Once upon a time, surveillance was something Americans associated with spies and foreign powers. We imagined satellites hovering over distant lands, listening to coded messages in languages we didn’t speak. Today, that lens is turned inward. The same digital tools once designed to track “threats” abroad are now quietly aimed at us — American citizens.
What began as immigration enforcement has grown into something far broader, something that crosses constitutional lines not with a bang, but with a quiet API connection.
The ICE Playbook: From Detention to Data
ICE’s “Alternatives to Detention” program sounds harmless enough, almost compassionate. But beneath the language of reform is a digital cage — phone apps that record location and behavior, biometric scans, facial recognition, and massive databases connected across federal and state systems.
At first glance, these programs target only non-citizens. Yet ICE’s reach now extends into systems that hold everyone’s data: DMV records, Social Security, tax databases, and even voter rolls. When agencies merge these datasets, the line between citizen and non-citizen begins to blur.
That is how hundreds of U.S. citizens have already been detained or interrogated — not because of who they are, but because of what an algorithm or database thought they were.
Enter DOGE: The Department of Government Efficiency
It sounds almost comic, but the newly formed “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) has reportedly been building what it calls a “master database” with DHS — a centralized vault meant to merge information from multiple agencies. On paper, the goal is national “efficiency.” In practice, it could become one of the most powerful surveillance engines ever created on American soil.
A system that integrates immigration files with Social Security, tax, and biometric data doesn’t just affect migrants. It pulls in citizens by default. Anyone who pays taxes, receives Social Security, votes, or interacts with the federal government in any way becomes part of the dataset. Once your information is in the machine, there is no easy way out.
Mistaken Citizens and Vanishing Rights
There have already been at least 170 known cases of U.S. citizens detained by ICE. Some were held for days. One Florida man was handcuffed because an agent decided his Real ID “looked fake.” That number represents only the mistakes we know about — and if we know anything about bureaucracy, those numbers rarely shrink over time.
When the government misidentifies a citizen, it’s not just an administrative hiccup. It’s a failure of sovereignty. It’s the moment when citizenship itself ceases to be a guarantee of freedom. In a society that prizes due process, this kind of error should terrify us all.
The Data Hunger of a Government Without Restraint
The danger is not ICE alone. It’s the precedent being set — that agencies can quietly expand their surveillance nets in the name of “security” or “efficiency,” using tools designed for one purpose to achieve another.
Technology is seductive that way. It promises order. But without strict oversight, it becomes power unmoored from accountability. When the government begins to monitor its own citizens through the same mechanisms used to track non-citizens, the Republic itself begins to wobble.
History shows us that surveillance programs never shrink on their own. They metastasize, justified by new emergencies and newer fears. The next administration rarely dismantles what the last one built. It simply renames it, refines it, and aims it elsewhere.
Why This Matters Now
I care about immigrants. I care about privacy. But as a citizen, I care even more about what this means for us. Once citizens are inside the same data systems as those being targeted, all that remains is a change in policy to turn a tool of “enforcement” into a tool of control.
The question isn’t whether the government should have the technology. It already does. The question is whether it should have the right to use it without consent, without oversight, and without consequence.
A Quiet Warning
When efficiency replaces ethics, when databases replace due process, the Constitution becomes a checkbox in a software update.
The next time a federal agency says it is “only” collecting data on non-citizens, remember this: your information is already part of that same ecosystem. All it takes is one wrong click, one misfiled document, or one hasty policy shift — and you, too, can find yourself on the wrong side of the screen.
Cheers! Slรกinte! Na zdravie!
Compiled with aid of ChatGPT
