Putin, Dugin, and Trump: The Geopolitical Challenge Facing America

Alexander Dugin is a Russian philosopher, political theorist, and strategist known for his far-right and nationalist ideas. He is considered one of the most influential intellectuals behind Vladimir Putin’s geopolitical vision and has developed a distinctive worldview that challenges Western liberalism, democracy, and globalism.

Who is Alexander Dugin?

Dugin is often associated with the ideology of Eurasianism, which emphasizes the idea that Russia, rather than being a part of Europe or Asia, should lead a unique Eurasian civilization. He is a vocal critic of liberal democracy and Western values, seeing them as threats to the survival of traditional Russian culture, values, and political systems. His philosophy blends Russian Orthodox Christianity, traditionalism, nationalism, and anti-modernism. Dugin is also a prominent advocate for an authoritarian system that rejects the principles of liberal democracy, which he believes lead to decadence, moral decay, and societal breakdown.

Dugin’s work, particularly his book "Foundations of Geopolitics", has been highly influential within certain circles of Russian politics and military strategy. His vision of a "multipolar world" contrasts with the Western-led "unipolar" world order, which he sees as dominated by the U.S. and its allies. He advocates for a new international order, where Russia plays a central role, asserting itself against the West.

Putin’s Relationship with Dugin’s Beliefs

Putin’s policies and rhetoric, especially in recent years, reflect a certain alignment with Dugin’s ideas, particularly regarding nationalism, anti-liberalism, and anti-Western sentiments. Although it’s difficult to say how directly Putin subscribes to Dugin's specific philosophy, Dugin has been described as a key ideological figure whose ideas resonate with the Kremlin’s foreign and domestic policies. Here are the key ways Putin has embraced Dugin’s beliefs:

1. Anti-Western Sentiment:

   • Both Dugin and Putin are staunchly critical of Western liberalism, seeing it as morally corrupt, decadent, and a threat to Russia’s traditional values. Putin has positioned Russia as a defender of conservative and Christian values in opposition to what he perceives as the permissiveness and liberalism of the West.

   • Dugin’s ideas, particularly the rejection of liberal democracy, mirror Putin’s own distrust of Western-style political systems and his promotion of a strong, centralized state under his control.

2. Eurasianism and Russia’s Role in Global Politics:

   • Dugin’s philosophy of Eurasianism calls for Russia to assert its dominance over the Eurasian landmass, rejecting the West's political and cultural dominance. This has been reflected in Putin’s foreign policy, especially in his actions in Ukraine, Georgia, and other former Soviet republics, where he has sought to reassert Russian influence and challenge Western power.

   • Dugin envisions Russia leading a coalition of countries (often referred to as the "Eurasian bloc"), which would challenge the global order dominated by the U.S. and Europe. Putin’s actions in Ukraine and Syria can be seen as part of this broader vision of establishing Russia as a counterbalance to U.S. hegemony.

3. The Rejection of Globalism:

   • Dugin is a vocal critic of globalism, the idea that countries should be governed by global institutions and international norms. He believes that this undermines national sovereignty and leads to the erosion of cultural and religious identities.

   • Putin has positioned Russia as a champion of national sovereignty, particularly in opposition to Western-led international institutions like the European Union (EU) and NATO. He has used rhetoric that positions Russia as a defender of the "multipolar world," a world where power is not concentrated in the hands of a few Western countries.

What They Are Doing to Support These Beliefs Against America and for Russia

1. Ukraine and the "Eurasian Sphere":

   • One of the most significant actions taken by Russia under Putin that aligns with Dugin’s beliefs is the invasion and annexation of Crimea in 2014, followed by the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine. This move was justified by Putin as necessary to protect Russian speakers and culture, but it also fits within the broader Eurasian vision of reasserting Russian influence in territories once part of the Soviet Union.

   • Dugin has openly supported these actions, viewing them as part of Russia’s rightful return to its place as the leader of a Eurasian bloc. He also sees Ukraine as a critical part of this vision, often referring to it as the "heartland" of Eurasia.

2. Promotion of Anti-Liberal Values:

   • Putin has sought to promote Russian Orthodox Christianity as a unifying force in Russia, positioning it against the secularism of the West. This resonates with Dugin’s traditionalist views, which stress the importance of religion in society and politics.

   • Russia’s opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, its push for conservative family values, and its crackdown on opposition movements all align with Dugin’s idea of a society that rejects liberal freedoms in favor of order and traditionalism.

3. Cyber Warfare and Disinformation:

   • Russia, under Putin’s leadership, has been accused of using cyber warfare and disinformation campaigns to destabilize Western democracies, particularly the U.S. during the 2016 presidential election. This aligns with Dugin’s idea of undermining Western influence and sowing chaos in the political systems of liberal democracies.

   • Dugin’s geopolitical ideas also encourage the use of unconventional methods to achieve strategic goals, including the use of information warfare to destabilize the U.S. and European Union.

4. Energy and Economic Influence:

   • Russia has leveraged its control over energy supplies, especially natural gas and oil, as a tool of geopolitical influence. By using energy as leverage, Russia under Putin has sought to deepen its ties with Eurasian countries while also undermining Western sanctions and economic influence.

   • This economic strategy is part of a broader effort to reduce Russia’s dependence on the West and assert its dominance within the Eurasian region.

