Undocumented Workers Are Funding Your Retirement—And Getting Screwed

 Watch “I wasn’t aware of that” on YouTube: 

​Against all MaGA/Trumpian toxic conservative disinformation, in 2022, undocumented immigrants contributed $96.7 billion into Social Security & Medicare, and they'll receive nothing. Really, just kinda screwing ourselves there. 

Same as we've done with migrant farmworkers?

Exactly—history repeating itself. Just like with farmworkers in the recent past, there’s a push to get undocumented workers out, only to realize too late that they were essential all along. The same thing would happen if they were removed from industries like construction, food service, and elder care. 

It's like shooting yourself in the foot and then wondering why you can’t walk.

​In 2022, undocumented immigrants contributed significantly to U.S. social programs:​

• Social Security: $25.7 billion​ 

• Medicare: $6.4 billion​

These contributions are part of the approximately $96.7 billion in total taxes paid by undocumented immigrants that year.

Despite these substantial payments, undocumented immigrants are generally ineligible to receive benefits from these programs. ​

These figures underscore the significant role undocumented immigrants play in supporting U.S. social insurance programs.

Yeah, it's a pretty ironic situation—undocumented workers pump billions into programs they can’t even benefit from, essentially subsidizing Social Security and Medicare for everyone else. If anything, the system relies on their contributions, but they’re demonized instead of acknowledged for it.

Is there a counter to that, because one assumes rationally speaking, there just isn't a reasonable counter to that

It’s really hard to argue against the fact that undocumented immigrants contribute billions to Social Security and Medicare without getting benefits in return. But the usual counterarguments tend to be emotional, ideological, or based on broader concerns rather than directly addressing this specific point. Here are the most common ones:

1. "They still use public services."

   • Some argue that undocumented immigrants use emergency healthcare, public schools, and infrastructure without paying their "fair share." However, studies show they pay into taxes at local, state, and federal levels while receiving fewer benefits than citizens.

2. "They drive down wages."

   • Critics claim undocumented workers undercut wages by accepting lower pay, making it harder for legal residents to compete. However, economists are divided on this, with some finding minimal impact on wages and others noting that undocumented labor fills jobs that many Americans avoid.

3. "They're here illegally—tax contributions don't justify breaking the law."

   • This is more of a moral/legal argument than an economic one. The idea is that even if they contribute, it doesn’t excuse their undocumented status. But this ignores the reality that many industries (agriculture, construction, hospitality) depend on undocumented labor.

4. "They send money abroad instead of reinvesting in the U.S."

   • Some critics point out that undocumented workers send remittances to their home countries, which doesn't help the U.S. economy. But this ignores the fact that they still spend money on rent, food, transportation, and taxes—stimulating local economies.

5. "They take jobs from Americans."

   • This claim assumes a zero-sum job market, which isn't how economies work. In many cases, undocumented workers take low-wage, physically demanding jobs that have persistent labor shortages, rather than positions most Americans are competing for.

The reality is that undocumented immigrants contribute significantly to the economy, and removing them would likely create serious financial strain on Social Security, Medicare, and multiple industries. The counterarguments tend to focus on legal or emotional perspectives rather than the hard numbers.

So, there it is. What is our mistake then in all this? Listening to Donald Trump, apparently. Electing him as POTUS45, realizing he's an autocrat destructive to America and democracy, and then, re-electing him to continue his damage to our country, now that he's more astute at our destruction.

When WILL we ever learn? Probably when we realize just how important education is and holding people in power to account.

Yeah, better be soon. Real soon...

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Manufacturing Nostalgia: Why Trump's Industrial Revival Is an Economic Illusion

 How do we explain Trump’s push to make America a manufacturing country again when we long planned to be a service economy—and automation is set to take most manufacturing jobs anyway?

Donald Trump Patron Saint of Economic Collapse

Trump’s push to "make America a manufacturing powerhouse again" is based on nostalgia for an era that no longer exists rather than economic reality. Here’s why:

1. The U.S. Shifted to a Service Economy for a Reason

   • Since the late 20th century, the U.S. intentionally transitioned to a service-based economy (finance, tech, healthcare, entertainment) because manufacturing labor is cheaper overseas and services generate more wealth in a developed nation.
   • Manufacturing jobs peaked in the 1970s and have steadily declined, not just because of outsourcing, but also because of automation and efficiency improvements.

