Thursday, January 20, 2011

Catholic school, uniforms, reputations and explosives

I sat in the eighth grade Holy Rosary Catholic school class in Tacoma, WA, wearing my Catholic school uniform, and wondered; how had I gotten here? I had been abused by these "nice" kids, beaten by the ancient Nun who was our teacher and Principle and abused by the alter boys (no, not in that way, either, nor did the Priests, ever).

I looked around the room. Everyone wore the standard dress, dark blue sweater, black slacks (or immensely ugly skirts for girls, except for their length which a few of the more attractive girls were always trying to raise the hem on), black patent leather shoes, white shirt.

It was supposed to be the great equalizer, wearing the same clothing throughout the entire school. No one was better than anyone else. It was a grand design, a wonderful concept. There was no concern about gang violence back then, in our Parish anyway. No concern about someone getting killed over what they were wearing. Just that thought that no one was better than anyone else. Someone should have told those kids though. Because it was quite apparent some kids were better than other, or thought they were, or most certainly, had more money than others.

Of course, the rich kids, all had about five or six complete outfits; when their clothing got worn out, it got replaced. The poor kids all had but one set of the uniform, which they wore every day of the school year, if at all possible, and year after year until it was either too out sized or you were told you could no longer wear it, wherein it was given away, sold, or handed down to the next sibling line in line, again, if at all possible. Those kids were easy to spot. Their shoes were scuffed, their sweaters had holes in them, which the kids tended to keep their hands over in order to hide their poverty, and which usually made the holes grow even bigger with time.

In reality, there really was no equalizing accomplished by way of wearing a uniform. It only ended up making us all look like dweebs. And embarrassed the more poor kids in that they couldn't adjust their wardrobe with whatever they had available, or whatever hand-me-down they could acquire from an older sibling.

I'm not going to argue the use of uniforms relaxes the issues with gang signs, or physical abuse. I had plenty of physical abuse in that uniformed school.

I had been in seventh grade, having gone through public school from the beginning. But my little brother, five years my junior, started in Catholic school (I have no idea why) from the beginning. When I had problems in public school we gave thought to my moving to a Catholic school where I'd be more protected and comfortable.


I had gotten in a little bit of trouble in public school, you see.

A guy in 7th grade gave me a few firecrackers. Seems his dad went over to Idaho to pick up illegal fireworks for the 4th of July. So, bright one I was, a friend and I went out into the football field, to the other side, by the street, away from the school building, at lunch, no one around, and we lit the device, threw it into a pile of sawdust and it went bang. We laughed. Walked back to the school building, an old brick thing from the medieval times.

As we were walking up the stairs, the Vice Principle was coming out the huge, double, thick wooden doors. We said, "Hi." Trying to be nice. He said, "Hi boys." We all took a few steps, continuing on. Suddenly, he stopped, I think he made the connection, explosion, no one in the field, two boys walking in off the field, kind of a no brainer now that I think about it, but back then, we were amazed at his super powers of reasoning.

He drug us both back to the office. He went through our lockers. He talked to the other guy first who walked out looking dejected and I assumed he gave me up. I was escorted in to his office. Now, the Vice Principle, was a hard assed kind of guy, I liked the Principle far more. He pressured me, used all kinds of weird techniques, like asking me where I got the firecracker. He said, "You know firecrackers are against the law, right?"

I said, "No, I didn't. They aren't against the law." I assumed acting stupid would help my case. He said, "You don't believe me? Would you like to hear it from a police officer?" I thought, cool, yeah, I'd prefer to get this kind of information from a direct source. Really, that was what I was thinking, I had the best of intentions. He said, "Okay, I'll call them." He did.

"Hello? This is the Vice Principle of Stewart Jr. High school (I was there 1967-70). I have a young man here who does not believe that firecrackers are against the law. He wanted to talk with a policeman about it. Okay, here you go." He handed me the phone.
Stewart Jr. High School, Tacoma, WA (5/47)
"H-Hello?" I said, hesitantly. The cop went on to tell me the law. I thought, I was being very nice. I thanked him and said goodbye and gave the Vice Principle the phone. He talked to the cop. He said something about the cop thinking I was a smart ass (how insightful). I was shocked. Then I was more shocked at how this went after he hung up.

"The officer said we have a real trouble maker here." My face dropped. "WHAT?" I thought. 'Here is what we will do, you tell me where you got the fireworks from, and that will be the end of it. Of course, I will want you to tell your mother to expect a phone call from." He drilled me until I gave up a name. And that, was the end of my Jr High school career in public school. Until, I had earned my way back from the abyss, that is.

The next day I got to school and was told by several kids my life was forfeit. They said if the kid I got the firecracker from, if his dad got in trouble with the law over this, over my giving him up (of course I tried to put blame on the other kid as the snitch, but it didn't work), they were going to beat me up every day of my life from then on. After a few altercations, and my being increasingly stressed out about going to school day after day, my mother asked me if I wanted to leave school. 'Oh yes,' I thought.

Speaking of my mother. The day that happened with the Vice Principle, I went home and no one was there. My mother called pretty soon to say she was at her girlfriend Virginia's house. So I told her what happened. Honestly. That the VP said he'd be calling her. So she recounted what I had done that was so terrible. She verified that I was careful. She understood my reasoning, then she broke up laughing.

'I thought, how cool. My mom is so cool.' Then she caught herself and said Mom stuff, like oh I suppose I shouldn't laugh, but you were careful, still, you shouldn't have done that  and don't do it again, okay? I said, no problem, no more explosives at school. That was the end of it. Other than my waiting on the VP to call.