Dugin’s ideas, particularly his vision of a multipolar world led by Russia and his rejection of liberal Western values, resonate with Putin’s worldview and have influenced many of his policies. While the extent of their personal relationship and alignment is not fully clear, it is evident that Putin has adopted certain aspects of Dugin’s philosophy, especially in terms of nationalism, anti-Western rhetoric, and the quest for Russian dominance in Eurasia. Together, they advocate for a Russia that pushes back against American global leadership and the liberal international order, positioning Russia as a defender of tradition, sovereignty, and an alternative vision for global politics.

Putin's connection to various philosophers and ideologies, including figures like Alexander Dugin, is often viewed through a complex and controversial lens. Dugin, in particular, is known for his far-right, nationalist, and anti-liberal views, advocating for Eurasianism, which emphasizes Russia's unique role in world history and its need to assert its power against the West.

Critics of Dugin and his philosophy argue that his ideas are deeply problematic, even dangerous, and foster a worldview that is deluded or extreme. They point out that his approach often relies on conspiracy theories, anti-democratic sentiments, and a rejection of modernity. Whether he is "stupid," "deluded," or "insane" largely depends on one's perspective. Some might argue that Dugin's ideas are misguided and dangerous, while others might see them as strategic in promoting a certain vision for Russia.

It's a highly subjective matter, with critics often calling his ideas intellectually dishonest or harmful, while supporters view him as a visionary seeking to challenge Western dominance. Ultimately, the label depends on the values and beliefs of those doing the evaluating.

The beliefs and actions of Trump, Bannon, Putin, and Dugin share certain themes, but they are not perfectly aligned, and the connections are complex.

1. Nationalism and Populism:

• Trump and Bannon: Both Trump and Bannon have espoused strong nationalist and populist rhetoric. Trump’s "America First" approach, with a focus on prioritizing U.S. interests, echoes a populist desire to challenge global elites and institutions. Bannon, as a strategist, championed similar themes, promoting a right-wing, anti-establishment ideology that sought to upend the liberal international order.

• Putin and Dugin: Similarly, Putin’s Russia under his leadership has embraced a form of nationalism, particularly in opposition to Western influence. Dugin’s philosophy, particularly his concept of Eurasianism, aligns with this by emphasizing Russia’s role as a unique civilization, distinct from the West.

2. Anti-Globalism:

• Trump and Bannon: Both Trump and Bannon have been critical of international institutions and agreements. Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement and the Iran Nuclear Deal, along with Bannon's criticism of globalist elites, reflects a shared skepticism of global governance and institutions like the EU and UN.

• Putin and Dugin: Putin’s opposition to NATO and the European Union, alongside Dugin's advocacy for Russian supremacy in Eurasia, also fits into an anti-globalist narrative, though with a more explicitly authoritarian and imperialistic bent. Dugin often critiques liberal democracy as part of a Western-led globalist project that he believes undermines national sovereignty.

3. Anti-Liberalism:

• Trump and Bannon: Trump's actions often targeted liberal values, especially in areas like immigration, civil rights, and press freedom. Bannon has been a vocal critic of liberalism and often associates it with globalism and what he perceives as a threat to traditional values and sovereignty.

• Putin and Dugin: Putin’s governance in Russia has consistently undermined liberal democratic values, with crackdowns on dissent, the press, and LGBTQ+ rights. Dugin’s philosophy, with its rejection of liberal democracy, aligns with this anti-liberalism, advocating instead for a more authoritarian, conservative, and hierarchical society.

4. Relations with the West:

• Trump and Bannon: While Trump often expressed admiration for Putin and appeared open to closer ties with Russia, especially during the 2016 election, his administration maintained policies that were at odds with Russian interests, such as sanctions on Russia and support for NATO. Bannon, too, has expressed admiration for the strength and sovereignty of nations like Russia, although his strategic thinking was more focused on undermining Western globalism.

• Putin and Dugin: Putin, particularly under Dugin's influence, has seen Russia as a counterbalance to Western liberalism, viewing the U.S. and Europe as rivals in the ideological and geopolitical struggle for global influence. Dugin's vision calls for Russia to lead a broader Eurasian bloc to challenge the Western-dominated world order.

In summary, there are some overlapping themes, particularly the opposition to globalism, liberalism, and the embrace of nationalism, but the alignment between Trump, Bannon, Putin, and Dugin is not straightforward. Trump's and Bannon's views are more focused on national sovereignty and populism from a Western, American context, while Putin and Dugin’s philosophy is rooted in Russian imperialism and Eurasianism. The alignment tends to be more about shared anti-establishment, anti-liberal views, rather than an exact match in ideology or strategy.

In dealing with the rising geopolitical tensions involving Russia, particularly in the context of Putin's policies and the influence of figures like Dugin, there are several strategies that America could pursue to safeguard its interests and uphold democratic values. The role of leadership, especially in the presidency, is critical to how effectively the U.S. navigates these challenges.

What Should America Do?

1. Strengthen Alliances and Multilateral Cooperation:

   • NATO and EU Relations: A strong, united NATO is critical to countering Russian aggression and preserving global security. The U.S. must work closely with NATO members, especially in Eastern Europe, to ensure that collective defense is robust, and that Russia's attempts to weaken the alliance are thwarted.

