With the inauguration of convicted Felon Donald Trump today, we have to consider where we are at. And it does not look good. While some praise it as a New America. Something we have heard criminals claim at various times in the past, always proven to be untrue. Those like Joseph McCarthy with his "red scare" who, as with Trump, is just a calling of others to arms to empower himself, first and foremost.
Donald Trump as POTUS47. It this the beginning of the end for us? Or the end of the beginning? Is this the beginning of an authoritarian America, or simply growing pains to strengthen America from ever again going down this anti-democratic and authoritarian path of disingenuity, disinformation, disruption, and destruction?
Kakistocracy. by the way, refers to a system of government in which the leaders are the least qualified, most corrupt, or most incompetent individuals available. The term comes from the Greek words kakistos (meaning "worst") and kratos (meaning "rule" or "power"), and it describes a government run by those who are corrupt, inept, or unfit to govern. In a kakistocracy, power is typically held by individuals who act in their own self-interest rather than for the benefit of the public, often leading to mismanagement, widespread corruption, and poor governance.
Why? Because this IS what (and who) Trump is, in nominating to lead our government institutions people lacking proper qualifications for their nominated positions.
Why?
Putting unqualified individuals in positions of power and institutions can happen for a variety of reasons, often influenced by political, economic, or ideological factors. Here are a few common reasons why this might occur:
Political Patronage and Loyalty: In some cases, leaders or political parties may prioritize loyalty and personal connections over qualifications. Appointing friends, allies, or political supporters, regardless of their competence, helps maintain power and solidify political support. This can lead to positions being filled by individuals who lack the skills or knowledge required to perform effectively.
Ideological or Partisan Goals: Political leaders might appoint individuals who share their specific ideological or partisan views, even if they are not qualified for the role. The goal may be to advance a particular agenda rather than ensuring competent governance. This is often seen in the appointment of judges, agency heads, or other key figures in the administration.
Cronyism and Corruption: In some cases, the appointment of unqualified individuals is a result of cronyism or corruption. Individuals may be chosen because they are willing to engage in corrupt practices or because they offer financial or personal benefits to those in power. This often undermines the effectiveness and integrity of institutions.
Political and Business Influence: Large corporations, interest groups, or wealthy individuals may influence the appointment of unqualified people to positions of power to protect their own interests. By placing their allies in positions of influence, they can shape policies that benefit their business or financial goals, sometimes at the expense of public welfare.
Lack of Accountability: In some systems, especially those with weak checks and balances, leaders may be able to appoint unqualified individuals without facing significant public scrutiny or consequences. In such environments, there may be little to no pressure to ensure that the most qualified individuals are appointed to positions of power.
Short-Term Political Gains: Some leaders may prioritize short-term political or electoral gains over long-term governance and effectiveness. Appointing individuals who can mobilize a certain voter base, or who are seen as symbols of a particular movement, may be seen as more beneficial in the short run, even if they lack qualifications.
Ideological Disregard for Expertise: Some populist or anti-establishment movements deliberately place unqualified individuals in power as a rejection of traditional elites, experts, or institutions. This is often framed as a way to "drain the swamp" or challenge the establishment, though it can lead to ineffective governance.
In all these cases, the decision to place unqualified people in power can harm institutions, diminish the quality of governance, and erode public trust in the system. It may also result in poor decision-making and the mismanagement of critical issues, potentially leading to long-term damage to a country's political and economic health.
While some may believe that Donald Trump is saving them from our government (apparently by destroying it), it is an irrational and disreputable view regarding our most immoral (and effectively nearly our worst) POTUS...a convicted felon who was re-elected under circumstances of delusion and frankly, criminal intent.
In presidential rankings, Abraham Lincoln rated #1. Barack Obama rated #10. Donald Trump...#41 out of our 46 presidents as of today (with tomorrow being convicted felon Donald Trump's inauguration as POTUS47.