Well, finally, he did. A week later and was he pissed. I got home from school and my mom told me what happened. He called and said he had told me for my mom to call him (he didn't say that). She told him I had immediately told him and that she had been waiting on his phone call; that what I did, really wasn't that big a deal and they made far too much over it, and proceeded to read him the infamous riot act.

My mom had always said that if her kid were wrong in something, she'd be the first to admit it; but if her kid wasn't wrong, or was being treated badly, she'd be right in somebody's face over it. I thought the VP had treated me underhandedly. Seems my mom thought so too.. So should she have punished me? Well, I never did it again. Isn't that the purpose of the punishment? I felt more loyal to my mom and was willing to not do whatever she wanted.

I never did anything like that again. Until High School, but I didn't blow off anything at school ever again.
Lincoln High School, Tacoma, WA
As I said, my mom asked if I wanted out of that school. She meant the Catholic school my little brother went to. Which I never wanted to go to, although I was head alter boy at our tiny Slovak church, St. Joe's, a few blocks from the more massive, Holy Rosary Parish Church which had far more money and resources. But I had served at old, kindly Father Joe's funeral and was loyal to the small underdog of a church. And wearing a uniform? Uh, no.
Holy Rosary Catholic Church, Tacoma, WA

But my life was on the line and I was tired of being stressed out every single day so I said, yes, finally. She called. I was there. They asked, is he a good boy, we only take on good children. I was starting to feel good about this. She made sure from my mom I would promise to be good and on my best behavior. And I tried.

But, my experience was, I never had as many fights in school, ever again. Thank God, I had been fighting Karate tournaments for a couple of years. So I got the uniform, started going to the same school as little brother. And duly got teased, abused, battered, set up, and berated for a solid 8th grade year of school. I was resented and rejected by the alter boys because I refused to join them as I was head alter boy at St. Joe's, something they never understood. So when the alter boys, all the 8th grade boys, got a day off from school for a field trip, I had to stay with the girls, who either wanted nothing to do with me, or vice versa.
St. Joseph's Catholic Church, Tacoma, WA
Once, I was by the corner of the school, two of the boys came up to me, one hung back by the corner, kept looking around the corner, the other boy, harassed me into pushing him, then he fell, on purpose, I didn't push him hard enough, just as the head Nun, our Teacher, the Principle, Sister Rogers, an old and hardened old bat. As she came around the corner, they both immediately started saying I push that kid down for no reason. I tried to tell her what happened, but hey, two against one. Right?

Legend tells it, by the way, that years later was carried kicking and screaming out of the home the Nuns lived at, to go to the old Nuns home. She, my friends, was really odd.

One time, the boys all go in a circle around me, about twenty feet across, and took turns throwing the basketball at my head until I was so sick and in pain I was going to throw up. They wouldn't stop, so finally I said, "That's it, I've had it, I'm outta here." I walked off to walk home. They yelled at me in fear, "HEY, you can't leave, you'll get in trouble!" I said, "Oh yeah, watch me." I walked home.

Another time, my mother came to pick me up, there must have been about six inches of slush on the ground. My mother pulled the car up in the school yard as it was all part of the parking area. My little brother got in. The kids were all about, milling around, heading out, waiting for rides. I was about to get in the car, my mother standing by the driver's side door, when a big old slushball hit the seat and exploded all through the car. I turned around, everyone was laughing. I felt at the time, like I will put up with all the abuse, all the humiliation, but once you bring my family into it, that's it!

Little did I know, one of the two kids involved in the pushing incident, had been riding by on a bike, and he threw it. But with all the kids laughing and jeering, boys and girls, I simply grabbed the closest kid. I started yelling at him, "Who did it!" He responded by taking a swing at me. I grabbed both his shoulders by his shirt. He took another swing, I couldn't believe how bad he was at fighting (remember I'd been going to the dojo for years, nearly every day of the week sometimes). He hit my shoulder, sad really. Then he did something stupid, he tried to trip me. I was very good at not getting tripped in a tournament fight. So I showed him how to do it.

But when he hit the ground, I was so pissed off, and this was the only time this ever happened in my life, I was so mad that I hit him in the head while he was down. It felt so good, the release, that I hit him in the head again, and six more times, before I could realize I was counting my hits and not going to stop. It scared me so bad, all that year of abuse by these kids, that it all flooded out into this one kid that wasn't the sole reason for all of my woes. I stopped. Stood up, looked around, everyone was quiet, not a sound.

I walked away. I got three steps and heard him get up. Now, tournament fighting gives you a 6th sense. And I knew, he was about to jump me, so I threw a back kick, directly into his center, taking out his testicles perfectly and he went down again like a wet rag. After a few moments, he got up, and yelled at my mom: "Your son is a dirty fighter!" And he shambled off behind the church, where I heard later by a kid that went to him, that 1) he was going to jump me, and 2) I got him really good with that last kick. From then on these kids backed off from me a bit and my reputation for years to come was sealed.

By time I graduated, I had their respect and fear. Rather than go to an all boys Catholic Prep school, Bellarmine Prep, I opted for 9th grade back at the same Jr. High school. But things were different. I had a rep now. Once I hit High School the following year, more of the boys from 8th grade were there and told people, "Don't mess with him, I've seen him do damage repeatedly" and so was born, my reputation that followed me through High School and beyond. Thanks guys.

As I said before, I never blew off any more fireworks at school, ever again. I only possessed; a couple of Black kids, our school was half black and the lowest income ranking in Tacoma, picked me up as I was leaving the student lounge (which only they year before you were allowed to smoke in, you could see the burn marks on furniture), carried me to the back wall of the lounge, slammed me against the wall up off my feet and said, "We hear you have fireworks, give us some." So...I did, but told them, brazenly, do NOT use them on campus; I've had bad experiences with that."

When I came to school the next day, I was called into the Principle's office. I had no idea why. I sat there for a while, then Principle Willie came in. I didn't like our VP; I had known him from the Jr High experience, so I was pretty happy it wasn't him, regardless what was going on. Willie (who had a great Flip Wilson act and did it at every reasonable chance, and very well, indeed) sat across his desk, folded his hands, smiled and said, "Okay Murdock, what is it this time." I liked this guy, everyone liked this guy.

"I said, I have no idea."

He said, "Something about fireworks?" I thought, "Oh, crap, not again. And I didn't even do anything this time.' He said, 'Two young men were caught blowing off firecrackers on campus yesterday and they said they got them from you." I sighed. Then I told him exactly what happened. But I said I found them, this time. No one to tell on; no matter what, after my last experience, I wasn't snitching on anyone. I told him they forced them from me, and I was only taking them home, that I told them not not use them on campus.

He was cool, as always and said, "Tell you what, gather up all remaining firecrackers and turn them in to me tomorrow and we'll just forget this ever happened, okay?" See, he was the coolest, and really, that's all it needed. He had far worse things to deal with at that school. We had a guy pulled from gym class, from the locker room, for robbing the bank across the street once. I feared for my life walking down a hallway alone. I'd had some run ins with the Black kids who all seemed to "have attitude".

So, I gathered up what was left from people (none) and gave him half of what I had left, the next day. He looked in the brown paper bag and said, wow, that's a lot; and looked at me like I wasn't a lost cause after all. He was always such a gentleman when we had dealings and we grew to respect one another. As for the VP, he always sucked. Straight laced, hard assed, tall, thin like a Doberman Pincher.

So, do uniforms help? I don't know. Are explosives at school bad? Yes. Can Catholic private schools suck just like public schools? Yes, but Catholic school can really help one's reputation.

Seattle's first openly Gay Bar Shelly's Leg and Tugs (Beltown and Belmont)

Found this today and thought it was interesting.
Today from the seattlepi.com archive we share a bit about Shelly Bauman who helped bring an openly gay bar to Pioneer Square in the early 1970s.

Bauman died November 18 at her Bremerton home. She was 63. Her obituary in Seattle Gay News is available here.

On July 14, 1970, Bauman was rushed to Harborview Medical Center after being struck by an antique cannon, used as part of a parade in Pioneer Square. The owner was cited for not getting a permit and attorneys for Bauman, then 23, filed a $1 million lawsuit against the cannon owner in King County Superior Court.

Also named were the proprietor of the Brasserie Pittsbourg restaurant and the Pioneer Square Association that promoted the event where the cannon was fired.

Bauman accepted a $330,000 settlement in April 1973 and with the money was co-owner of Shelly's Leg � a bar advertised as being "provided for Seattle's gay community and their guests."

Seattle had gay bars before, but Shelly's Leg was noted for being open about the bar's intention. Seattle Gay News also said it was the city's first disco, opening on Nov. 13, 1973.

It took the place of the former Grapvine Tavern and a KOL-AM deejay, Burl Barer, spun records there two night a week. Read a January 1974 Emmett Watson column about Shelly's Leg here.

On Dec. 4, 1975, a tanker truck crashed hit a guardrail on the southbound viaduct and dumped 3,700 gallons of gasoline. Shelly's Leg had about 150 people in it when the crash occurred at 1 a.m. Patrons left the bar, which was near the viaduct, out a side door as windows were shattering. Read more about that incident here.
The bar lasted until 1979, and the sign declaring Shelly's Leg a gay bar is now at the Museum of History and Industry. Read more here.

From Seattle PI Check out this article as it has some cool archived stuff on it.

I had grown up with my mother's best friend and her kids. One of them was Patrick who was a part owner of Seattle's Tugs Belltown bar. I had never been in it but I heard a lot about it. I hadn't really known Pat was gay, until after he died of the usual suspect back in those days. A sad thing, as both Pat and his younger brother Gary were both very cool people (as is their sister who had offered to go to my Senior Prom with me even though she was already old enough to drink by then; but what a picture she would have made on my arm as they were all very attractive people; but I declined because I had hoped for the possibility of a romantic tryst that night and I figured, no chance with such an older and sophisticated woman, but that story, for another time).

I don't know much about the bar as it was before my time to get into bars if I remember, and I might not have gone in there anyway, but had Pat invited me I would have. If I knew more about Tugs, I would give it its own article just out of respect for Pat. Tugs Belltown has a profile on Facebook. I'm getting the feeling Patrick was involved with the Tugs Belltown bar.
Patrick Harrison and David Hecker - Owners

The articles below is more than I ever knew about it.

From Wikipedia:

"In the late 1980s, another gay bar, Tugs Belltown, moved up to the Hill (corner of Pine and Belmont) and became Tugs Belmont where underwear parties were held. In this new venue, it played a key role in Seattle's burgeoning and sexy fringe theater scene. Possibly the first bar[citation needed] in Seattle since before the Prohibition era to host regular theater performances, in the early 1990s it was the primary home of the Greek Active Theater, founded by sex columnist and Capitol Hill resident Dan Savage (working pseudonymously as Keenan Hollohan)."

Here's more:
"I used to be a regular at the original Belltown T.U.G.S. where Nina Hagen came to party. I can also tell you that the newer T.U.G.S., on the block being torn down for condos, was where Sandra Bernhardt came to party after appearing at The Paramount up the street toward downtown."
"DAN SAVAGE: I never made it to Tugs—the original Tugs, Belltown's legendary gay bar. The gay men I knew when I arrived in Seattle (hey, Kurt!) couldn't shut up about Tugs—how great it was, how much fun it was—and they treasured their Tugs T-shirts. ("I am not just a person. I am a piece of meat.")

When I got to Seattle in 1991, Tugs had moved up the hill to Pine Street and Belmont Avenue, and no one that had been to Tugs Belltown thought very much of it. Post-1991 arrivals, though, loved the place. It was home to notoriously sleazy underwear parties that so offended the Washington State Liquor Control Board that it threatened to shut Tugs Belmont down. The threats stopped after Cal Anderson, Washington State's first openly gay state legislator, showed up at one of Tugs Belmont's underwear parties in his legislative underwear and chatted up the inspectors sent by the WSLCB."
both above paragraphs from Silenced Majority


Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Aim to Misbehave

In the film, Serenity, Mal (character, Capt. Malcolm Reynolds) says that some day the government will try to make people better again (after having failed unbelievably badly) and that has to stop. This was said during his Miranda speech near the film's end.

This has a real world correlation. If you look about you, you can see it happening now. The US Government and not only the US government, but most governments, I think, merely as a process of their development, do this. They are there, set up to run the country, to be a force for good, but in the end, they always seem to try and fix everything, and everybody, just to justify their positions.

Part of the problem there is that every job, every manager, every company, every government position, has to justify their position. If not to themselves as it should be, then to some higher authority. They have to produce, and in that, lies the rub. They cannot just be in their job, waiting for the next thing, they have to always be doing something. So sometimes, the invent things. Sometimes they do indeed think they are helping. But in the end of what they plan, and execute, they find, and sometimes they don't even find this out, that they make things worse.

And so, things are thought up, and carried out, that should never have been started in the first place.

Other times, its just delusion, or focus too much on something that really isn't anyone's business. People have problems with boundaries, especially, when put in position of "caring for" others. As we need commissions and authority to oversee that things are done, so also we need advocates to protect us from our own protectors. Special interest groups, factions, religious groups, and others, many of which are merely a local minority, get things pushed through and instituted to where other people who have no voice, or think they have no voice, are put down, incarcerated, or at very least, abandoned.

Sometimes, as Mal says in Serenity, you have to aim to misbehave. At times you need to just do what is right, and tell no one; cover it up, forget about it. Other times, you need to push through your own agenda, to correct what has been incorrectly put into practice. But this is far harder.

What we do need to do, if nothing else, however, is the see when these things are happening, and Do something about it. You may receive no thanks, or even suffer for it at times. But if everyone started doing that, I think in the end we would have a better living environment; or at very least, things would be invigorated enough that things will fall about in far better order. People would become more fluid in their motivating things to correctly run.

How can we do that? As I said, try to do what is right, even if you have to be quiet about it. When possible, speak up, speak out. Push for change, push for people to be forced into being intelligent, thoughtful, effective.

And one more thing, remember, we do not, what the common man running things. The last thing we need is Joe the Plumber as President. We want the superior man. Or the superior woman. Gender is unimportant. What is important, is that we have those who can most functionally and intelligently think. To be proactive. To be persuasive. To stand up, get things done, even through the sad, sick, thick morass of common foolishness and yes, for a big part, those of the current Tea Party configuration. Some of them are intelligent and mean well, but there seems to be far too many who are not of that persuasion.

So, try to think things through, beyond what is nominal and on to what is superior and try, to make things just a little bit better. Or, a lot bit better, if you feel so disposed. Go for it.

Skip and Go Naked (a drink) - Tower Records 1981-82

This is a lot about the Tower Records Tacoma store in the 1980s; the old one, not the one up by the Tacoma Mall entrance. Skip and Go Naked parties. Kind of like the Shandy on steroids, before I even knew what a Shandy was back then.
Notice it no longer says Posters
To set the atmosphere, I started at Tower working at the Posters store in 1980, next door to the Record store on 38th street in a shopping center parking lot where across from us was a great tavern called, "Mom's"; what a great place.

I had gone for a job at the Record store but got hired by the manger of the next door Posters Store (a head shop really). I was out of the Air Force, no more wife, no job, started college and thought I'd see my childhood dreams through. Like working at a record store. So, I stopped by Tower Records, figuring I didn't have a chance in Hell at a job there. Everyone wanted to work there.

So, I was talking to a woman in front of the Poster store, trying to get courage to go into Records, and I asked her about the Record store. Once she knew I was looking for a job, she started asking ME questions. I didn't realize at the time that I was being interviewed for a job at the Posters Store. So she hired me on the spot. Easiest job I ever got. I mean, I didn't even know I was in the process of getting a job there.

After I was hired, Record store employees would come over to talk, purchase (we'd "write them up", indicate their purchase and employee number and they'd get a discount) and on occasion they'd off-handedly mention that they were having or were about to have a "Skip and go naked" party. I was always envious. 

Eventually, I did end up working at Records. Another long story how that came about, let's just say our new manager fired my room mate who was the current interim manager, then fired me, the Records manager obviously hated that guy and hired me on the spot when he heard I'd been fired; he knew it was probably for no reason. "That guy" (Posters manager) had been demoted from Seattle to Tacoma and no one had much nice to say about him. He pretty much fired every one eventually and hired new people. Mostly really overweight scary women. I kid you not. It was horrible because trying to get by them behind the counter with VERY little room was simply miserable on several levels. And these women all had really bad attitudes, simply not Tower people as I understood it.

And so, we did indeed sometimes, have these parties.
 Tower Tacoma Tacoma Store #188 1980s back room
Someone would get the blender we kept in the back room, mix it up and we'd all grab a big red "kegger" cup and get a drink, then head out on the sales floor ("the stage" I liked to call it as you felt you were on stage all the time) and of course, we'd keep working. I can't remember if we were supposed to not take it out on the floor, but I do remember being out there with it.
`
 Sales floor of Tower Records Tacoma Store #188 1980s
I think that we could if we just kept it under the front counter at the cash register and at least TRIED to be discrete about it. We were professionals after all so we didn't act drunk, or we'd hang out in the back room till we got more professional and could go back out on the floor again. But then we had that famous Tower attitude that we ruled this domain and were certainly there to help you, but don't push it too far. I'll have to talk sometime about the shoplifters situation.


Anyway, I do however, remember one annoying customer, Mr Middle-Class (or Mr Buzz Kill) in a cheap suit, I think his name was. Just an ordinary family guy probably going to Church on Sunday, who asked me at the register if I had alcohol in that there red cup?! 

"Uh, Yes sir, its a Skip and Go Naked, the manage..r is mak--ing them in the uh, back, want one, pal? okay, we never actually said that. However, I did have a woman I was supervising, years later, at the Seattle Tower Video store, I caught saying to a customer who was being an ass to her: "Fuck you very much, Sir and have a very nice day!" She said this cheerfully. He cheerfully (and obliviously) thanked her, took his purchases and left with his wife. I was stunned. I said, "did you just say what I think you said?" She said: "Yes, of course. Why?" Of course, I said intensely and quietly: "You CAN'T say that to a customer!" She said: "Why not? I say things like that all the time. Has anyone ever complained?" I said: "Well, no, but...." She said: "Well then, what's the problem?" I said: "What if someone catches what you said?" She said: "Oh, they never will. They never have, had they?" I said: "No. But....if they do, you know what I'll have to do?" And she said: "Not to worry, you'll never have to deal with it." And, ladies and gentlemen, I never did have to deal with it.

Getting back to Mr. Middle-Class thinking I had alcohol at the register of all things....and I had thought I was being so discrete, too! So, I tried to be nice, but he kept ragging me and there was a line of people waiting to purchase and so I finally just said, with just a tiny bit of force behind it: "Do you want that album?"
We stared at one another for a moment or two while he thought about it and he got the hint, paid for it, left, and we never heard another word about it.



Some years later, at the new Video store, in the same location as the old Posters store, the boss allowed us to bring alcohol as we all had to work that night, late and all through the night. We had a blast. But, we had to do recounts of stock too much. For obvious reasons. We paired up, and everyone counted racks of videos. We drank as much as we wanted. Everyone pretty much did what got them comfortable in that respect. All racks were counted at least twice to assure accuracy but there was one rack, the "Haunted Rack" we called it by end of night; we had teams counting that rack thirteen times before we got a duplicate number indicating accuracy. For at least a couple of hours, no matter how we counted that rack of videos we could NOT come up with the same number twice. I really have no reason how that could have happened. Once we hit end of night, early AM really, the manager, Mark, said, "I'm glad we all had fun, but I think we all agree, we're never having alcohol for another inventory ever again." And we didn't. But at least everyone knew (and agreed on) why.

We had some good times working at Tower. Great times. I started there at the beginning of my college career, went back there for a while after graduating until acquiring a position at the University of Washington, Medical Centers Information Services (or Systems, they changed the name at some point) department. MCIS was no way as much fun as Tower, though it was five years of night work by myself with full access to the mainframe of two large hospitals. 


Some of the bands doing in store appearances at Tower stores could be really jerks (Cinderella for one, what pompous asses they were, I thought the employees were going to mutiny and kill the entire band one day), 

Years later at the Seattle, Mercer Street Tower Video, the Playboy Playmates were most excellent. The stories I could tell. I was lucky(?) in that I got a unique perspective, having worked at three of the types of stores at three locations, in two cities, and one store space in two iterations of a version of store. Yes, I think that's correct but sounds funny, though. :)

About the Skip and Go Nakeds:

One friend said: "I like the fact that you use the empty can from the frozen lemonade concentrate as a measure for the gin!"

Now the recipe that was used at Tower Tacoma back in the 80s (if not also before that):

In a blender fill with Ice
8oz (frozen) pink lemonade concentrate
One cheap beer
Using the empty lemonade container, fill with cheap Vodka
Blend all together.

Skip and go naked....

According to GroupRecipes website:

"Skip and Go Naked. A Connecticut drink from the 70's. Sounds awful-tastes absolutely delicious. Won drink of the year. You will skip [they did taste pretty good and maybe you'll go naked, too]."

GroupRecipes says:

Ingredients

  • One can of frozen pink lemonade
  • One can full of gin
  • One can of beer

How to make it

  • Blend in the blender on high.
  • Be in a safe place. Wear a helmet if necessary.
  • ENJOY!

Other people's comments on that site about SAGNs:

"Whoa baby...these are wickedly powerful. To all peeps: First of all, don't start drinking these on an empty tummy. I did and by the second drink, I really started listing to one side. Fortunately I had assistance to right me - and act as a prop. And its probably good to sip them slowly, otherwise the naked part will be incredibly easy - but the skipping part will become a definite challenge. Heh."

"I used to be involved with the named drink in the early 70,s and it was mixed in a garbage can, larger quanities, as you can imagine, and included melted sherbert ice cream, additional liquor, and all mixed together with a canoe paddle... man!!! the good ol days!!"

"Skippies!!! These are great. Don't drink them sitting down, you'll discover gravity the hard way when you stand up. Also - use a pilsner or "Export" style beer - something like a budmiller..."

So, drink up!

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Dangerous weapons, guns, guns, guns....kids and marriage

The Small Arms Survey (this link did not work) recently showed Guns per Captia world wide. It stated that America has, well, a lot of guns. The Small Arms Survey was published by the UN. Those were just a few of the insights found in the tenth annual Small Arms Survey 2010: Gangs, Groups, and Guns, which was launched today at Headquarters in New York during a press conference organized by the Permanent Mission of Switzerland to the United Nations.  The 343-page report was put together by the Geneva-based Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies:
  • America is #1 in the world with 90 guns per 100 citizens
  • The #2 slot is held by Yemen, with 61 guns per citizen.
  • The United States owns 30% of all known guns in the world and buys 50% of all new guns made in the world.
  • Consider that the US has 5% of the world's people.
That, is a lot of guns.

I have always wondered why, you can't get a driving license without study, practice and testing. But you can buy a gun to allow the easy demise of multiple people in quick succession, with little, or sometimes, no education whatsoever.

Why? Because of a constitutional element? This goes along the lines of any idiot can get married or have kids, but to end a marriage or properly or successfully raise a child, is quite difficult.

Doesn't it seem sometimes that things are a bit backward?

I would like to see people have to apply for a gun, for marriage, for childbearing. I would like to see them unable to own a gun, marry someone, or have a child, until, they know, understand, feel comfortable with, having or being responsible for, any one of those. Responsibility first. What makes you think anyone who purchases a gun can be responsible for it and its effects.

I would say perhaps we should find a way to disable the capability for childbearing, until a certain age, until a mature understanding of what it entails, prior to enabling it and allowing anyone to have kids. I think granting that right, should be liberal and fairly openly available, but unavailable until a person reaches a certain age, a certain degree of competence in life and in child rearing.

I think divorce should be easy. I think marriage, as it is in reality, should be hard, to acquire. People should only get married when they are ready and it has a reasonable chance of success. We have too many people who are having children, while they are still children. We have adults who have no right to have a child, having children and then raising really dysfunctional kids who grow up into adults and add to the national deficit and human suffering. We have people marrying into a physically violent coupling with someone they should never have been with. We have people marrying when, with a little bit of education, they could have a successful or much more successful, marriage.

Our priorities are all screwed up. Some of that is the fault of organized religions, as well as unorganized religions, for that matter. Perhaps, its time to stop, look around, and reset our understanding of how the world should work?

The venerable Shandy

Years ago, my wife (ex now, sadly; or, happily) came home with a mix from one of her horse shows she worked on as professional rider, trainer and instructor. It was a Shandy I was told. Being a beer/ale purist for the most part, I was horrified at what she told me. But she pointed out that I would drink Hefeweizen with lemon or Coronas with lime, so...she had to try it. So I did. Now, first of all, first time someone tried to give me beer with fruit, I was stunned and wasn't interested, until they pushed it and insisted; I tried it, and it was indeed, pretty cool. So my ex put part of a can of frozen pink lemonade into a pitcher and added a bunch of lager (we had Miller Genuine Draft (MGD) which I could take, but not any other Miller beer but that was a long time ago), but any lager will typically do. You have to blend to taste. We took it outside to the back yard on a hot day and sat and poured. It was strange at first but it grew on me by the time I finished my first glass. We drank that not very big Tupperware picture of the drink. We went through another and began to smile more broadly and had a fun time. It was very refreshing on such a balmy day. Years later, we had moved to where I live now still. My kids made new friends and my daughter made one friend of a family where the father was a doctor and an Irishman. One day when we were over at their house, I mentioned the shandy and he smiled. His take on it however was different. He said in Ireland they used 7-Up (or Sprite) mixed with Lager. I screwed up my face and he said, maybe it was an acquired taste but they liked it. We also talked about Guinness and how they were making cold Guinness which I figured was for the rather base American drinker who likes so much, watered down beers that HAVE to be chilled so the flavor is hidden as much as possible. Whereas beer served room temperature, has much flavor and so you don't WANT to chill it. My favorite temperature of Guinness is when you take your first sip and its room temperature, but there is almost a hint of coolness deep within the sip. Perfect! Getting back to the Shandy.... I have now been drinking it since about the mid 90s. Its a refreshing drink, gives you a little buzz (or big one if you're not careful or too long in the sun, or don't drink enough water on the side, remember, alcohol dehydrates you), and is generally fun and low alcohol content if done right, for those who like to imbibe but only slightly. So, give it a try, you might like it too. S handy on Wikipedia The Shandy, as known around the world: * Australia: o Portagaff is made with a 1:2 or 1:1 mixture of lemonade and stout. Particularly popular in South Australia. Sometimes called a Black Shandy. o Shandy is made with 1:2 or 1:1 mixture of lemonade and either light or heavy beer, most commonly lagers. * Austria: An Almradler is made with a 60/40 mix of popular Austrian Almdudler soda (a traditional Alpine herb drink that tastes a bit like a ginger ale) and pils or lager beer. A 50/50 blend is marketed by Puntigamer in bottles and cans. It is also popular in Bavarian Germany. * Bahamas: Local dialect pronounces Shandy as "Shanti" or "Shanty" (as in shanty town, where the ragamuffins live). * Belgium o Flanders: Kivela (Finnish > “land of stone”) A mixture of German lemonade and lager. Spavola (Italian > "bubbling water") a mixture of sparkling mineral water and lager. Mazout is a mixture of cola and lager. o Wallonia: Diabolo (“devil”), a lager mixed with mint or grenadine. o Brussels: Tango, dark beer with grenadine. * Canada: Black Shandy, a mixture of stout beer with lemon soda. Also described as a Guinness Shandy. (See also Australia: Portagaff). * Chile: Fan-schop, a mixture of draught beer with Fanta orange soda. * Colombia: Refajo, a mixture of lager beer with red cola-style soda like Kola Román or Colombiana. * France: A Monaco is a Panaché with Grenadine added. * Netherlands: A Snowwhite (sneeuwwitje) is a mixture of beer and 7 Up. * Japan: Shandygaff, a mixture of beer and cola.[citation needed] * Peru: Quara [1], a mixture of barley and fruits, made by SAB Miller Brewery in Lima. Particularly popular with girls. * Portugal: Called indiscriminately either a Panache or a Shandy, it is a drink popularized by the European tourists who brought the drink here. It is made with draft beer mixed with carbonated lemonade or a lemon-flavoured soft drink (often 7 Up or Sprite). * Switzerland: Called either a Panaché [Swiss French] or Panasch [Swiss German]. In the canton of Valais, the Swiss-French call it "Bière-lime". * Spain: o Called a Clara or Clara con limón if it’s made with sweet carbonated lemon soda (Clara Spanish > “Clear Lemonade”). o When made with carbonated soda-water, whether it is lemon-flavored or not, it is called Clara limón gaseosa ("Lemon Soda"). o In some other parts of Spain, a mixture of beer and sweet lemon-lime soda is called a Champú ("shampoo"). o It is called a Pica / Pika ("Sting" or "Bite") in the Basque Country. o It is called a Lejía ("chlorine bleach") in parts of Guipuscoa. * UK: In the southern part of the UK, a "Fantandi" is a 3:7 mix of orange soda (such as Fanta) and lager. * USA: o In the midwestern USA, a "Cincinnati" is a 1:2 mixture of lemon-lime soda (i.e., Sprite or 7 Up) and beer. o In Texas, a lager mixed with lime juice is called a Gringo Honeymoon.

Monday, January 17, 2011

Following the Rules and Zero Tolerance - The ZT Zombies

A Happy Martin Luther King Day to you all. In that vein....

Zero Tolerance. Following the Rules. Fear.

Reasonable Rule breakers. Intelligence. Bravery.

Diametrically opposed concepts.

Sure, rules are there for a reason; because some people are too damn stupid, or too ignorant, to be able to make a conscious, intelligent decision. But also because, in the paradigm of hierarchy, the intelligent are too challenging to the oligarchy. Those in charge want things to run smoothly, but also, they don't want to waste time, or have to do more work than necessary, or to have to think, to administer appropriately or with divergence.

Fear governs much of this Zero Tolerance nonsense. The powers to be are too afraid of one saying they were treated differently than another, when in reality, they should, many times, be treated differently. I have seen far more laziness in business on this topic, than I have reasons indicating those in power are most concerned about productivity; mostly, they are afraid of being challenged, being shown to be ineffectual, inefficient, incompetent.

I have been a supervisor in the Military, in business, in search and rescue. I have built highly loyal and effective teams. I had shown to get more from employees than fellow supervisors, much to their chagrin. And much to my embarrassment, when employees wanted only to work for me and not others; vying for a position under me. I was embarrassed; not only for the complement, but also at the average-ness, or incompetence of other to manage people who have feelings and minds. What I have noticed over the years is you have to be a kind of therapist, a manager, an organizer, a motivational speaker. If you think you can simply manage resources to be a good manager, you are a fool, or at very least, you are fooling yourself.

In recent years, I have noticed that many things in our lives that are dysfunctional have to do with concepts such as Zero Tolerance (ZT). That is a perfect example of applying a theory that is perfectly functional in one realm of thought, to another, where is rapidly becomes completely ineffectual and damaging. People drawn to things such as ZT and full adherence to following the rules become ZT Zombies.

Don't become a ZT Zombie!

So why, do we continue to apply principles such as zero tolerance to so many areas of our lives? Partially, its because we have pushed ourselves to the point of having not enough time to exist as Humans. To have a need, to get things done quickly, as superficially functional as possible, then expect others to follow that dysfunctional path, and expect them to achieve what you have yet to notice hasn't really worked for you either. And so on, down below you, and them, and theirs.

In the end, it leaves us sitting around wondering: "Why, is the world falling apart all around us?"

A child bring a G.I. Joe toy guy to school. The toy is like an inch long, plastic, no moving parts. But that very young child is sent home for the day, or the week. Why? Zero Tolerance for weapons. But its not a weapon. Is it. It's a toy. Its not even a functional toy gun. Its a hunk of plastic.

Third time a guy is brought before the courts on breaking the law. This last time its for being caught with a Cannabis cigarette. Or, even a gram of Pot. Its their third infraction. They go to jail for a long time. But, they are not a violent criminal. But, they are not put in a prison with violent criminals. Perhaps, after trying to protect themselves, in the hopes of getting out of prison alive, or unviolated sexually, they become a violent leaning individual. Why?

Yes, cannabis is illegal, but think, should it be? That is controversial, though it shouldn't be. But what about a kid and a piece of plastic? Why can't we simply deal with things in a "small is beautiful way", rather than defer responsibility to say, I am only following orders?  Take the responsibility and deal with things appropriate, as each individual incident warrants. Tell others to think for themselves, correct them to train them, not punish them.

I have heard an argument for years from managers and supervisors, "If I let you do it, I have to let everyone do it." Well, not if you are a good manager. What they are really saying is, I don't want to be troubled, I don't have the time, I don't want to deal with it, I don't know how to deal with it." None of those are good excuses. If you treat one employee differently, you must have a reason, but it should be a reason that is able to be aired, open to all, and reasonable. If some one else is treated less preferred, they shouldn't be able to say anything against your decision, because it would be obvious they don't deserve it, or you need to be trusted in your decision, that it was correct.

Yes, its taking a chance. More of us need, to take chances in life, to do what is "right". Like the Buddha said, you should know what is right when you see it. Trouble is, too many of us haven't taken the time to think, what really IS right.

Following the Rules. Zero Tolerance. Sounds good doesn't it? Quick. Easy. Little thought. Just slam someone for doing what was designated as not to be done. No thought. Just action. Quick. Easy. Push button. Short attention span. Fast.

We don't have to consider the person, their situation. We just do. Head down, bully right ahead. Do not think too much, power through it. Don't think to open the door, just put your head down, slam right into that wall, that situation; don't worry about damaging the wall, or your head; just push through, get done, move on to the next crippled individual.

Zero Tolerance, and worrying too much about people's personal freedoms, bordering on thought police sometimes, is a dysfunctional paradigm of social management.

There was an example in a movie recently, during a war in Israel, of a guy that was an officer, a leader. He had to manage his people out of a dangerous situation, but he followed the rules. He didn't look around and think for himself, he just let those above him think and he followed their rules; rules that didn't fit the situation. But, they were the rules and since he was a "good" soldier, many would die and there in lay the drama of the tale. He was a perfect example of a bad leader. Sometimes you simply need to throw the book out and make new rules. Think. Consider each new change as a new situation and govern appropriately. Those types of individuals are our best leaders.

I've always taught my kids that sometimes in life, you have to break the rules to do what is right and then, you may very well be punished for it. So, if you can, avoid getting caught when doing what is right.

I cannot count the times in my life, in business, that I have "taken the reigns" at work, sometimes from others, and completely ignored the rules, gotten the job done, had the undying thanks of my superiors, because I had the foresight, the lack of care for what the rules were, to do what had to be done, be clever enough not to get caught, and make things work. I gained the respect of those around me, below me, next to me, above me, but not too far above me, because those up there in the lofty heights would have been forced to come down hard on me for getting the job done.

This, is not a paradigm for a brokerage house, necessarily, not where you are screwing over people who have entrusted you with their life savings, just so you can make the company money. You have to have a brain, work out all the details. Doing what is right, is complicated. You have to weigh the common good, the individual good, you have to know right from wrong; and so many today, are clueless about what that is.

And so the child gets sent home for having a toy. Instead of simply taking the toy away, explaining to them what is what, GIVING them the toy back at end of day, and dropping it. Instead of the cop on the street realizing that the guy that has the cannabis cigarette, really just needs to be ignored because, if that cop doesn't have better things to do, then he needs some proper training.

Does ZT ever have a time to be practiced? Possibly. Victim crimes. Bullies, rapists, murderers. But what does that really have to do with someone smoking a joint, drinking a beer in public, having a plastic toy, these victimless crimes have little to do with serious crimes.

For people who think that banning a child who brings a toy gun to school, ever one that actually shoots, to push the limits of this topic, have little to do with a kid that actually shoots the toy at someone; but even then, its a TOY. Should the child be dealt with? Absolutely. But appropriately and not as if it were a real gun, that only confuses the child and indicates that you, the authority in charge, are unreasonable, unintelligent, and hysterical in your behavior. Have you considered THAT? What message are you REALLY sending to kids who are told a toy, is real?

Rules, like the bible, need to be followed, as a guide. That's it. The Law, is the same thing. These are things that are there as a last ditch attempt at keeping order, but really, they do not need to be applied so many times, they just need to be thought about, used when necessary, but not applied 100% of the time.

You just need to think. Use your head. Make a decision. Don't worry so much, about applying rules so evenly. Sometimes, you need to come down hard on one person, soft or not at all, on another. We have become so fearful of getting caught, not being perfect, or fast, or Politically Correct, that we have become a part of the problem.

I know, part of the problem is that there are very many people in the world who do not have the brain power to push a pencil. But if we apply pressures to those around us, those people who should never be in positions of authority, will stop so many times, being the ones in power. Make it known, don't hide their failures or others will suffer. If we start trying to make people accountable for their bad decisions, at least in the areas of what the common thought is considered to be "good" in the ares of things such as Zero Tolerance and always following the rules, life will get better.

Break a rule or two. Ignore Zero Tolerance. When they, a community, votes on something as stupid as ZT, vote it down, scream, stamp your feet, point out how they are being ignorant at very least, stupid at worst. Tell them that being stupid is a choice to be ignorant. Tell them that people will suffer by way of ZT policies.

So, start coming down on those that apply Zero Tolerance, who always follow the rules. Push people to think. Push them to consider the whole picture. And NOT the WHOLE picture, because, sometimes? Sometimes, the whole entire picture is completely irrelevant. Consider what is appropriate. Force intelligence. Push people to be thoughtful. To make not the proper by the rules decision, but the Right decision, the Correct decision.

If we all started doing this, the entire world would start to be a better place.