Trump, Putin, and His GOP (Whose REALLY?): A Legacy of Revisionism, Regression, and Ongoing American Ruin

There's a lot to get to here...

Donald Trump's longstanding admiration for Vladimir Putin—a war criminal in Ukraine and a ruthless despot in Russia and beyond—aligns with Putin's revisionist and regressive beliefs, mirrors those of the now Trump "Republican" Party. 

Here I would like to reflect forward to an upcoming blog.for Monday, March 31, 2025: "Would the Founding Fathers Be Republicans Today? A Look at the Constitution's Signers and Modern Conservatism"

The once Republican Party's alignment with Trump (and therefore, Putin) has been evident not just recently, but for decades leading up to the Trump 2016 election, and then his 2024 return as POTUS47, despite his status as a convicted felon—a reality as absurd as it is alarming.

First, let's share, from the Marsh singing family at @marshsongs (music video):"The people of Europe stand with Ukraine against the threat of a false peace as much as a brutal war. Because of our shared history. Because of our shared future. Because it is just. Because it is necessary. And because they deserve nothing less. Don't abandon them. #SlavaUkraini"

Remember Project 2025?

From Julie B(rooklyn) BABY WOKE AF 🇺🇸🇯🇲 @JMeanypants - It’s Project 2025. Every single fuck up, including the signal chat breach, is plucked from the pages of Project 2025. It’s a DOOMSDAY INITIATIVE:

Moving on...

It's important to recognize one very serious issue about Donald Trump:

Donald Trump is still POTUS45, who worked hard to normalize his purposeful chaos & autocratic bigotry. Playing out now as convicted felon POTUS47, we are witnessing his now normalized version of a fascist POTUS, reshaped, hidden in plain sight, to overtake and diminish this country. But all still Donald. The guy who is not our friend. Not an American "President" in the historically understood version of the office. 

Unless you're a person of very questionable orientation. Or utterly deluded. Fooled by the charlatan, the career criminal, Donald Trump.

Trump, as POTUS45 and now POTUS47, has worked to reshape the country in his own toxic image, bringing change that challenges the status quo in ways his supporters seem incapable of recognizing. While his approach may be unconventional, it's important to recognize how his vision and leadership continue to resonate with a significant portion of disaffected, if not mesmerized, Americans. 

Who voted for this clown? This career criminal? It has to do with how such bad ideas spread across the nation and the world. For an examination to give you an idea, just in case you're still unaware of this kind of thing...

The Rise and Fall of Terrorgram - FRONTLINE & ProPublica investigate how an online network known as Terrorgram spread extremism & violence. This traces the rise of a global community of white supremacists & the anonymous, loosely moderated platforms used to spread hate & promote terror attacks.

So...

Regardless of differing opinions, we must remember that we are all part of the same nation and that the future of America, as founded and intended, relies on open dialogue and mutual respect, even amidst strong disagreements. We must also listen to our international friends, while realizing that listening too closely to our international (and domestic) enemies will lead us to ruin, and to their decades long struggle for success over and against US..

​If Vladimir Putin had a U.S. president under his influence, he might pursue the following actions to undermine America:​

1. Weaken NATO Alliances: Undermine commitments to NATO, creating divisions within the alliance.​

2. Reduce Support for Ukraine: Halt military and financial aid to Ukraine, allowing Russian aggression to proceed unchecked.​Chatham House+1Institute for the Study of War+1

3. Lift Sanctions on Russia: Remove economic sanctions, bolstering Russia's economy and geopolitical standing.​

4. Undermine U.S. Intelligence: Discredit and weaken U.S. intelligence agencies to reduce their effectiveness.​

5. Promote Isolationist Policies: Encourage withdrawal from international agreements and organizations, diminishing U.S. global influence.​

6. Foster Domestic Division: Exploit social and political divisions to destabilize internal cohesion.​

7. Compromise Cybersecurity: Allow vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, exposing the U.S. to cyber threats.​

8. Weaken Trade Alliances: Dismantle trade agreements that counterbalance Russian economic interests.​

9. Reduce Military Readiness: Cut defense spending or reallocate resources away from strategic priorities.​

10. Control Energy Policies: Implement energy strategies that increase dependence on Russian resources.​Business Insider

Since his inauguration in January 2025, convicted felon and insurrectionist (absurdly) Pres. Donald Trump has undertaken several actions:​

1. Imposed 25% Tariffs on Auto Imports: Aimed at boosting domestic manufacturing but criticized for potential global trade repercussions. ​AP News

