I do this every once in a while to familiarize some who are still unfamiliar with using AI.
I was chatting with ChatGPT about how Trump thinks. I'm pasting that here in its raw form of the entire conversation without editing for several reasons. It shows to those who don't use AI, how it can go, and the content shows commentary about Trump. It also shows my process in using an AI to question it. Which can be daunting to those unused to it.
Many will ask a question, get the wrong or not appropriate enough answer for what they are thinking or trying to ask, so you have to tune your questions to get the answers you're seeking. I do NOT mean, to make it answer incorrectly to satiate your beliefs, but to drill down to the point you're seeking actual and factual information about.
I have actually asked a question, and been unable to receive a good response, so I've taken my question and asked it how can I state that question, to get my point across properly until it gives me the right question to ask it.
Here we go...
ChatGPT said:
Your statement is already quite clear and conveys your point well, but if you want to refine it for greater accuracy or clarity, you might consider:
"Donald Trump isn't necessarily stupid, but he's shallow in his understanding. He tends to grasp issues at one or two levels, whereas reality operates on eight to ten. He's playing checkers while reality plays Go."
This version maintains your meaning while improving readability and flow. If you want to soften or add nuance, you could say:
"It's not that Donald Trump is unintelligent, but his understanding tends to be superficial. He engages with issues on a couple of levels, whereas reality operates on many more. It's like he's playing checkers while reality plays Go."
Would you like it sharper or more analytical?
I asked:
ChatGPT said:
Donald Trump's cognitive style has been a subject of extensive analysis by psychologists and political observers. Several key characteristics distinguish his thinking from that of many others:
Narcissistic Traits: Mental health professionals have observed that Trump's behavior aligns with characteristics of narcissistic personality disorder, such as grandiosity, a need for admiration, and a lack of empathy.
Dominant and Controlling Behavior: Analyses indicate that Trump exhibits dominant and controlling personality patterns, bordering on aggressive tendencies.
Extroversion and Restlessness: Trump is described as highly extroverted, driven, and restless, often engaging in constant interaction through rallies, interviews, and social media.
Transactional Thinking: His approach to relationships and policy decisions is often transactional, focusing on immediate benefits rather than long-term alliances or strategies.
Simplified Communication Style: Trump's communication is characterized by simplicity and repetition, which some experts suggest could indicate cognitive decline.
These traits collectively contribute to a cognitive style that differs from conventional political figures, emphasizing personal dominance, immediate gains, and straightforward communication.
ChatGPT said:
Trump’s cognitive style is highly functional for certain aspects of being POTUS but problematic for others.
Where It Works Well:
✅ Messaging & Branding: His simple, repetitive communication style helps him connect with a broad audience, especially those who respond to strong, clear messages.
✅ Dominance & Disruption: His aggressive, transactional approach makes him effective at dominating political opponents and reshaping norms.
✅ Media Manipulation: His instinct for commanding media attention keeps him at the center of public discourse, drowning out opposition.
✅ Short-Term Negotiations: His deal-making mentality can sometimes yield quick political wins, particularly in one-on-one negotiations.
Where It Fails as POTUS:
❌ Complex Decision-Making: His tendency to think in simple, binary terms (winners/losers, loyal/disloyal) limits his ability to navigate nuanced policy issues.
❌ Long-Term Strategy: His transactional approach often sacrifices long-term stability for immediate gains, damaging alliances and institutions.
❌ Crisis Management: His need for dominance and control can make him resistant to expert advice, which is crucial in high-stakes crises (e.g., COVID-19 response).
❌ Governing Institutions: His focus on personal loyalty over institutional norms weakens governmental structures, leading to dysfunction.
Final Take:
His thinking style is highly functional for gaining and maintaining power but is less effective for governing a complex nation. It works well in a campaign setting but creates instability in actual governance due to its short-term focus, resistance to expertise, and prioritization of personal image over systemic success.
I asked:
ChatGPT said:
A good word that conveys dysfunction in a way similar to dissonance is "discordance."
- Discordance suggests a lack of harmony or coherence, often implying dysfunction in relationships, ideas, or systems.
- If you want something stronger, "dysregulation" conveys a failure to function properly, especially in decision-making or governance.
- "Incoherence" works if you mean something that lacks logical consistency.
- "Maladaptive" describes thinking or behavior that is counterproductive or poorly suited to a situation.
Would you like something even sharper or more nuanced?
I asked:
ChatGPT said:
The number of levels at which reality functions depends on how you define "levels," but in broad terms, reality can be understood as operating on multiple layers, from the simplest to the most complex. Here are some ways to break it down:
1. Physical and Natural Levels
- Quantum Level – The subatomic world of particles, waves, and probability.
- Atomic Level – How atoms interact to form elements and compounds.
- Molecular Level – The chemistry that governs materials, biology, and reactions.
- Biological Level – The functioning of cells, organisms, and ecosystems.
- Ecological Level – How life interacts with the environment, from food chains to climate systems.
- Cosmological Level – The vast structure of the universe, from planets to galaxies to dark matter.
2. Cognitive and Human Levels
- Neurological Level – How the brain processes information, emotions, and consciousness.
- Psychological Level – Individual thoughts, biases, and behaviors.
- Sociological Level – How people interact in groups, societies, and cultures.
- Political and Economic Level – The structures that govern nations, economies, and global power.
3. Abstract and Philosophical Levels
- Logical and Rational Level – How arguments, science, and reasoning function.
- Moral and Ethical Level – Principles guiding right and wrong, justice, and fairness.
- Metaphysical Level – Theories about existence, reality beyond physical observation.
So How Many Levels?
Depending on how detailed you want to be, you could say reality operates at:
- A few basic levels (physical, cognitive, social, philosophical).
- 8–10 levels (as in a structured breakdown like the one above).
- An infinite number, since each level contains deeper sublevels.
So if you’re saying someone like Trump functions on only 1–2 levels, you’re implying he lacks depth beyond the immediate and transactional (perhaps only engaging at a psychological and political level while ignoring deeper scientific, sociological, or ethical dimensions).
I asked:
ChatGPT said:
Go is vastly more complex than checkers in terms of strategy and possible game states. Here’s a breakdown of their relative complexity in "levels":
1. Board Size & Possible Moves
- Checkers: 8×8 board (64 squares), each player starts with 12 pieces, limited move options.
- Go: 19×19 board (361 intersections), players can place stones almost anywhere, leading to vastly more possibilities.
2. Complexity in Terms of Possible Game States
- Checkers: ~ possible game states.
- Go: ~ possible game states (more than the number of atoms in the observable universe).
3. Levels of Strategic Thinking
Checkers:
- Basic tactics (forced captures, piece advantage).
- Intermediate strategies (controlling the center, kinging).
- Advanced play (setting traps, positioning).
(3–5 strategic layers at most).
Go:
- Local tactics (life and death, capturing stones).
- Positional judgment (influence, territory control).
- Global strategy (balancing multiple areas of the board).
- Psychological play (forcing moves, misleading opponents).
- Endgame precision (squeezing out the last points of advantage).
(8–10+ strategic layers, with almost infinite variations and meta-strategies).
Final Comparison
If you equate complexity with "levels of reality," then:
- Checkers functions at around 3–5 levels.
- Go functions at 8–10+ levels, making it far deeper in terms of decision-making, long-term planning, and emergent complexity.
So when you say, "Trump is playing checkers while reality is playing Go," you’re essentially saying he operates in a simple, short-term, low-dimensional way, while reality demands multi-layered, high-dimensional thinking.
I asked:
Trump's trade war will lead us to a what?
ChatGPT said:
President Trump's recent escalation of trade tariffs against major partners such as China, Canada, and Mexico is poised to have significant repercussions on the U.S. economy.
Immediate Economic Impacts:
Increased Consumer Prices: The implementation of 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico, along with heightened levies on Chinese goods, is expected to raise production costs for U.S. businesses. This surge in costs is likely to be transferred to consumers, resulting in higher prices for various products.
Stock Market Volatility: Following the announcement of these tariffs, U.S. stock markets experienced notable declines. The S&P 500 decreased by 1.2%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 1.6%, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped by 0.4%, erasing gains achieved since President Trump's inauguration.
Sector-Specific Consequences:
Manufacturing and Technology: Industries heavily reliant on global supply chains, such as manufacturing and technology, are facing increased production costs. The technology sector, in particular, is bracing for significant impacts due to its dependence on components from China.
Automotive Industry: The auto industry is especially vulnerable, as vehicles produced under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) framework cross borders multiple times during production. A 25% tariff on all goods crossing the border could lead to compounded cost increases, disrupted supply chains, and higher prices for consumers.
Long-Term Economic Outlook:
Potential for Stagflation: Economists warn that sustained tariffs could lead to stagflation, characterized by slowed economic growth coupled with rising inflation. This scenario poses significant risks to global economic stability.
Job Market Effects: Studies have indicated that previous tariffs imposed during the 2018-2019 trade war reduced long-term U.S. GDP by 0.2% and resulted in the loss of approximately 142,000 full-time equivalent jobs.
In summary, President Trump's trade war is anticipated to lead to increased consumer prices, stock market volatility, sector-specific challenges, and potential long-term economic slowdowns, underscoring the complex dynamics of international trade policies.
I said:
ChatGPT said:
You're welcome! If you have any more questions or need further information on this topic, feel free to ask. 🚀
Me to YOU...
On the topic of being polite to AI:
"I stopped saying thanks to
ChatGPT – here's what happened" | from TechRadar
Finally...
Multiple individuals have offered sharp critiques of Donald Trump, highlighting concerns about his fitness for office, policies, and character. Here are some notable examples:
Bandy X. Lee, a forensic psychiatrist, organized a 2017 Yale conference where mental health professionals discussed their "duty to warn" about Trump's psychological state. They expressed that his mental impairments could pose a national emergency, stating, "our survival as a species may be at stake."
John D. Gartner, a clinical psychologist, launched the "Duty to Warn" initiative in 2017, gathering signatures from over 25,000 mental health professionals who deemed Trump "unwell" and "dangerously unfit." He described Trump as having a "malignant personality" causing significant harm.
Robert Kagan, a historian and foreign policy expert, left the Republican Party in 2016, endorsing Hillary Clinton. He warned that Trump resembled a "Frankenstein monster" and cautioned about the potential rise of fascism in America.
Maxine Waters, a U.S. Congresswoman, has consistently criticized Trump, labeling him "the most deplorable person I've ever met." She called for his impeachment, stating he was "leading himself" to it due to conflicts of interest and actions causing "chaos and division."
These individuals have made significant and impactful comments regarding their concerns about Donald Trump's suitability for the presidency.