   • Diplomacy with Allies: The U.S. needs to strengthen diplomatic ties with its European allies and other democracies around the world. This will help create a coordinated response to Russian expansionism and the spread of anti-democratic ideologies.

2. Countering Russian Influence and Disinformation:

   • The U.S. must continue to combat disinformation campaigns and cyberattacks originating from Russia. This includes protecting U.S. electoral processes, critical infrastructure, and countering Russian-backed propaganda both at home and abroad.

   • Cybersecurity should be a top priority, ensuring that both government and private sector systems are resistant to cyberattacks and influence operations.

3. Support for Democracy and Human Rights:

   • The U.S. needs to be a consistent voice for human rights and democratic values around the world, including pushing back against autocratic regimes like Russia’s. Supporting civil society organizations, journalists, and opposition leaders in countries like Russia and Belarus is essential to promoting freedom and democracy globally.

   • Sanctions should continue to be a tool for holding Putin’s government accountable for human rights abuses, corruption, and aggression toward neighboring countries. However, sanctions need to be strategically designed to target key figures and industries, while minimizing harm to ordinary citizens.

4. Energy and Economic Strategies:

   • The U.S. should focus on energy independence and strengthening its position in global energy markets. This will help reduce European dependence on Russian energy exports, making it more difficult for Russia to use energy as a geopolitical weapon.

   • Economic sanctions on Russian oligarchs and key industries that fund the Russian regime should be maintained and expanded to put pressure on Putin’s inner circle.

5. Support Ukraine and Other At-Risk States:

   • The U.S. must continue to support Ukraine in its defense against Russian aggression, providing military aid, economic support, and diplomatic backing.

   • Expanding partnerships with countries in Eastern Europe, the Baltics, and other former Soviet republics is vital in creating a buffer zone to prevent further Russian territorial expansion.

Do We Need to Avoid Having Someone Like Trump in Office?

The question of leadership in the U.S. is crucial in determining how effectively the country can respond to the current global challenges posed by Russia. Here are some key considerations:

1. Coherent Foreign Policy:

   • Under Trump, U.S. foreign policy was often characterized by unpredictability and isolationism. Trump's "America First" rhetoric led to withdrawing from international agreements and undermining multilateral institutions, such as NATO, and distanced the U.S. from long-standing alliances. This created openings for authoritarian regimes like Russia to exploit divisions and weaknesses within the West.

   • A more consistent and cooperative approach to foreign policy, with a focus on strengthening alliances and promoting democratic values, is critical to countering Russian influence. Leaders who prioritize diplomacy, multilateralism, and a commitment to global institutions are better equipped to handle the complexities of a world where authoritarian regimes are challenging liberal democracies.

2. Values and Leadership:

   • Trump’s admiration for Putin and other authoritarian leaders raised concerns about the U.S.'s commitment to promoting democracy and human rights globally. A president who is less sympathetic to autocrats and more committed to upholding democratic values would be better suited to leading the U.S. in the face of Russian and other authoritarian threats.

   • Leadership that is aligned with democratic principles, like rule of law and respect for human rights, would help restore credibility on the world stage. A leader who consistently supports the liberal international order and defends the rights of nations to self-determination is crucial for U.S. leadership in countering Russia’s geopolitical ambitions.

3. Diplomatic Engagement vs. Isolation:

   • Trump’s tendency toward unilateralism, such as withdrawing from agreements like the Paris Climate Accord and the Iran nuclear deal, undermined U.S. credibility and made it harder for America to lead global coalitions. A more engaged, diplomatic approach, where the U.S. works with allies and partners to address shared challenges, is essential for confronting Russia’s growing influence.

   • The U.S. should prioritize engagement with both its allies and neutral countries, presenting a united front against authoritarianism, while avoiding isolationist policies that could embolden Russia and other adversaries.

4. Domestic Stability and Unity:

   • A strong domestic foundation is critical for addressing foreign threats. The divisions within the U.S. during Trump’s presidency—exemplified by polarized political discourse, misinformation, and attacks on democratic institutions—undermined America’s ability to project a coherent and united front internationally.

   • A president who can bridge divides within the U.S., promote civic trust, and work to restore the integrity of democratic institutions would strengthen the country’s resilience in facing external challenges, including Russia’s attempts to undermine democracy.

Conclusion

To effectively counter the threats posed by Russia, the U.S. needs to pursue a multifaceted strategy that includes strengthening alliances, combating disinformation, supporting democratic movements, and maintaining economic and military pressure on authoritarian regimes. The role of the president is central in shaping the U.S.'s response to these challenges. Leadership that emphasizes global cooperation, democratic values, and consistent foreign policy is essential to confronting Russia’s ambitions, especially when it comes to safeguarding American interests and the international order.

Given the complexities of the current geopolitical landscape, it’s crucial that the U.S. has a president who is committed to democratic principles and multilateral cooperation, which would suggest that a figure like Trump—who has shown a pattern of undermining these values—may not be the best fit to lead the country through these difficult times.

Trump, and those who support him... have GOT to GO, ASAP.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Trump, Putin, and His GOP (Whose REALLY?): A Legacy of Revisionism, Regression, and Ongoing American Ruin

There's a lot to get to here...