2. Paused Foreign Aid Programs: Ordered a 90-day suspension of U.S. foreign development assistance for review, affecting global aid projects.​Wikipedia

3. Reinstated the Mexico City Policy: Restricted U.S. funding to foreign organizations that provide or promote abortions. ​Reuters

4. Reduced DEI Initiatives: Issued executive orders curbing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs within federal agencies.​

5. Negotiated with Russia on Economic Deals: Discussed potential joint ventures and lifting sanctions in exchange for cease-fire agreements in Ukraine. ​Business Insider

6. Adjusted Immigration Policies: Implemented stricter immigration controls and revised asylum procedures.​

7. Restructured Federal Agencies: Initiated plans to reorganize agencies to increase efficiency, including dissolving USAID.​

8. Revised Environmental Regulations: Rolled back certain environmental protections to promote energy independence.​

9. Addressed Election Integrity: Signed executive orders focusing on election security measures.​Ballotpedia+2Federal Register+2AP News+2

10. Granted Clemency to Devon Archer: Issued a pardon to the former business associate of Hunter Biden. ​Ballotpedia

Comparing these lists, certain actions by President Trump, such as negotiating economic deals with Russia and adjusting foreign aid, align with strategies that could potentially benefit Russian interests. However, it's important to note that these actions are part of broader policy decisions and may not directly indicate foreign influence. The motivations and implications of each action require careful analysis to understand their impact on U.S. interests and global relations.

​Now...if we redraw that with comparisons of similarities and list in order if importance of damages to America, here’s a structured comparison, ranked by potential damage to America, with similarities highlighted.

Most Damaging Actions (1-5)

1. Weaken NATO Alliances (Putin Goal) ⇄ Reduced NATO Commitments (Trump Action)

   • Trump has signaled a decrease in U.S. support for NATO, questioning its value and suggesting European nations should pay more.

   • Weakening NATO directly benefits Russia by undermining Western military cooperation.

2. Reduce Support for Ukraine (Putin Goal) ⇄ Negotiated with Russia on Economic Deals (Trump Action)

   • Trump has explored lifting sanctions on Russia in exchange for potential cease-fire agreements.

   • This aligns with Putin’s objective of securing control over Ukraine with minimal Western resistance.

3. Lift Sanctions on Russia (Putin Goal) ⇄ Eased Sanctions Discussions (Trump Action)

   • Trump’s administration has debated loosening restrictions on Russia to encourage economic collaboration.

   • This would strengthen Putin’s economy and geopolitical leverage.

4. Foster Domestic Division (Putin Goal) ⇄ Reduced DEI Initiatives & Election Integrity Actions (Trump Action)

   • Policies reducing diversity programs and focusing on election security have fueled internal debates and division.

   • Social instability and political polarization weaken national unity—key to Russian disinformation goals.

5. Control Energy Policies (Putin Goal) ⇄ Rolled Back Environmental Regulations (Trump Action)

   • Rolling back environmental protections encourages fossil fuel dependence, potentially reducing renewable energy investment.

   • A less energy-independent U.S. could lead to future reliance on global (including Russian) energy markets.

---

Moderate Damage Actions (6-8)

6. Undermine U.S. Intelligence (Putin Goal) ⇄ Restructured Federal Agencies (Trump Action)

   • Trump’s moves to reorganize intelligence and government bodies have created uncertainty about their future operations.

   • Discrediting or limiting intelligence agencies aids foreign adversaries by reducing U.S. counterespionage capabilities.

7. Weaken Trade Alliances (Putin Goal) ⇄ Imposed 25% Tariffs on Auto Imports (Trump Action)

   • Tariffs disrupt global trade partnerships, potentially alienating allies and strengthening rival economies.

   • Disrupting international trade agreements benefits Russia by diminishing U.S. economic leadership.

8. Compromise Cybersecurity (Putin Goal) ⇄ Paused Foreign Aid Programs (Trump Action)

   • Halting aid may include cybersecurity-related support to allies, weakening digital defenses against Russian cyberwarfare.

   • A weaker digital infrastructure exposes America to cyber threats from foreign adversaries.

---

Less Immediate but Still Harmful Actions (9-10)

9. Reduce Military Readiness (Putin Goal) ⇄ Reprioritized Defense Spending (Trump Action)

   • While not explicitly reducing military funding, Trump’s redirection of defense priorities could impact readiness.

   • A less agile military benefits adversaries like Russia in strategic planning.

10. Promote Isolationist Policies (Putin Goal) ⇄ America-First Immigration and Aid Policies (Trump Action)

• Limiting foreign aid and focusing inward could lead to diplomatic disengagement.

• This creates a power vacuum Russia (and China) can exploit.

---

​Several of these overlaps between Pres. Trump's actions and policies that align with Russian President Vladimir Putin's interests have raised concerns about prioritizing personal or foreign interests over those of the United States. 

Notable instances include:​

1. Advocating for Russia's Reentry into the G7: President Trump expressed a desire to see Russia reinstated into the Group of Seven (G7), stating, "I'd love to have them back. I think it was a mistake to throw them out." This stance aligns with Putin's interest in regaining a platform within this influential group, potentially easing international isolation. ​POLITICO

2. Praising Putin Publicly: Throughout his tenure, President Trump has consistently offered commendations to President Putin, referring to him as "highly respected." Such public endorsements can bolster Putin's international standing, serving Russian interests by legitimizing his leadership on the world stage. ​Representative Swalwell

3. Negotiating Economic Deals Favorable to Russia: In recent discussions, President Trump and President Putin have explored significant economic collaborations, including joint ventures in Arctic exploration and space projects. These initiatives could lead to the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Russia, directly benefiting the Russian economy while raising questions about the strategic advantages for the United States. ​Business Insider

4. Brokered Agreements Undermining European Security: The Trump administration has facilitated deals that, while presented as ceasefires, have been criticized for heavily favoring Russia over Ukraine. These agreements risk compromising Ukraine's strategic advantages and pressuring European allies, aligning more with Russian geopolitical goals than with reinforcing U.S. alliances and commitments. ​Latest news & breaking headlines

These actions have been perceived by too many analysts as aligning more closely with President Putin's interests, potentially at the expense of U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. The extent to which these overlaps serve President Trump's personal interests over those of the country remains a subject of ongoing debate and analysis.​

Conclusion?

Oh my God! What in the Hell were we thinking re-electing a malignant narcissist, career criminal, recidivist adjudicated sexual abuser, convicted felon, and fascistic revisionist bigot to the highest office not just in OUR land, but in the most powerful and richest country in the history of Humanity?

Seriously. What is Wrong with US?

While not all Trump actions directly align with Putin’s goals, there are significant overlaps in policies that weaken U.S. alliances, benefit Russian economic and geopolitical interests, and increase domestic divisions.

 Whether intentional or not, these policies shift global power dynamics in ways that Russia could exploit.

With Trump prioritizing personal gain and favor with Putin over national security, democracy, and global stability, America is teetering on the edge of authoritarian demagogery, continuing intentional fascist division, and irreversible decline.

Unless we do SOMETHING. In 2026 we can (and likely will) vote Republicans out. Then in 2028, we can end the Trump MaGA/Republicans' political personality cult and return America to Americans. But we then need to never, ever return to this nonsense. Including never, ever again electing a Trump family member, or any of the Trump Seditionist/Insurrectionist Party members, many of whom are still in Congress today.

Who?

​Several current members of Congress have demonstrated strong allegiance to former President Donald Trump, aligning closely with his political ideology and supporting his initiatives. 

Notable Congressional figures include:​

Senators:

1. John Cornyn (Texas)

2. Ted Cruz (Texas)

3. Josh Hawley (Missouri)

4. Mitch McConnell (Kentucky) – Supported Trump in many areas, though with occasional tensions.

5. John Kennedy (Louisiana) – A consistent supporter of Trump’s policy agenda.

Representatives:

1. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Georgia, 14th District)

2. Matt Gaetz (Florida, 1st District)

3. Lauren Boebert (Colorado, 3rd District)

4. Jim Jordan (Ohio, 4th District)

5. Paul Gosar (Arizona, 4th District)

6. Scott Perry (Pennsylvania, 10th District)

7. Andy Biggs (Arizona, 5th District)

8. Louie Gohmert (Texas, 1st District)

9. Kevin McCarthy (California, House Speaker)

10. Jim Banks (Indiana, 3rd District)

These individuals represent a faction within the Republican Party that has worked to support and advance Trump’s vision, some more vocally than others, but all aligned to varying degrees with his policies and influence.

If we want America back from right-wing extremists, we have to see who they are, recognize what is being done to us, and eliminate them from political or public office, ever again.

Including Trump and his 1st family of criminals. 

Brief aside...

Seeing clearly what must be seen
Steve Schmidt
"2025 marks the beginning of a splendid season of American anniversaries that come in a time of American crisis that is growing greater by the day."

Another...

Toxic Christian Nationalist Evangelicalism has made it into the WH, unseparating it with gov. WH cuts health/vaccinations, adds..."Faith"? America's worst donation to the world, Evangelicalism, already in government & elsewhere, yeah, this is bad.

Remember all those warnings about maintaining a separation between Church and State?
Yes, the attached image is just as crooked as this nonsense from Trump, now also in our WH: The Great Grift Expansion.

​The principle of separating church and state is fundamental to ensuring religious freedom and maintaining a fair, pluralistic society. For a comprehensive exploration of this topic, you might find the following article insightful:​

• "Five Reasons To Be Thankful For Separation Of Church And State" by Americans United for Separation of Church and State

This article outlines key reasons why this separation is vital, including:​

1. Freedom from an Official Religion: Preventing the establishment of a state-sponsored religion protects individuals from potential oppression and ensures that religious institutions remain independent from governmental control.​

2. Promotion of Pluralism: A clear boundary between church and state fosters a diverse society where multiple faiths and beliefs can coexist peacefully, enriching the cultural fabric of the nation.​

3. Protection of Individual Belief: By keeping government out of religious matters, individuals retain the right to choose, change, or abstain from religious affiliations without state interference.​MSUToday | Michigan State University

4. Secular Public Education: Ensuring that public schools remain free from religious endorsements creates an inclusive environment for students of all backgrounds and upholds the integrity of educational content.​

5. Counteraction of Christian Nationalism: Maintaining church-state separation challenges the notion that any single religion should dominate governmental policies, thereby safeguarding democratic principles.​

For a historical perspective, the National Park Service provides an overview of how this principle has been integral to American democracy:​NPS.gov

• "Separation of Church & State History" by the U.S. National Park Service

This resource delves into the origins and evolution of church-state separation, highlighting its role in protecting individual rights and preventing governmental overreach into religious affairs.​

These articles offer a thorough understanding of why the separation of church and state remains a cornerstone of freedom and equality in society.​

Look. We can do better. We just have to want to, to even see that we need to, but it will require ongoing effort to educate and reintegrate those who have lost their way in the great American experiment that has endured for over 200 years. Meanwhile, one major political party has actively worked to undermine it, pushing for Christian Nationalist ideals, fringe beliefs like "accelerationism," dangerous conspiracy theories like "replacement theory," and the misguided goal of transforming our democratic constitutional republic into a fascist, oligarchic, kakistocratic state—one defined by abuse, inequality, and toxic capitalism where only the powerful hold control.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Taking A Look At Just Who And What CFPOTUS47 Donald Trump IS

Let's take a brief look at just who and what CFPOTUS47 (our 1st and only Convicted Felon POTUS in history).

Donald Trump actually IS, aside from the propaganda and lies about him (so unnecessary as he's actually pretty despicable all on his own), a poor example of a human being, or a leader. Simply tell the truth about the man. There's absolutely no need to exaggerate or lie about him. Because he already IS a...

• Convicted Felon
• Civilly Liable for Sexual Abuse
• Indicted Defendant
• Fraudster Racketeer
• Obstructionist
• Tax Cheat
• Defamer
• Election Interference
• Seditionist
• Insurrectionist
• Corporate Criminal
• Charity Fraudster
• University Scammer
• Classified Documents Hoarder...

Now take a look at his psychological makeup:

• Malignant Narcissist
• Malignant Pathological Liar
• Megalomaniac
• Sociopath
• Gaslighter
• Delusional
• Grandiose
• Vindictive
• Paranoid
• unEmpathetic
• Compulsive Manipulator
• Attention-Seeker
• Extreme Projectionist
• Obsessive Grudge-Holder
• Impulse-Control Deficient...

For a bit more on this... 

The Link Between Early Trauma and Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Also...

How to Spot a Narcissistic Sociopath - Is a Sociopathic Narcissist the Same Thing as a Narcissistic Sociopath?

Now, let's consider what kind of a childhood environment leads to building an adult of such a pathetic character:

• Cold
• Authoritarian
• Absent Parenting
• Excessive Praise/Grandiosity Indoctrination
• Exposure to Deception & Corruption
• Lack of Consequences for Bad Behavior
• Extreme Sibling Rivalry/Isolation
• Early Signs of Manipulative/Antisocial Behavior
• Obsession with Status/Power...

This is who just enough Americans were fooled (MaGAFooled) into believing was a swell idea as the man to hold the most powerful office in the history of Humanity.

Mary Trump, a clinical psychologist and Donald Trump's niece has extensively discussed the dysfunctional nature of her uncle's childhood, particularly in her 2020 memoir, Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man. 

She describes the Trump family as "malignantly dysfunctional," attributing this dysfunction to their patriarch, Fred Trump Sr., whom she characterizes as a "high-functioning sociopath" who lacked empathy and used his family members as pawns.

theguardian.com

Mary notes that Donald Trump's mother, also named Mary, was "emotionally and physically absent," and his father, Fred, was even more so. She writes that Fred "seemed to have no emotional needs at all."

vogue.com

In her book, Mary Trump also discusses how Fred Sr.'s treatment of his children, including Donald, led to lasting psychological impacts. She observes that Fred Sr.'s cruel influence ensured that Donald would have limited access to his range of emotions.

en.wikipedia.org

These insights suggest that Donald Trump's upbringing was marked by emotional neglect and manipulation, contributing to the complex personality traits he exhibits today.

So what IS needed to be POTUS?

Being President of the United States requires a unique blend of qualities and emotional health to handle the immense pressures and responsibilities of the role. Here are some essential qualities:

1. Emotional Resilience: The ability to manage stress, setbacks, and personal challenges while maintaining focus and composure. The president must make tough decisions in high-pressure environments and stay calm under fire.

2. Empathy and Compassion: Understanding and connecting with people across diverse backgrounds and issues is essential. This emotional intelligence helps in leading a nation and building relationships with citizens, world leaders, and lawmakers.

3. Emotional Stability: Presidents often face criticism, loss, and difficult decisions. An emotionally stable individual can maintain their focus, avoid overreaction, and lead with a clear vision despite external pressures.

4. Self-Confidence: Confidence in one's decisions is necessary, especially when faced with uncertainty. The ability to trust your instincts and not second-guess decisions in critical moments is essential.

5. Integrity: Ethical decision-making and trustworthiness are core to the role. The president must be able to stand by their beliefs, even in the face of public or political adversity.

6. Adaptability: Flexibility to adjust to new challenges, domestic and international situations, and the changing needs of the country. This includes handling crises effectively.

7. Communication Skills: The ability to inspire, educate, and lead the nation through speeches, meetings, and public appearances is vital. Clear, persuasive communication helps in rallying people and explaining difficult issues.

8. Judgment: The ability to make sound decisions that balance many factors, including short-term and long-term consequences, national security, and public welfare. The president must prioritize and make tough choices without personal bias.

9. Patience and Perseverance: Political and legislative progress can be slow, and working with Congress or foreign leaders can be frustrating. The ability to persist through these challenges while keeping the ultimate goal in mind is crucial.

10. Humility: A strong president recognizes the power of the office is derived from the people, not personal entitlement. This involves a willingness to learn from others, admit mistakes, and work collaboratively.

Emotional health is vital to maintaining these qualities. Presidents who are in touch with their own emotions, can navigate stress, and make thoughtful decisions tend to lead more effectively.

Moving on from the sheer and utter nightmare that IS our current POTUS...

 Dealings with Dictators: A Ceo's Guide to Defending Democracy

‘If You Compromise With Totalitarian Systems, You Pay a High Price’

Mathias Döpfner's new book urges US & Europe to join in a “Freedom Trade Alliance” against China, Russia & other autocracies.

'Threat to the republic': How Trump squandered goodwill and sent Dems into resistance

OK, OK, but what about the Trump supporter? Republicans turning on their Party and country, MaGA (Undeserving of a capital "A" in America until they stop their sedition and support of insurrection and their chief insurrectionist). Let's take a quick look at what and who would support such a defective person and criminal leader.

What does this say about MaGA & Trump supporters who relish support of such a "person"? Such a mental patient and criminal?

The steadfast support of Donald Trump's base, despite his controversial actions and statements, has been the subject of extensive psychological and sociopolitical analysis. 

Several factors contribute to this phenomenon:

1. Perceived Mythical Leadership

Many supporters view Trump as a larger-than-life figure endowed with extraordinary abilities to combat perceived societal threats. This perception fosters a deep emotional connection and unwavering loyalty.

sesp.northwestern.edu

2. Authoritarian Personality Traits

Research indicates that individuals with a preference for clear hierarchies and strong leadership gravitate towards Trump. Traits such as right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation are prevalent among his supporters.

jspp.psychopen.eu

3. Shared Psychological Dynamics

The concept of "shared psychosis" suggests a psychological alignment between Trump and his followers, characterized by a mutual reinforcement of beliefs and behaviors. This dynamic can lead to a collective dismissal of opposing viewpoints and facts.

scientificamerican.com

4. Cultural and Economic Factors

Economic hardship, cultural displacement, and a sense of lost status contribute to the appeal of Trump's message. His rhetoric resonates with individuals who feel marginalized by societal changes.

newlinesmag.com

In summary, the fervent support for Trump among his base is a multifaceted phenomenon, rooted in psychological predispositions, cultural identities, and perceived existential threats.

But how about as related to the great narcissist's personality defects and criminal behaviors?

The unwavering support for Trump, despite his well-documented personality defects and criminal behaviors, suggests several psychological and sociological phenomena at play among his followers:

1. Cult of Personality

• Many supporters see Trump as a "strongman" who can break the rules for a greater cause.
• His narcissism, lies, and bullying are reframed as "strength" rather than defects.

2. Shared Narcissism & Projection

• Some followers identify with Trump's grandiosity and self-victimization, seeing their struggles reflected in his defiance.
• His refusal to admit fault aligns with their own aversion to accountability.

3. Cognitive Dissonance & Motivated Reasoning

• Instead of acknowledging his faults, supporters rationalize them ("he's fighting for us," "he's being unfairly targeted").
• The more he's accused, the more they dig in, seeing him as a victim of corruption.

4. Authoritarian Psychology

• Many supporters value dominance, rule-breaking, and loyalty over ethics or truth.
• Trump's disregard for the law is perceived as a necessary tactic against "the enemy."

5. Desensitization & Normalization of Corruption

• Scandals become white noise, and his behavior seems less shocking over time.
• His constant legal troubles are spun as proof of a corrupt system, rather than evidence of his own wrongdoing.

6. Parasitic Relationship with a Demagogue

• Trump provides his followers with identity, meaning, and purpose.
• To abandon him would mean admitting they were deceived, which is psychologically unbearable.

Would we like to make a deeper analysis of any of these points?

Good grief! Not really.

I think we know all we need to know about him, and them.

Ending on something humorous...

Trump Names Himself Principal Ballerina of Kennedy Center Ballet
from The Borowitz Report
"Announcing a purge of the company’s ballerinas, Trump declared on Truth Social, “I will soon be announcing a new roster of ballerinas, with an amazing principal ballerina, DONALD J. TRUMP.
"He said he was “disgusted” to discover that all of the company’s current ballerinas were women, a state of affairs that he blamed on DEI." More

Why is America "Trumpomuskovia"? A New Name for a New Regime - Timothy Snyder (from Dec 09, 2024)

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

CFPOTUS47 Donald Trump's Kakistocratic Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth

 Starting here with neutral commentary on Secretary of Defense Hegseth:

Military Effort to Scrub Diversity Programs Leads to Dead Websites and Confusion

And...

As Hegseth Takes Charge at the Pentagon, Here's What Changes Could Be in Store

Moving on now with the obvious commentary on this situation...

Convicted Felon now again POTUS Donald Trump's new Kakistocracy: 

Pete Hegseth's recent confirmation as Secretary of Defense has been accompanied by significant controversy due to past allegations of sexual assault, alcohol abuse, and misconduct. These concerns have led to questions about his ability to manage the immense responsibilities and pressures associated with leading the Department of Defense.

During his confirmation process, Hegseth faced allegations of sexual assault dating back to 2017, which he settled out of court. Additionally, his former sister-in-law provided a sworn affidavit detailing instances of excessive alcohol consumption and emotionally abusive behavior. Despite these allegations, Hegseth and his supporters have dismissed them as politically motivated attacks.

WSJ

The role of Secretary of Defense is one of the most demanding positions in the U.S. government, requiring sound judgment, integrity, and the ability to handle high-pressure situations. Given Hegseth's history, there are concerns about how he will manage the stress inherent in overseeing the nation's military operations. His past behavior raises questions about his decision-making capabilities and his commitment to maintaining the ethical standards expected of someone in his position.

As Hegseth assumes leadership of the Pentagon, it will be crucial to monitor how he addresses these concerns and whether he can uphold the responsibilities of his office effectively. The military community and the public will be watching closely to see if he can navigate the challenges ahead without the personal issues that have marred his past.

Pete Hegseth Confirmed as Defense Secretary Amid Controversy

what is reasonable in how he handles this pressure considering the personality of such a person's past failures to run far smaller organizations?

It is reasonable to expect that Pete Hegseth's leadership of the Department of Defense will reflect his personality traits, management style, and past behavior, both positive and negative. Given the immense pressure of running the world's largest organization, here are some considerations based on his past:

1. Reliance on Public Image

• Hegseth's media background suggests he will likely focus on projecting strength and charisma to the public. This could help rally confidence among certain constituencies but may also deflect attention from substantive organizational challenges.

2. Delegation vs. Micromanagement

• If his history of struggling to manage smaller organizations holds true, he may face difficulties handling the complexities of the Pentagon. Effective delegation to skilled subordinates could mitigate this, but a lack of trust or micromanagement might exacerbate inefficiencies.

3. Handling of Accountability

• Given allegations of deflecting blame and downplaying personal responsibility in his past, there’s a concern he might respond to crises defensively rather than transparently. This could erode trust within the military ranks and the public if problems arise.

4. Response to Stress

• High-stress environments tend to magnify a leader's pre-existing tendencies. If his past issues with substance abuse and impulsivity resurface, they could undermine his decision-making during critical moments. Alternatively, if he's worked to address these issues, it could provide a chance for personal redemption and effective leadership.

5. Potential for Overconfidence

• Hegseth's ideological fervor and confidence in his beliefs may push him toward aggressive policy decisions or reforms. While decisiveness can be valuable, overconfidence could lead to rash or poorly executed strategies, particularly in military or geopolitical matters.

6. Support Systems

• Whether he surrounds himself with experienced advisors or loyalists will significantly affect his capacity to manage the department. Experienced advisors could compensate for his shortcomings, whereas an insular team could magnify them.

What’s Reasonable to Expect?

• High public visibility and likely controversial policy stances as he works to align the Pentagon with his administration's political goals.
• Potential struggles with the organizational complexity and internal resistance, especially if he takes an authoritarian or combative approach.
• Public criticism or internal fallout if past personal issues resurface under the stress of the role.
• The possibility of high turnover among senior staff if his leadership style clashes with the Pentagon's culture.

His success or failure will depend heavily on whether he can adapt his leadership style to the realities of the role, manage his personal weaknesses, and build trust within the organization. However, his past challenges managing smaller organizations suggest this will be a steep learning curve.

Hegseth said if he gets the job, he did, he would just quite drinking alcohol because that works so well with alcoholics?

The idea that Pete Hegseth claimed he would "just quit drinking" if confirmed as Secretary of Defense raises red flags for several reasons, especially considering the stress and responsibilities tied to the role. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Oversimplification of Alcohol Dependency

• If Hegseth has struggled with alcohol abuse in the past, simply deciding to quit "cold turkey" without acknowledging the complexity of addiction or seeking support is often insufficient. Long-term recovery typically requires structured intervention, therapy, or programs like Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), particularly under high-stress circumstances.

2. The Stress of the Role

• Leading the Pentagon is among the most high-pressure jobs in the world. Stress is a significant trigger for relapse among individuals recovering from substance abuse. Without a clear and credible plan to manage stress and maintain sobriety, his promise might falter when tested.

3. Impact on Decision-Making

• The stakes at the Pentagon involve life-and-death decisions, long-term military strategy, and national security. Leadership under the influence—or impaired by withdrawal, stress, or untreated addiction—could have catastrophic consequences.

4. Pattern of Dismissiveness

• A statement like this reflects a dismissive attitude toward the seriousness of addiction. It suggests a lack of understanding or acknowledgment of the need for accountability, professional help, and long-term planning, which may extend to how he approaches other challenges in the role.

5. Historical Parallels

• Leaders who have struggled with substance abuse while in power—if untreated—often face scrutiny over their ability to perform their duties. If Hegseth’s approach is superficial or fails to address the root causes of any alcohol-related issues, it could lead to significant public and internal backlash.

Reasonable Expectations:

• Establishing a Plan: If he genuinely intends to quit drinking, it’s reasonable to expect him to engage with professional support systems, openly or privately, to ensure he can maintain sobriety.
• Transparency: The public and military personnel might expect updates or reassurances about his ability to handle the role effectively, given the doubts raised by his history.
• Building Trust: Sobriety claims alone won’t assuage concerns. His leadership decisions, consistency, and ability to handle stress will ultimately determine if he can overcome this shadow from his past.

Quitting alcohol cold turkey might sound decisive, but for those with a history of substance abuse, it’s rarely a sustainable or effective solution, especially when faced with the unprecedented pressure of running the Pentagon.

Few expect Pete to be successful which supports CFPOTUS47 Donald Trump's kakistocracy concept of running our government.

The appointment of Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense has intensified discussions about the concept of "kakistocracy," defined as governance by the least qualified or most unscrupulous individuals. Critics argue that Hegseth's limited experience and controversial past exemplify this notion, suggesting that his leadership may not meet the demands of overseeing the Department of Defense.

Default

Vice President J.D. Vance has described Hegseth as a "disrupter," emphasizing the need for significant changes within the Pentagon. This perspective aligns with the administration's broader approach of appointing individuals who challenge established norms.

Politico

However, concerns persist that such appointments prioritize loyalty and ideological alignment over competence, potentially undermining effective governance. The narrow confirmation of Hegseth, with Vice President Vance casting a tie-breaking vote, underscores the contentious nature of his selection and reflects broader apprehensions about the administration's commitment to qualified leadership.

Time

In summary, Hegseth's appointment is viewed by some as indicative of a governance style that favors disruption and loyalty over traditional qualifications, reinforcing concerns about a "kakistocracy" within the current administration.

Hegseth's Appointment and the Debate Over 'Kakistocracy'

As for kakistocracy, Tulsi Gabbard comes to mind.

The association of Tulsi Gabbard with the concept of kakistocracy is likely grounded in her controversial political trajectory, polarizing views, and alliances that have garnered criticism from across the political spectrum. While some see her as an independent thinker willing to challenge orthodoxy, others argue that her actions and rhetoric undermine democratic principles or prioritize personal ambition over governance quality.

Why Some Might Connect Gabbard to Kakistocracy:

1. Shifts in Political Alignment: Gabbard’s shift from being a Democratic congresswoman to aligning with more right-wing causes and media outlets has led to accusations of opportunism and inconsistency in her political philosophy.

2. Controversial Foreign Policy Positions:

   • Her frequent criticism of U.S. foreign policy, including her meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, was perceived by some as legitimizing authoritarian regimes.
   • Critics argue that her non-interventionist stance sometimes aligns with dictators rather than promoting human rights.

3. Media Role Post-Congress:

   • Gabbard’s move into media, often appearing on conservative platforms, has fueled skepticism about her motivations. This has led to accusations that she prioritizes public visibility over meaningful policy contributions.

4. Reputation for Disruption:

   • Like figures associated with kakistocracy, Gabbard has been labeled a "disrupter." While disruption can bring reform, it can also result in instability or governance challenges when not paired with clear and competent leadership.

Counterpoints:

• Support from Independents and Libertarians: Many supporters praise Gabbard’s willingness to address issues like military-industrial overreach, corruption, and censorship.
• Military Service: Her experience as a combat veteran and her advocacy for veteran-related issues have earned her respect in some circles.

Ultimately, whether Tulsi Gabbard fits into the framework of a kakistocracy depends on one’s perspective. Supporters view her as a principled outlier, while critics see her as a figure whose actions may contribute to governance by those ill-suited for leadership.

IF one were shooting for a kakistocracy, Donald Trump has been following a path supporting that is his intention.

The term "kakistocracy," derived from the Greek words "kakistos" (meaning "worst") and "kratos" (meaning "rule"), refers to governance by the least qualified or most unscrupulous individuals. Critics have applied this term to former President Donald Trump's administration, citing several factors that they argue support this characterization.

1. Appointment of Unqualified Loyalists:

• Trump has been noted for nominating individuals to key positions based on loyalty rather than expertise. This approach is seen as undermining the Constitution's vision of merit-based governance.
  Default

2. Disregard for Established Norms:

• His administration has been characterized by a willingness to flout established political and ethical norms, leading to concerns about the erosion of democratic institutions.
  The Fulcrum

3. Polarizing Leadership Style:

• Trump's leadership has been marked by divisive rhetoric and actions that have deepened political polarization, which some argue is indicative of governance by the least suitable individuals.
  The Atlantic

These factors contribute to the argument that Trump's leadership aligns with the concept of a kakistocracy, where governance is conducted by individuals considered the least qualified or most unscrupulous.

Compiled with the aid of ChatGPT