Wednesday, February 16, 2011

The Church Of Scientology, Fact-Checked

L Ron Hubbard said he had been damaged and blind when he was out of the military after the war. And from that he healed himself and wrote Dianetics. Actually, he had not been a war hero, though he had medals, but military documentation showed Hubbard wasn't anything outstanding in the military and his entire system and therefore, the Church of Scientology is all false.

Scientology, is false, based upon a false foundation. He was a science fiction writer and a con man. At the end of his life he was under scrutiny by the FBI. His contemporaries such as Isaac Asimov, all laughed over Hubbard and his sci fi religion, back in the day before Scientology began and after. Does it really matter if Scientology has actually helped people? Yes, it does. Scientology can help people, on a superficial level, as can anything actually. But if you get too deep into it, it will fall down, the church as abused civil rights and there are allegations that they have actually surreptitiously caused the demise of more than one person who has gone up against them or tried to speak out against them.

Why are some ex Scientologists so fearful to speak out against this pseudo religion and science?

From NPR:
"New Yorker writer Lawrence Wright explains how he found a number of inconsistencies between documents the Church of Scientology says are official records of founder L. Ron Hubbard's war service and the actual official military records that Wright obtained."

Screenwriter Paul Haggis left the "church" of Scientology. Haggis wrote and directed "Crash" and won an Oscar for it. Wright asked if he could interview Haggis and they refused. But this lead Wright to be more curious and seek deeper information on the Scientologists.

"Wright says that one of the most interesting parts of the meeting came when he asked Davis about L. Ron Hubbard's medical records. Hubbard, the founder of Scientology, had maintained that he was blind and a 'hopeless cripple' at the end of World War II — and that he had healed himself through measures that later became the basis of Dianetics, the 1950 book that became the basis for Scientology.
"I had found evidence that Hubbard was never actually injured during the war. ... And so we pressed [Tommy Davis] for evidence that there had been such injuries and [Hubbard] had been the war hero that he described," says Wright. "Eventually, Davis sent us what is called a notice of separation — essentially discharge papers from World War II — along with some photographs of all of these medals that [Hubbard] had won. ... At the same time, we finally gained access to Hubbard's entire World War II records [through a request to the military archives] and there was no evidence that he had ever been wounded in battle or distinguished himself in any way during the war. We also found another notice of separation which was strikingly different than the one that the church had provided."

On the meeting Wright held with Tommy Davis and scientology lawyers
"In September, Tommy Davis and four Scientology lawyers arrive in New York with 47 volumes of supporting material, these binders that stretched seven linear feet. And we met in a conference room in 10 in the morning with me and two of the checkers and the head of our checking department and our lawyer and my editor and David Remnick, the editor of the New Yorker, who had just come in to welcome everyone, but took a seat and didn't get up until six that evening."

"In one very interesting moment, Davis said, 'Of course, if it's true that Mr. Hubbard was never injured during the war, then he never did heal himself using Dianetics principles, then Dianetics is based on a lie, and then Scientology is based on a lie. The truth is that Mr. Hubbard was a war hero.' And the way he phrased that, that everything depended on whether Hubbard had sustained these injuries and healed himself was like a wager on the table."

On what the Church of Scientology said about Hubbard's war records
"I asked Tommy Davis to square the records that we had with the church's own records of Mr. Hubbard's war records. And he said, 'Well, we the church were also puzzled about it until we found an expert who clarified all this.' And he said the man who did that was Mr. X in Oliver Stone's movie JFK who in real life was a man named Fletcher Prouty, who had been involved in inner circles of the American Defense Department. And Prouty, who also had worked for the church, had told them that Hubbard had actually been an intelligence agent, and the records were, as he said, sheep-dipped. That's apparently a term of art in intelligence that maintains that there were two sets of records. And we obtained all of Mr. Hubbard's military records, and there was no second set of records. There was no evidence that he had ever acted as an intelligence agent during the war in any serious capacity, and that he had never been wounded."

On Hubbard's notice of separation
"The notice of separation they gave us was signed by an individual named Howard Thompson, a lieutenant commander who apparently never existed. They gave us a photograph of the medals that Mr. Hubbard supposedly had won. Two of them weren't even commissioned until after he left active service. On there, it says that he graduated after four years of college and got a civil engineering degree, which is not accurate. ... In the 900-some-odd pages of Hubbard's war records, there were numerous letters from other researchers from over the years. And one of them had inquired about Howard D. Thompson, this lieutenant commander that supposedly signed this notice of separation. And the archivist at the time said they had thoroughly researched the roles of Navy officers at the time, and there was no such person."