Donald Trump's longstanding admiration for Vladimir Putin—a war criminal in Ukraine and a ruthless despot in Russia and beyond—aligns with Putin's revisionist and regressive beliefs, mirrors those of the now Trump "Republican" Party. 

Here I would like to reflect forward to an upcoming blog.for Monday, March 31, 2025: "Would the Founding Fathers Be Republicans Today? A Look at the Constitution's Signers and Modern Conservatism"

The once Republican Party's alignment with Trump (and therefore, Putin) has been evident not just recently, but for decades leading up to the Trump 2016 election, and then his 2024 return as POTUS47, despite his status as a convicted felon—a reality as absurd as it is alarming.

First, let's share, from the Marsh singing family at @marshsongs (music video):"The people of Europe stand with Ukraine against the threat of a false peace as much as a brutal war. Because of our shared history. Because of our shared future. Because it is just. Because it is necessary. And because they deserve nothing less. Don't abandon them. #SlavaUkraini"

Remember Project 2025?

From Julie B(rooklyn) BABY WOKE AF 🇺🇸🇯🇲 @JMeanypants - It’s Project 2025. Every single fuck up, including the signal chat breach, is plucked from the pages of Project 2025. It’s a DOOMSDAY INITIATIVE:

Moving on...

It's important to recognize one very serious issue about Donald Trump:

Donald Trump is still POTUS45, who worked hard to normalize his purposeful chaos & autocratic bigotry. Playing out now as convicted felon POTUS47, we are witnessing his now normalized version of a fascist POTUS, reshaped, hidden in plain sight, to overtake and diminish this country. But all still Donald. The guy who is not our friend. Not an American "President" in the historically understood version of the office. 

Unless you're a person of very questionable orientation. Or utterly deluded. Fooled by the charlatan, the career criminal, Donald Trump.

Trump, as POTUS45 and now POTUS47, has worked to reshape the country in his own toxic image, bringing change that challenges the status quo in ways his supporters seem incapable of recognizing. While his approach may be unconventional, it's important to recognize how his vision and leadership continue to resonate with a significant portion of disaffected, if not mesmerized, Americans. 

Who voted for this clown? This career criminal? It has to do with how such bad ideas spread across the nation and the world. For an examination to give you an idea, just in case you're still unaware of this kind of thing...

The Rise and Fall of Terrorgram - FRONTLINE & ProPublica investigate how an online network known as Terrorgram spread extremism & violence. This traces the rise of a global community of white supremacists & the anonymous, loosely moderated platforms used to spread hate & promote terror attacks.

So...

Regardless of differing opinions, we must remember that we are all part of the same nation and that the future of America, as founded and intended, relies on open dialogue and mutual respect, even amidst strong disagreements. We must also listen to our international friends, while realizing that listening too closely to our international (and domestic) enemies will lead us to ruin, and to their decades long struggle for success over and against US..

​If Vladimir Putin had a U.S. president under his influence, he might pursue the following actions to undermine America:​

1. Weaken NATO Alliances: Undermine commitments to NATO, creating divisions within the alliance.​

2. Reduce Support for Ukraine: Halt military and financial aid to Ukraine, allowing Russian aggression to proceed unchecked.​Chatham House+1Institute for the Study of War+1

3. Lift Sanctions on Russia: Remove economic sanctions, bolstering Russia's economy and geopolitical standing.​

4. Undermine U.S. Intelligence: Discredit and weaken U.S. intelligence agencies to reduce their effectiveness.​

5. Promote Isolationist Policies: Encourage withdrawal from international agreements and organizations, diminishing U.S. global influence.​

6. Foster Domestic Division: Exploit social and political divisions to destabilize internal cohesion.​

7. Compromise Cybersecurity: Allow vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, exposing the U.S. to cyber threats.​

8. Weaken Trade Alliances: Dismantle trade agreements that counterbalance Russian economic interests.​

9. Reduce Military Readiness: Cut defense spending or reallocate resources away from strategic priorities.​

10. Control Energy Policies: Implement energy strategies that increase dependence on Russian resources.​Business Insider

Since his inauguration in January 2025, convicted felon and insurrectionist (absurdly) Pres. Donald Trump has undertaken several actions:​

1. Imposed 25% Tariffs on Auto Imports: Aimed at boosting domestic manufacturing but criticized for potential global trade repercussions. ​AP News

2. Paused Foreign Aid Programs: Ordered a 90-day suspension of U.S. foreign development assistance for review, affecting global aid projects.​Wikipedia

3. Reinstated the Mexico City Policy: Restricted U.S. funding to foreign organizations that provide or promote abortions. ​Reuters

4. Reduced DEI Initiatives: Issued executive orders curbing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs within federal agencies.​

5. Negotiated with Russia on Economic Deals: Discussed potential joint ventures and lifting sanctions in exchange for cease-fire agreements in Ukraine. ​Business Insider

6. Adjusted Immigration Policies: Implemented stricter immigration controls and revised asylum procedures.​

7. Restructured Federal Agencies: Initiated plans to reorganize agencies to increase efficiency, including dissolving USAID.​

8. Revised Environmental Regulations: Rolled back certain environmental protections to promote energy independence.​

9. Addressed Election Integrity: Signed executive orders focusing on election security measures.​Ballotpedia+2Federal Register+2AP News+2

10. Granted Clemency to Devon Archer: Issued a pardon to the former business associate of Hunter Biden. ​Ballotpedia

Comparing these lists, certain actions by President Trump, such as negotiating economic deals with Russia and adjusting foreign aid, align with strategies that could potentially benefit Russian interests. However, it's important to note that these actions are part of broader policy decisions and may not directly indicate foreign influence. The motivations and implications of each action require careful analysis to understand their impact on U.S. interests and global relations.

