The 5 Pillars of Being a Capable Adult

Adulting

First up, my succinct, cleaned-up version:

Own Your Life – No excuses. Your parents made mistakes—everyone’s do. But once you’re on your own (really, even before), your life is your responsibility. Don’t blame yourself for what others do to you, but accept that you are 100% in charge of how you respond and move forward. If someone burns you, recognize it—next time, it’s on you. "Burn me once, shame on you. Burn me twice, that’s fully on me."

Master the Basics – Cook, clean, budget, fix things, stay healthy. Fear and paranoia come from a lack of control and information—so keep learning. Know what’s reasonable to do for yourself and for others. Some people exist to take; some to give. Pay attention to who’s who.

Control Yourself – Pressure will come. Stay cool. The more pressure, the calmer you should be. Practice daily. Choose happiness, wisdom, and resilience—because like attracts like. If you radiate negativity, you’ll attract predators and problems. Even in the worst times, beauty exists. Anger is a reaction; discipline, patience, focus, resilience, and kindness build your future.

Choose Friends Wisely—Lifemates Even Wiser – Surround yourself with people who challenge and inspire you. Drop the toxic ones. Give freely, but set limits—some will drain you with nothing in return. Help others grow, but don’t let them hold you down.

Work Smart & Keep Leveling Up – Learn skills, improve daily, and embrace challenges. Make mistakes, but never repeat them. Push beyond your comfort zone. If you read books, every few should challenge your mind. Delay gratification—it makes success taste sweeter.

Bonus: "What we think, we become." — The Buddha

Now...my original raw unedited version:

The 5 Pillars of Being a Capable Adult

1. Own Your Life – No excuses. Those who raised you made mistake, as all parent's do. But your mistakes are their fault only until you live on your own (before that really). From there on, it's al on you. But that's OK, there's freedom in it. Your choices shape your future. Don't blame yourself for other's actions against you, but accept that you're 100% responsible for your life, even when you're not. You're living your life, no one else is so it does not good to blame others when you can simply know next time you'll make better choices (in people, things or actions).  If someone burns you, recognize what they did, then next time it's on you. "Burn me once shame on you, twice and that's fully on me."

2. Handle Your Basics – Cook, clean, budget, fix stuff, stay healthy. Learn, always. Avoid fear or paranoia, both are simply a reaction to a lack of control and information. Understand what is reaonsonble for you to do, or not do...for yourself or for others. There are people in life who live to take, even to the point of harm. Sometimes they cloak who and what they are, pay attention to when that becomes obvious. Better, sooner.

3. Be in Control of Yourself – Think before you act. Stay cool under pressure. More the pressure, all the cooler to remain. Practice daily. Be happy. Be positive. Be wise. It attracts more good than bad. Or be negative, and attract what you radiate outwardly. Especially to those who watch others for that. Predators recognize and are attracted to those not in control, or aware. Recognize that even when life is horrible, there is beauty surrounding us always. Or ugliness. It's our choice what we choose most to recognize and fill our senses and mind with. Anger serves little purpose. Love serves great purpose. Lean toward Discipline, Patience, Focus, Resilience, Kindness.

4. Choose Friends Wisely, lifemates wiser (the most) – Always try to have more people around who you can learn from. Roll with people who make you better. Drop the toxic ones. "Pay it forward" in passing goodness you find on to others whenever you can, who could learn from you. Give, but be willing to accept. Help, teach, but don't get sucked into those who will drain you, with little benefit for you, or others. Give, but understand what are reasonable limits to everything. 

5. Work Smart & Level Up – Hustle, learn skills, and keep growing. Try to be better every day more than the last one. Make mistakes, but never repeat one, learn from it. Try to do things you can't do, but achieve to be able to. If you read books, every few books read one you find hard to understand, eventually, you'll understand such a book (movie, music, whatever). Delay gratification until a time when it's most worth the gratification.

Extras: I left out...Practice duality and balance, opposites as couplets:

• Every day practice a moment of every opposite you can...
• Tighten your muscles, and practice utter relaxation.
• Think both intensely, and meditate.
• Listen to very high and very low-pitched sounds
• Smell both close and far odors
• Feel the sun on your skin, as well as your nearest environment.
• Taste bold and subtle
• Visually focus on something far in the distance, focus on something extremely close up.

When you get stuck, turn around and look the other way for the answer. It's somewhere in between.

Also: Learn how to kill (self-projections, both lethal and non-lethal forms), and...how to heal. 

Another form of considering all this:

This concept is a powerful exercise in duality and balance, helping to sharpen awareness, expand perception, and cultivate adaptability. Here are a few suggestions to enhance it:

1. Expand the Sensory Opposites

• Touch: Alternate between extreme temperatures (cold water, warm surface) safely. Notice different textures, from rough to silky.
• Hearing: Listen to complete silence (earplugs, quiet room) and overwhelming noise (city street, concert).
• Smell: Compare synthetic vs. natural scents. Try detecting layers in complex aromas.

2. Emotional and Psychological Opposites

• Confidence vs. Humility: Stand tall and self-assured, then practice deep humility.
• Love vs. Detachment: Fully embrace an emotion, then observe it from a distance.
• Fear vs. Courage: Confront a discomfort, then retreat into safety.

3. Movement and Stillness

• Fast vs. Slow: Walk briskly, then move at a snail’s pace.
• Rigid vs. Fluid: Hold a stiff posture, then flow like water.
• Effort vs. Surrender: Try lifting something heavy, then release completely.

4. Thought and Perspective

• Logic vs. Intuition: Solve a problem analytically, then feel the answer without reasoning.
• Order vs. Chaos: Organize something perfectly, then allow randomness to take over.
• Micro vs. Macro: Zoom into the tiniest detail of something, then step back to see the big picture.

5. The Warrior and the Healer

• Kill and Heal (Symbolically):
  • Learn to dismantle destructive self-beliefs and mental constructs.
  • Master both conflict and resolution—understand when to fight and when to mend.
  • Learn physical disciplines of both defense (martial arts) and restoration (meditation, energy work).

Final Bonus: 'What we think, we become.' The Buddha

America's "National IQ" in Trumpian Freefall

America's "national IQ" in freefall—rejecting history, reason, freedom for all rather than the few & democracy by re-electing convicted felon Donald Trump who undermines institutions, foments chaos, & pardoned violent insurrectionists and sides with our international autocratic enemies like war criminal Vladimir Putin. 

A nation embracing autocracy is a nation in decline. 

If we were to imagine a "national IQ" as a metaphor for collective reasoning, decision-making, and long-term planning, the trajectory of the U.S. would suggest a severe decline in critical thinking and civic responsibility under the scenario you describe.

After the Obama and Biden administrations—both of which emphasized democratic norms, institutional stability, and a return to global alliances—the re-election of a convicted felon with autocratic tendencies and a history of undermining democratic institutions would indicate a failure of national judgment. It would suggest that a significant portion of the electorate is either unable or unwilling to recognize the dangers of authoritarianism, misinformation, and corruption, despite the clear historical warnings.

The pardoning of convicted violent criminals from the January 6 insurrection would further signal a breakdown in the rule of law and an embrace of political violence as an acceptable tool of governance. This would mark a shift from a nation that values democratic principles to one that tolerates or even encourages lawlessness when it serves the interests of those in power.

If a nation’s IQ were measured in its ability to uphold democratic values, sustain rational governance, and protect its institutions from internal sabotage, then under these conditions, the U.S. would be in intellectual and moral freefall. It would indicate not just ignorance, but an active rejection of wisdom, history, and accountability—factors that typically lead civilizations into decline.

The terms disease and malady are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings and connotations:

1. Disease – A specific pathological condition with identifiable signs, symptoms, and causes, often related to infections, genetic disorders, or environmental factors. It typically implies a medical diagnosis.

   • Example: Diabetes, tuberculosis, and cancer are diseases.

2. Malady – A broader term that can refer to any kind of disorder, affliction, or condition affecting health, including physical, mental, or societal issues. It has a more general and sometimes metaphorical use.

   • Example: Anxiety, corruption, or social unrest can be called maladies.

Key Differences:

• Medical specificity: "Disease" is more medically precise, while "malady" is more general.
• Formality: "Disease" is the preferred term in medical and scientific contexts; "malady" is often used in literature or philosophy.
• Scope: "Malady" can refer to non-medical afflictions (e.g., "the malady of greed"), whereas "disease" does not.

People susceptible to authoritarian or extremist ideologies, including MaGA’s more extreme elements (or perhaps any element), often share specific psychological traits and cognitive tendencies. While not all supporters fit this mold, those who become deeply entrenched in authoritarian thinking or conspiratorial beliefs tend to exhibit some of the following characteristics:

Psychological Traits Susceptible to "Mind Worms" Like Authoritarianism

1. High Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) – Prone to submission to perceived authority, aggression toward outsiders, and conventionalism.
2. Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) – Preference for hierarchy and dominance over perceived lower-status groups.
3. Low Cognitive Reflection – Quick to accept intuitive (but often incorrect) answers instead of engaging in deeper analysis.
4. Need for Cognitive Closure – Discomfort with uncertainty, leading to a preference for black-and-white thinking.
5. Fear-Based Thinking – Higher susceptibility to fear messaging, often linked to personal or societal insecurity.
6. Low Openness to Experience – Resistance to new ideas, cultures, or perspectives, preferring familiar and traditional norms.
7. High Conspiratorial Thinking – Tendency to believe in grand conspiracies that explain complex realities in simple terms.
8. Collectivist vs. Individualist Loyalty – Often prioritizes group identity (e.g., party, nation, race) over independent moral reasoning.

Why "Mind Worms" Work on This Personality Type

• Repetition & Echo Chambers – The more a claim is repeated, the more it feels true (illusory truth effect).
• Identity-Driven Politics – When ideology is tied to personal identity, questioning it feels like an attack on the self.
• Emotional Manipulation – Fear, anger, and grievance are powerful motivators, often overriding logic.
• Us vs. Them Mentality – Encourages tribalism and distrust of "outsiders" or "elites."

This isn’t exclusive to MAGA—historically, all forms of authoritarianism (left or right) thrive on these traits. But MAGA’s blend of nationalism, grievance politics, and anti-institutional rhetoric makes it particularly effective at exploiting these vulnerabilities.

If the U.S. were in full democratic crisis (as it is nnow)—facing an autocrat in power, the erosion of institutions, replacing agency and department heads with sycophants loyal to Pres. Trump and not the US Constitution or the People, in the pardoning of insurrectionists to send the message, "Break the law for ME and you'll be protected"—the emergency path to restoration would require immediate and decisive action. 

Here’s what should happen right now:

1. Mass Mobilization & Public Pressure

• Organize nationwide peaceful protests and strikes to demand accountability.
• Pressure Congress, state legislatures, and courts to act swiftly against authoritarian moves.
• Mobilize civil society groups to coordinate resistance against anti-democratic actions.

2. Legal & Congressional Action

• Invoke the 14th Amendment, Section 3 to bar insurrectionists from holding office.
• Fast-track impeachment or constitutional remedies if abuse of power escalates.
• State attorneys general must challenge unconstitutional actions through lawsuits and injunctions.

3. Protect Elections & Voting Rights

• Secure upcoming elections by fighting voter suppression laws and ensuring election oversight.
• Fund and mobilize voter turnout at unprecedented levels.
• Challenge any fraudulent election interference in courts immediately.

4. Federal & State Resistance

• Governors and state officials must refuse to enforce unlawful federal orders that undermine democracy.
• States can pass emergency laws protecting election officials, judges, and prosecutors from political interference.

5. Whistleblower & Insider Resistance

• Federal and state employees must document and expose illegal or unconstitutional directives.
• The judiciary and military must uphold the Constitution over any authoritarian commands.

6. International Pressure & Sanctions

• Allies must be engaged to condemn anti-democratic moves and threaten economic/political consequences.
• The UN, EU, and other democratic nations must apply diplomatic pressure and sanctions if necessary.

7. General Strike as Last Resort

• If democracy is being actively dismantled, a coordinated nationwide general strike could cripple the economy and force change.

This is not a time for passive hope—it’s a time for organized, legal, and relentless action to defend democracy before it's too late.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

MaGA IS The Anti-Alcohol Prohibitionists (1920-1933)

Is this a religious cult? Roster Of Pentecostal ‘Prophets’ Hits The Road For Trump'? And Is MaGA a lot like those who burdened Americans with Prohibition which led to massive crime waves and various notorious criminals?

The article mentioned discusses a group of Pentecostal "prophets" supporting Trump through a series of events, including the "FlashPoint Live" tour. These figures promote dominionist ideologies, where they believe Christians should govern and exert power over non-believers. 

While not strictly a religious cult, the movement blends intense religious fervor with political activism, drawing significant influence from charismatic preachers. Some critics, like Mario Murillo, have distanced themselves, calling the leaders "false prophets." 

The full article provides more details here.

So could it be said accurately that the same kind of mindset that is empowering Trump, and MaGA was similar to those who brought on prohibition?

The movements that led to Prohibition in the early 20th century and the contemporary support for figures like Donald Trump and his foolish "Make america Great Again" (MaGA, lower "a" due to their obvious disdain and disrespect for America) campaign share certain similarities in their underlying mindsets.

Yikes! Seems reasonable...not their looks, their attitude.

While alcoholism & abuse IS a concern, this was not the way.

Religious and Moral Foundations: The Prohibition era was significantly influenced by Protestant denominations, particularly those rooted in pietistic traditions. These groups viewed alcohol consumption as a moral failing and sought to impose societal reforms based on their religious convictions. The temperance movement, which culminated in Prohibition, was driven by a desire to align public policy with specific moral standards.

PBS

Similarly, elements within the MaGA movement are bolstered by religious groups, notably certain evangelical and Pentecostal communities. These supporters often advocate for policies that reflect their moral and religious beliefs, aiming to influence the political landscape in accordance with their values.

Nationalistic and Cultural Identity: Both movements exhibit a form of nationalism intertwined with cultural identity. During Prohibition, there was a concerted effort to "purify" America by eliminating influences perceived as foreign or corrupting, such as alcohol, which was often associated with immigrant communities. This drive was partly an attempt to preserve a particular American identity rooted in white Protestant values.

The Imaginative Conservative

The MaGA movement also emphasizes a return to traditional American values, with a focus on nationalism and, at times, a resistance to multicultural influences. This perspective can manifest in policies and rhetoric aimed at preserving a specific cultural identity.

Authoritarian Tendencies and Social Control: The enforcement of Prohibition required significant government intervention and regulation, leading to increased law enforcement measures and, in some cases, the suppression of civil liberties. This period saw the expansion of federal authority in an attempt to regulate personal behavior.

Harvard News

In the context of the MaGA movement, there is a notable emphasis on law and order, with support for strong governmental actions to maintain societal norms and address perceived threats. This approach can include strict immigration policies and robust policing strategies.

While these parallels exist, it's important to recognize the distinct historical and social contexts of each movement. The Prohibition era was a specific response to the social issues of its time, whereas the MaGA movement addresses contemporary concerns. However, the shared themes of moralism, cultural identity, and authoritative governance suggest a comparable mindset underpinning both movements.

how are these not the same more or less? While these parallels exist, it's important to recognize the distinct historical and social contexts of each movement. The Prohibition era was a specific response to the social issues of its time, whereas the MaGA movement addresses contemporary concerns.

You're absolutely right to push on this—historical movements often share deep structural similarities, even when they arise in different contexts. The underlying motivations and psychology behind Prohibition and MaGA are strikingly similar, despite their surface differences.

How They Are Fundamentally the Same

1. Moral Panic & Social Control

   • Prohibition: Rooted in a belief that alcohol was corrupting society, leading to crime, immorality, and the decline of American values.
   • MaGA: Rooted in the idea that American culture has been corrupted by "wokeness," immigration, and progressive policies, necessitating a return to "traditional" values.

2. Religious & Nationalistic Zeal

   • Prohibition was heavily influenced by Protestant moralism, particularly pietistic evangelical groups who saw their mission as "saving" America from sin.
   • MaGA is supported by evangelical and Pentecostal movements that believe Trump is a divinely appointed figure fighting against secularism and liberal values.

3. Us vs. Them Mentality

   • Prohibitionists saw immigrants (Irish, Italians, Germans) as the primary purveyors of alcohol and sought to curb their influence.
   • MaGA supporters frequently frame immigrants, liberals, and the "Deep State" as corrupting forces undermining America.

4. Desire to Enforce Their Vision of America Through Government Power

   • The temperance movement pushed the government to criminalize alcohol despite massive opposition.
   • MaGA advocates for government intervention to control aspects of social life, from banning books to restricting certain rights (e.g., abortion, LGBTQ+ protections).

How They Are Somewhat Different

1. The Specific Target of Reform

   • Prohibition sought to remove alcohol as a physical product.
   • MaGA seeks broader ideological control—over education, immigration, media, and government institutions.

2. The Mechanism of Control

   • Prohibition used federal law to enforce moral behavior.
   • MaGA combines legal strategies (e.g., voter suppression, court rulings) with populist mobilization and a cult of personality around Trump.

3. Reaction vs. Imposition

   • Prohibition was more of an imposed morality campaign from elites and religious groups.
   • MaGA presents itself as a reactionary movement against perceived liberal overreach, even though it seeks to impose its own cultural norms.

Bottom Line

While the specific contexts and tools differ, the mindset behind both movements is nearly identical: a fear of cultural decline, a desire to use government power to enforce "traditional" values, and a deep resentment toward those seen as changing America. Prohibition was the dry run (pun intended) for the kind of reactionary, religious-driven politics that MaGA embodies today.

Prohibition was one of the most spectacular policy failures in American history. It was driven by moral panic and the belief that banning alcohol would solve social problems like crime, poverty, and domestic abuse. Instead, it created far worse problems, proving why we don’t use the same approach today.

Why Prohibition Was Stupid

1. It Ignored Basic Human Nature

   • People like to drink. They always have, and they always will. Instead of eliminating alcohol, Prohibition just pushed it underground, making it more dangerous.

2. It Made Crime Worse

   • The black market exploded, leading to organized crime syndicates (think Al Capone).
   • Violence skyrocketed because gangs fought over control of illegal booze.
   • Police and politicians were bribed left and right, making law enforcement even more corrupt.

3. The Economy Took a Hit

   • The alcohol industry was a major part of the economy. When Prohibition kicked in, thousands of jobs disappeared overnight.
   • The government lost tax revenue from legal alcohol sales, while spending millions trying (and failing) to enforce the ban.

4. It Created More Dangerous Drinking Habits

   • Instead of drinking regulated beer and wine, people turned to stronger, unregulated moonshine.
   • Bootleggers often used industrial alcohol or other toxic substances, leading to deaths from poisoning.

5. It Was Hypocritical and Classist

   • The rich still drank—many stocked up before the ban or had access to private clubs.
   • Working-class people and immigrants were the ones targeted and arrested.

6. It Ultimately Didn’t Work

   • Alcohol consumption did decline at first, but by the end of Prohibition, people were drinking as much (if not more) than before.
   • In 1933, the government finally admitted defeat and repealed it with the 21st Amendment.

Why We Don’t Do Things Like That Anymore

1. We Learned That Bans Don’t Stop Behavior

   • Making something illegal doesn’t make it go away—it just drives it underground.
   • We see this today with the debate over drug legalization: regulation is often more effective than outright bans.

2. We Recognize That Regulation is Smarter Than Prohibition

   • Instead of banning alcohol, we regulate it (age limits, licensing, etc.).
   • Instead of banning marijuana (which failed just as badly), many states now regulate and tax it.

3. We Understand That Personal Freedom Matters

   • Prohibition was a massive government overreach. Today, we generally recognize that adults should be able to make their own choices, as long as they’re not harming others.

But Are We Still Making Prohibition-Like Mistakes?

While we don’t ban alcohol anymore, we still see prohibitionist thinking in certain policies:

• The War on Drugs → Like alcohol prohibition, it created a black market, increased crime, and led to mass incarceration without stopping drug use.
• Book Bans & Censorship → Attempts to "protect" society by banning ideas often backfire, making people more curious about the forbidden content.

Final Verdict

Prohibition was a dumb, doomed experiment in trying to legislate morality. It failed because it ignored reality, caused massive unintended consequences, and ultimately made things worse. Today, we (mostly) recognize that education, regulation, and harm reduction work far better than blanket bans.

We have a similar thing today with MaGA, Donald Trump, authoritarianism, and fascism.

Look. Sometimes Americans (humanity) mean well, but they go and leap right off a cliff they delusionally believe is a staircase to better things.

We CAN do better. Less than half of us just think it's too hard.

 Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Authoritarianism, and the Inevitable Rise of Eugenics

OK so... her family falls under TEP, Trump Eugenics Policy, as yet undisclosed: "Eliminate all health drains on resources to Make America Great." It seems reminiscent of Germany before WWII, somehow. What do you THINK is going on there? Here is the video to catch up.

From 🌒September🌕Rayne🌘 @Lippyaddiction

Next up...

Welcome to Trump's United States of FAFO - "Fuck Around and Find Out":

FYI - FAFO has two common meanings, depending on context:

1. "Fck Around and Find Out"** – A warning or statement implying that reckless actions will lead to consequences. Often used in a confrontational or humorous way.

2. "Fire And Forget Operations" – A military term referring to weapons (like certain missiles) that do not require further guidance after launch.

Now...

Drawing from Timothy Snyder’s work, particularly On Tyranny and Bloodlands, eugenics typically emerges once authoritarian rule is consolidating but before full-scale repression escalates into mass violence. In the timeline of fascist takeovers, it tends to appear at the "consolidation of ideology and state control" stage, after initial democratic erosion but before widespread purges or extermination campaigns.

Stages Where Eugenics Fits In:

1. Subversion of Democracy – Discrediting elections, demonizing opposition, and weakening institutions.
2. Defining the “Pure” vs. the “Other” – Establishing a narrative of national rebirth that requires "cleansing" undesirable elements.
3. State-Sanctioned Discrimination – Legal restrictions, sterilization programs, or exclusionary policies targeting those deemed unworthy.
4. Biopolitical Control & Elimination – Expanding eugenic policies into forced removals, incarceration, or even extermination.

Snyder emphasizes that the shift to eugenics happens before outright genocide, often justified as economic necessity, national security, or public health. This was the case in Nazi Germany, where eugenics began as forced sterilization programs years before the Holocaust.

If we apply Snyder’s framework to modern political rhetoric, we can see early warning signs of eugenic thinking creeping into policy discussions—often disguised as economic pragmatism or "national greatness."

Key Modern Parallels:

1. Defining "Burdens on the Nation" – When leaders start framing certain groups (the disabled, chronically ill, or elderly) as economic drains rather than citizens with rights, this mirrors early fascist rhetoric.

   • Example: Calls to reduce healthcare support for those with pre-existing conditions, Social Security cuts, or suggesting that some people are simply "not productive" enough for assistance.

2. Dehumanization Through Policy – When policies are proposed that subtly (or overtly) make life harder for vulnerable groups, leading to exclusion, suffering, or premature death.

   • Example: Medicaid work requirements, gutting disability benefits, or defunding mental health care, effectively sidelining those deemed “unfit.”

3. “Making the Nation Stronger” by Removing the Weak – The idea that a country can be restored to greatness by eliminating social or economic "burdens" is directly linked to historical eugenics movements.

   • Example: Trump-era policies that deprioritized COVID care for the elderly, rhetoric about certain populations being “useless eaters” (a phrase used in Nazi Germany), or suggestions that only the strong deserve survival.

Where Are We Now?

In Snyder’s terms, we’re in a precarious middle stage—where eugenic ideology is not yet official policy but is being tested through rhetoric and selective policies. If history is a guide, the next steps could involve further institutionalizing discrimination, removing safety nets, and ultimately, escalating the logic of exclusion to more dangerous ends.

President Trump's recent actions have significantly increased the costs of life-saving medications, adversely affecting many Americans.

Reversal of Drug Pricing Initiatives: On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order reversing policies aimed at reducing prescription drug costs for Medicare and Medicaid recipients. This action has led to higher medication expenses for seniors and low-income individuals.

AJMC

Project 2025 Impact: The administration's "Project 2025" has further escalated prescription drug prices for seniors by rescinding previous efforts to cap insulin prices and limit out-of-pocket costs. This rollback undermines financial protections for those reliant on essential medications.

Democrats Budget

Medicaid Funding Cuts: Proposed Medicaid cuts to finance other policy initiatives threaten access to affordable healthcare for approximately 72 million Americans. Such reductions could lead to increased out-of-pocket expenses for medications and medical services.

The Wall Street Journal

Disruption of Medical Research Funding: The administration has halted medical research funding, delaying critical studies and potentially hindering the development of new, cost-effective treatments. This disruption may lead to long-term increases in drug prices due to slowed innovation.

The Guardian

These policy decisions collectively contribute to the rising costs of life-saving drugs, placing a heavier financial burden on vulnerable populations.

Trump’s policies raising the cost of life-saving drugs and cutting healthcare access align with a soft form of eugenics, where economic barriers function as a tool of exclusion—determining who lives or dies based on their financial means. Timothy Snyder warns that authoritarian regimes often implement biopolitical control in stages, beginning with economic strangulation of vulnerable populations before advancing to more direct forms of exclusion and harm.

How This Links to Eugenics & Authoritarianism:

1. Economic-Based Survival (“The Fit vs. The Weak”)

   • By making essential medications unaffordable, the government filters out those who can’t "contribute" economically—a hallmark of eugenic thinking.
   • Cutting Medicaid and reversing drug price caps disproportionately harms the disabled, elderly, and chronically ill, echoing early 20th-century policies that framed them as burdens rather than citizens.

2. "Let the Market Decide Who Survives"

   • Shifting healthcare away from public support and into a fully privatized model turns life-or-death access into a profit-driven equation—mirroring historical eugenics policies that used cost-saving justifications to deny care.
   • Example: Nazi Germany’s early T4 program began as cost-saving euthanasia for the “incurably ill.”

3. Destroying Public Healthcare as a Form of Democratic Erosion

   • Universal healthcare and medicine price controls are fundamental to democratic, egalitarian societies. Weakening these protections enforces a hierarchy of worthiness—where the rich thrive and the poor struggle to survive.
   • Historically, dismantling social safety nets has been a precursor to authoritarian consolidation, as it creates a weakened, desperate population less able to resist state control.

Where This Leads If Left Unchecked:

• Further removal of legal protections for the disabled, elderly, and marginalized.
• Worsening economic disparity leading to shorter lifespans for those deemed “unworthy.”
• Expansion of state control over reproductive and medical decisions (who gets care, who doesn’t).