The image above illustrates themes of power dynamics and collective action. It depicts a transformation from oppression to liberation: initially, a figure wields a whip over a submissive group, but the group eventually rises against the oppressor. The image suggests that solidarity and collective action can overpower tyranny.
In the context of the past 20 years in America, and particularly with the framing of Donald Trump as either a savior or a manipulator, interpretations vary depending on political alignment. But it's quite obvious to anyone paying close, or even distant attention (as with our friends worldwide) that Donald Trump is part of a tyrannical orientation with an easily uncovered disreputable career.
Conservative Perspective:
Many conservatives see Trump as the figure fighting against entrenched elites, "saving" the people from oppressive systems like "the swamp," big government, or globalist agendas. To them, Trump represents the individual who breaks the whip held by these powers. "Conservatism" today, is not what it once was. Or as it's still claimed to be.
While both forms of conservatism value national identity, personal liberty, and tradition, Trump’s conservatism has brought a more combative and populist tone to the forefront, often challenging the status quo and the institutions that traditional conservatism sought to preserve.
Opposing Perspective:
Critics argue that Trump himself embodies the authoritarian figure, concentrating power and leveraging divisive rhetoric to maintain control. From this perspective, his actions and policies (e.g., tax cuts for the wealthy, environmental deregulation, and alleged undermining of democratic norms) disproportionately serve elites rather than ordinary citizens, contradicting the notion of him as a liberator.
Overarching Theme:
The image underscores the potential for manipulation of collective belief systems. Trump's supporters might view themselves as the liberated group, but critics could argue that their alignment with Trump perpetuates systemic oppression under the guise of populist rhetoric. The image invites reflection on how leaders use narratives of "us versus them" to wield influence and whether true liberation is achieved or if the cycle of oppression continues under a different guise.
Pointing out how the objective view about Donald Trump is not a good one as he is a convicted felon and has been a lifelong and career criminal.
The claim that Donald Trump is a "convicted felon" is inaccurate as of now. While he has faced numerous legal challenges, including indictments and civil lawsuits, none have yet resulted in a felony conviction. However, he has been found liable in certain civil cases, including one involving sexual abuse and defamation. It is critical to distinguish between criminal convictions and civil liabilities when discussing his record.
That said, Trump has faced significant legal and ethical controversies over the years that invite scrutiny. Here's an objective overview of some of the major issues often cited by critics:
1. History of Fraud and Business Misconduct
- The Trump University case resulted in a $25 million settlement after allegations that the program defrauded students.
- The Trump Foundation was dissolved in 2019 following a lawsuit alleging misuse of charitable funds for personal and political purposes.
- Multiple contractors and employees have accused Trump of failing to pay for services rendered.
2. Tax and Financial Irregularities
- Trump was the first president in decades to refuse to release his tax returns voluntarily, raising questions about transparency.
- The New York Times' investigation into his taxes revealed years of aggressive tax avoidance, claiming substantial losses to offset income and paying little to no federal income tax in some years.
3. Criminal Indictments (2023–2024)
- Trump has been criminally indicted four times in connection with:
- Classified documents case: Mishandling sensitive national security documents after leaving office.
- 2020 election interference: Allegations of attempting to overturn election results in Georgia and on a federal level.
- Stormy Daniels hush money case: Alleged falsification of business records to conceal payments.
- January 6th Capitol attack: Charged for conspiring to defraud the United States, obstructing an official proceeding, and inciting insurrection.
4. Evasion of Accountability
- Critics argue that Trump's tactics often involve delaying and deflecting through lawsuits, appeals, and public attacks on institutions like the judiciary, FBI, and DOJ. This behavior erodes trust in the rule of law and democratic norms.
5. Ethical Concerns During His Presidency
- Emoluments clause violations: Accusations of profiting from the presidency by promoting his properties for official government and foreign delegations.
- Nepotism: Appointing his children and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, to key advisory roles despite their lack of qualifications.
- Use of presidential power for personal gain: Pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden (which led to his first impeachment).
6. Patterns of Manipulation and Deception
- Trump has a documented history of making false or misleading statements, with fact-checkers counting tens of thousands during his presidency. Critics argue that his frequent use of misinformation undermines public trust.
7. Social and Political Impact
- Trump's divisive rhetoric has exacerbated polarization, emboldened extremist groups, and fueled distrust in democratic institutions.
- His role in the January 6th Capitol insurrection marked a low point in American democracy, with many viewing it as an attack on the peaceful transfer of power.
The Broader Implications
While Trump’s supporters delusionally view him as a fighter against corrupt elites (which he is himself), critics and most rational thinkers argue his actions consistently reflect self-interest, authoritarianism, and a disregard for democratic norms, the US Constitution, and the law.
Controversies surrounding Donald Trump and those from his inner circle, suggest patterns of prioritizing personal and political gains over accountability, ethical governance, or public service. To wit, a career of criminality and abuse.
With convicted felon Donald Trump's inauguration on Monday, January 20, 2025, a new era of America arises under the auspices of an authoritarian and convicted criminal as POTUS47.
US institutions and the US Constitution, aside from the Department of Justice (recognizing its own failures in holding Trump accountable after he left office in 2021), politically swelter under the weight of the Trump crime organization, now being assimilated within the US Government as it reforms it from an oligarchy or plutocracy, with elements of kleptocracy, into a kakistocracy.
As of January 19, 2025, the most fitting description of the United States, based on current political and economic trends, could be oligarchy or plutocracy, with elements of kleptocracy and meritocracy also being relevant, depending on the specific issue being discussed.
Oligarchy: Many critics of the U.S. system argue that power is increasingly concentrated in the hands of a small number of wealthy individuals, corporations, and interest groups, who influence policy through lobbying, campaign contributions, and media ownership. This has led to concerns that the government serves the interests of the elite rather than the general population, especially on issues like tax policy, healthcare, and corporate regulation.
Plutocracy: With the growing influence of wealth in politics, such as the rise of super PACs, the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few individuals, and the outsized impact of billionaires on elections, the term "plutocracy" is often used to highlight the role that wealth plays in shaping political outcomes. This has raised concerns that economic inequality has reached levels where the rich can effectively control government policy.
Kleptocracy: While the term "kleptocracy" generally refers to the outright theft of state resources for personal gain, there have been instances where government officials or business elites have been accused of corruption, embezzlement, and self-dealing, particularly in relation to issues like government contracts, tax policy, and regulatory capture. Critics of the current system sometimes use the term to suggest that corruption is pervasive at the highest levels of power.
Meritocracy: Despite its ideal, the U.S. is increasingly criticized for not functioning as a true meritocracy, especially with regard to social mobility. Structural inequalities related to race, class, education, and geography have made it difficult for many Americans to succeed based purely on merit. However, meritocratic ideals are still often used to justify policies, particularly in education and employment.
As of January 19, 2025, the most fitting description of the United States IS, based on current political and economic trends with Donald Trump's inauguration tomorrow, is that of a plutocracy or oligarchy, where wealth and concentrated power shape the political landscape, limiting true democratic representation.
However, aspects of kleptocracy (with lingering remains of an ever-decreasing meritocracy), still play roles in the broader discussion of American governance, depending on the specific issue being discussed.
Much of the problem is Donald Trump's divisional tactics to divide and conquer America. WE can do better together. We all need to see that.
We can do better. But not if one cannot see beyond one's partisan, especially when delusional, beliefs.
Do we even want to do better anymore? Because it doesn't seem like it as those on the right denigrate democracy, praise authoritarianism and autocratic enemies of Western democracies, and continue to confuse reality with fantasy and tribalism.
We CAN do better. Easily.
Reality still matters. While we are welcome to our own opinions, we are not welcome to have our own personal (or tribal or partisan)...facts.
Let's end with these two thoughts:
Twenty Lessons On Tyranny, From the Twentieth Century - Timothy Snyder.
And finally...
Why I remain hopeful about America Even as darkness falls - Robert Reich
Compiled with the aid of ChatGPT