Full NPR article

Is this the original CocaCola recipe?

This American Life, from WBEZ had a radio program last weekend exploring if this alleged recipe was really the original CocaCola recipe, and if it was, what did people think about its taste. And so they made it and hit the road for a taste test. 

The formula for Coca-Cola is one of the most jealously guarded trade secrets in the world. It's rumored that only two people know it, and they never travel on the same airplane. So we were surprised to come across a 1979 newspaper article containing what was supposedly the original recipe for Coke. We were even more surprised when we found reasons to believe the recipe is real. (25 minutes)

Want to try and make the "original recipe" yourself?

If you do try it, let us know how it turned out and what you thought:

Everett Beal's Recipe Book
In Feb 28, 1979 Article
Atlanta Journal and Constitution Newspaper
Pemberton's Notebook
Published in the 1992
History: For God, Country & Coca-Cola
FE Coca
(Fluid Extract of Coca)
3 drams USP4 oz FE Coco
Citric Acid3 oz3 oz
Caffeine1 oz1oz Citrate Caffein
Sugar30 #30 #
Water2.5 gal2.5 gal
Lime Juice2 pints (1 qrt)1 qrt
Vanilla1 oz1 oz
Caramel1.5 oz or more to colorColor sufficient
Use 2 oz flavor (below) to 5 gals syrup2.5 oz flavor
7X Flavor
Alcohol8 oz1 qrt
Orange Oil20 drops80
Lemon Oil30120
Nutmeg Oil1040
Corriander Oil520
Neroli Oil1040
Cinnamon Oil1040
For the full article "Is this the original recipe of Coca Cola?"

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

FCC on Universal Service Fund (USF) High Speed Internet, etc.

I've been covering a lot of issues about change in the world, lately, mostly about the Middle East and Egypt as that is the most dynamic issue we have going on at this time. However, there are other issues just as important, in many ways,  that can easily slip by us when we are looking at issues that so dramatically affect the daily life of individuals and governments in upheaval. I thought I would take this time to address something else that is vitally important to us all (consider the Egyptian, indeed the Middle Eastern, uprising of January and February 2011, without the internet); that of high speed internet and the revamping of the rules and laws, the fundings of public services related to telephone and internet systems.

I just listened to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski speaking on the Universal Service Fund (USF) and other issues. It is a very large effort to straighten out the mess that is 20th century telecommunications technologies, rules and laws, and to make those laws, rules, public funding and attitudes, change and update for the 21st century technologies that are upon us as well as address the needs of the people of not only America, but the world.
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski Speaking on Net Neutrality
When you can spend more money to call a friend a few towns over, but its far cheaper or free, to call someone on the other side of the world; when a high school student has to park at a local library to hit its "hot spot" to get internet because they do not have it at home; when someone cannot get high speed internet in an urban area, when the next neighborhood over has it; all these things and more need to be addressed and rectified. But how does one do that with the limited resources and funding that is available?

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission will unveil a proposal Tuesday to phase out subsidies for traditional telephone service to rural areas, with the money transferred to a broadband deployment program.
The Universal Service Fund (USF) is outdated and inefficient, with much of its budget going to support last-century networks, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said Monday in a speech at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.

"In the 21st century, high-speed Internet, not telephone, is our essential communications platform, and Americans are using wired and wireless networks to access it," Genachowski said in a preview of Tuesday's FCC meeting. "But while the world has changed around it, USF -- in too many ways -- has stood still, and even moved backwards."

A revamped USF is needed to bring broadband to an estimated 24 million U.S. residents who don't yet have access to traditional broadband service, Genachowski said. 

But USF is "plagued with inefficiencies," he added. "The fund pays almost $2,000 per month -- more than $20,000 a year -- for some households to have phone service. And in many places, the existing system funds four or more phone companies to serve the same area."

The FCC proposal will focus on eliminating waste and inefficiency, and on finding better measures of effectiveness for the Connect America Fund, the broadband program that would replace the USF high-cost fund, Genachowski said.

The proposal will also suggest ways for the FCC to revamp intercarrier compensation, the complicated formulas that telecom providers use to carry each other's traffic. The proposal, he said, will address so-called traffic pumping, a controversial practice in which some small carriers with high intercarrier access fees partner with sex chat lines or free teleconferencing services to drive voice traffic to their networks.

