Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Hey, I have an idea, you should write it!

Ever have someone beg you to read their writing? When you are a professional writer, it happens even more frequently, trust me.

Mostly, I would shy away from someone desperate for you to read their work. Sounds funny, but it's from experience. Those people for me, have tended to be amateurs. And I've read too many things like that already and it usually ends up wasting my time.

For most of them, if you try to help them, they really aren't that interested in getting better, in doing the work or in learning. They really just want to hear you say that it was great and then they would have written the great story, novel or script without any real effort. I first remind them that writing is rewriting, for any writer.

Anyone can write, but to turn out something good takes editing yourself. It takes practice. It takes learning rules and other unrelated to writing things. Most the time, people simply lose interest at that point.

I really have no time for people like that. After you've gone through that enough times, you get tired of even having to say no.

Now, on the other hand, if some friend can prove to me they are serious, then they can quite easily get my time. But I don't want to spend the time, to waste my time, when in the end, they don't also want to spend the time, especially if they simply want me to edit it, to turn it into some masterpiece for them. I have my own works I spent decades learning how to write.

I've run into this many times:

"Hey, I have a great story idea for a book, a screenplay, whatever. You should write it."

Usually they are passionate about it, energetic; they mean well. They just don't see it from the other side.

Problem is, I have plenty of my own ideas to write and already not enough time to write them. I seldom need other ideas. still, I will usually listen and be polite if I have the time. A friend just the other day had a great idea. I offered to him that if he would just write it up I'd work on it with him, but he really wasn't interested.

So I could only say that when I find the time we can work on it together. If I do write the script for it, I'll give him story credit. But he has yet to give me that. Maybe I should give him "concept by" credit or something?

Writing a book or screenplay, takes an intense personal and emotional investment. It's much harder, for me, to take someone else's idea and turn it into something if I'm not invested deeply in it. You can do it, but honestly, if it's yours to the core, you can simply do it to a more deeply passionate level. And that's what makes it all worth it. Otherwise, I might as well go back to being a technical writer.

Just my two cents. :)

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Sirius / XM Satellite Radio

Do you have Satellite Radio yet? No? Really? Do you love commercials?

Having a piped in availability to the music and programs you want without commercials as with broadcast, has to be worth something. Not to mention, your transmission is coming not from across the land via an antenna land based and blocked by too many obstacles, but from the sky, directly overhead (or thereabouts).

Plenty of channels, even individual rock bands have their own channels in some cases, such as The Rolling Stones. Can you believe it?

The original argument against Sirius and XM Satellite radio (now merged) were tired and old arguments. It was the longest time for the approval of this merger by the US Government (18 months) and others have tried hard to kill the company ever since. But, Sirius/XM is still alive and kicking. All those efforts to kill the merger and the company had dropped it down to .19 a share. Today, it is at $2.20 a share (last week it made it up to $2.40 a share). And it keeps going strong.

I do think we need to support new technologies. The newest argument is that Internet Radio will kill Satellite. That's possible. But perhaps we have another add-on, or merger in the works. Hard telling. But they seem like a dynamic company that wants to keep going and acts like the little engine that can do.

Aside from all that, you get it free in new cars (a genius stroke on the part of the company years ago) and after you listen to it for a while with no commercials and with the content you want, it's hard to go back to commercially broadcast standard radio. Even Internet radio has its problems. If you've ever listened to it, you probably ran into that. The Internet is not quite there yet. Of course part of that problem is in the US we have some of the worst bandwidth available in the World. Just look at South Korea. I mean come on. South KOREA?

I think we have a pretty good situation. For those who can afford that monthly subscription fee of $12.95 for 120 channels on Sirius / XM radio. If you want to listen on your laptop or internet device, it's $2.95/mo. Not bad there.

So for now I think Sirius / XM is doing well and not going anywhere for the foreseeable future. My hope is they will morph into something we didn't see coming. Innovation is key in this world. They need to expand into... I don't know what. But keep an eye on them.

Monday, May 16, 2011

Reefer Tunes - Music about Cannabis, back when it wasn't such an issue

As I said Friday, Blogger was down for a couple of days, so I released my Thursday blog Friday and this was to have been Friday's blog. Well, here it is now. Enjoy:

Someone posted this song, previously unknown to me, today on facebook and it got me thinking, what great tunes are out there, banned or unknown, just because they related or referred to something unacceptable by the Zeitgeist of the times?

The first one, mentioned above, is one on YouTube, performed by Cab Calloway, one of my favorite musicians of the past.

Smoking Reefers - Cab Calloway
Reefer man - Cab Calloway

This one, from the Harlem Experiment, with Taj Majal, is just too funny and anti-Bush (Jr.) so I had to include it - Reefer Man

Another, this one by a group I never heard of , but it's incredibly good.

Weed Smoker's Dream - Harlem Hamfats. According to the poster, MoleDFigg: "Despite their name, the "Harlem" Hamfats were a Chicago band in the 1930's whose members came from various places; for example, the McCoy brothers hailed from Mississipi, Herb Morand, John Lindsay and Odell Rand were from New Orleans and Horace Malcolm and Freddy Flynn came from Chicago!!"

Sweet Marijuana Brown - (may be) Barney Bigard Sextet
The closing music used on the second segment of the community cable access television series, 'Time 4 Hemp', hosted by Casper Leitch. To find out more about the first television series to ever focus on the topic of marijuana, check out http://www.Time4Hemp.com where you can find over 80 free video and 100 free audio downloads. 
Time 4 Hemp © Casper Leitch - 1991


When I Get Low I Get High - Ella Fitzgerald with Chick Webb and His Orchestra. 

My brother mentioned this to me:


"You gotta keep one thing in mind about those old tunes by black folk, they almost always had  double meanings, first one be for white folk, the ordinary just what you hear, the second one would be the black man's code for slamming the man [government], or whitey, or what or who ever, and also lots about sex, a lot of it had sexual hidden references. Or as Shrek would say, "the blues is like an onion, with many layers."

"You ever heard Henry Thomas doing Bull Doze blues? they be Playing it now on the BB King Blues channel See if it sounds familiar: Bull Doze Blues by Henry Thomas

"This one might jog your brain if you didn't recognize Henry's tune revised version

"Gotta love that You tube for preserving this kinda stuff."
And that was what my older brother had to say about it all.



Yes, we have more obviously, contemporary artists, like Neil Diamond, a great artist, but not a great song
Pot Smoker's Song This is from his album "Velvet Gloves and Spit". I think this was an anti drug song. But like many, it was mixing up the good with the bad. 

Do I think coffee should be included with cigarettes and alcohol? No. Is it questionable? Yes, but as with most things, only in its misuse. Research has shown many positive qualities to coffee. And the same with Cannabis. The fact that both give the users a pleasant, euphoric boost, shouldn't have any bearing on the positive effects. Can you say that about cigarettes, heroin, cocaine? Yes, but the I would argue the downside of those drugs, that should be categorized as narcotics, were as Cannabis should not, is an important consideration.

Speaking of coffee, here is Black Coffee by Ella Fitzgerald. I honestly can't make up my mind after listening to a few versions of this song, if I like (other than Ella) Peggy Lee's version or Sinad O'Connor's. I didn't like Julie London's version, or some others I heard (KD Lang). But then, in an entirely different vein, there was Henry's Black Flag version; maybe they should have called that "VERY Black Coffee with shots of espresso".


Getting back to the original concept here, of course there are other more recent artists who have turned out a good tune or two and mentioning those everyone knows, is boring. 



Here is Red Wine and Reefer from poster ellisdrecords by BURNETTE DOWN & THE ASHES (Ellis Parrish, Travis Brawley, Joe Carroll, & Martin Penman filling in for Jarad Wilson) burn it down and leave the place in ashes! This one features EllisD on vocals! Originally "Champagne & Reefer", the champagne opposed lead singer changed the lyric to reflect his own taste in spirits. This wine drinking, joint smoker's anthem was recorded in December of 2006 at Fenian's Pub in Jackson, MS and was their second show EVER! Video footage recorded by John Bragg.

A Muddy Waters Cover by the Legendary Jones Gang - Champagne and Reefer

Stevie Ray Vaughan & Buddy Guy's Champagne & Reefer



And the original Champagne Reefer by Muddy Waters.

Well, I could go on and on, deeper into the blues at this point, but I think you get the drift.

Have a great day!

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Weekend Wise Words

Be Sharp! Be Brilliant!

A reporter was trying to set Gandhi up to acknowledge the "superiority" of Western ideas:
"What do you think about Western Civilization?"
Gandhi's response:
"Well, I think that would be a good idea!"

You know what? So do I.

"I sincerely believe... that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." - Thomas Jefferson, 1816

Considering what has been done to our Nation and Middle Class by the bankers, Government agencies and individuals of this upper economic and banking class, I'd have to agree. Those at the top have deconstructed far too many of the protections of the people in these last few decades than in the last hundred years of building them up.

Thursday, May 12, 2011

On being happy more times than not

Before this article gets started, Blogger.com has been down since yesterday morning so my blog for yesterday and today did not go out. Sorry about that, it was out of my control. But here is yesterday's blog now:

People always want to just be Happy.

But we weren't designed to be happy. We were designed to procreate. We are a bag of waters and chemical productions oriented toward making copies of ourselves to progress and stabilize the group.

We have lucked out in a few areas however, in that process. Love, fun, orgasm, pleasures indirectly derived through community, social endeavors, art, music, and the exploration of the senses and their juxtaposition. Lucky in deed.

Dr. John Gottman, University of Washington

An old acquaintance of mine, Dr. John Gottman, at the University of Washington in Seattle, discovered in his work in Martial Research that it takes five positive responses for every one negative response to make up the best formula for a happy relationship. So we really do have to try to be happy more than not, to give more positive vibes than negatives to people in close interpersonal relationships with us. And others, but it's a bit more important to be extra nice to your spouse, your kids, your girlfriend. And maybe that explains why so many have a girlfriend on the side (or a boyfriend).

If we were designed to be happy, wouldn't that be reversed? Or, wouldn't it be heavily weighted toward the happiness emotion? Why is it this way? Maybe it's so we'll try to diversify, over achieve, to never quite be fully happy.

It's something to think about. Don't you think?

If nothing else, I suppose....

Don't Worry. Be Happy!

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Saint Chef Gordon Ramsey

Why SAINT Gordon Ramsey? Two words: "Kitchen Nightmares".

Chef Gordon Ramsey
You may hate Gordon Ramsey because of his Chef like attitude, his Michelin star demeanor, his "Hell's Kitchen" show, or "The "f" Word", or many other shows. Mostly people seem to hate him from Hell's Kitchen.

I enjoy all his shows. I like the guy. I can't help myself. I read his biography. He had a tough life. He was a professional Footballer in Britain and quit because of an injury and found himself in a career with not a lot of respect from his mates. He worked his way up and is a dynamo of producing successful TV shows. I haven't watched all of his "f" Word shows but they were entertaining too.

The people that hang our with him are always surprised at how different he is from his public show persona and his interpersonal persona. I have been in the military and I've been around martial arts all my life, I'm used to big egos. But I've learned a great deal from people like this. Others have wandered off or away while I stuck it out and moved to the top of that area because I could stick it out and I always find something to learn from these people.

He has a lovely wife who is a rock and some beautiful kids. He seems to be a loving, if frequently absent, father. And that is all I have to say on that and his personality. You love him or you hate him, or you have no opinion if you think you are too cool to have an opinion on him.

But what I am actually thankful for is his "Kitchen Nightmares" series of shows. Why? Isn't it obvious? He's going around Britain and America, turning around really crummy, just about to fail, restaurants. Thank God, I've heard about people who own restaurants watching his show (and hopefully applying some of his words and idea). All the while that he's performing his shocked attitude and revamping of the establishments, he's educating the customers and educating the  Restauranteurs.

Which of these is more important to me, I am not sure but I would have to lean toward those who own restaurants. God knows what I've eaten over the years at various eateries, or what that "stomach flu" actually was after having eaten out somewhere. But now knowing what actually goes on in some restaurants, I find extremely valuable.

Some of the restaurants he has visited would have been well seated on the show, "Hoarders".

On the entertainment side, I've met through his shows, some fairly horrible personality types. If you think he is a tyrant, you've seen nothing until you see chefs and owners who have Napoleon complexes greater than their namesakes. People who should NEVER have been allowed to own a business that has anything to do with putting food into people's mouths.

I really don't have that much of a problem with someone who has a big ego, if they deserve it. I do have a problem with people who have inflated egos, and have absolutely no basis in their over estimation of themselves. I prefer not being around people with big egos, but at least you can learn from them and it can take you to another level altogether in climbing the ladder of ascension in your art or business.

There have been some unbelievable horror stories. So I assume some people don't want to know, because as you shovel food into your mouth at a questionable food establishment, you really don't want to know what kind of filth or bug ridden substance that last crunch was, in a usually never crunchy food.

So, I'm going to stick along with Gordon Ramsey. I find him entertaining and educational and I really think he's doing more good than harm. And he's always entertaining.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

David Barton and Wallbuilders

Have you ever heard of, or noticed yourself, that the History taught in schools has little to do with reality? Have any idea who David Barton is?
David Barton


No, it's true. I noticed it myself. My K-12 years taught me whatever was in the History books. Then later in life, through running into historical documents, or a variety of documentaries, people talking who were there, etc., proved some of those History lessons to be incorrect, fallible or out right lies.

I was stunned. But then I was stunned about a lot, having come out of the fantastical 50s and 60s.

Here's a few:

"Duck and Cover" - if a nuclear bomb goes off near you, after you see it, if you're in school get under your desk; if outside, stop, drop and cover; if you are on fire, roll. Okay, well that's wrong.

This is a Christian Nation. Actually, the Founding Fathers for the most part, were not religious and found it distasteful, wanting a separation of church and state. Why is it even mentioned then? Because that was the way of the world back then. If they had created the US now, I don't think they would even have brought it up.

Columbus Discovered the Earth is Round; and discovered America, and was a great and wonderful guy. Well, he bumped into the Caribbean to begin with. Vikings found North America before him, Mongolians made it over thousands of years before he did. In his later years, he killed a quarter of a million natives. Wikipedia: "Under the terms of the Capitulations of Santa Fe, after his first voyage Columbus was appointed Viceroy and Governor of the Indies, which in practice entailed primarily the administration of the colonies in the island of Hispaniola, whose capital was established in Santo Domingo. By the end of his third voyage, Columbus was physically and mentally exhausted: his body was wracked by arthritis and his eyes by ophthalmia. In October 1499, he sent two ships to Spain, asking the Court of Spain to appoint a royal commissioner to help him govern. By then, accusations of tyranny and incompetence on the part of Columbus had also reached the Court."

Well, I could go on but look it up yourself. History, has been as much fiction as reality. It's been a travesty for decades about History. The old adage that the winner writes the History, is true. Those in power, set what the reality once was. The best way to stay in power, is to change History. I'm not saying our modern Government is doing that, but it has been de rigueur throughout History.

That was partly what I loved about reading "A Distant Mirror, the Calamitous 14th Century" by Barbara W. Tuchman (1978). One of best and at that time, The Best History book I had ever read. Why? because she went back to the actual documents of the time, and found out what the truth was as best as she could find it to be. For instance, History had it that an army left Paris that was huge, 50,000 troops. But in looking over the actual documents of provisions, there was no way that could have been true because they didn't have enough to supply an army on the move. So the inflated story that was told over the years since then, that go into History books, which were then used as sources for later History books, lead to a fallacy being perpetuated for centuries.

Which brings us up to now.

WallBuilders is an organization dedicated to presenting America's forgotten history and heroes, with an emphasis on the moral, religious, and constitutional foundation on which America was built – a foundation which, in recent years, has been seriously attacked and undermined. In accord with what was so accurately stated by George Washington, we believe that "the propitious [favorable] smiles of heaven can never be expected on a nation which disregards the eternal rules of order and right which heaven itself has ordained."

WallBuilders' founder and president, David Barton, resides in Aledo, Texas (just west of Fort Worth), with his wife, Cheryl, and their three children. David spent eight years as an educator and school administrator before founding WallBuilders. He has received numerous awards including several Who's Who honors, two Angel Awards for excellence in media, and the George Washington Honor Medal. He has spoken to numerous state legislatures, consulted with both state and federal legislators on various bills, and has written amicus briefs in cases at the U. S. Supreme Court.

This, is an incredible group doing an important thing. Setting History right, based upon hard core documentation and not just sourcing previous books that source previous books that source generally accepted and agreed upon, questionable History.

We need more of this kind of thing. Well, there is one downside, actually.

This is a pro Christian group. Or so it would seem. Using Historical accounts to be pro Religion, without putting it in proper and ancient context, can give a view that could indicate how things should be now, when in reality, as I had said above, were George Washington to be alive today, carrying on the kinds of things he had to do back then, I'm not so sure he would be talking about religion as he did back then. Was that an option open to him considering the climate of the times? Well, not really.

So the sad side of this kind of thing is that to simply expound what was, to now, can give a false impression. But you know what? It's better to have a slightly biased reporting of History, rather than a completely false reporting. So, fundamentally, I do applaud the WallBuilder's efforts and can only hope that more scientific groups will spring up to carry on the effort.

The problem I see is this. People read the Bible. Then they go around telling people what it means, what they think it means, how we should act according to what it says, and then we have what we have now. If however, you were to read the Bible (or the Quaran, or whatever ancient texts) and to study the times and meanings of words and lifestyles, and then talk to people about it all, you would have a very different interpretation of what you have read.

On top of that, to take those ancient's comments and to bring them up to modern understandings of reality, scientific and spiritually, you will come to understand life in a much different way. It's not that ancient religious or spiritual writings and teachings are useless, but they are far more useful if we understand them for what they are, and what was originally meant or intended. Much of what is not done now.

So, we should do the best we can. But we should make sure that we realize, we don't know it all.