Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Dangerous weapons, guns, guns, guns....kids and marriage

The Small Arms Survey (this link did not work) recently showed Guns per Captia world wide. It stated that America has, well, a lot of guns. The Small Arms Survey was published by the UN. Those were just a few of the insights found in the tenth annual Small Arms Survey 2010: Gangs, Groups, and Guns, which was launched today at Headquarters in New York during a press conference organized by the Permanent Mission of Switzerland to the United Nations.  The 343-page report was put together by the Geneva-based Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies:
  • America is #1 in the world with 90 guns per 100 citizens
  • The #2 slot is held by Yemen, with 61 guns per citizen.
  • The United States owns 30% of all known guns in the world and buys 50% of all new guns made in the world.
  • Consider that the US has 5% of the world's people.
That, is a lot of guns.

I have always wondered why, you can't get a driving license without study, practice and testing. But you can buy a gun to allow the easy demise of multiple people in quick succession, with little, or sometimes, no education whatsoever.

Why? Because of a constitutional element? This goes along the lines of any idiot can get married or have kids, but to end a marriage or properly or successfully raise a child, is quite difficult.

Doesn't it seem sometimes that things are a bit backward?

I would like to see people have to apply for a gun, for marriage, for childbearing. I would like to see them unable to own a gun, marry someone, or have a child, until, they know, understand, feel comfortable with, having or being responsible for, any one of those. Responsibility first. What makes you think anyone who purchases a gun can be responsible for it and its effects.

I would say perhaps we should find a way to disable the capability for childbearing, until a certain age, until a mature understanding of what it entails, prior to enabling it and allowing anyone to have kids. I think granting that right, should be liberal and fairly openly available, but unavailable until a person reaches a certain age, a certain degree of competence in life and in child rearing.

I think divorce should be easy. I think marriage, as it is in reality, should be hard, to acquire. People should only get married when they are ready and it has a reasonable chance of success. We have too many people who are having children, while they are still children. We have adults who have no right to have a child, having children and then raising really dysfunctional kids who grow up into adults and add to the national deficit and human suffering. We have people marrying into a physically violent coupling with someone they should never have been with. We have people marrying when, with a little bit of education, they could have a successful or much more successful, marriage.

Our priorities are all screwed up. Some of that is the fault of organized religions, as well as unorganized religions, for that matter. Perhaps, its time to stop, look around, and reset our understanding of how the world should work?

The venerable Shandy

Years ago, my wife (ex now, sadly; or, happily) came home with a mix from one of her horse shows she worked on as professional rider, trainer and instructor. It was a Shandy I was told. Being a beer/ale purist for the most part, I was horrified at what she told me. But she pointed out that I would drink Hefeweizen with lemon or Coronas with lime, so...she had to try it. So I did. Now, first of all, first time someone tried to give me beer with fruit, I was stunned and wasn't interested, until they pushed it and insisted; I tried it, and it was indeed, pretty cool. So my ex put part of a can of frozen pink lemonade into a pitcher and added a bunch of lager (we had Miller Genuine Draft (MGD) which I could take, but not any other Miller beer but that was a long time ago), but any lager will typically do. You have to blend to taste. We took it outside to the back yard on a hot day and sat and poured. It was strange at first but it grew on me by the time I finished my first glass. We drank that not very big Tupperware picture of the drink. We went through another and began to smile more broadly and had a fun time. It was very refreshing on such a balmy day. Years later, we had moved to where I live now still. My kids made new friends and my daughter made one friend of a family where the father was a doctor and an Irishman. One day when we were over at their house, I mentioned the shandy and he smiled. His take on it however was different. He said in Ireland they used 7-Up (or Sprite) mixed with Lager. I screwed up my face and he said, maybe it was an acquired taste but they liked it. We also talked about Guinness and how they were making cold Guinness which I figured was for the rather base American drinker who likes so much, watered down beers that HAVE to be chilled so the flavor is hidden as much as possible. Whereas beer served room temperature, has much flavor and so you don't WANT to chill it. My favorite temperature of Guinness is when you take your first sip and its room temperature, but there is almost a hint of coolness deep within the sip. Perfect! Getting back to the Shandy.... I have now been drinking it since about the mid 90s. Its a refreshing drink, gives you a little buzz (or big one if you're not careful or too long in the sun, or don't drink enough water on the side, remember, alcohol dehydrates you), and is generally fun and low alcohol content if done right, for those who like to imbibe but only slightly. So, give it a try, you might like it too. S handy on Wikipedia The Shandy, as known around the world: * Australia: o Portagaff is made with a 1:2 or 1:1 mixture of lemonade and stout. Particularly popular in South Australia. Sometimes called a Black Shandy. o Shandy is made with 1:2 or 1:1 mixture of lemonade and either light or heavy beer, most commonly lagers. * Austria: An Almradler is made with a 60/40 mix of popular Austrian Almdudler soda (a traditional Alpine herb drink that tastes a bit like a ginger ale) and pils or lager beer. A 50/50 blend is marketed by Puntigamer in bottles and cans. It is also popular in Bavarian Germany. * Bahamas: Local dialect pronounces Shandy as "Shanti" or "Shanty" (as in shanty town, where the ragamuffins live). * Belgium o Flanders: Kivela (Finnish > “land of stone”) A mixture of German lemonade and lager. Spavola (Italian > "bubbling water") a mixture of sparkling mineral water and lager. Mazout is a mixture of cola and lager. o Wallonia: Diabolo (“devil”), a lager mixed with mint or grenadine. o Brussels: Tango, dark beer with grenadine. * Canada: Black Shandy, a mixture of stout beer with lemon soda. Also described as a Guinness Shandy. (See also Australia: Portagaff). * Chile: Fan-schop, a mixture of draught beer with Fanta orange soda. * Colombia: Refajo, a mixture of lager beer with red cola-style soda like Kola Román or Colombiana. * France: A Monaco is a Panaché with Grenadine added. * Netherlands: A Snowwhite (sneeuwwitje) is a mixture of beer and 7 Up. * Japan: Shandygaff, a mixture of beer and cola.[citation needed] * Peru: Quara [1], a mixture of barley and fruits, made by SAB Miller Brewery in Lima. Particularly popular with girls. * Portugal: Called indiscriminately either a Panache or a Shandy, it is a drink popularized by the European tourists who brought the drink here. It is made with draft beer mixed with carbonated lemonade or a lemon-flavoured soft drink (often 7 Up or Sprite). * Switzerland: Called either a Panaché [Swiss French] or Panasch [Swiss German]. In the canton of Valais, the Swiss-French call it "Bière-lime". * Spain: o Called a Clara or Clara con limón if it’s made with sweet carbonated lemon soda (Clara Spanish > “Clear Lemonade”). o When made with carbonated soda-water, whether it is lemon-flavored or not, it is called Clara limón gaseosa ("Lemon Soda"). o In some other parts of Spain, a mixture of beer and sweet lemon-lime soda is called a Champú ("shampoo"). o It is called a Pica / Pika ("Sting" or "Bite") in the Basque Country. o It is called a Lejía ("chlorine bleach") in parts of Guipuscoa. * UK: In the southern part of the UK, a "Fantandi" is a 3:7 mix of orange soda (such as Fanta) and lager. * USA: o In the midwestern USA, a "Cincinnati" is a 1:2 mixture of lemon-lime soda (i.e., Sprite or 7 Up) and beer. o In Texas, a lager mixed with lime juice is called a Gringo Honeymoon.

Monday, January 17, 2011

Following the Rules and Zero Tolerance - The ZT Zombies

A Happy Martin Luther King Day to you all. In that vein....

Zero Tolerance. Following the Rules. Fear.

Reasonable Rule breakers. Intelligence. Bravery.

Diametrically opposed concepts.

Sure, rules are there for a reason; because some people are too damn stupid, or too ignorant, to be able to make a conscious, intelligent decision. But also because, in the paradigm of hierarchy, the intelligent are too challenging to the oligarchy. Those in charge want things to run smoothly, but also, they don't want to waste time, or have to do more work than necessary, or to have to think, to administer appropriately or with divergence.

Fear governs much of this Zero Tolerance nonsense. The powers to be are too afraid of one saying they were treated differently than another, when in reality, they should, many times, be treated differently. I have seen far more laziness in business on this topic, than I have reasons indicating those in power are most concerned about productivity; mostly, they are afraid of being challenged, being shown to be ineffectual, inefficient, incompetent.

I have been a supervisor in the Military, in business, in search and rescue. I have built highly loyal and effective teams. I had shown to get more from employees than fellow supervisors, much to their chagrin. And much to my embarrassment, when employees wanted only to work for me and not others; vying for a position under me. I was embarrassed; not only for the complement, but also at the average-ness, or incompetence of other to manage people who have feelings and minds. What I have noticed over the years is you have to be a kind of therapist, a manager, an organizer, a motivational speaker. If you think you can simply manage resources to be a good manager, you are a fool, or at very least, you are fooling yourself.

In recent years, I have noticed that many things in our lives that are dysfunctional have to do with concepts such as Zero Tolerance (ZT). That is a perfect example of applying a theory that is perfectly functional in one realm of thought, to another, where is rapidly becomes completely ineffectual and damaging. People drawn to things such as ZT and full adherence to following the rules become ZT Zombies.

Don't become a ZT Zombie!

So why, do we continue to apply principles such as zero tolerance to so many areas of our lives? Partially, its because we have pushed ourselves to the point of having not enough time to exist as Humans. To have a need, to get things done quickly, as superficially functional as possible, then expect others to follow that dysfunctional path, and expect them to achieve what you have yet to notice hasn't really worked for you either. And so on, down below you, and them, and theirs.

In the end, it leaves us sitting around wondering: "Why, is the world falling apart all around us?"

A child bring a G.I. Joe toy guy to school. The toy is like an inch long, plastic, no moving parts. But that very young child is sent home for the day, or the week. Why? Zero Tolerance for weapons. But its not a weapon. Is it. It's a toy. Its not even a functional toy gun. Its a hunk of plastic.

Third time a guy is brought before the courts on breaking the law. This last time its for being caught with a Cannabis cigarette. Or, even a gram of Pot. Its their third infraction. They go to jail for a long time. But, they are not a violent criminal. But, they are not put in a prison with violent criminals. Perhaps, after trying to protect themselves, in the hopes of getting out of prison alive, or unviolated sexually, they become a violent leaning individual. Why?

Yes, cannabis is illegal, but think, should it be? That is controversial, though it shouldn't be. But what about a kid and a piece of plastic? Why can't we simply deal with things in a "small is beautiful way", rather than defer responsibility to say, I am only following orders?  Take the responsibility and deal with things appropriate, as each individual incident warrants. Tell others to think for themselves, correct them to train them, not punish them.

I have heard an argument for years from managers and supervisors, "If I let you do it, I have to let everyone do it." Well, not if you are a good manager. What they are really saying is, I don't want to be troubled, I don't have the time, I don't want to deal with it, I don't know how to deal with it." None of those are good excuses. If you treat one employee differently, you must have a reason, but it should be a reason that is able to be aired, open to all, and reasonable. If some one else is treated less preferred, they shouldn't be able to say anything against your decision, because it would be obvious they don't deserve it, or you need to be trusted in your decision, that it was correct.

Yes, its taking a chance. More of us need, to take chances in life, to do what is "right". Like the Buddha said, you should know what is right when you see it. Trouble is, too many of us haven't taken the time to think, what really IS right.

Following the Rules. Zero Tolerance. Sounds good doesn't it? Quick. Easy. Little thought. Just slam someone for doing what was designated as not to be done. No thought. Just action. Quick. Easy. Push button. Short attention span. Fast.

We don't have to consider the person, their situation. We just do. Head down, bully right ahead. Do not think too much, power through it. Don't think to open the door, just put your head down, slam right into that wall, that situation; don't worry about damaging the wall, or your head; just push through, get done, move on to the next crippled individual.

Zero Tolerance, and worrying too much about people's personal freedoms, bordering on thought police sometimes, is a dysfunctional paradigm of social management.

There was an example in a movie recently, during a war in Israel, of a guy that was an officer, a leader. He had to manage his people out of a dangerous situation, but he followed the rules. He didn't look around and think for himself, he just let those above him think and he followed their rules; rules that didn't fit the situation. But, they were the rules and since he was a "good" soldier, many would die and there in lay the drama of the tale. He was a perfect example of a bad leader. Sometimes you simply need to throw the book out and make new rules. Think. Consider each new change as a new situation and govern appropriately. Those types of individuals are our best leaders.

I've always taught my kids that sometimes in life, you have to break the rules to do what is right and then, you may very well be punished for it. So, if you can, avoid getting caught when doing what is right.

I cannot count the times in my life, in business, that I have "taken the reigns" at work, sometimes from others, and completely ignored the rules, gotten the job done, had the undying thanks of my superiors, because I had the foresight, the lack of care for what the rules were, to do what had to be done, be clever enough not to get caught, and make things work. I gained the respect of those around me, below me, next to me, above me, but not too far above me, because those up there in the lofty heights would have been forced to come down hard on me for getting the job done.

This, is not a paradigm for a brokerage house, necessarily, not where you are screwing over people who have entrusted you with their life savings, just so you can make the company money. You have to have a brain, work out all the details. Doing what is right, is complicated. You have to weigh the common good, the individual good, you have to know right from wrong; and so many today, are clueless about what that is.

And so the child gets sent home for having a toy. Instead of simply taking the toy away, explaining to them what is what, GIVING them the toy back at end of day, and dropping it. Instead of the cop on the street realizing that the guy that has the cannabis cigarette, really just needs to be ignored because, if that cop doesn't have better things to do, then he needs some proper training.

Does ZT ever have a time to be practiced? Possibly. Victim crimes. Bullies, rapists, murderers. But what does that really have to do with someone smoking a joint, drinking a beer in public, having a plastic toy, these victimless crimes have little to do with serious crimes.

For people who think that banning a child who brings a toy gun to school, ever one that actually shoots, to push the limits of this topic, have little to do with a kid that actually shoots the toy at someone; but even then, its a TOY. Should the child be dealt with? Absolutely. But appropriately and not as if it were a real gun, that only confuses the child and indicates that you, the authority in charge, are unreasonable, unintelligent, and hysterical in your behavior. Have you considered THAT? What message are you REALLY sending to kids who are told a toy, is real?

Rules, like the bible, need to be followed, as a guide. That's it. The Law, is the same thing. These are things that are there as a last ditch attempt at keeping order, but really, they do not need to be applied so many times, they just need to be thought about, used when necessary, but not applied 100% of the time.

You just need to think. Use your head. Make a decision. Don't worry so much, about applying rules so evenly. Sometimes, you need to come down hard on one person, soft or not at all, on another. We have become so fearful of getting caught, not being perfect, or fast, or Politically Correct, that we have become a part of the problem.

I know, part of the problem is that there are very many people in the world who do not have the brain power to push a pencil. But if we apply pressures to those around us, those people who should never be in positions of authority, will stop so many times, being the ones in power. Make it known, don't hide their failures or others will suffer. If we start trying to make people accountable for their bad decisions, at least in the areas of what the common thought is considered to be "good" in the ares of things such as Zero Tolerance and always following the rules, life will get better.

Break a rule or two. Ignore Zero Tolerance. When they, a community, votes on something as stupid as ZT, vote it down, scream, stamp your feet, point out how they are being ignorant at very least, stupid at worst. Tell them that being stupid is a choice to be ignorant. Tell them that people will suffer by way of ZT policies.

So, start coming down on those that apply Zero Tolerance, who always follow the rules. Push people to think. Push them to consider the whole picture. And NOT the WHOLE picture, because, sometimes? Sometimes, the whole entire picture is completely irrelevant. Consider what is appropriate. Force intelligence. Push people to be thoughtful. To make not the proper by the rules decision, but the Right decision, the Correct decision.

If we all started doing this, the entire world would start to be a better place.

13 points for Surviving a Horror Movie

I was just watching 2009s, "The Last House on the Left", a Wes Craven produced Horror film; It is a remake of the 1972 film of the same name,. It motivated me to write one of these, how to survive things. I thought it was pretty good, for being that kind of movie. Cinematography was excellent. It had some refreshing elements in the horror genre. Still, there were some natural and common mistakes committed by the normal and not so common characters.
And so we have my version of....

13 points for Surviving, should you find you are in a Horror Movie:

1) If you have had sex with someone, simply kill yourself, as it has to be better than whatever is about to happen to you before this is all over. However, if the someone you had sex with was the killer, hang in there, they make get their due in the end.

2) When you find you have a killer to deal with, grab a gun; if you don't own one, start now, but own it before you need it.

3) If someone shows up with a random bullet wound, or if one of your group turns up having been attacked, or you find them dead and its not from old age, or some similar natural cause, immediately grab (go get, find, beg, borrow, steal, or make...get it?) a gun; or get them to safety if they are still alive, whichever is more available or reasonable.

Always grab the gun first if possible, though sometimes getting them to safety is the most safe thing to do (typically because that is where the gun is), and it also gets you to safety. However, if getting them to safety means taking them where the assailant is, and it may even be a friend or a part of your group, you have to at least acknowledge and consider that possibility, and then act accordingly (typically to deduce who it is, and then kill them).

4) If you hit, stab, or shoot the killer, do NOT stop. Stabbing: do not leave the knife in them for them to use; pull it the Hell out and practice stabbing techniques for as long as there is movement; then continue on to the vital points until you are tired. Bludgeoning: beat them untill you are tired, if you can keep going and they are still alive, for God's sake, keep going. Shooting: if you shoot them once, typically it stuns them for a second, but only for a second; use that time to take better aim and take off the top of their head, preferably along with their eyes; because a murderer without eyes, is a somewhat distracted and well, blind, murderer.

5) Literally anything can be used as a weapon. Be inventive. Once you find, or create a weapon, do it again, carry as much (and as hidden but easily accessible) as possible. Remember, redundancy, is King.

6) Once you realize your situation, create a plan, once you have created a plan, created plan B, then plan C. If you have time, create a plan D.

7) Once you get the upper hand, do NOT get all righteous and religious. Screw that, go Medieval on their ass(es). Pretend you enjoy it. Remember that the phrase is, "neutralize the threat" (and once you think it IS neutralized, look around, its probably got elements to it you hadn't seen yet).

8) If there are multiple attackers, always attack the most powerful first. Remember, divide and conquer. When you do shoot the first time, don't hesitate for the theatrical effect, continue shooting, one bullet per person, then recycle and start again from the beginning.

9) When you have a gun, or a more powerful weapon than your attackers, do NOT allow them to neutralize it. If you shoot them once, do not allow them to throw a table or lamp or something at you, or to allow someone else to blindside you. Shoot first (repeatedly and accurately, see item #4 above) and ask questions later. Better still, don't ask questions at all, just get the Hell out of there. Remember, whenever you can finally get out of there, well, see item # 12 below.

10) Always remember this is THEIR hobby, THEIR entertainment; when you do get the advantage over them, take it with extreme prejudice; waste no time, do not hesitate, do not think. If you think, think these thoughts: "I am a killing machine, I live to kill my object, my object is my attacker, my attacker is not a person, it is an object, I live to kill my object. I am a killing MACHINE." But don't even think that, just kill them. If you come upon them dead, perhaps a friend of yours died while killing them, kill them again anyway, then run away (see item #12 below).

11) If you decide to capture your assailant, don't. If you DO capture your assailant, do it in such a way that you can kill them in the process. If you capture them and for some sick, stupid reason you decide to keep them for the authorities (screw the authorities, kill them), do not: tie them up in only one way; do not tie them up near anything they can use; be sure to watch them (always from a distance) and every second.

If you need to sleep, kill them, kill them several times even; then sleep the sleep of peace (and wonder, that you;'re still alive), in another room (another very secured room). If they try to talk to you, disable their ability to speak; to do so, kill them if necessary. Do not feed them, keeping them hungry only makes them weaker. Do not give them water, keeping them thirsty only makes them weaker and harder for them to talk (you really don't want to hear what they have to say anyway). Do not take them to the bathroom. Ever. If and when possible, do not give them air, either.

12) If you do somehow, even accidentally kill the evil one(s), as you go for help, remember, they probably had an assistant, or an entire family who may now be looking for you to seek their revenge and pleasures.

13) If you do survive all this, you may wake up in bed, realizing you were in a dream, and probably still are. And if so, you're not done yet. They, are still out there looking for you. Find them first.

In the end, kill them and live to see another day.

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Weekend Wise Words

A man who has not passed through the inferno of his passions has never overcome them.
- Carl Jung


Monday morning's Entertainment Blog:
"13 points for Surviving, should you find you are in a Horror Movie"

Friday, January 14, 2011

B-52 Stratofortress from a Survival Equipment Tech's POV

Back in the last half of the 1970s, I was a Survival Equipment Technician, a Parachute Rigger, and a Fabric /  Rubbergear Specialist. I packed emergency chutes, B-52 drag chutes (stored just behind and below the rear rudder tail section), any chutes that arrived on base temporarily and needed a repack, and Pararescue (PJs) chute repacks, which they jumped regularly. Emergency chutes are only used in emergencies and then examined, documented and disposed of. 

In flight

I also had to pack about three or four B-52 drag chutes per day, 48' split ribbon nylon, at 228 pounds each, the buckle alone that connects the chute to the plane was 25 pounds of metal surrounding by a rubber border. Here's some photos at another base packing the chute.

Jump packing into pack and metal container
I've seen it stated that it was 32' but the ones I packed were 48' and heavy as hell, after scooping up snow, then having to be emptied outside of my shop where they were dopped off in wet piles, drug in, hung, dried in the tower, then all fluffy and static, stretched, unknotted (usually using a rubber mallet), straightened out, folded, packed into the bag inside the metal packing container.

loading drag chute into stow/deploy compartment on B-52
You then had to jump up and down on repeatedly until the damn thing finally fit into the bag, sealed off and carried to the storage room for pickup. I finally got to where I could pick up two and carrying them inches off the floor, out of the packing room and into the pickup room.

I've blogged about this before, but I've found some better photos of what I'm talking about.

And its support aircraft, the Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker:

Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker
KC-135 cargo area


Loading KC-135 through cargo door
In the last half of the 70s, I had to spend way more time than I wanted on these two aircraft. B-52, mostly, in their cockpit, as that's where those windows were. KC-135, in the cockpit and a couple of windows on each side of the cargo bay. I don't remember if we had them in the refueler's bay but, probably.

Summer's were fine, but winters were freezing until the ground unit got things heated up.

I worked on BUFFs (Big Ugly Fat F*ckers) B-52s, both while it was downloaded (no ordinance on board) and uploaded with nukes, in the highly secured Alert Facility area. The Alert Facility always had the best video games and food on the base, pampering the Pilots who certainly deserved it and slept in trailers right next to their grounded aircraft, within yards of it in fact.


Looking from inside, bottom of the plane to the ground where you climb up into the aircraft. Ladder going up the "tube" (we called it the tube anyway), past the lower two ejection seat area to the cockpit area. Behind the cockpit of the B-52 is the tunnel, full of electronics all around. At the back is a kind of cave with two seats and below two more seats.

 Looking backward from the A/C's seat.at the "tube" going down.

I only dealt with the A/C and Co-Pilots seats.


Here you can see the red safety streamers, there were seven of them. You really wanted those to be checked and into place, other wise, you could potentially fire off the ejection seat. No fun, plus, if  I survived, they'd probably make me repack the chute that I probably repacked within 120 days anyway. They told us stories about a seat being fired off in the hanger, crushing the worker up there until the rocket ran out of fuel, then dropping back a long ways to the hard concrete floor. Yes, the guy was dead.

It's possible they told us this just to scare the hell out of us; if so, it worked, I always checked those streamers. I never forgot. There were also stories of ejections of workers who didn't check the streamers, accidentally fired off the seat, and was positioned incorrectly, thus removing body parts on the way out of the ejection portal.

I probably saw that cockpit in ways no Aircraft Commander, or Co-Pilot ever saw, or thought to see them. At times, I would be lying completely upside down in the ejection seats trying to work on the windows, on the thermal nuclear radiation flash barrier curtains, made out of a material that back in the 70s was $150 a square foot.


Here (above) you can actually see the flash barrier curtain in its stowed away position (shown: A/C seat, left side of aircraft from viewing forward position).


Here you can see, middle left, the little gray cone shape handle used to pull the curtain shut, coming up from the bottom of the dash, sometimes a real bear to work on with dysfunctional.

We had to secure all windows, allowing not even a speck of light to show through, accomplished by day, using sunlight, by night using a flood lamp on a long pole. Someone would stand outside and flash the windows, while we (being a two-man security HRP/PRP team) sat inside, sometimes the warm cockpit, looking for any specs of light after having completely light sealed all the windows.

If it showed a pinhole of light, we could "red ball" the plane, even taking it off full alert status; something no one wanted and always caused a lot of noise.

As well as working on the barrier curtains, we also packed parachutes.


Example of the chute packed and inserted into the seat of the Co-Pilot.

Shot of a deployed 48' ribbon drag chute
I believe this chute was also used on the Space Shuttle landings

That's all I had to say. I spent years working on these planes and greatly enjoyed it for the most part. The only part I found difficult was that I found it hard supporting an organization who's job it was, possibly, to melt entire cities if need be. I found in complaining to my boss one day, to feel better in realizing my job directly, was to save lives, not end them. I don't have any real issue in killing in war, if I'm dealing with those attacking me, but if it's indiscriminate, as in bombing, I do have issues.

What was so stupid about this, or ironic, was that I was originally assigned to a TAC base (Tactical Air Command) and would have been dealing with fighters, not bombers. I foolishly swapped with a guy and ended up with SAC. That caused a great deal of laughter among my new coworkers when I first arrived at my main base. Especially so, because I had been assigned to a base at the tip of Florida and ended up at Spokane, Washington, where the winters were, shall we say, a bit brisk, when on the flightline, during alerts, in the early AM morning hours, with a more than brisk wind blowing.

Sometimes you just have to look back and laugh. Of course, its easier to do from years down the road and in a warm room.

These excellent photos were from http://blog.flightstory.net/1510/cockpit-photos-inside-b-52-stratofortress/

Horror Cinema News

'28 MONTHS LATER’ TALK WITH DANNY BOYLE

Director Danny Boyle (127 Hours, 28 Days Later) conducted a web chat with his fans for Empire Magazine recently. If one sifted through some of the random questions people had for him (do you like banana muffins?), you'd find a few nuggets of info regarding the world he aggressively kick-started with 28 Days Later and its possible threequel, 28 Months Later.Boyle in recent months has said that he's got a lot of projects on his plate at the moment, including the 2012 Olympics, but he would consider directing a third film. 


What's the latest? Pretty much the same thing, however, he seems to be making some time to think about it:"There is a good idea for it, and once I've got Frankenstein open, I'll begin to think about it a bit more."In case you haven't heard, Boyle is directing a stage adaptation of Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" for London theater-goers.Someone had asked him if he feels responsible for the "death" of slow-moving zombies. He responded, "It's a dream come true! Finally, they're a real menace!" Let the slow versus fast zombies debate begin again...

JOE JOHNSTON ADMITS HIS ‘WOLFMAN’ REMAKE WAS GARBAGE

Director Joe Johnston is finally opening up about the atrocity of cinema known simply as The Wolfman., Johnston opens up a bit about the Wolfman disaster-piece. Details Below-

"CAPTAIN AMERICA was a lot of things. Every picture has its highs and lows, its dreads and excited anticipations. To fully understand the CAPTAIN AMERICA experience, I have to keep reminding myself that I had just come off another film I shot in the UK, THE WOLFMAN," Johnston tells Comic Book Movie. "The two experiences could not have been more different, in fact in many ways (certainly not all) they were polar opposites. I had three weeks of prep on WOLFMAN, a ridiculously inadequate amount of time to try to bring together the fractured and scattered pieces of the production. 


I had taken the job mostly because I had a cash flow problem, the only time in my career I’ve ever let finances enter into the decision process. Money is always the wrong reason for doing something that requires passionate devotion. The production was a leaky, rudderless ship in a perfect storm suffering from bad decisions, infighting, reluctance of the powers-that-be to take responsibility, and too many under-qualified cooks in the kitchen. The good news and bad news about directing is that when the picture works you’re showered with all the credit and when it doesn’t work you’re dumped on with all the blame. Both scenarios are undeserved. I take full responsibility for THE WOLFMAN not working because it goes with the territory."

from: Reggie Dwight for comment:
http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=17281&uid=50506169943