The notice of proposed rulemaking, or NPRM, is an early step in the FCC's efforts to revamp USF. In an NPRM, the FCC makes proposals and asks for public comment on them.

Full Article from  Tech World

IFC cable channel sucks

First off, congratulation to the Arab World for finally joining the modern world in Freedom and Free Speech in wanting to throw off the shackles of your tyrannical governments. Like China after putting down their Communist leaders who had set China back 100 years, the realization of people all over the world is that the people, not the governments, should be in charge and responsible for their lives and futures. You're on a roll people, don't stop now. And my condolences to those people and families who are going to lose loved ones through murderous and paranoid behavior by those, especially religious leaders who are set to continue to oppress their people and charges. Shame on you. Let your people go, dudes!

Now, about another of the losers in our own country....

Okay, IFC, Independent Film Channel (should be Ignorant f------ C-, well you figure it out), has commercials now. For some small time now, really. Their mismanagement of a public trust leading to this current situation is unbelievable.

Maybe old news, but every time now I see there is a film I would like to watch, I realize its IFC. Hopefully, because if you Tivo it, you may end up watching it and then when you are hit in the face with a commercial, you go, wait a minute, what CHANNEL is this, oh, NO, its the IFC, and you then switch it off, or watch it and angrily zip through commercials to the end of the show.

I was just watching Monty Python's Life of Brian. Commercials. Ruins the atmosphere of the film, it does.

IFC used to be cool. A channel that was some kind of awesome, with hard to find films on it. Then they stopped that, started showing mostly run of the mill stuff with the occasional tidbit thrown in. Then, commercials. Now? Now, I think they are run by retards. Oh, sorry, not PC enough? Then they are, no, wait, yes, they are retarded. Mentally deficit. I don't know? Idiots? Bastards is a bit strong but really, they are not very nice people. At least, that's how I see their programming department. Stupid.

I have to have a few more derogatory adjectives around here. oh, there's one, stuck in between the cushions of the couch: Banal. Their programming is bociferous. Yes, bociferous. That's banal and vociferous, yes, its screaming banality.

Don't give me that. Oh, I know, there are exceptions. But they really don't disprove a thing. It's just sad.

I'm giving serious thought to blocking the channel so I can't see what they have available. I WOULD continue watching this channel, but really, they would have to change their name from Independent Film Channel, to something more realistic like, Intermittent Farce Channel (well, they can keep their acronym, I don't care).

It's kind of like what I hear about Sundance Film Festival. Just no longer what it once was and now there is too much corporate-ness about it. Now, the Sundance Channel, could do what IFC is doing and that wouldn't bother me because at least they didn't start out all pretentious and making promises they didn't keep.

Sundance is an independent film channel too, they just weren't pompous enough to call themselves that.

Monday, February 14, 2011

Countering Online Extremism

Countering Violent Messages

"Alistair Millar, the director of the Center on Global Counter Terrorism Cooperation, says having the right messengers to counter these violent messages is important. If governments try, he says, they will fail.

Inspire magazine, al-Qaida's first
English-language magazine, is based in Yemen.

"Youth and others who might be susceptible to the allure of the terrorist narrative are going to be repulsed by any overt effort by government to tell them what to do," Millar says.

"It may be up to people like Carie Lemack to really reach people, he says.

"Our motto is to speak truth to terror, which is a very American way of approaching it," Lemack says.
Millar calls Abdullah Kemal Sharayed, a former leader in an al-Qaida-inspired group in Jordan, another credible voice.

"At the meeting in Riyadh, Sharayed and another ex-al-Qaida member explained how they were radicalized at an early age — and why they later turned against the group. According to Millar, that's a message they often deliver to young people who are susceptible to calls for violence.

"They have credibility among the people we are trying to reach," Millar says. "And I think it highlighted exactly what we wanted to do in terms of showing that we need to have the right messengers to deliver the message."

Full article: Agencies Aim To Counter Threat Of Online Extremism


Visitor Ville

First off, the fun stuff.

Happy St. Valentine's Day! Share the love with your loved ones. Let those you love who know it, know it some more. And let those know you love them, who do not know; if possible.

Now....

Have you heard yet about Visitor Ville? Okay, I'm not sure if this should be under entertainment, or business, curiosity, or commentary. I just found it interesting.

I hadn't either. But then I did. They call themselves, "Sim City for Traffic Nerds".
Visitor Ville

Now granted, this isn't a site for everybody. I'm really still not sure what to do with it, but it does seem that in some way, its kind of cool. It's like the Matrix for web analytics, or something. I'm not even sure who WOULD use this software. But it has potential, especially as the Bandwidth really picks up, the possibilities are pretty interesting.

  • It's SimCity® for traffic nerds... The software appeals to users on visceral and pure business levels -- Wired
  • I never thought I would be this excited or this amused by a statistics program! VisitorVille takes your normal, boring traffic and brings it to life. -- Lockergnome
  • This is the sort of product that'll get people huddled around your desk... Traffic analysis to amaze your friends... The concept is fantastic. -- Internet Magazine
  • VisitorVille is one of the best examples of complex visualization I think I've ever seen -- Watercoolergames.org
  • Everything you need to know about your traffic can be seen in one of the most visually appealing interfaces I have ever seen. -- Scott Swedorski, former Editor-in-chief, Tucows.com 


Here is their blurb from their front page:


VisitorVille: Fun, Accurate, Professional Stats for Your Website
One Animation Is Worth A Thousand Graphs


"Since 2003 VisitorVille Has Been the One and Only Visual Website Analytics Tool
In real-time, VisitorVille translates raw traffic data into visual insights. It's easy: each building represents a web page; each bus a search engine; and each animated character a real visitor to your site. Just paste our tracking code into your web pages, then launch VisitorVille for Windows to watch your traffic in real time, analyze your stats, and provide Live Help. VisitorVille also collects visitor data 24/7, so you can play it back at any time, at any speed, with our Virtual VCR. Perform A/B analysis, plus track your Google Adwords, Yahoo!, and email campaigns, accurately and with ease. In less than 10 minutes, start seeing the visitors to your website."

Well, I don't know, but it sparks my creative side. I don't have a comment good or bad, I just find it interesting.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Special Weekend Ed.: Egypt


We heard many people speak out against the US Government, for President Obama, not standing sooner to call for Mubarak's stepping down.
 US President Obama
However if you look through history:
 Ferdinand Marcos
Reagan took three years to call for Philippine Dictator Ferdinand Marcos stepping down, after he had an opposition leader gunned down;
 Suharto
Clinton only issued calls for reform, regarding Indonesia's Suharto in 1997, finally acquiescing eighteen months after protests began, when the IMF was actually the one to force Suharto out of office. Obama took one week from supporting Mubarak to calling for a transition to democracy.
Hosni Mubarak has fled to his luxurious mansion at the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh

Pretty quick historically speaking, don't you think? Slow by today's instant media and communication speeds, but one has to consider other elements. What if Mubarak never did leave, then how would the US deal with Egypt? If the US pushed him out, how would other leaders the US deals with feel about that, how would they react now, how would they react, should the same kind of thing happen in their country? Would the US want to seem "fickle" to the leaders of the world?

There are typically many more things to consider when  you are the leader of a country, far unlike being a simple citizen. Had Obama only been a citizen like the rest of us, perhaps, he would have called for a step down of the leader far sooner, but as President of the United State of America, a leading country in so many ways, he didn't have that luxury.

Moving on....
Egyptian Defense Minister Mohamed Hussein Tantawi
Today's current issue is with the Egyptian Army. Where, are they? They need to stand up and say something. They need to give some direction of how they are going to move themselves out of power, and hand the country over to the people, otherwise, the people are about to start action against the Military, as they did against Mubarak.

Guys, SAY SOMETHING!

THIS JUST IN LATE: The military council has just said that they have suspended the constitution and they will be conducting things for the next six months or until there are elections. What we need here is a free, fair, transparent election. Take your time, reach out to the world, and you will have to work hard to have a good election even by September.

Consider that you have two different clocks going on in Egypt, what you need, and what you want. Do not be impatient, be vigilant; find a happy balance. You will want to hold people accountable, but be careful, you have some of those people in charge of your country now. Do not create undue friction, there will be time for accountability as things stabilize. Get control of your government first. Then you will be able to bring those responsible to account for their incorrect actions, in safety and order for the Egyptian people.

Egyptians, consider that very few revolutions end as happy as they begin. The hard work as I've said before last Friday, begins now. What, are you going to do? And when are you going to start doing it? Be prepared to block the Army from taking power, from delaying tactics, from losing their way through well intentioned putting off action due to ignorance of what to do.

The world stands waiting to help you.