2. Manufacturing Jobs Aren't Coming Back in Large Numbers

   • Even when Trump imposed tariffs to bring back U.S. manufacturing, companies didn’t massively rehire workers—instead, they invested in automation to keep costs low.
   • The industries that did return (like steel) saw only short-term gains, and many of those jobs disappeared again due to trade wars and global competition.

3. Robots and AI Are the Future of Manufacturing

   • Even if factories return, they won’t create millions of blue-collar jobs—they’ll use automation, AI, and robotics to cut labor costs.
   • Example: Modern car plants use a fraction of the workers they did decades ago, with robots doing much of the assembly work.

4. The Real Economic Future Is in Innovation, Not Nostalgia

   • The strongest job growth today is in AI, software development, healthcare, and renewable energy, not traditional factory work.
   • If the goal is long-term economic strength, focusing on education, R&D, and advanced technology makes more sense than trying to recreate a 1950s-style industrial economy.

Trump's "manufacturing revival" is mostly a political slogan that appeals to nostalgia but ignores economic reality. The real battle isn’t bringing back old factory jobs—it’s preparing for a future where automation and AI dominate.

Even if President Trump achieves favorable outcomes in his trade disputes, the broader consequences may include increased consumer prices, economic growth challenges, and strained international relations.

While intended to protect domestic industries, tariffs often lead to higher costs for imported goods, which can be passed on to consumers. This results in increased prices for everyday items, affecting household budgets.

PBS

Furthermore, trade tensions can disrupt global supply chains, leading to reduced efficiency and higher production costs for businesses. This economic uncertainty may dampen investment and slow overall economic growth.

Reuters

The imposition of tariffs has also led to retaliatory measures from trading partners, affecting U.S. exports and potentially resulting in job losses in export-dependent industries. Studies have estimated significant job losses due to these trade policies.

Brookings Institution

Even if specific trade disputes are resolved favorably, the broader implications of such protectionist policies may include economic challenges, higher consumer prices, and strained international relationships.

FYI, there have been multiple reports of attacks on Tesla dealerships and vehicles in recent months. These incidents appear to be part of a broader protest movement against Tesla's CEO, Elon Musk, particularly in response to his political affiliations and actions within the Trump administration.

America should be moving toward a future-focused economy that prioritizes innovation, adaptability, and workforce development rather than clinging to outdated industrial models. Here’s the ideal direction:

1. Embrace Automation & AI—But Prepare the Workforce

• Instead of resisting automation, we should invest in AI and robotics while ensuring workers are trained for high-tech jobs in maintenance, programming, and oversight.
• Expand vocational training, apprenticeships, and STEM education to help workers transition from traditional manufacturing to advanced tech fields.

2. Strengthen the Service & Knowledge Economy

• The biggest drivers of economic growth are healthcare, software, AI, finance, biotech, and renewable energy—sectors that require skilled labor and continuous innovation.
• Investing in education, R&D, and digital infrastructure will keep America competitive.

3. Reshore Critical Industries, But Smartly

• Instead of forcing mass manufacturing back, focus on reshoring key industries (like semiconductors, green energy, and medical supplies) using automation and high-skilled labor to remain cost-effective.
• Partner with allies and trading partners to ensure supply chain security without unnecessary trade wars.

4. Prioritize Green Energy & Sustainability

• The future economy will be shaped by renewable energy, battery technology, and climate adaptation industries—not coal and oil.
• Investing in solar, wind, and electric vehicles creates sustainable, high-paying jobs and reduces dependence on foreign energy sources.

5. Support Small Businesses & Entrepreneurship

• Rather than just propping up mega-corporations, policies should make it easier for startups and small businesses to thrive through better access to funding, reduced red tape, and fairer tax policies.
• Encourage innovation by incentivizing research, patents, and new tech development.

6. Improve Infrastructure & Digital Connectivity

• A modern economy needs modern infrastructure—high-speed internet, updated transportation systems, and smart cities.
• Expanding broadband to rural areas ensures that economic growth isn’t limited to major metropolitan hubs.

The Bottom Line

America shouldn’t try to recreate a 1950s-style economy but instead prepare for a tech-driven, globally connected future. The focus should be on innovation, adaptability, and workforce development—not outdated nostalgia.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT