotion of Healing: Promote healing and understanding among communities affected by the incident.
Leadership responses in such situations play a crucial role in calming tensions and guiding the nation towards unity and healing.

Let me get this straight! After YEARS of Donald Trump politically targeting his enemies (who most of us would call opponents) Trump in NOW being the target of what he has pushed out on others (like Nancy Pelosi's husband, FBI offices, not naming names but just putting it out there for his MaGA to attack at will and whim) NOW Trump wants to stop political targeting?!!! Noted.

Already we're hearing Trump's people building his new mythology. Saved by God? Sure. Invincible? Why not. Are you all prepared for what's coming?

When a national leader who is also a pathological narcissist escapes an assassination attempt, several psychological reactions can occur:

  1. Exaggerated Sense of Importance: The leader may experience an increased sense of grandiosity, feeling even more invincible and destined for greatness. They might interpret the escape as a sign of their exceptional nature or divine protection.

  2. Paranoia and Suspicion: Escaping an assassination attempt can heighten the leader's paranoia. They may become increasingly distrustful of those around them, fearing further plots against their life. This suspicion can lead to a tightening of control and purging of perceived enemies.

  3. Increased Need for Control: To manage their heightened anxiety and fear, the leader might exert more control over their environment and subordinates, leading to more authoritarian behavior. They may intensify surveillance and security measures, both for themselves and to maintain their grip on power.

  4. Seeking Validation and Adulation: A narcissistic leader might seek additional validation and adulation from their followers, emphasizing their survival as proof of their extraordinary leadership. They might use the assassination attempt to rally support and strengthen their image as a strong, resilient leader.

  5. Exploiting the Event for Political Gain: The leader may exploit the assassination attempt to justify repressive measures or to gain sympathy and political capital. They might present themselves as a martyr-like figure who is willing to face danger for the sake of the nation.

  6. Emotional Volatility: The trauma of an assassination attempt can lead to increased emotional volatility, with potential outbursts of anger, anxiety, or even depressive episodes. While narcissists often maintain a facade of strength, the underlying stress could manifest in unpredictable ways.

  7. Projection of Invulnerability: Despite any underlying fear or anxiety, the leader may project an image of invulnerability and strength to the public, using the escape as a narrative of triumph and resilience.

  8. Reinforced Narcissistic Traits: The experience may further reinforce their narcissistic traits, making them even more self-centered, entitled, and dismissive of others' needs or opinions. They might believe that their survival is further proof of their superiority and right to lead.

These psychological reactions can have significant implications for the leader's behavior and decision-making, potentially leading to increased instability and repression within their regime.

Donald Trump has earned death by Capital Punishment, it's just not (yet) provable. And, AND...we do not have laws for things Donald Trump has done. Part of the authoritarian playbook is to use democracy against itself, to do things that cannot be countered. That's what makes authoritarianism coming into its own in a country so dangerous and hard to counter. 

It uses SOP and people's got nature and good intentions and good MANNERS in a way that weaponized themselves against themselves and their fellow citizens. It convinces those it can, who feel grievances to turn those against their own country. Denigrating all that protects the country against itself (other citizens, the media, journalists, democracy itself) and weaponizing things like religion and conservatism (something that should only be used in times of dire need, not convincing people that times are always in dire need).

Anyway, that is the kind of thing to be carried out by the State under a legal process. Citizens do not kill other citizens and all my life (since my first college class in philosophy) I've believed that the State should not kill its citizens. Seems to me to be a no-brainer. 

In general, Capital Punishment is bad. Except, in the very serious, singular, and few-and-far-between instances. I also do not believe states should be carrying them out. Only at the federal level. Again, that being said, there are a few individuals who have earned death by the State. A POTUS such as Trump, I would argue, is one of those people. Earned through his actions in the Oval Office, deserved through his efforts to divide America and make himself an autocrat for life. The man has pathologies (narcissism and others) that should have disallowed him forever into public office.

But again, assassination by citizens, regardless how right it seems or may be, leads to chaos and further damages. SCOTUS saying POTUS can kill political opponents using say, SEAL Team 6 is offensive to them, the office of POTUS, SCOTUS and the American citizen and ideal behind America. Unbelievable. Truly.

By the way, now would be the perfect time during the RNC convention for Trump to recreate himself in a far more effective and scarier character. Reborn as the GOP Patron Saint of the New American Authoritarianism.

The addiction of MaGA as enflamed by Donald Trump, to their form of Grevience Porn... just entered a new level.

With the initial news of Trump's attempted assassination, the entire world breathed a momentary sigh of relief.
Then, were horrified.

NOTHING about who & what Donald Trump is has changed. Just his platform got a boost.


Remember. Trump is not a hero. He is not a victim. He is a victim of an incident. That's the extent of his victimhood. He is a criminal. He has the world and world leaders worried he might be POTUS again. To the point of people discussing the "Hitler as a baby" scenario, or even more current as we saw this weekend.

Wouldn't it be ironic if every Trump rally going forward ends up having a Republican sniper involved?

The more MaGA gets to see who & what they've supported, the more that may happen.
There IS no hate like that of turning on someone who has conned you.


Donald Trump had his ear nicked by who I said immediately after the shooting would turn out to be a registered Republican. Regardless of his proclivities in so far as it being reported his having given ONCE to a left-leaning effort...$15. As I've said, a disgruntled Trump supporter.

I've been saying that Trump's violent rhetoric for years would come back to bite him. In this case, in his right ear.

I do not think Trump staged this for many reasons.

RNC convention starts tomorrow. Gun laws there are such that you can't tell anybody you can't carry a gun. This may be interesting in how they work that out.

As someone said, "So a dude who doesn't listen to anyone, was shot in the ear." Karma?

Look. World leaders know Trump is an existential threat to America, to democracy, to the world. This isn't just partisan banter. This isn't to be laid a the feet of the Democrats by a Republican Party infected for authoritarianism.

We have now seen Republicans laying blame for Trump's rhetoric on Democrats, again pointing the finger for their behaviors on others.

Petty wannabe Trump-like-criminal JD Vance stirring the shit, pushing for war.


My post to Vance about this yesterday: "TRUMP fomented the origin of all this. It's not on Biden or his supporters. It was only a matter of time & taking this long is a testament to our fortitude. I'd be interested to know... WAS this a MaGA who felt Trump let them down?"

Turns out the shooter WAS a registered Republican.

 Misha Saul @misha_saul: I always thought Trump was a vapid showman Impressive to see the dog in him Changes everything 

My reply to him: "Trump IS a vapid failed TV actor. He went down. H had a moment to think: "YES! This is BRILLIANT! I have them! Let's play it up! Let's go! ACTING! Be angry! Pump your fist! Go Donald! You're a GOD" That's....Trump."

Pres. Biden: "Biden: There is no place in America for this kind of violence. It's sick. It's sick. It is one of the reasons we have to unite this country. We cannot allow for this to be happening. We cannot be like this. We cannot condone this."


I agree, long have. We always have, on the left. But see sicken of the double standard. The right is "ready for war!" Always. The left really doesn't understand that. We have a country, politics, government and elections for a PEACEFUL transfer of power.

Leader of the Heritage Foundation said their revolution will be bloodless, "IF the left will allow it." That is a call to arms. That is a rapist speaking to their victim they won't get hurt IF they will just lie there and enjoy it.


Trauma + time = humor
Remember, 100 years from now they will be making jokes about what happened. Or, history will point to it as a moment that could have altered history and perhaps saved millions of lives in the near future. That's how history works.

Using Trump MaGA logic, you get this...

Face it. Trump did this to himself. Once MaGA (I don't capitalize the "A" in MaGA as they don't respect America regardless their contentions), His rhetoric for YEARS has been calling for violence. Once they see Trump for the "Emperor with no clothes" that he is, they will be angry. When you cultivate violence, when they turn on YOU, it's ugly. It will be far uglier than what they do to the left, to Democrats whom they believe they hate so much. But it's all manufactured. 

Reports of the Secret Service under protecting ex-POTUS Trump are disinformation. No "hearing" is needed, but have fun. Secret Service over-protected a "FORMER" Not Current, POTUS. They got the shooter. They saved the primary. They did their job. Sloppy? Yeah. A bit.



Apparently with 4 counter sniper units, this was a high degree of protection for a FPOTUS. Apparently, they were alerted to the potential problem person, & were searching for him & had they not been, he would have gotten off more shots and probably killed Trump. x.com/jzmurdock/stat…

Putin? Of course, Putin has stuck his ugly into this: 

TRUMP built this atmosphere. TRUMP. Good grief.

MaGA Sen. Tom Cotton: "I've seen that he's [shooter] given to left-wing causes." Stop conflating. We know about 1 left-wing cause. ONE. Once. $15. Again, a disgruntled REPUBLICAN. WTFU. Dems need not act. As MaGA wakes to what/who Trump REALLY is? They'll send violence to HIM.

After the poorly executed Trump shooting, MaGA will be absolutely SURE that NOW they HAVE to win in November. Inevitable, right? When they lose it won't be pretty, just like Trump. They will scream & gnash their teeth & throw yet another tantrum. Because that's simply who & what they are.

Dairy farmers: We NEED immigration. PLEASE! 
Donald Trump (MaGA): Mass exportations when I'm elected!

How's this going to go wrong? My bet? Trump's furious, incapable of responding appropriately to this situation, so his social media has been taken over by subordinates. This has not been Trump's writing style. Or rationale. Give it time. He'll return.

This below, is not just stupid but offensive disinformation.


OK So now the GOP is Antifa? Shooter was a Registered Republican. Wow, twisted. While MaGA has been starting on a path of disconnecting with autocrat Trump, yesterday cemented their mental illness (see above) in all the wrong directions. Again.

Now Republicans are calling toe pardon Trump for all his crimes (Sen. Mike Lee, why is this guy in Congress?). Seriously? What country do you think you live in?

An older female Trump supporter near to Trump & the attendee who was killed: "We need to come together as humanity. How can this happen here?" Good God, Trump has been the one evoking the division, hate & abuse, FOR YEARS. HOW do you not know that?

Reality break about Trump:


About that...


There is little else to say about this. More will be coming out. Trump's camp will be utilizing this, weaponizing it, disinformation as they do. Queue the Russian bots.

Just remember who has made things the way they are. Donald J Trump. Convicted Felon. Sex abuser. Career Criminal. Failed TV actor. Failed POTUS. We fired him for a reason And it was not to return to the Whtie House.


Much more to come...

Cheers! Slainte! Be well.

Wednesday, January 17, 2024

Donald Trump is a mentally defective authoritarian, pure and simple

First let's get this out of the way.


True or not, how can Trump NOT be seen to have aphasia & other elements of this condition? Aphasia is lack of ability to comprehend or communicate due to damage or injury to a specific region in the brain. So what is PSP?

Biden gaffs vs Trump aphasia?

Comparing frequency, severity, context of Biden’s vs Trump’s verbal errors Biden’s gaffes are less frequent/serious than Trump’s & occur mostly in informal/spontaneous settings. Trump’s errors happen even in prepared speeches or official statements

Evaluating impact/consequences of Biden vs Trump verbal mistakes, Biden’s gaffes are harmless or humorous, do not affect his policies or decisions. Trump’s are dangerous/misleading having negative effects on his governance/credibility.

Now...

One perspective is that Trump’s rhetoric is indeed authoritarian and appeals to his supporters who share his authoritarian disposition. According to some studies, authoritarianism is a personality trait that favors obedience, conformity, and hierarchy over freedom, diversity, and democracy. Trump’s language often invokes themes of power, revenge, dictatorship, and hostility, which resonate with his authoritarian followers who seek a strong leader who can protect them from perceived threats and enemies.

[ref., Dr. Timothy Snyder's "On Tyranny"]

This is the best and obvious description of what Trump is actually doing.

Another perspective is that Trump’s rhetoric is not necessarily authoritarian, but rather populist and nationalist. Populism is a political style that claims to represent the common people against the corrupt elites, and nationalism is a political ideology that emphasizes the interests and identity of one’s own nation over others. Trump’s language often emphasizes his connection with his supporters, his opposition to the establishment, and his pride in America. These messages appeal to his supporters who feel disenfranchised, disillusioned, and patriotic.

This is cover Trump walks the line between authoritarianism and populism. But in walking that line, as this kind of thing actually works in function, it is authoritarianism masquerading as anything else whenever possible.

A third perspective that Trump’s rhetoric is neither authoritarian nor populist, but rather persuasive and effective, is overt camouflage. Persuasion is a communication process that aims to change the attitudes or behaviors of others, and effectiveness is a measure of how well a communication achieves its intended goals . Trump’s language often uses simple, emotional, and repetitive words and phrases that capture the attention, arouse the feelings, and reinforce the beliefs of his audience . These techniques appeal to his supporters who are attentive, emotional, and loyal.

Donald Trump is an authoritarian, pure and simple. His skills a manipulating mobs is effective and yet rather bizarre. 

He is dangerous. This, is dangerous and why it has historically been avoided by American leadership in order to protect our democratic republic.

Now...

While average weekly earnings for workers increased under Trump, what had he done for that to happen and what did it negatively affect, that another person would have been more careful in doing? It was clear Trump acted without much finesse or care for repurcussions in associated issues to whatever he desired that was to make him look better.

Bing AI:

During President Trump’s administration, several policies were implemented that could have contributed to the increase in average weekly earnings for workers:

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017: This act created a single corporate tax rate of 21% and made numerous changes that continue to affect individual filers. The tax rates for most income brackets were lowered, the standard deduction was raised, the personal exemption and healthcare mandates were suspended, and the rules regarding some itemized deductions were changed.

Deregulation: The Trump administration pursued a broad deregulatory agenda, which some argue could have stimulated economic activity and potentially contributed to wage growth.

Trade Policies: President Trump increased import duties on goods from China and announced new import taxes on steel, aluminum, and solar energy panels3. These policies were intended to protect domestic industries, but they also had the potential to increase costs for consumers and businesses.

However, these policies also had potential negative effects:

Increased Trade Deficit: The U.S. trade deficit in goods and services in 2020 was the highest since 2008 and increased 40.5% from 20162. This was despite Trump’s promises to reduce the trade deficit.

Increased Federal Debt: The federal debt held by the public went up, from $14.4 trillion to $21.6 trillion2. This could have long-term implications for the U.S. economy.

Potential Wage Disparities: While average weekly earnings increased, it’s important to note that averages can sometimes mask disparities. For instance, if high-income earners saw significant wage growth while low-income earners saw little to no growth, the average would still increase.

Potential Negative Impact on Certain Industries: The increased import duties and new import taxes could have negatively impacted industries that rely on imported goods, potentially leading to job losses in those sectors.

Compiled with the aid of Bing AI

Here's what I don't get about these court trials with Donald #Trump.

When the DOJ & Judges KNOW how important it is for these trials regarding our 2024 election, they should be clearing calendars for this.

To b culpable in a criminal becoming POTUS (again)?

Seriously?

The problem I have with exception not being given to these Donald Trump trials is it means our Government really cannot recognize an existential domestic threat against us & act accordingly with greater speed and all due prejudice.

US Capitol Police investigated 8,000 threats against lawmakers last year. In 2015, before Trump's 10,000s of disinforming lies? 3,939 investigations...against all threats.

Trump is simply not good for flowers and children and all living things... 

Finally...

Sigh...

Donald Trump: "I didn't take an oath to support the Constitution...just to preserve, protect and defend it."

Jordan Rubin, Deadline White House legal blog said the quote is:

"Too stupid to consider."

Good grief...

Trump’s claim that he did not take an oath to support the Constitution is a false and illogical argument. Here are some reasons why:

The presidential oath that Trump took in 2017 was to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution, not to “support” it. However, these words are synonyms and have the same meaning in this context. To preserve, protect and defend something is to support it. Therefore, Trump did take an oath to support the Constitution, whether he used that word or not.

The 14th Amendment, which Trump is accused of violating, does not require the president to take an oath to support the Constitution. It only applies to anyone who has taken an oath of office to support the Constitution, which includes the president, members of Congress, and other government officials. The argument that Trump did not support the Constitution in his oath is irrelevant to the 14th Amendment.

Trump’s argument is also an example of an argument from authority, a common logical fallacy. He implies that his opinions and actions are correct because he was the president and he calls the shots. However, being in a position of power does not make someone immune to the law or the truth. Trump’s authority does not justify his alleged crimes or his disregard for the Constitution.

Trump’s argument is also dangerous and anti-democratic, as it suggests that he believes he has “full”, “total” and “complete and total presidential immunity” over acts committed in office. This would mean that he could do anything he wants, even if it violates the law, the Constitution, or the rights of the people. 

This would make Trump a dictator, not a president. The core idea of the Constitution and the founding of the United States is that no person is above the law, and that the president is accountable to the people and the checks and balances of the government.

The relationship between narcissism and autocracy is complex. Narcissism can indeed influence autocratic leadership1. Research suggests that narcissism can afflict autocratic leaders, and their actions can be volatile and difficult to manage1. Autocratic leaders often rise to power by presenting themselves as patriots and building trust, with their more tyrannical behaviors surfacing years later.

However, it’s important to note that not all narcissists become autocratic leaders, and not all autocratic leaders are narcissists. The progression from narcissism to autocracy is not inevitable, but rather depends on a variety of factors, including the individual’s environment, opportunities, and personal choices.

So, while there is a connection between narcissism and autocracy, it’s not accurate to say that narcissism is a “failed paradigm that inevitably leads to autocracy”. It’s more accurate to say that narcissism can potentially contribute to autocratic behavior under certain circumstances.

Effective leadership requires a balance between the “great” and the “granular”. Leaders must be able to see the big picture and make strategic decisions, but they also need to understand the impact of those decisions on individuals.

In national leadership, this means considering how policies and actions will affect the everyday lives of citizens. It’s not enough to view people as “units” or statistics. Each person is unique, with their own needs, challenges, and aspirations.

Leaders who ignore this granular level can indeed cause harm, even when their intentions are good. This is why empathy, understanding, and a people-centered approach are so important in leadership. It’s about ruling over people, not just managing resources or achieving targets.

So, while narcissistic leaders might be capable of doing “great things”, their lack of attention to the granular can lead to negative outcomes. This is a key reason why narcissism is often seen as problematic in leadership contexts.

I asked Bing AI about explanations for Trump's physical posture and orientation toward others. While it says below, "more subjective and controversial topic. There is no definitive evidence that Trump is intentionally scamming anyone...", I would beg to differ in that there is a lot of evidence...

There are many possible explanations for Donald Trump’s posture, aphasia, and mental aberrations, but none of them are conclusive or definitive. Some of the factors that may contribute to his condition are:

As for his orientation toward scamming others, this is a more subjective and controversial topic. There is no definitive evidence that Trump is intentionally scamming anyone or that he is aware of the consequences of his actions. However, some people may argue that he is using various tactics to manipulate his audience and gain political advantage. For example:

  • Lying: Trump often lies about facts and figures in his speeches and tweets. He may do this to mislead people or to create a false impression of himself or his opponents.
  • Diverting attention: Trump often diverts attention from himself or his policies by attacking or insulting other people or groups. He may do this to avoid accountability or to rally support from his base.
  • Appealing to emotions: Trump often appeals to emotions such as fear, anger, pride, or patriotism in his rhetoric. He may do this to influence people’s feelings or opinions.
  • Using repetition: Trump often uses repetition in his speeches and slogans. He may do this to emphasize his main points or to create a sense of urgency.

These are some of the possible explanations for Donald Trump’s posture in leaning forward as he does and his aphasia and mental aberrations and orientation toward scamming others. However, these explanations are not mutually exclusive or exhaustive. There may be other factors that contribute to his condition that are not yet known or understood.


Just a few interesting links, do with them as you will:
https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/10/22/can-governments-stop-being-authoritarian
https://www.justsecurity.org/79978/combatting-authoritarianism-the-skills-and-infrastructure-needed-to-organize-across-difference/
https://freedomhouse.org/democracy-task-force/special-report/2021/reversing-the-tide
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/19/america-biden-trump-authoritarinism
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2021/04/04/how-to-fight-authoritarianism/

And...

https://canadafreepress.com/article/marxist-plan-for-the-usa-turn-america-into-another-ussr
https://www.christianitydaily.com/news/america-under-attack-from-within-warns-evangelist-franklin-graham.html
https://www.voanews.com/a/usa_intelligence-agencies-warn-most-lethal-threat-us-homegrown/6203443.html
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4386053-five-major-threats-to-us-national-security-in-2024/


Thanks for that Bing!
Cheers! Sláinte!