​Now...if we redraw that with comparisons of similarities and list in order if importance of damages to America, here’s a structured comparison, ranked by potential damage to America, with similarities highlighted.

Most Damaging Actions (1-5)

1. Weaken NATO Alliances (Putin Goal) ⇄ Reduced NATO Commitments (Trump Action)

   • Trump has signaled a decrease in U.S. support for NATO, questioning its value and suggesting European nations should pay more.

   • Weakening NATO directly benefits Russia by undermining Western military cooperation.

2. Reduce Support for Ukraine (Putin Goal) ⇄ Negotiated with Russia on Economic Deals (Trump Action)

   • Trump has explored lifting sanctions on Russia in exchange for potential cease-fire agreements.

   • This aligns with Putin’s objective of securing control over Ukraine with minimal Western resistance.

3. Lift Sanctions on Russia (Putin Goal) ⇄ Eased Sanctions Discussions (Trump Action)

   • Trump’s administration has debated loosening restrictions on Russia to encourage economic collaboration.

   • This would strengthen Putin’s economy and geopolitical leverage.

4. Foster Domestic Division (Putin Goal) ⇄ Reduced DEI Initiatives & Election Integrity Actions (Trump Action)

   • Policies reducing diversity programs and focusing on election security have fueled internal debates and division.

   • Social instability and political polarization weaken national unity—key to Russian disinformation goals.

5. Control Energy Policies (Putin Goal) ⇄ Rolled Back Environmental Regulations (Trump Action)

   • Rolling back environmental protections encourages fossil fuel dependence, potentially reducing renewable energy investment.

   • A less energy-independent U.S. could lead to future reliance on global (including Russian) energy markets.

---

Moderate Damage Actions (6-8)

6. Undermine U.S. Intelligence (Putin Goal) ⇄ Restructured Federal Agencies (Trump Action)

   • Trump’s moves to reorganize intelligence and government bodies have created uncertainty about their future operations.

   • Discrediting or limiting intelligence agencies aids foreign adversaries by reducing U.S. counterespionage capabilities.

7. Weaken Trade Alliances (Putin Goal) ⇄ Imposed 25% Tariffs on Auto Imports (Trump Action)

   • Tariffs disrupt global trade partnerships, potentially alienating allies and strengthening rival economies.

   • Disrupting international trade agreements benefits Russia by diminishing U.S. economic leadership.

8. Compromise Cybersecurity (Putin Goal) ⇄ Paused Foreign Aid Programs (Trump Action)

   • Halting aid may include cybersecurity-related support to allies, weakening digital defenses against Russian cyberwarfare.

   • A weaker digital infrastructure exposes America to cyber threats from foreign adversaries.

---

Less Immediate but Still Harmful Actions (9-10)

9. Reduce Military Readiness (Putin Goal) ⇄ Reprioritized Defense Spending (Trump Action)

   • While not explicitly reducing military funding, Trump’s redirection of defense priorities could impact readiness.

   • A less agile military benefits adversaries like Russia in strategic planning.

10. Promote Isolationist Policies (Putin Goal) ⇄ America-First Immigration and Aid Policies (Trump Action)

• Limiting foreign aid and focusing inward could lead to diplomatic disengagement.

• This creates a power vacuum Russia (and China) can exploit.

---

​Several of these overlaps between Pres. Trump's actions and policies that align with Russian President Vladimir Putin's interests have raised concerns about prioritizing personal or foreign interests over those of the United States. 

Notable instances include:​

1. Advocating for Russia's Reentry into the G7: President Trump expressed a desire to see Russia reinstated into the Group of Seven (G7), stating, "I'd love to have them back. I think it was a mistake to throw them out." This stance aligns with Putin's interest in regaining a platform within this influential group, potentially easing international isolation. ​POLITICO

2. Praising Putin Publicly: Throughout his tenure, President Trump has consistently offered commendations to President Putin, referring to him as "highly respected." Such public endorsements can bolster Putin's international standing, serving Russian interests by legitimizing his leadership on the world stage. ​Representative Swalwell

3. Negotiating Economic Deals Favorable to Russia: In recent discussions, President Trump and President Putin have explored significant economic collaborations, including joint ventures in Arctic exploration and space projects. These initiatives could lead to the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Russia, directly benefiting the Russian economy while raising questions about the strategic advantages for the United States. ​Business Insider

4. Brokered Agreements Undermining European Security: The Trump administration has facilitated deals that, while presented as ceasefires, have been criticized for heavily favoring Russia over Ukraine. These agreements risk compromising Ukraine's strategic advantages and pressuring European allies, aligning more with Russian geopolitical goals than with reinforcing U.S. alliances and commitments. ​Latest news & breaking headlines

These actions have been perceived by too many analysts as aligning more closely with President Putin's interests, potentially at the expense of U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. The extent to which these overlaps serve President Trump's personal interests over those of the country remains a subject of ongoing debate and analysis.​

Conclusion?

Oh my God! What in the Hell were we thinking re-electing a malignant narcissist, career criminal, recidivist adjudicated sexual abuser, convicted felon, and fascistic revisionist bigot to the highest office not just in OUR land, but in the most powerful and richest country in the history of Humanity?

Seriously. What is Wrong with US?

While not all Trump actions directly align with Putin’s goals, there are significant overlaps in policies that weaken U.S. alliances, benefit Russian economic and geopolitical interests, and increase domestic divisions.

 Whether intentional or not, these policies shift global power dynamics in ways that Russia could exploit.

With Trump prioritizing personal gain and favor with Putin over national security, democracy, and global stability, America is teetering on the edge of authoritarian demagogery, continuing intentional fascist division, and irreversible decline.

Unless we do SOMETHING. In 2026 we can (and likely will) vote Republicans out. Then in 2028, we can end the Trump MaGA/Republicans' political personality cult and return America to Americans. But we then need to never, ever return to this nonsense. Including never, ever again electing a Trump family member, or any of the Trump Seditionist/Insurrectionist Party members, many of whom are still in Congress today.

Who?

​Several current members of Congress have demonstrated strong allegiance to former President Donald Trump, aligning closely with his political ideology and supporting his initiatives. 

Notable Congressional figures include:​

Senators:

1. John Cornyn (Texas)

2. Ted Cruz (Texas)

3. Josh Hawley (Missouri)

4. Mitch McConnell (Kentucky) – Supported Trump in many areas, though with occasional tensions.

5. John Kennedy (Louisiana) – A consistent supporter of Trump’s policy agenda.

Representatives:

1. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Georgia, 14th District)

2. Matt Gaetz (Florida, 1st District)

3. Lauren Boebert (Colorado, 3rd District)

4. Jim Jordan (Ohio, 4th District)

5. Paul Gosar (Arizona, 4th District)

6. Scott Perry (Pennsylvania, 10th District)

7. Andy Biggs (Arizona, 5th District)

8. Louie Gohmert (Texas, 1st District)

9. Kevin McCarthy (California, House Speaker)

10. Jim Banks (Indiana, 3rd District)

These individuals represent a faction within the Republican Party that has worked to support and advance Trump’s vision, some more vocally than others, but all aligned to varying degrees with his policies and influence.

If we want America back from right-wing extremists, we have to see who they are, recognize what is being done to us, and eliminate them from political or public office, ever again.

Including Trump and his 1st family of criminals. 

Brief aside...

Seeing clearly what must be seen
Steve Schmidt
"2025 marks the beginning of a splendid season of American anniversaries that come in a time of American crisis that is growing greater by the day."

Another...

Toxic Christian Nationalist Evangelicalism has made it into the WH, unseparating it with gov. WH cuts health/vaccinations, adds..."Faith"? America's worst donation to the world, Evangelicalism, already in government & elsewhere, yeah, this is bad.

Remember all those warnings about maintaining a separation between Church and State?
Yes, the attached image is just as crooked as this nonsense from Trump, now also in our WH: The Great Grift Expansion.

​The principle of separating church and state is fundamental to ensuring religious freedom and maintaining a fair, pluralistic society. For a comprehensive exploration of this topic, you might find the following article insightful:​

• "Five Reasons To Be Thankful For Separation Of Church And State" by Americans United for Separation of Church and State

This article outlines key reasons why this separation is vital, including:​

1. Freedom from an Official Religion: Preventing the establishment of a state-sponsored religion protects individuals from potential oppression and ensures that religious institutions remain independent from governmental control.​

2. Promotion of Pluralism: A clear boundary between church and state fosters a diverse society where multiple faiths and beliefs can coexist peacefully, enriching the cultural fabric of the nation.​

3. Protection of Individual Belief: By keeping government out of religious matters, individuals retain the right to choose, change, or abstain from religious affiliations without state interference.​MSUToday | Michigan State University

4. Secular Public Education: Ensuring that public schools remain free from religious endorsements creates an inclusive environment for students of all backgrounds and upholds the integrity of educational content.​

5. Counteraction of Christian Nationalism: Maintaining church-state separation challenges the notion that any single religion should dominate governmental policies, thereby safeguarding democratic principles.​

For a historical perspective, the National Park Service provides an overview of how this principle has been integral to American democracy:​NPS.gov

• "Separation of Church & State History" by the U.S. National Park Service

This resource delves into the origins and evolution of church-state separation, highlighting its role in protecting individual rights and preventing governmental overreach into religious affairs.​

These articles offer a thorough understanding of why the separation of church and state remains a cornerstone of freedom and equality in society.​

Look. We can do better. We just have to want to, to even see that we need to, but it will require ongoing effort to educate and reintegrate those who have lost their way in the great American experiment that has endured for over 200 years. Meanwhile, one major political party has actively worked to undermine it, pushing for Christian Nationalist ideals, fringe beliefs like "accelerationism," dangerous conspiracy theories like "replacement theory," and the misguided goal of transforming our democratic constitutional republic into a fascist, oligarchic, kakistocratic state—one defined by abuse, inequality, and toxic capitalism where only the powerful hold control.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

The Narcissism of Power: How Trump’s ‘Drain the Swamp’ Rhetoric Fuels Authoritarianism

The dynamic between Donald Trump’s supporters and his opponents can be understood through psychological and sociopolitical lenses, particularly in relation to narcissism and authoritarianism.

First off, let's talk about the mechanics of this nonsense.

The mesolimbic system, often called the brain's "reward pathway," plays a crucial role in motivation, pleasure, reinforcement learning, and addiction. It involves the release of dopamine, reinforcing behaviors that are perceived as rewarding, whether beneficial or harmful.

In the case of MaGA Trump supporters who seem impervious to reality, their engagement can be understood through this neurobiological framework:

1. Reinforcement and Reward

   • Trump’s rhetoric and MaGA culture provide a strong sense of belonging, identity, and emotional highs akin to addiction.

   • The dopamine-driven reinforcement from rallies, social media echo chambers, and community validation makes it hard for individuals to accept contradictory information, as doing so would disrupt their reward cycle.

2. Cognitive Dissonance Avoidance

   • If reality contradicts their worldview, processing it would cause psychological discomfort. Instead of adapting, they double down, seeking reinforcement from the same sources that reward their beliefs.

   • The mesolimbic system encourages behaviors that avoid pain—admitting they were deceived or wrong would be painful, so the brain resists.

3. Fear and Threat Processing

   • The amygdala (linked to the mesolimbic system) is highly active when individuals feel threatened. Trump's messaging often uses fear (immigrants, deep state, etc.), which hijacks rational processing in favor of emotional responses.

   • Once the brain perceives a group or idea as a "threat," logic takes a backseat to emotion-driven responses.

4. Loss Aversion and Sunk Cost Fallacy

   • Many Trump supporters have invested years of identity into MaGA ideology. The mesolimbic system reinforces continued investment rather than accepting loss and moving on.

   • If they absorbed exactly where they were headed (authoritarianism, personal harm, national instability), it would require them to admit a massive personal and ideological loss—something their brain chemistry fights against.

In essence, the MaGA movement operates like a dopamine-reinforced loop, where the fear of loss, social validation, and emotional highs keep individuals trapped in an alternate reality. If they could break that reinforcement cycle, many might recognize the path they’re on and abandon it—but their neurobiology makes that extremely difficult.

Now how about this nonsense?

As of today, March 22, 2025, only a few Republican members of Congress have publicly opposed the idea of President Donald Trump seeking a third term. Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma stated he would not support Trump running for a third term unless the U.S. Constitution is amended to allow it, emphasizing that such a change should reflect the will of the American people.​

Additionally, Representative Andy Ogles of Tennessee introduced a proposal to amend the Twenty-second Amendment, aiming to permit presidents who have served non-consecutive terms to run for a third term. This proposal is widely viewed as a means to enable Trump to seek another term.

However, these instances appear to be exceptions rather than the norm. The majority of congressional Republicans have not publicly expressed opposition to Trump's potential pursuit of a third term. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska has criticized her colleagues for their reluctance to challenge Trump, attributing it to fears of primary challenges and media backlash. She emphasized the importance of maintaining integrity, even in the face of potential threats from influential figures like Elon Musk. ​Politico

In summary, while a small number of Republican lawmakers have taken stands against Trump's third-term ambitions, there is no widespread opposition within the party. Many Republicans continue to support Trump, reflecting his significant influence over the party.

Getting back to the direct issue at hand...​

1. Trump's Narcissism and Authoritarian Appeal

Donald Trump exhibits traits consistent with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), including:

• Grandiosity: An exaggerated sense of self-importance.

• Lack of Empathy: An inability or unwillingness to understand others' perspectives.

• Need for Admiration: Constant validation and loyalty from followers.

• Manipulative Behavior: Gaslighting, deflecting blame, and creating an "us vs. them" mentality.

These traits align closely with authoritarian leadership, which emphasizes:

• Strongman politics: A leader who projects power and infallibility.

• Control over norms and institutions: Undermining checks and balances, rejecting legal constraints.

• Demonization of outsiders: Defining clear enemies (immigrants, media, political opponents) to unify followers.

2. Why Trump Supporters Are Drawn to Him

Many of Trump's supporters resonate with his narcissistic tendencies because of psychological, social, and political factors:

• Authoritarian Personality Theory: Some individuals are naturally inclined toward hierarchical, strongman leadership. They seek order, clear rules, and an authoritative figure who claims to protect them from chaos.

• Mirroring and Identification: Many of his supporters either admire or unconsciously mimic his behavior. They see his refusal to apologize, his aggression, and his self-assurance as qualities of strength.

• Fear and Resentment: Trump validates their grievances, whether about economic hardship, racial demographic changes, or perceived cultural decline.

• Desire for Belonging: His movement offers a sense of identity and unity, with shared values and a common enemy.

3. Why Opponents Cannot Connect With Their Mindset

Those who oppose Trump generally do not share authoritarian or narcissistic tendencies, making it difficult for them to empathize with his supporters:

• Higher Empathy and Tolerance: Many Trump opponents value inclusivity, diversity, and democracy, which contradict authoritarianism.

• Analytical vs. Emotional Thinking: Trump's base often responds to emotional narratives, while his opponents focus more on rational arguments and fact-checking.

• Disgust at Narcissism: Narcissistic behavior—such as lying, bragging, or lacking empathy—is seen as repulsive rather than admirable.

• Skepticism Toward Absolute Authority: Many of Trump's critics prefer decentralized power, institutional accountability, and collective decision-making over following a singular leader.

4. The Incompatibility Between the Two Groups

The fundamental reason why Trump's supporters and opponents cannot see eye to eye is that they operate from fundamentally different worldviews:

• One side admires strength, dominance, and unwavering confidence (even at the cost of truth).

• The other values humility, cooperation, and adherence to facts and norms.

This psychological and moral divide makes it nearly impossible for each side to understand or respect the other’s orientation. Trump's supporters view his critics as weak, naive, or unpatriotic, while his opponents see his followers as manipulated, authoritarian-leaning, or complicit in narcissistic behavior.

Trump and his allies often claim that their movement is about fixing the government, shrinking the federal bureaucracy, and restoring power to "the people." This rhetoric taps into long-standing conservative and libertarian ideals about small government and deregulation. However, when we compare what they say with what they actually do, contradictions emerge.

---

1. CLAIM: “Shrinking the Federal Government”

• RHETORIC: Trump and his supporters argue that they want to reduce the size of government, eliminate waste, and return power to states and individuals.

• REALITY:

  • Expansion of Executive Power: Rather than decentralizing power, Trump concentrated more control in the executive branch, undermining checks and balances.

  • Selective Cuts: While Trump talked about cutting government, he primarily targeted agencies that regulate corporations (EPA, FDA, etc.) while expanding spending on defense, border security, and tax cuts for the wealthy.

  • Project 2025: A Heritage Foundation-backed plan supported by Trump allies seeks to purge the federal workforce of career civil servants and replace them with ideological loyalists—a move that increases executive power, not shrinks it.

---

2. CLAIM: “Draining the Swamp”

• RHETORIC: Trump campaigned on eliminating corruption, removing “deep state” bureaucrats, and putting the government back in the hands of the people.

• REALITY:

  • Increased Cronyism: Instead of eliminating corruption, Trump filled his administration with lobbyists, industry insiders, and personal loyalists. Many of them, such as Steve Mnuchin (Treasury), Betsy DeVos (Education), and Wilbur Ross (Commerce), had deep financial ties that benefitted from their government roles.

  • Weaponizing the Government for Personal Use: Trump repeatedly used the DOJ to protect himself and his allies while pressuring it to investigate political opponents.

  • Profiting from the Presidency: Trump and his family directly profited from his presidency through foreign business dealings, government contracts at Trump properties, and funneling campaign money into his businesses.

---

3. CLAIM: “Fighting for Freedom and Small Government”

• RHETORIC: Trump and his allies present themselves as champions of individual liberty, opposing government overreach.

• REALITY:

  • Authoritarian Policies: Despite talking about freedom, Trump has endorsed policies that centralize power:

    • Proposing to deploy the military against domestic protesters (2020).

    • Supporting state-level abortion bans that override individual rights.

    • Promoting censorship of political opponents and media outlets that criticize him.

  • Using the Government Against Enemies: Trump frequently suggests he will use federal agencies to punish critics, imprison political opponents, and retaliate against perceived disloyalty.

  • Expanding Federal Surveillance: Despite libertarian rhetoric, Trump continued mass surveillance programs and even tried to use the NSA and FBI to benefit himself.

---

4. CLAIM: “Law and Order”

• RHETORIC: Trump’s movement claims to stand for law, order, and public safety.

• REALITY:

  • Selective Enforcement: Trump and his allies want a justice system that punishes their enemies while protecting their own.

    • He pardoned convicted criminals who were his political allies, including Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, and Paul Manafort.

    • He demonizes federal law enforcement when it investigates him (FBI, DOJ) but uses it aggressively against others (BLM, immigration raids).

  • Encouraging Lawlessness: Trump’s rhetoric has emboldened:

    • January 6 insurrectionists, whom he has called “patriots.”

    • Vigilante groups and extremist militias that operate outside legal frameworks.

    • Erosion of accountability, as he suggests that if re-elected, he will go after prosecutors, judges, and opponents who challenge him.

---

5. CLAIM: “The People Are in Charge”

• RHETORIC: Trump supporters argue that their movement is about giving power back to regular Americans rather than elites.

• REALITY:

  • Elitist Power Grab: Trump’s policies overwhelmingly benefited the wealthy, with tax cuts that favored corporations and billionaires while increasing the deficit.

  • Undermining Democracy: Instead of empowering "the people," Trump and his allies:

    • Attempted to overturn the 2020 election.

    • Spread false election fraud claims to justify suppressing votes.

    • Encourage rule by force, not by democratic institutions.

---

CONCLUSION

Trump and his movement promote a myth of small government, anti-corruption, and populism while enacting policies that expand executive power, protect elites, and erode democratic institutions. His supporters believe they are fighting against an overreaching government, but in reality, they are enabling a more centralized, authoritarian system that prioritizes loyalty over competence.

Brief aside:

Does Trump Have ADHD? My Professional Opinion | HuffPost Latest News

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT