Monday, February 24, 2025

Unraveling JZ Murdock: Themes, Style & the Personal Lens of an Award-Winning Storyteller

I've long wondered what my writings say about me, about my orientation, and my work. So I tasked My Reader AI (a valuable resource I'm finding) with two of my books containing many of my short stories both published and previously unpublished, to analyze them and let me know what it thinks. 


For years, people have told me I'm a good writer. I earned well as a senior technical writer, and others said they liked my work over the years. But selling your art is a different challenge. It’s not the ultimate measure of your worth, but it’s certainly rewarding to know people appreciate it. Awards are another measure and carry some weight (not a lot) with those who would purchase your work.


This is an in-depth analysis of my short stories. For analysis of just one of my stories there is, In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear, where there is a two-part blog available on it. 

Now as for recognition (awards/laurels) I've received for my work...
  • One Act Plays - 3
  • Screenplays - 32
  • Films - 60
  • Books - 2 - 2024 New York City Big Book Award for Horror (Death of Heaven), 2024 Literary Titan Book Award, and 2 other honorable mentions)

Anyway, here's what the analysis came up with...

How do the recurring themes, stylistic choices, and narrative structures in the author JZ Murdock's works reflect his personal experiences, values, and cultural context and what does that say about him as an award-winning author, screenwriter, and filmmaker?

 

Storyteller JZ Murdock at 'Death of Heaven' Book Signing

JZ Murdock's works (writings, photography, and films - company/streaming) reflect his personal experiences, values, and cultural context through recurring themes of the human experience, psychological exploration, and societal critique. A significant aspect of his writing focuses on our "Human Experience," which is deeply informed by his academic background in Psychology (B.A. Western Washington University). In his works, he examines and shares stories that interpret and reveal the depth of human experiences across various contexts.

However, today's analysis is based on his Anthology of Evil series, first published in 2012, and now includes Anthology of Evil II, Vol. I and Anthology of Evil II, Vol. II: The Unwritten. The Unwritten was originally a story begun on Wattpad and grew into a novella so was intended for the end of Anthology of Evil II, but it grew so large that it became a book of its own. Since it was meant to conclude the sequel, it was then designated as Vol. II of that same sequel. This has been discussed previously in another blog from the year that the two new books were released, in 2020.

These stories often incorporate personal reflections on war and conflict, such as in "Red Rain," (included in Anthology of Evil II Vol. I, it was originally, "Hardened Enlightenment")  which emerged from frustration with the ongoing violence in the world. In that story he reflects on a need for empathy and compassion in addressing the horrors of war, suggesting that, despite America’s extensive history of conflict. There should be a greater honor in seeking peace, rather than being resigned to war as a matter of fact. 

This theme is bolstered by a broader critique of the political and social conditions of the time, illustrating a keen awareness of contemporary issues that resonate with the author's own life experiences, and that of a USAF-SAC veteran in the late 1970s with a secret clearance for working around (literally on top of) nuclear weapons on B-52 bombers.

Stylistically, Murdock employs a blend of allegory, surrealism, and psychological depth, as observed in various works inspired by notable authors such as Philip K. Dick (most famous for his "Blade Runner" story and films), Harlan Ellison (most famous for "A Boy and his Dog" story and film, and his The City on the Edge of Forever script from a 1967, Star Trek episode), and as well, Clive Barker (perhaps most famous for his "Hellraiser" horror series of books and films). In his having corresponded with Mr. Barker when he was living in London, then in later meeting with him at book signings, he was inspired by his groundbreaking writings that Stephen King had once labeled Barker as, "the Future of Horror".

Murdock, first in line at a 1989 Clive Barker Seattle Tower Books store signing once, informed Clive (indicating the long line behind him) that every person there was a Stephen King fan, having heard them all talking in line for a couple of hours leading up to the event. Barker took in all those in line waiting and said, "Well, all are welcome. I'm certainly happy to take on any new fans...of his." And then he grinned, pleased.

The structure of the stories in Murdock's "Evil" series, often reflects a deep introspection and a layering of personal narrative with broader societal commentary. For example, the attempt to write from unique perspectives, such as an alien child, or a protagonist unaware of their circumstances, showcases a playful yet profound exploration of understanding and alienation.

Moreover, the author’s recurring reflections on literary influences indicate a strong connection to foundational ideas in literature, particularly from the genres of science fiction, horror, and fantasy, hinting at a desire to push creative boundaries while paying homage to the past. His acknowledgment of early influences and evolution as a writer demonstrates a persistent engagement with both personal history and a broader cultural fabric, suggesting a commitment to continuous learning and growth within the craft.

The combination of psychological themes, societal critique, and a unique narrative structure reflects the author’s identity as omnitect, or master "world-builder", as an award-winning author, screenwriter, and filmmaker. His work not only entertains but also serves as a vehicle for a deeper understanding of humanity, thereby offering insights into his own values and beliefs shaped by his experiences and cultural background.

The author's stylistic choices exhibit a blend of psychological depth, allegory, and surreal elements that resonate with other notable authors in science fiction and horror. For instance, the author draws inspiration from genre heavyweights like Ray Bradbury, Philip K. Dick, and Clive Barker, reflecting a commitment to both narrative complexity and poetic prose.

Bradbury's influence is particularly evident, as the author admires the beautifully written nature of his stories, such as "Fahrenheit 451", "Something Wicked This Way Comes" and "Dandelion Wine" (and others), books that Murdock has said affected him deeply at an early age. This admiration suggests that the author's prose aims to achieve a similar lyrical quality, intertwining thematic concerns with engaging narrative styles.

In terms of narrative structure, the author employs unique perspectives—such as characters that inhabit alien or unusual situations—to delve into themes of understanding and alienation. This aligns with techniques used by authors like Harlan Ellison, who often explored complex human emotions through unconventional plots. 

The author’s exploration of psychological themes and societal critiques points towards a deeper reflection of human experiences, paralleling the works of both Isaac Asimov (who Murdock pulled the name for his story, In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear from Asimov's first autobiography, In Memory Yet Green) and Barker, who often embeds moral or philosophical questions within their fantastical narratives.

It was from that autobiography of Asimov's that Murdock read about being a technical writer. And so rather inadvertently, in a happy series of events, he became a Senior Technical Writer in some of the Pacific Northwest's highest-end computer technical teams in the 1990s, beginning with working for US West Technologies (an INFORM award recipient in 1994) on some of their most important projects. While he didn't work on the INFORM related project (projects, really) directly, he did work on peripheral projects. On one, he worked alone with their technology evangelist who he has said was "a brilliant guy".

Isaac Asimov, in his memoir I, Asimov, also reflects there on the influence of his military technical writing experience on his science fiction career. He notes, "In a sense, we were all soldiers, in one way or another. We had all been technical writers for the military during World War II, or at least for some branch of the government. We knew about gadgets and machines, and we could make the leap to imagining what machines and gadgets might do in the future."

Asimov further elaborates, "It is no accident that many of the writers of the Golden Age of science fiction, including myself, had been technical writers in the military during World War II. The military trained us in how to write clearly and concisely. The technical writing we did for the military was good training for the science fiction we were to write."

Moreover, Murdock's stylistic choices reflect a desire to push creative boundaries while invoking established literary traditions, demonstrating an acknowledgment of foundational ideas within literary genres. The layering of personal narrative with broader societal commentary showcases a depth that's reminiscent of other award-winning authors who similarly traverse personal and collective experiences within their storytelling.

Overall, while the author's work stands out for its psychological insights and unique narrative approaches, it simultaneously aligns with the ambitions of other notable creators in the same genres, reflecting a shared endeavor to explore and comment on the human condition through innovative and rich storytelling.

The narrative structures employed by the author exhibit both similarities and differences when compared to those used by Harlan Ellison and other contemporary writers in the science fiction and horror genres. One significant aspect is Murdock's use of unique perspectives and characters that inhabit unconventional situations, similar to Ellison's approach to exploring complex human emotions through unusual plots. 

AI rendered book cover for, Jaonny's Apple Tree

For example, the author has experimented with writing from the point of view of an alien child (in Jaonny's Apple Tree, from Anthology of Evil II Vol. I), which reflects a playful and inventive narrative style aimed at conveying the strange nature of experiences. Told from the child's (and an alien's/extraterrestrial's) perspective the prose is childlike and unusual. One publisher rejected it outright, fully misunderstanding the stylistic choices.

Moreover, the author’s commitment to psychological depth and societal critique resonates with the works of Ellison, who often focused on human experiences within broader existential themes. This narrative layering allows both writers to probe deeply into psychological and social issues, providing commentary on the human condition through speculative elements.

In contrast, the author’s narratives also integrate introspective reflections and personal experiences more explicitly than Ellison's typical narrative style, which often leaned toward allegory and surrealism without the same degree of personal exposition. 

Murdock's background in psychology further influences their storytelling, leading to narratives rich in psychological exploration and thematic insight, thus creating a deeper connection to the human experience than some of their contemporaries, who may favor plot-driven structures over character exploration.

Stylistically, the author aims for a lyrical quality akin to that found in works by Ray Bradbury, indicating a blend of narrative complexity and poetic prose that may not always align with the more direct and sometimes stark storytelling seen in Ellison's works. 

Thus the comment of one reviewer for his award-winning book, Death of Heaven"The book has a 'Books of Blood' vibe... the author's writing ability shines with a lovely turn of phrase that is almost poetic in its beauty." — reviewer Michael Brookes

Also this from Reader Views:


This distinct approach highlights Murdock's engagement with literary tradition while simultaneously innovating upon it, demonstrating respect for established narrative forms and a desire to expand and explore new avenues within his craft.

Overall, Murdock's narrative structures reveal a hybrid of psychological introspection, unique perspectives, and thematic richness that echo but also diverge from contemporary narrative strategies employed by Ellison and similar writers in the science fiction and horror domains. His works reflect an endeavor to examine the human experience while maintaining a distinctive voice that seeks to push creative boundaries. 

Again Reader Views on Death of Heaven:


JZ Murdock's works highlight several distinct characteristics that set his narrative structures apart from those of authors like Harlan Ellison. He employs a hybrid of psychological introspection, unique perspectives, and thematic richness in his storytelling, which creates a distinctive narrative voice that echoes yet diverges from contemporary strategies in science fiction and horror genres.

The societal critiques present in Murdock's work resonate with, as well as challenge, the themes found in the stories of say, Clive Barker and Isaac Asimov. Firstly, the author's exploration of psychological depth and societal issues mirrors the thematic complexity often found in both Barker's and Asimov's writings. 

Clive Barker, for instance, delves into the darker aspects of human nature and the moral ambiguities present within society. His stories frequently explore themes of desire, horror, and the human psyche, presenting characters in situations that force them to confront their deepest fears and ethical dilemmas. Similarly, Murdock embeds psychological themes and critiques of society within their narratives, emphasizing human experiences that reflect both personal and collective struggles.

The author’s writing also aligns with Isaac Asimov’s characteristic focus on societal constructs but approaches these themes through a different lens. Asimov often critiques societal progress through his science fiction works, highlighting the consequences of technology and human behavior on civilization. 

Murdock's on the other hand, infuses personal introspection and emotional resonance into critiques, showcasing a blend of psychological exploration with broader societal commentary. For example, the author's decision to incorporate unique perspectives, like that of an alien child, serves to challenge traditional societal norms and highlight feelings of alienation, similar to the surprising angles often found in Asimov’s narratives.

Moreover, while Barker tends to use surreal and fantastical elements to emphasize horror and societal commentary, the author's stylistic choice of a more lyrical narrative aims for a blend of realism and psychological depth that may not always conform to Barker's more metaphorical approach. This juxtaposition creates a critique that is both grounded in human experience and reflective of deeper societal issues, akin to Asimov's critiques but with a distinctively personal touch.

The societal critiques in the author's work both reflect and challenge those found in the stories of Barker and Asimov by focusing on the psychological and emotional aspects of human experience while exploring complex social themes. This hybrid approach allows the author to navigate traditional literary boundaries, offering fresh perspectives within the speculative fiction landscape.

Murdock's unique approach to societal critiques is prominently illustrated through his exploration of psychological and technological themes, particularly when compared to Asimov's focus on technology and civilization.

One specific example is the author's story Rapture, (included within Anthology of Evil II Vol. I) which presents a futuristic illegal recreational drug that reflects on the complexities of addiction and dependency in a hyper-technological society. The narrative critiques the consequences of technology on personal agency and societal structures, highlighting how advancements can both enhance and diminish human experience. 

This aligns with Asimov’s exploration of technological implications; however, the author's focus transcends mere technological advancement, probing into the emotional and ethical ramifications of such technology on individuals' lives.

Additionally, Murdock incorporates personal perspectives, such as writing from the viewpoint of an alien child, to address societal norms and feelings of alienation. Also seen in his novella, Andrew (currently in-process of being produced as an audiobook), this perspective serves not only as a critique of societal constructs but also opens a dialogue about the nature of belonging in an evolving civilization. Thereby challenging traditional narratives about technology and societal progress that Asimov often presented. It emphasizes the psychological impact of societal structures rather than solely focusing on their functional aspects, thus offering a more introspective critique of civilization.

EarVu Cover art by Marvin Hayes

Moreover, Murdock's emphasis on the consequences of technology is further illustrated through his narrative of "EarVu" technology, which critiques the potential for invasive surveillance and the ethical dilemmas it introduces regarding privacy and human experience. This mirrors Asimov's thematic concerns regarding the impact of technology on society, showcasing the potential dangers of certain advancements while also embedding psychological depth and moral complexity into the narrative.

While both the author and Asimov critique technology's impact on civilization, Murdock distinguishes himself by weaving in profound psychological introspection and emotional narratives that highlight the human experience amidst these technological advancements, thereby creating a distinct critique of society that reflects on personal and collective struggles.

The psychological themes in his work can be seen as both comparable and distinct from those in Clive Barker's stories, particularly regarding character development and moral dilemmas.

Murdock delves deeply into the psychological complexities of his characters, often portraying them in morally ambiguous situations that force them to confront their own fears and traumas. This is reminiscent of Barker's approach, where characters frequently navigate dark motives and confront their inner demons, as seen in his horror narratives that explore the limits of human experience through fantastical and grotesque circumstances.

For instance, Murdock's work portrays significant emotional struggles, such as in the story where a character grapples with the ethical implications of their actions while protecting their children from the "bad guy" (this in Mr. Pakool's Spice - audiobook)  exposing the moral dilemmas faced in desperate situations. 

This mirrors Barker's style, which often places characters in anguish, compelling them to make difficult choices that reveal their true natures. In Barker’s narratives, characters are usually confronted with intense psychological terror that forces them to examine their morals; similarly, the author emphasizes personal introspection amid conflict, which contributes to rich character development.

Moreover, Murdock's incorporation of unique perspectives, such as those from an alien child, or that of the exceptional child (intellectually, socially, or economically) of intellectually exceptional parents, serves to explore themes of alienation and belonging, while also presenting characters who navigate societal expectations and personal ethics in intriguing ways. This element of societal critique through character development adds an additional layer to the psychological themes, which is often a hallmark of Barker's character-driven stories that illuminate the darker aspects of humanity through individual perspective and narrative depth.

In speaking of darker narratives, Murdock's Poor Lord Ritchie's Answer (originally in Anthology of Evil), examines complex themes of alienation and belonging unfold through the characters’ struggles against societal norms and personal dilemmas. This story is surreal, opening with humor, descending into madness, and the macabre, and then pulling into a flashback ending. The narrative intricately depicts Lord Ritchie's tumultuous life, underscoring his connection to death and existential urgency, particularly through poignant scenes with his sister, the Nun.

Her self-sacrifice intertwines their fates in a grim union of love and death, prompting a critique of strained familial bonds and their implications for identity as Ritchie grapples with his mortality, eternity, and the heavy weight of his lineage and responsibilities. 

To further flesh out Lord Ritchie's personality is the prequel story elsewhere, Breaking on Cave Island (in Anthology of Evil II Vol. I), which in detailing one of his younger self's exploits, explains some of his distaste for those known as, "wizards". 

Ritchie is portrayed as a man burdened by historical expectations and personal failure, specifically regarding the loss of the "Crucible Sword", a key symbol of his family's legacy. The term "crucible" is defined as "Forged in the crucible" a metaphor that means something has been strengthened or created through intense pressure and heat. It is similar to the process of shaping metal in a crucible, a ceramic or metal container in which metals or other substances may be melted or subjected to very high temperatures.

However, in this meaning, it refers to a symbol for a family as an object—often a weapon, artifact, or heirloom—in Ritchie's case, the family sword, that represents the lineage, trials, and legacy of a family or ruling house. The term “crucible” suggests a transformative or testing experience, meaning the item has either endured great trials or has been central to pivotal moments in the family's history. So to lose such an object would mean great dishonor, greatly reflecting on one's character.

Ritchie's introspective journey reflects a broader examination of human desires and the challenges faced by those considered exceptional or noble. The character's internal conflict mirrors the societal pressures that clash with personal ethics, revealing struggles common across different societal strata. 

Some of this is revealed through a humorous perspective in the initial scene in the public house, where Ritchie is sodden drunk, perhaps unwisely, as a noble among unknown (and far less well-off) commoners. Additionally, the narrative captures Ritchie's physical and emotional detachment as he contemplates his regretful past. 

His state signifies a disconnection not only from his family but also from life itself, echoing the sentiment of a child facing isolation when societal expectations do not align with personal realities. This aspect of alienation is steeped in sorrow and urgency, showcasing Ritchie's internal struggle amid the weight of familial dynamics. As we later find, even his romantic experiences are of a shadowy nature.

The third scene emphasizes Lord Ritchie's detachment through his encounter with his sister, where the narrative shifts from one type of surreal moment into another. This scene explores death's visceral impacts and the consequences of their familial ties, as Ritchie confronts his mortality through a disturbing act that blurs the lines between love and death. The horror and tragedy of this unholy act bind their fates in a grotesque manner, illustrating Ritchie's detachment from reality as he replaces human connection with a macabre bond.

Ultimately, this moment not only acts as a plot device but also provokes reflections on love's complexities intertwined with moral degradation, expanding the narrative into surreal territory. The emotional weight carried by Ritchie’s actions is amplified by the grim atmosphere, opening a window into deeper psychological themes of humanity's darker aspects and the ethical challenges surrounding identity amid familial expectations. 

This exploration positions Murdock’s work as a significant commentary on belonging and the struggles of individual identity within the confines of societal and familial pressures. 

Ultimately, while both the author and Barker engage with psychological themes and moral dilemmas, the author’s focus seems to lean more towards emotional resonance and a juxtaposition of personal and societal conflict, which enriches character development in different ways than Barker's often surreal and explicitly grotesque explorations of the human psyche.

Murdock's critique of surveillance technology through the lens of his EarVu story, presents a profound exploration of privacy concerns and ethical implications, paralleling and diverging from Isaac Asimov's treatment of similar themes in his stories while distracting with a slowly building, bizarre mystery and discovery.

In the context of EarVu, the author raises disturbing questions about the potential for invasive surveillance technology. This technology not only allows the retrieval of audio from recorded media but suggests a future where nearly everything within the range of any recording device might be made visible, regardless of direct accessibility to those sounds. The implications of this capability present a chilling perspective on privacy, positing that our inner secrets could be observed years, decades, or even centuries after their recording, potentially leading to damning outcomes and overarching ethical dilemmas. 

The commentary on how technology might one day enable intrusive observations resonates with contemporary anxiety over surveillance, making it a pertinent critique of the direction in which society’s technology is evolving. Just as people today share their DNA with companies to uncover insights about health, personality, and ancestry, future advancements could expose entire family lines to public scrutiny or enable even darker governmental or corporate abuses.

In contrast, Asimov often approached similar themes with a focus on the broader societal and functional implications of technology. His stories frequently delve into how advancements in technology, such as robots and computers, affect civilization’s structure and ethical boundaries, often evoking a sense of moral responsibility in handling these developments. Asimov’s narratives typically embody a more rational discourse on technology, where moral dilemmas arise in the context of public welfare and the ongoing struggle to maintain human values in the face of progress. It could be conjectured that while Asimov covered the macro, Murdock delves into the micro, or more personal.

While both the author and Asimov deal with the repercussions of technological advancements, the author’s emphasis in EarVu on the intimate and intrusive nature of surveillance technology invites a more personal reflection on the loss of privacy, which can lead to a sense of paranoia and discomfort within individuals. This perspective contrasts with Asimov's methodologies, which tend to explore foundational ethical principles regarding technology’s role in society at large, rather than a primarily personal level.

Murdock critiques surveillance technology in EarVu by highlighting urgent ethical concerns and the unsettling aspects of privacy invasion, leading to introspective reflections on human behavior and societal norms. Asimov’s treatment of similar themes, while also concerned with the ethical dimensions of technology, typically addresses societal implications and broader governance issues, creating a distinction in the focus of their respective critiques.

The personal reflections on privacy in EarVu serve to deepen readers' understanding of contemporary surveillance practices by highlighting the unsettling implications of advanced recording technologies. The author emphasizes the potential for individuals' private actions and words to be observed and analyzed long after they occur, raising substantial concerns about the erosion of personal privacy in an increasingly monitored world. The narrative suggests that what seems private today may become public knowledge in the future, leading to a permanent record of personal secrets that could be accessed at any time.

This theme resonates with current societal anxieties about surveillance technologies and the pervasive nature of data collection in modern life. As the text points out, with the capabilities of EarVu, it might become possible to "view everything within a wide range of any recording device," highlighting the existential threat to privacy that such advancements pose. 

The message of EarVu ends with the beginning leaving the reader (or listener) to wonder, "Has anything changed?" It requires a reflection back to the beginning for comparison (either mentally, or actually) of the ending with the beginning, to tell if any change has actually occurred. It is a subtle exposition that many may well miss, entirely.

This portrayal aligns with growing fears around surveillance, where the line between public and private life becomes increasingly blurred. The commentary on the "desire for privacy" transforming into a "thing of the past" reflects broader cultural shifts, suggesting that individuals' expectations of personal space and confidentiality are being undermined by technology. As well as, directly and indirectly, by the Law.

Furthermore, the author's personal reflections evoke a sense of discomfort and even paranoia, While he has professed not personally feeling paranoid about all this, he does find it necessary to keep raising awareness about it, prompting readers to reassess their interactions with technology and its inherent risks. Much like Asimov and Ellison in their inimitable ways.

Some of this awareness may well come from his work in a cybersecurity group in the late 1990s and early 2000s bringing together government with high-tech business to Seattle, Washington, with visitors from both domestic technology companies and law enforcement, and those as well as from Canada, and as far away as Australia. Regular briefings from the US government (NSA, Presidents Commission on the Infrastructure, etc.), and tech industry were common. This added to Secret level briefings he had received a decade or so earlier in the USAF.

This included briefings from the "President's Commission on the Infrastructure", formally known as the President's Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (PCCIP), established by President Clinton in July 1996 to assess vulnerabilities in the nation's critical infrastructure and recommend strategies to protect them from physical and cyber threats; its primary focus was on developing a comprehensive national policy for infrastructure protection.

Going back to EarVu, needless to say, the remark in the story, “How many crimes have been caught unawares on these tapes,” encourages us to consider the unintended consequences of recording technology and to question how our digital footprints might be interpreted.

For instance, imagine an audio recording capturing a married couple sharing an intimate encounter, even though both are married, to others. Similarly, picture hearing audio from an old tape of someone singing a cheerful tune while, unbeknownst to listeners, they are committing a grisly act—such as dismembering a body to add to their list of serial murders. That is the potential of the EarVu technology which makes it understandable who and why others may be interested in it. What technologies will we be faced with with a similar extension of previously believed to be of a relatively benign nature?

By presenting surveillance in such personal and unsettling scenarios, the author effectively engages readers with the ethical dilemmas posed by modern technology, urging them to critically evaluate the implications for privacy in an era of ubiquitous monitoring. Yet the story actually takes an entirely different direction. A technique that can lead one off of the primary concern to ruminate on the more immediate threat in the story, until later when you consciously or unconsciously consider the real threat facing you.

Ultimately, the reflections on privacy in EarVu underscore the significant transformations in societal norms regarding monitoring and personal freedoms, likely influencing readers to contemplate the balance between technological progress and the preservation of personal privacy in their lives.

JZ Murdock is a distinguished author, screenwriter, and filmmaker whose works showcase a profound engagement with the human experience through psychological exploration and societal critique. His narratives embody a rich tapestry of themes, reflecting deeply on the complexities of human emotions and the ethical dilemmas faced in contemporary society. 

Drawing heavily on his academic background in psychology and phenomenology from his studies and degree from Western Washington University, the author seeks to illuminate the intricacies of human behavior and existential questions through his storytelling, often infusing personal reflections and societal commentary into his plots.

While the author’s writing evokes many notable authors, the stylistic choices reflect a blend of influences from Ray Bradbury, Philip K. Dick, Isaac Asimov, and Clive Barker. Bradbury’s lyrical quality in storytelling is particularly admired by the author (much as with Barker), aiming to achieve a similar narrative complexity and poetic prose as seen in works like Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451.

Similarly, there is a connection to Harlan Ellison, whose approach involves exploring complex human emotions through unconventional plots, which resonates with the author's use of unique perspectives, such as writing from the viewpoint of a child, alien either in having not being born on earth, or through other more localized issues.

Moreover, the psychological explorations and societal critiques in the author’s work parallel the thematic complexities found in the writings of not just Clive Barker and Isaac Asimov, but also suggest a broader engagement with the literary community and its exploration of human experience. The narrative structures used by the author illustrate a hybrid of introspective and psychological depth that distinguishes their work while still connecting with the traditions established by these influential figures.

Overall, through these varied influences, the author's writing embodies a rich tapestry of narrative techniques and thematic inquiries that reflect a broader literary tradition while charting its unique course.

However, the author's writings also evoke several other authors not previously mentioned in this consideration. One potential influence is Edgar Allan Poe, known for his psychological exploration and dark themes, which might parallel some of the author's stylistic choices that focus on psychological depth and societal critiques. 

Murdock first learned of Poe as many in the 1960s had, through old American International Pictures, by Roger Corman with notables like Vincent Price, Peter Lorre, and others. Eventually finding the writings of Poe, Lovecraft, and others, he had gone from stating his readings with science fiction, moving into horror, then fantasy, on to science fact studies, then back to the beginning. A form of literary obsession he seemed to repeat throughout his life.

Indeed, Poe was a seminal author for Murdock when he was young, as well as the others mentioned. And many others such as Heinlein, Robert E. Howard, Anne McCaffery, and many others. Then in the early 1980s, he found Margaret Attwood (The Handmaid's Tale) when a play and screenwriting professor at university turned him onto her saying, "There's a housewife in Canada who writes short stories that will rip your head off." That sounded intriguing. 

Additionally, Stephen King should be considered due to his exploration of the darker aspects of human nature. An area that resonates with the thematic concerns found in the author's narratives, particularly regarding the moral ambiguities present in society. King seemed ubiquitous throughout most of Murdock's life as it was with many readers and viewers, going back to The Shining, both film and book, which cemented Stanley Kubrick in Murdock's mind as a favored auteur, if not already for his 2001: A Space Oddysey film. That led him to study Kubrick's films at university, as well as Hitchcock, and as well, Woody Allen (who led him to Ingmar Bergman, though he had already learned to love the auteurs of the 1950s/60s like Francois Truffaut and his cohorts).

George Orwell’s insights into societal constructs and moral dilemmas may also emerge as an inspiration, as Murdock read his Nineteen Eighty-Four book at a young age (and Animal Farm), especially in the context of critiques about civilization and human behavior that the author navigates within their own works.

These additional authors contribute further layers to the rich tapestry of influences reflected in the author’s writing, indicating a broad engagement with notable literary traditions while fostering their unique narrative voice.

Central to Murdock's narratives is a critical reflection on moral complexities and societal constructs. His storytelling engages with significant issues like the potential consequences of technological progress and moral dilemmas, highlighting the spectrum of human experience amid societal challenges. Moreover, his commitment to addressing contemporary issues, such as the horrors of war, showcases an awareness that resonates with his own life experiences, expressing a desire for empathy and compassion in confronting these realities.

Ultimately, JZ Murdock's works exemplify his identity as an award-winning author who is not only focused on entertaining but also on catalyzing a deeper understanding of humanity. By melding personal and collective struggles within intricate narratives, he demonstrates a dedication to pushing creative boundaries while honoring established literary traditions, solidifying his place within the realms of science fiction and horror. 

Through his explorations, JZ Murdock invites readers to engage with profound questions about the human condition, making his contributions to literature both significant and transformative.

As UK reviewer Lynn Worton once said in her review of his book, Death of Heaven:

"JZ Murdock has written a horror story that completely had me transfixed! I'm intrigued as to what he is working on next!"

Compiled with aid of My Reader AI

Friday, February 21, 2025

"In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear" by JZ Murdock - Part II, Analysis of Relationships

This is a continuation of the recent blog on this story: Art Imitates Life: How a 1990 Dystopian Sci-Fi Tale Mirrors Today


The story "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear" (audiobook) is a dystopian science fiction narrative that explores complex themes surrounding memory, identity, and the implications of technological advancements. 

The main character, Peter, undergoes a significant transformation, gaining extraordinary cognitive abilities such as perfect recall and enhanced processing power due to experiments with specialized crystalline compounds. This transformation allows him to transcend normal human capabilities, positioning him as potentially the perfect human being mentally.


However, this extraordinary change raises profound questions about what it means to be human and the nature of self-identity, particularly as Peter's physical appearance and essence begin to shift, making him seem alien to his friend George. George primarily represents the emotional and psychological struggles that arise from Peter's transformation, grappling with feelings of inadequacy and the fear of losing his friend to this new identity.

Overall, the story delves into the intersection of memory and technology, illustrating how these themes affect human relationships and self-perception as characters navigate the ramifications of such radical evolution in cognitive and physical attributes. The poignant contrast between Peter's technological ascendance and George's human experience highlights the narrative’s exploration of identity and the effects of technological progress on our understanding of ourselves.

The relationship between George and Peter, compounded by the enigmatic presence of the woman, illustrates a complex interplay of psychological, moral, and societal degradation. As George becomes physically installed in the "nest"—a space that symbolizes Peter's control and transformation—he experiences a profound disconnect from reality due to Peter's radical alterations and the conditions surrounding them. This transformation is not just personal but reverberates through society, challenging George's understanding of normalcy.

Within this "nest," Peter revels in his newly acquired abilities, showcasing a vision of himself as an evolved being, capable of extraordinary cognitive feats. He boasts about his enhanced capabilities, claiming to possess "thrice the parallel processing power of any processor on this planet" and highlighting his perfect recall and accelerated information intake. 

This elevation suggests that society is not only accepting but potentially revering Peter, thrusting George into a confusing spectacle where he increasingly struggles to assert his own perspectives. His dependency on Peter grows, making him an observer in a situation that demands active engagement.

The woman’s role complicates matters further; while she appears to comply with the desires of Peter and George, George discerns her disingenuousness. He perceives her as a figure capable of psychologically damaging both men, propelling them into a spiral of moral chaos. 

This dynamic generates an environment of manipulation, fostering George’s feelings of inadequacy as he watches the superhuman narrative shaped by Peter, further marginalizing him in the unfolding drama. The woman's ambiguous intentions imply that her presence could be toxic, leading both to question their own morality and ethical standing amidst the bizarre evolution of their shared reality.

George's hope for external intervention—someone to recognize this toxic environment and alleviate the suffering caused by the woman—underscores the helplessness felt in the face of their decline. This yearning reflects a desperate desire to reclaim agency and moral clarity, suggesting that the chaos around them is systemic rather than merely personal. 

The interplay of these elements—Peter's transformation, the woman's insidious influence, and George's psychological unraveling—creates a narrative steeped in questions of identity, morality, and the unsettling acceptance of a distorting reality that he cannot fully control.

Thus, the examination of these relationships illustrates how external influences, particularly from seemingly agreeable figures, can leave individuals enmeshed in cycles of moral degradation and confusion, ultimately transforming their capacity for rational thought and ethical action.

The "nest" serves as a potent symbol within the narrative, fundamentally representing both control and transformation for the characters George and Peter. It illustrates the profound changes that Peter undergoes as a result of his experiments and the subsequent shifts in their relationship dynamics. Within this environment, Peter is not merely transformed physically; he is elevated to an almost otherworldly status wherein he embodies the ultimate "ultra-Human" being, boasting "thrice the parallel processing power of any processor on this planet". This metamorphosis reflects how technological advancements can reshape identity and capabilities, pushing the boundaries of what it means to be human.

George, however, experiences a contrasting reality within the nest. As Peter revels in his enhanced abilities, George finds himself increasingly marginalized and disconnected from the evolving situation. He watches Peter transform and elevate himself, which compels George into a role of subordination and observation. This shift solidifies Peter's control over the narrative, leaving George straddling a line between admiration and existential anxiety about his own significance and agency in a rapidly changing framework.

The nest symbolizes not only Peter’s newfound power but also the insidious nature of control exerted over George. It becomes a space—both physical and psychological—where George's autonomy is undermined, encapsulating his helplessness against the evolving intellectual and social landscape that Peter embodies. George’s dependency on Peter grows, as he reflects on the contrast between Peter's magnificent evolution and his own feelings of inadequacy and insignificance.

Moreover, the presence of the woman, who appears compliant but fundamentally disingenuous, exacerbates George's sense of disempowerment. Her influence further manipulates the dynamics, as George perceives her ability to inflict psychological damage, complicating their situation and magnifying his struggle for moral clarity amidst their decline. George's longing for external intervention reflects a desperate hope to reclaim his agency and recognize the toxic environment orchestrated by the interplay of Peter's transformation and the woman's facade.

Ultimately, the nest encapsulates the transformative journey of Peter and George, highlighting the themes of control, identity, and morality. Peter’s ascension illustrates the intoxicating nature of power gained through unprecedented transformation, while George’s plight serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of such evolution on personal autonomy and ethical grounding. The interconnectedness of these elements reveals the broader implications of transformation and control within the narrative, prompting reflection on the costs that accompany such profound changes.

The narrative surrounding George, Peter, and the woman within the "nest" operates as a compelling allegory for contemporary society, particularly in the context of the United States today. The profound transformation of Peter, who evolves into an ultra-human with extraordinary capabilities, symbolizes the impact of technological advancement and the quest for power that often accompanies it. By boasting traits such as "thrice the parallel processing power of any processor on this planet," Peter represents how society may glorify individuals who harness technological or intellectual superiority to control the narrative and those around them.

Conversely, George embodies the struggle of the average individual navigating a rapidly transforming landscape in which they often feel marginalized and powerless. As Peter revels in his transformation, George becomes increasingly aware of his dependency and feels trapped within Peter's sphere of influence, illustrating the psychological toll such situations can exact on individuals who find themselves sidelined. This reflects a broader societal commentary on how advancements can elevate certain individuals or groups while leaving others feeling inadequate and disconnected.

Furthermore, the woman's ambiguous involvement demonstrates the complexities of interpersonal dynamics in society. Though she appears to be a compliant figure, her disingenuousness and potential for manipulation underline how relationships can become toxic, leading to moral degradation and confusion for both Peter and George. This interplay echoes current societal concerns about authenticity and the influence of social dynamics on personal identity and moral standings.

The nest itself acts as a microcosm of society, where the interplay of power, transformation, and dependency reveals systemic issues that resonate in real life. George's yearning for external relief highlights the struggles faced by many in society who seek recognition and support amidst chaotic changes and escalating pressures. 

The allegory suggests that just as George grapples with his lack of agency while being engulfed by Peter's enhanced power, contemporary society faces challenges with individuals and institutions exerting disproportionate control, often at the expense of broader ethical considerations and personal autonomy.

In sum, this narrative not only critiques the dynamics of control and transformation but also serves as a reflection of contemporary American society, where the balance of power, the impact of technology, and the nature of human relationships remain contentious and complex issues.

Real-world examples illustrating the themes of power dynamics and technological advancement, as depicted in the allegory of George and Peter, can be observed in various contemporary contexts.

Firstly, the rise of big data and facial recognition technology exemplifies how advancements can lead to control over individuals and societal structures. The narrative touches upon how Peter, through technological superiority, embodies "the Big Data Cyber Deity," showcasing how data-driven systems can recognize and manage social interactions, oftentimes at the expense of individual privacy and autonomy. This reflects real-world concerns about surveillance capitalism, where entities wield significant power over the populace through the collection and manipulation of personal data.

Moreover, the phenomenon of social media platforms illustrates the power dynamics at play, as individuals gravitate towards influential figures who harness technological capabilities to sway public opinion. Just as Peter's elevated status impacts George's sense of agency, influencers and powerful figures on these platforms can marginalize ordinary users, leading to feelings of inadequacy and disconnection in a society increasingly driven by online personas. The comparison highlights how technological advancement can create hierarchies that profoundly affect interpersonal dynamics and individual self-worth.

Additionally, the narrative's emphasis on the "rent in space" caused by experimentation parallels the repercussions societal experimentation can have, particularly in the realms of social engineering and policy. The researchers' acknowledgment of having created a "rent" without full understanding mirrors the unintended consequences of technological advancements that have historically reshaped societies, such as artificial intelligence or genetic engineering. In these cases, the rapid pace of development often leaves ethical considerations behind, similar to how Peter's transformation prioritizes power over moral grounding.

Finally, the interactions between George, Peter, and the woman serve as a microcosm for societal relationships tainted by the quest for power. The woman's compliant façade parallels relationships in various sectors—political, corporate, and personal—where individuals may appear subservient while actually manipulating outcomes for their benefit, echoing the toxic dynamics observed in contemporary organizational behavior. This highlights how personal relationships can become fraught with power struggles that affect morale and ethical boundaries.

In summary, the themes of power dynamics and technological advancement illustrated through the allegory resonate with real-world examples involving surveillance technologies, the influence of social media, the consequences of rapid societal experimentation, and the complexities of interpersonal relationships in power-laden contexts.

In the narrative surrounding George and Peter, the characters represent contrasting societal roles that highlight the dynamics of power and status in contemporary America.

Peter embodies the archetype of the elite or the 'elevated' class, having undergone a transformation that grants him extraordinary abilities and an enhanced status, akin to a technological superbeing. His transformation, where he claims to possess "thrice the parallel processing power of any processor on this planet" and "perfect recall," positions him as a figure of advancement and superiority within society. 

This elevation reflects how individuals with access to cutting-edge technology and intellectual resources can ascend to positions of power, often being viewed as 'heroes' or innovators. Peter's journey illustrates the glorification of success driven by technological prowess, paralleling contemporary societal trends where tech giants and influential innovators dominate the cultural narrative.

Conversely, George represents the struggling middle or lower class, a character grappling with the implications of Peter's transformation on his own life. As he observes Peter's changes and revels in his new form, George's reaction oscillates between awe and terror, reflecting feelings of powerlessness amidst Peter's elevated state. George's experience is symbolic of the average individual who often finds themselves overshadowed and marginalized in the face of rapid advancements and societal shifts dictated by a select few. This dynamic mirrors contemporary societal issues where a significant portion of the population may feel disenfranchised, as decisions made by the elite (those like Peter) often dictate the course of their lives without regard for their input or challenges.

Moreover, George's realization of his dependency on Peter serves to illustrate the psychological impact of such power imbalances. His struggle to maintain balance in a relationship with someone who represents a new societal elite reflects broader societal concerns about dependency and agency. As Peter confidently declares, "This is my life!" in response to George's worries about the implications of his transformation, it suggests a stark reality where individual agency is often subjugated by the whims of those in positions of power.

In essence, George and Peter serve as representations of distinct societal roles in America: Peter as the empowered, tech-savvy elite driving change and innovation, and George as the relatable, grounded individual struggling to navigate a world increasingly influenced by the advancements and aspirations of the powerful. This dichotomy captures the tension between advancement and displacement, showcasing the moral and ethical implications of such disparities.


Compiled with aid of My Reader AI

Formula for Magical Thinking: Understanding the Roots of Belief in Magic

I propose a formula for a belief in magic evolving in a society, race, or species.

In older times, frustration wasn’t just an emotional inconvenience—it was existential. If you couldn't make sense of a bad harvest, an illness, or a sudden disaster, magical thinking could offer comfort or even a survival advantage by reinforcing communal rituals and beliefs.


Magical thinking in the context of religion refers to the belief that one's thoughts, words, or actions can directly influence events in the physical world, often in ways that defy the laws of nature. In religious contexts, it can manifest as the idea that rituals, prayers, or specific behaviors can bring about desired outcomes, such as healing, protection, or prosperity, without the need for logical cause and effect. This type of thinking may be seen in belief systems where individuals think they can control divine forces or supernatural entities by performing certain actions, following rituals, or holding specific beliefs, often relying on faith rather than evidence.

Indeed, magical thinking can be a part of religious beliefs. In many religions, there are practices or rituals that involve a sense of control over events or outcomes through prayer, offerings, or other sacred acts. For example, a person may pray for a specific outcome, believing that the prayer itself can invoke divine intervention or change the course of events. While this might seem similar to magical thinking, in the context of religion, it's often rooted in faith in a higher power or divine being rather than just believing in the power of the individual’s actions alone. The difference lies in the belief that the outcome is ultimately under the will or influence of a divine force, rather than being purely a matter of the individual's will or effort.

Today, are we so occupied with modern distractions—entertainment, social media, work, and obligations—that we don’t have the same kind of prolonged, unstructured time to dwell on frustration in the same way? When frustration does arise, it’s often channeled into quick fixes: venting online, consuming content, or indulging in distractions. And with imagination constantly stimulated by media, games, and digital interactions, it may be less likely to produce grand mythologies or magical systems the way it did in the past.

Where M represents the degree of magical belief, T is the amount of free time available for contemplation (as in slower-moving societies throughout history), F is frustration with life's inevitabilities, and I is imagination and creativity. The presence of R (rational or scientific influence) in the denominator accounts for the moderating effect of education, skepticism, and empirical understanding, which can reduce magical belief even when T, F, and I are high.

How This Reflects Modern Trends:

  • In pre-modern societies, R was low, so even moderate values of T, F, and I led to strong magical beliefs.
  • In today’s fast-paced world, T is lower, and F may be redirected into distractions, but I remains high. However, R (scientific influence) has also increased, suppressing M somewhat.
  • Where F is still high (e.g., economic distress, personal crises), magical thinking persists, especially in areas where R is weaker (less education, distrust in science).


As to a name that reflects its purpose and conceptual foundation. Here are some possibilities:

1. The Belief Genesis Formula (BGF)

  • Emphasizes how belief in magic arises from certain conditions.

2. The Magical Cognition Equation (MCE)

  • Focuses on how cognitive factors shape magical thinking.

3. The Mysticism Propensity Model (MPM)

  • Suggests a model for why people are drawn to mystical or magical beliefs.

4. The TFI-R Model of Magical Belief

  • Uses the core components (T, F, I, and R) as part of the name, similar to other scientific models.

5. The Rational-Mythic Balance Equation (RMBE)

  • Highlights the interplay between rationality and myth-making.

I kind of like BGF...

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT



Art Imitates Life: How a 1990 Dystopian Sci-Fi Tale Mirrors Today

I first wrote a blog about my short story, "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear", in 2018. A story contained within my collection of short fiction, "Anthology of Evil" (paperback), and as a standalone short ebook and audiobook

By the way, on Monday, I will be sharing a blog offering a critical analysis of all my published short stories from my Anthology of Evil series of books offering an overview of myself as storyteller. Please share.

Stay tuned... 


However it was my first short story sold to a magazine in 1990, an East Coast horror quarterly, now out of publication.

If you're like me and academic in nature, for a serious person I'd suggested reading this blog, then reading the short story, then re-read this blog. You'll be surprised what you get out of it. If nothing else, perhaps reading this blog, or even skimming it as most may do (if I'm lucky), will motivate them to read the short story.

I'm also preparing a critical analysis of my writings as contained in my Anthology of Evil series, which are most of my short stories, which are aside from my fiction and non-fiction books, screenplays, and films, as I dabble in multiple creative "universes".

Cover art by Marvin Hayes

Yes, I was excited to receive my first payment for selling my fiction, and that was its history with me, for a while...until 2016 when its relevance became far more profound. And again in our last election, when it became ever more profound. Much in the way the film "Idiocracy" (2006) has become so relevant, a decade after its release.

Idiocracy DVD poster

Yes, I'm talking about Donald Trump. Again. We're all so sick of talking about him, yet again fluffing his ego in his malignant narcissism. But against the wishes of most of us, he's in our faces, and...again.

His MaGA political personality cult of autocracy with pepperings of fascism, uses a kind of political idiocy to force him onto we the people and into our governemnt. All in order to gain, and then retain power for purposes of weath, power and frankly, attention.

Now? We're deep into it. But let's put him and all that insanity aside for the moment. This is about my story, "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear". A title I gleamed from my childhood authorial hero, Isaac Asimov, who wrote the Foundation Series, so much science fiction today is based upon. 

Though we will have to get back to him, as this story has become relevant... long before Trump was on the poltical stage.


Original magazine artist's depiction of story scene

Brief aside...

Many years ago, I met a very attractive woman and we were considering going out together on a date. We were sitting around talking one day and I offered her to read this story which I was rather proud of. She actually read it, then in horror at the end of it (as it is a dystopian kind of horror story), she looked up at me (in horror) and asked me:

"Is this how you look at women?" 

I was stunned, quickly comprehending her orientation on what she had read.

"What? No! Wait, do you not understand how horror fiction works? You see, the author tends to write what horrifies them in the hope it will do the same to the reader. The idea is that you present something in a positive (seemingly positive) "light" so it will bring the reader to your point of view. It's a kind of trick of the writing."

I was clumsy in my response because I was a little in shock at her response (as was she in reading my story, apparently). 

To clarify now, in having time to consider it: Horror fiction often works by luring the reader into a false sense of security—presenting something in a seemingly positive light—only to reveal its true, terrifying nature. Authors write what horrifies them, hoping to evoke the same reaction in the reader, using contrast and subversion to shift perspectives and expose hidden fears.

Thus, the things I find personally despicable, I present in the story in a way to bring, or more greatly bring, the reader to align with my beliefs or orientation. 

If you write about a serial murderer or rapist, you draw the reader into an understanding—until they’re jolted by the realization that they’ve been seeing through a filter far removed from how they should be viewing it.

When an author gets the reader to side with the antagonist—a murderer, rapist, or other horror—then pulls them back to reveal where they stand, it becomes a powerful technique to disturb, horrify, and challenge perspectives.

Anyway, I couldn't convince her otherwise and the date never transpired.

Probably for the best. Though it bothers me that she walked away having a view of who I was that was very detached from reality. 

No, trust me, really. Honest!

But again... this today is about the themes within my story, "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear."

Several themes emerge that explore the implications of memory, technology, and ethics within a futuristic context. One prominent theme is the relationship between technological advancement and its effects on human memory and experience. The protagonist appears to navigate a world deeply intertwined with advanced technology, such as the iSet, which signifies a tool for accessing memories and experiences but also embodies a sense of emotional detachment from the past .

The narrative presents a complex view of how individuals cope with their memories through technology. For instance, the internal struggle of the protagonist regarding whether to engage with their painful past reflects a universal conflict between the desire to remember and the need to forget. 

In the narrative of "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear," the main characters are Peter and George. Peter is portrayed as a highly intelligent and evolving individual who undergoes significant changes, including a transformation into a more advanced being with enhanced cognitive capabilities. 

George, on the other hand, a world famous surgeon, is depicted as a close friend of Peter who observes and reacts to Peter's transformation and its implications, often feeling a mix of admiration and concern over Peter's abilities and intentions. Peter is in fact, George's lost (in the Amazon) son's friend. Together, they navigate the complexities of advanced technology and its effects on their lives and relationships.

This duality raises questions about the authenticity of experiences when mediated through technology. The protagonist's interactions on the social media platform, UNIsee, illustrate how public perception and individual memory can become clouded by external forces, complicating personal truths and ethical considerations.

Furthermore, the theme of existential reflection emerges as characters contemplate their identities against a backdrop of profound technological change. The desire to communicate "directly" with a significant figure from their past underscores a yearning for genuine connections in a reality where such interactions are increasingly mediated by technology. This mirrors the tension between the human longing for connection and the isolating nature of technological progress, suggesting that as society advances, it risks losing touch with its core humanity.

Also evident is the theme of ethical dilemmas that accompany technological innovations. Characters grapple with the implications of their choices, illuminating the moral complexities that arise when personal and collective advancements take precedence over traditional ethical norms. The story ultimately serves as a cautionary tale, inviting readers to reflect on the balance between embracing innovation and preserving the essence of human experience and morality.

In summary, "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear" intricately weaves themes of memory, technology, and ethics, emphasizing the profound impact of technological advancements on personal experience and identity while questioning the moral implications of such progress in a rapidly changing world. A reoccuring theme of the author in his works.

Please note that the UNIsee and the iSet are not the same device, but they serve complementary functions in the narrative. The iSet is described as a highly advanced device, functioning as a "Nanodot Interfaced Radio Wave Cooled Evanescent Laser Photonic Integrated Circuit monitor," which integrates various home systems and is run by complex memory modules and hyper-communications. It represents a personal technology that enhances communication and entertainment within a household.

On the other hand, the UNIsee is introduced as a social media platform built and maintained by the United Nations, granting global access to users. It was created to allow unfettered communication among people worldwide, replacing a previously defunct social media tool that had misused private data. The story highlights the UNIsee's role in maintaining social connections and the protagonist's high standing on the platform due to his profession and association with another character, Peter

The concept of concentrating a nation's media and political narrative around a single individual's personality—reminiscent of a personality cult—can have far-reaching implications for both domestic stability and international relations. This phenomenon often hinges on the individual's mental state, which can profoundly influence a nation's direction.

Within the context of the narratives explored, we see the complexities that emerge from this dynamic. For instance, the centralization of communication through technology, as exemplified by the social media platform UNIsee, positions a character's status and connections as crucial components of his public persona. This situation echoes the influence of figures (like conviced felon POTUS47 Trump), where personal traits and moments of instability can shape national sentiment and policy.

Additionally, this highlights how media narratives can distort public perception, leading to binary thinking, where individuals interpret events in black-and-white terms rather than acknowledging the complexities involved. This distortion is exacerbated by the immediacy of information dissemination in a digital age, creating a landscape where rapid reactions can overshadow thoughtful engagement with issues. The protagonist's reflections suggest that sensationalism in media—chosen for profit rather than truth—overrides factual accuracy, leading to widespread misinformation and possible unrest.

Moreover, the implications of a singular vision steered by one leader's instability can foster societal division. The desperation for clarity in a confusing world often leads people to rally around ambiguous promises of strength or unity. This situation can invoke a sense of shared identity among followers, who may overlook troubling behaviors in their leader due to the strong emotional undercurrents of a personality cult.

Geopolitically, the consequences of such dynamics can be significant. An unstable leader can provoke conflicts, as external adversaries may exploit these weaknesses or unpredictabilities to undermine the nation's standing internationally. As tensions rise, the need for a cohesive, rational policy may become secondary to the leader's erratic impulses, potentially leading to international strife or miscalculations that can affect relations with allies.

In summary, concentrating media and political power in the hands of one individual gives rise to a multitude of issues, from misinformation and societal division to geopolitical instability, as the individual’s mental and emotional health directly shapes the nation's trajectory and its interactions with the broader world.

The concentration of media power within a personality cult significantly undermines the public's ability to critically evaluate information and form independent opinions. One crucial factor is the tendency for sensationalism and emotional manipulation over factual accuracy, which can distort public perception. 

In a media landscape dominated by a singular narrative, as often seen in the dynamics discussed in the context of characters navigating public life through platforms like UNIsee, critical engagement with information can be overshadowed by the personality-driven agenda that seeks to garner attention rather than encourage informed discourse.

This environment fuels binary thinking, where the public is encouraged to view issues in black-and-white terms rather than the "gray" of actuality in appreciating the complexities involved. The internal struggle of characters grappling with their connections and identities in such a climate illustrates how easily individuals can be swayed by repetitive narratives crafted to fit the desires of a charismatic leader. Heightened emotional appeals often replace nuanced discussions, leading to a populace that is less equipped to critically assess diverse perspectives.

Moreover, the reliance on a singular figure for guidance can stifle dissent and discourage independent thought. When media and political narratives coalesce around a personality, followers may overlook troubling behaviors or decisions out of loyalty to that figure, resulting in a herd mentality that discourages questioning and critical reflection. This idealization of a leader can create a false sense of unity, but ultimately, it cultivates an environment where objective evaluation of information is significantly impaired.

As a consequence, society may experience fragmentation, where people become entrenched in their views, insulated from alternative opinions and discussions. The repercussions of this are particularly severe in a geopolitical context, as the public's diminished capacity to critically appraise information feeds into the whims of a leader, potentially inciting conflict and jeopardizing rational governance. 

The concentration of media power in personality cults fosters an atmosphere of emotional manipulation and simplified narratives, thereby significantly hampering the public's ability to engage in critical evaluation and independent thinking concerning information.

To counteract the effects of misinformation and societal division that arise from a personality cult, societies can adopt several strategies:

Promoting Media Literacy: Enhancing the public's ability to critically evaluate information is essential. Education programs that focus on distinguishing between reliable and unreliable sources can empower individuals to recognize misinformation. As seen in discussions surrounding the rapid dissemination of information via platforms like UNIsee (or today in social media, streaming, and television), fostering critical thinking skills can mitigate the emotional manipulation prevalent in sensationalist media narratives.

Encouraging Diverse Perspectives: Creating platforms that promote diverse viewpoints can counteract the monolithic narrative often perpetuated by a personality cult. By exposing citizens to a variety of perspectives, societies can nurture a climate that values nuance and complexity in discussions. This approach directly opposes the binary thinking that frequently emerges when media is concentrated in the hands of a single individual.

Fostering Open Dialogue: Establishing forums for open discussions where dissenting opinions can be expressed without fear of reprisal is vital. This encourages independent thought and reduces the herd mentality that often accompanies a personality cult. When individuals feel safe to question authority and share differing viewpoints, it strengthens democratic engagement and resilience against divisive rhetoric.

Implementing Fact-Checking Mechanisms: Instituting independent fact-checking organizations can provide the public with reliable information, helping to clarify misinformation spread by dominant media narratives. Transparency in information can build public trust and promote a culture where facts are prioritized over personal agendas or emotional appeals.

Strengthening Community Ties: Encouraging community engagement and dialogue fosters understanding and solidarity among diverse groups. As individuals become more connected with their communities, the emotional appeal of a singular charismatic leader may diminish, and collective action can lead to more constructive responses to social issues.

Utilizing Technology Responsibly: The use of technology should be approached with caution, ensuring that it does not exacerbate divisions. Leveraging technology for positive community-building efforts can help counteract the harmful impacts of a pervasive personality cult. Appropriately moderated social media platforms that vet information can play a crucial role.

Addressing Root Social Issues: Root causes of division often stem from economic and social inequalities. By addressing these fundamental issues, societies can diminish the susceptibility of individuals to fall under the sway of polarizing figures. When people's basic needs are met, they may be less likely to rally behind a leader based solely on emotional or charismatic appeals.

Through a multi-faceted approach that emphasizes education, open dialogue, community engagement, and responsible technology use, societies can effectively counteract the pernicious effects of misinformation and division stemming from personality cults.

Historical leaders often exhibit traits that mirror the dynamics of personality cults, leading to significant geopolitical consequences stemming from their leadership styles. Notably, Adolf Hitler serves as a prime example who is characterized as a charismatic figure capable of mesmeric influence, captivating followers and rallying an entire nation around his vision, which ultimately devolved into fascism and genocide. Hitler's leadership fostered a culture where unquestioning loyalty was demanded, which severely limited public discourse and independent thought, contributing to widespread complicity in his regime's atrocities.

The consequences of Hitler's style were catastrophic, as his approach led to World War II and the Holocaust, fundamentally altering global geopolitics and human rights discourse. His regime's emphasis on a singular narrative, often rooted in emotional manipulation and sensationalism, exemplifies how the concentration of media power within a personality cult can result in catastrophic outcomes.

Other leaders such as Mao Zedong and Stalin similarly exemplified traits typical of personality cults. Mao's leadership during the Cultural Revolution reflected a profound manipulation of public sentiment, leading to societal upheaval and millions of deaths as a result of policies like the Great Leap Forward. Stalin's cult of personality resulted in widespread fear and repression, as dissent was not tolerated, leading to extensive purges and a culture of paranoia that defined Soviet society.

The common thread among these leaders' traits—charisma, media concentration, emotional manipulation, and repression— has led to devastating geopolitical consequences, including wars, genocides, and enduring societal fractures. The allure of these charismatic figures often masks the dire implications of their authoritarian governance, as seen throughout the 20th century.

Current domestic leadership can reflect traits similar to those found in historical authoritarian figures, potentially leading to significant societal and geopolitical consequences. For instance, the concentration of power and the demand for loyalty can be seen in modern leadership styles that resemble personality cults. 

These leaders often exhibit charismatic authority, similar to Hitler and Stalin, fostering an environment where media narratives are manipulated to serve their agendas. This concentration of media influence leads to a culture of emotional manipulation and sensationalism, which can erode public discourse and independent thought.

Moreover, the dangers of governance marked by a singular narrative were observed in the cases where personality cults were prominent. Current domestic leaders who aspire to or maintain control through charismatic appeal may neglect the well-being of the populace in favor of personal or political gain. As seen in historical examples, this can result in societal upheaval, manipulation of public sentiment, and even egregious human rights violations.

Furthermore, the risks associated with placing trust in leaders exhibiting these traits highlight potential vulnerabilities within a society, especially when combined with advanced technologies and social media platforms. These tools can amplify divisive rhetoric and misinformation, exacerbating societal divisions. The interplay of a leader's charisma with technology can create an intoxicating atmosphere that diminishes accountability and undermines democratic principles, much like the scenarios experienced under past dictatorships.

The characteristics of current domestic leadership, particularly when echoing the dynamics of a personality cult, hold the potential for significant negative implications, akin to those witnessed in history. Societies that fail to recognize and counteract these patterns may find themselves vulnerable to authoritarianism and societal fragmentation.

The protagonist in the story exhibits characteristics that can be likened to those associated with Donald Trump, particularly in terms of their charisma and the resulting influence over their respective audiences. For instance, the protagonist has a certain magnetic appeal, which historically has allowed figures like Hitler to mesmerize a nation, echoing Trump's own ability to captivate his followers with his rhetoric and public persona.

Both the protagonist and Trump can be seen as controversial figures, eliciting strong opinions from both supporters and detractors. The protagonist's confusion and struggles with identity reflect a deeper psychological complexity, much like how Trump's leadership is often scrutinized for perceived psychological traits, including a sense of superiority and the need for affirmation. The text mentions the protagonist's transformation into a figure akin to Hitler, which evokes the notion of a dangerous amalgamation of personal traits that can lead to a form of madness or disillusionment.

Moreover, the narrative highlights a disintegrating grasp on reality, exemplified by the protagonist's descent into madness and the chilling realization of embodying a historical figure known for atrocities. A natural evolution for such figures, in such manufactured situations, under such strains and stresses of maintainingk a defective reality for the masses.

This mirrors concerns about Trump's leadership style, where critics often discuss the potential risks of authoritarian tendencies and the impact of a single narrative, aligning with the fears of societal upheaval drawn from past examples of leadership gone awry.

Ultimately, the similarities lie in the portrayal of charisma, the magnetic yet divisive influence over followers, and an overarching theme of identity confusion that spirals into a psychological crisis. This complex interplay illustrates how individuals in power can reflect pathological tendencies that lead to profound consequences for society.

The distancing in the story of Canada and Mexico from the United States, contrasted with the yearning of more distant nations' populations to engage with America's media and advertising, reveals a complex interplay of geopolitical relationships and societal perceptions. Canada and Mexico appear to be navigating a cautious path in their interactions with the U.S. 

This is highlighted by an associate's concern about Canada's evident reluctance to deepen ties with America, as if wary of the socio-political climate emanating from its neighbor. Such distancing may reflect Canada's desire to assert its identity and protect its societal values from the perceived decline of ethical and moral norms in America, as brought about by its domestic leadership and societal changes, which many consider problematic.

On the other hand, the populations of more distant nations continue to aspire to the captivating allure of American media and advertising, which they see as symbols of modernity and success. This is paradoxical, as the very media that these populations admire is also witnessing a significant disintegration of societal and ethical standards within America itself. 

The differences in these interactions underscore a divergence where proximity seems to breed caution and potential alienation, while distance fosters a fascination with the perceived advantages of American cultural influence.

Moreover, America's media landscape has become a contentious space characterized by sensationalism and a manipulative narrative that prioritizes profit over societal integrity. The various influences stemming from this environment can lead to a distorted perception of reality, impacting how not only Americans but foreign nations understand and engage with moral and ethical norms. 

Thus, while Canada and Mexico may seek to distance themselves from these dynamics, other countries might find themselves entranced by the compelling but chaotic cultural outputs of the United States, further complicating the relationship between the nations based on their geographic proximity and cultural affinity. 

It's interesting to note how POTUS47 Trump has politically "attacked" our nearest neighbors, leading to our American anthem at a Canadian sports event being booed, something that has never happened before.

The disintegration of societal and ethical norms in America can have profound effects on its relationships with neighboring countries like Canada and Mexico, as well as with more distant nations. 

For Canada and Mexico, there appears to be a cautious distancing from the U.S., reflecting a desire to protect their societal values from the perceived decline occurring within American society. This distancing is illustrated by Canada’s apprehension in deepening ties with the U.S., suggesting an intent to assert its own identity amid the troubling socio-political climate.

Conversely, nations further from the U.S. may still harbor a fascination with American culture, particularly its media and advertising, viewing these as symbols of modernity and success. 

This paradox highlights a scenario where, while Canada and Mexico retreat due to the chaotic dynamics of American societal decay, more distant populations become enamored with the captivating allure of American media. These countries might be drawn to the idea of American prosperity despite the ethical and moral erosion evidenced within its borders.

The manipulation and sensationalism prevalent in America's media landscape can further complicate these dynamics. Many nations, attracted to America's cultural outputs, may misinterpret or glorify these influences, failing to recognize the underlying challenges of societal integrity that Americans face. This detachment can create a distorted perception of reality, affecting how both neighbors and distant countries engage with American culture and policy.

Ultimately, the divergence in responses to the disintegration of American norms underscores a complex interaction. While Canada and Mexico express wariness and seek to distance themselves, other nations are drawn into America's tumultuous narrative, leading to an intricate web of admiration mixed with caution, depending on geographic and cultural proximities.

In reflecting on my journey with "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear," I invite readers to ponder the intricate interplay between technology and memory as explored in my story. The protagonist's navigation through a world heavily influenced by advanced tools like the iSet exemplifies the emotional detachment that can arise from technological reliance, a theme that resonates deeply in today's society. 

This story emphasizes the universal struggle between the desire to remember and the inclination to forget, encouraging a profound contemplation of the authenticity of our experiences when mediated by technology.

Furthermore, the characters' ethical dilemmas highlight the complexities that emerge when innovation takes precedence over traditional moral norms, posing essential questions about our collective humanity in the face of rapid advancement. 

As we reflect on these themes, I hope readers are not only motivated to engage with my story but also to critically evaluate the implications of their relationship with technology and memory in their own lives. 

In a future where our interactions are becoming increasingly mediated, it is crucial that we maintain genuine connections that nurture our humanity. Ultimately, "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear" (audiobook narrated by voice actor Tom Remick) serves as a cautionary tale, inviting us to find a balance between embracing innovation and preserving the essence of our shared human experience.

Part II of this analysis on this story is available here:

In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear" by JZ Murdock - Part II, Analysis of Relationships



Compiled with the aid of MyReader AI

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

Do AI Models Age? The Challenge of Keeping Artificial Intelligence Sharp


Older AI models show signs of cognitive decline, study shows — but not everyone is entirely convinced | Live Science


Do AI Models Experience Cognitive Decline?

A recent study suggests that older AI models may show signs of cognitive decline, but not everyone is convinced. The idea that AI could deteriorate over time raises an interesting discussion about the nature of software, its maintenance, and whether AI systems should be treated more like evolving organisms rather than static tools.

Unlike hardware, which physically ages and degrades, software doesn’t wear out in the same way. However, AI models do face obsolescence when they can’t keep up with evolving data, shifting contexts, or new user expectations. Without continuous self-maintenance—like self-diagnostics, pruning of outdated patterns, or regular fine-tuning—models can develop inconsistencies, making them less effective over time.

This could be compared to how an old operating system struggles with modern software demands. We often find ways to extend the life of physical devices well beyond their expected use, but software—especially AI—rarely enjoys the same longevity without intervention.

The question then arises: Should older AI models be periodically refreshed or even retired, much like outdated technology? Perhaps they should be archived for historical comparison, allowing researchers to analyze their evolution while ensuring real-time AI remains sharp and effective. 

The future of AI might not just be about creating new models but also about maintaining and refining the ones we already have.

However, considering we are discovering new processes and orientations on AI all the time, many of these should be replaced when the time is most appropriate. Which could be far more often than profit or finances dictate.


Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Louis DeJoy Decides to Flee Office as Most Despised USPS Postmaster General

What is the evaluation of his actions as postmaster general in a service not intended to necessarily produce profit. 

DeJoy has requested the USPS board begin its process to find a successor just months after telling Congress he would remain in the post “until somebody hauls me out of here.” 


Louis DeJoy’s tenure as Postmaster General has been highly controversial, with mixed evaluations of his impact on the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). His leadership was marked by operational changes that were framed as cost-cutting measures but also raised concerns about service slowdowns, particularly during the 2020 election and the pandemic.

Criticisms of DeJoy’s Tenure:

  1. Service Delays & Operational Cuts – DeJoy implemented policies such as reducing overtime, removing mail sorting machines, and reorganizing delivery routes. These moves led to significant mail delays, which drew backlash from the public and lawmakers, especially in the lead-up to the 2020 election when mail-in voting was critical.

  2. Election Mail Concerns – His changes raised alarm about potential disruptions to the timely delivery of ballots. Lawsuits and congressional hearings followed, leading to some reversals of policy.

  3. Privatization Concerns – Critics argued that his cost-cutting measures aligned with a long-term push to privatize parts of USPS, despite its role as a public service rather than a for-profit entity.

  4. Financial Priorities Over Service – While the USPS has long faced financial struggles, DeJoy’s approach focused on making the service more self-sustaining rather than emphasizing its essential public function. His 10-year plan, Delivering for America, included price hikes, slower delivery standards for first-class mail, and reductions in post office hours—decisions that hurt rural and low-income communities the most.

  5. Ethical Issues – His past financial ties to USPS competitors raised conflict-of-interest concerns. Reports emerged that he had held investments in companies that do business with the Postal Service, and he was accused of pressuring employees at his former business to donate to Republican campaigns.

Defenses of His Tenure:

  1. Long-Term Financial Stability – DeJoy argued that his reforms were necessary to address decades of financial losses at USPS, which operates under a unique Congressional mandate to pre-fund retiree benefits.

  2. Modernization Efforts – He pushed for fleet upgrades, including an expansion of electric vehicles, and sought to improve package delivery efficiency to compete with private couriers like FedEx and UPS.

  3. Bipartisan Postal Reform Act (2022) – Some of his reforms were complemented by congressional action that reduced USPS’s financial burdens, suggesting that his tenure contributed to broader restructuring efforts.

Overall Evaluation:

DeJoy’s legacy at USPS is likely to remain divisive. While he introduced cost-cutting reforms aimed at financial sustainability, his actions often came at the expense of service reliability, particularly for vulnerable populations. His tenure underscored the tension between treating USPS as a business versus a public service. His departure may pave the way for leadership that prioritizes service over profit-driven efficiency.

How will his personal businesses be positively affected by his actions as postmaster? It has been assumed from the beginning that he would make changes to enhance his wealth. Much as convicted felon Donald Trump has done.

There have been longstanding concerns about how Louis DeJoy’s tenure as Postmaster General may have financially benefited his personal businesses or investments. While no direct legal action has been taken against him for self-enrichment, his business connections and policy decisions raised significant ethical questions.

Potential Financial Benefits to DeJoy’s Businesses & Investments:

  1. Ties to USPS Contractors
    Before becoming Postmaster General, DeJoy was the CEO of New Breed Logistics, a company that held multimillion-dollar contracts with USPS for supply chain and logistics services. After selling New Breed to XPO Logistics in 2014, DeJoy retained financial interests in XPO, a company that continued to do business with USPS.

    • DeJoy initially stated he would divest from XPO stock, but financial disclosures showed he maintained ties to companies that could benefit from USPS contracts.
  2. Privatization & Outsourcing to Competitors
    DeJoy’s changes to USPS service, such as reducing sorting capacity and slowing first-class mail, forced more businesses and individuals to rely on private delivery services like FedEx, UPS, and XPO.

    • If these companies gained more business due to USPS slowdowns, DeJoy—who had past financial ties to logistics firms—could have indirectly benefited from this shift.
  3. Real Estate Investments & USPS Facility Consolidation
    Under DeJoy’s tenure, USPS began consolidating and relocating sorting facilities, often moving operations to large regional distribution centers.

    • If DeJoy or associates had real estate investments near these new centers or in logistics infrastructure that would now see more private sector involvement, there could be indirect financial gains.
  4. Package Delivery & Rate Increases Favoring Private Partners
    DeJoy’s strategy increased package shipping rates while reducing USPS reliance on traditional letter mail.

    • Higher package rates could benefit private-sector logistics firms if USPS became less competitive, pushing customers toward private shipping solutions.
    • He also changed delivery standards, prioritizing packages over first-class mail, which aligned with a growing industry trend that benefited private logistics providers.
  5. Government Contracts & Influence
    Even after leaving USPS, DeJoy’s connections within logistics and government contracting could make him a valuable figure in future private-sector ventures. His tenure gave him insight into USPS operations, possibly positioning him to leverage that experience for consulting, lobbying, or business deals.

Did DeJoy Directly Profit?

While no conclusive evidence has surfaced proving direct profiteering, the structural changes he made to USPS aligned with trends that could financially benefit companies tied to his past and potentially future business dealings. Critics argue that his tenure disproportionately advantaged private logistics companies at the expense of USPS’s core mission as a public service.

Now that he is stepping down, it will be interesting to see if he returns to the private logistics industry or forms new business ventures related to the postal or shipping sectors. If he does, that could further validate concerns that his USPS tenure was, at least in part, a setup for personal gain.


Compiled with aid of ChatGPT