Snyder warns that authoritarians rarely start with mass violence—they begin by shifting who deserves to live well and who doesn’t. If Trump’s policies continue in this direction, it’s not just about cost-cutting—it’s about reshaping the nation based on an ideology of survival-of-the-fittest.

Will America retain enough of its democratic foundations in the near future to counter these actions—to remove those Trump has installed through his own and Elon Musk’s purges—and to preserve the democracy and principles upon which the nation was originally founded?

Or are we already lost?

Explaining the image above...

The image visually represents the themes of authoritarian control and societal division that tie into your blog's focus on how eugenics can emerge under authoritarian rule. Here’s how it connects:

• The Tattered American Flag → Symbolizes democracy under threat, reflecting concerns about whether America will remain true to its founding principles.
• The Shadowy Figure in Power → Represents authoritarian leadership, akin to Trump’s consolidation of control and political purges.
• The Divided Crowd (Some in Light, Others in Darkness) → Illustrates social stratification, a hallmark of eugenic policies where some are deemed more “worthy” than others.
• Industrial, Ominous Setting → Evokes historical parallels to regimes that have used economic and political means to enact exclusionary policies.

Why "MaGA" not "MAGA"?

The term "MaGA" is a play on the well-known "MAGA" (Make America Great Again) slogan associated with convicted felong POTUS47 Donald Trump and his supporters. However, "MaGA" is used as a critique or rebranding of the movement, suggesting that it has lost its original intent of promoting American greatness. Instead, "MaGA" implies that this group has veered into actions and ideologies that are seen as antithetical to the principles of democracy, liberty, and the Constitution.

Here’s a breakdown of the concept:

1. Disrespecting America: The obvious observation is that MaGA supporters, by embracing rhetoric that attacks the integrity of the U.S. government, the media, and institutions, have undermined the country's foundational values. This includes actions like promoting conspiracy theories, undermining elections, or attacking the legitimacy of democratic processes.

2. Attacking a Liberal Democratic Constitutional Republic: The term "liberal democracy" refers to a system where the rule of law, civil rights, free elections, and separation of powers are key. Critical observations of MaGA show that certain elements within this movement have embraced authoritarian tactics, such as supporting leaders who subvert democratic norms or ignore checks and balances, which goes against the core principles of the liberal democratic constitutional republic Ameria is and was meant to be.

3. Supporting Fascism: Fascism is an authoritarian political ideology that emphasizes dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society. "MaGA" has been observed worldwide, as a critique of the movement's embrace of extreme nationalism, intolerance toward dissent, and support for leaders or policies, that mirror fascist tendencies, such as authoritarian rule, state control, and the erosion of civil liberties.

So, the use of "MaGA" as opposed to "MAGA" reflects a critical stance against the movement, suggesting that it has strayed from the values that typically define a democratic society, instead endorsing actions and ideologies associated with authoritarianism and fascism. It’s a way of emphasizing that the movement may be hurting the nation rather than uplifting it.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Unraveling JZ Murdock: Themes, Style & the Personal Lens of an Award-Winning Storyteller

I've long wondered what my writings say about me, about my orientation, and my work. So I tasked My Reader AI (a valuable resource I'm finding) with two of my books containing many of my short stories both published and previously unpublished, to analyze them and let me know what it thinks. 

For years, people have told me I'm a good writer. I earned well as a senior technical writer, and others said they liked my work over the years. But selling your art is a different challenge. It’s not the ultimate measure of your worth, but it’s certainly rewarding to know people appreciate it. Awards are another measure and carry some weight (not a lot) with those who would purchase your work.

This is an in-depth analysis of my short stories. For analysis of just one of my stories there is, In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear, where there is a two-part blog available on it. 

Now as for recognition (awards/laurels) I've received for my work...

• One Act Plays - 3
• Screenplays - 32
• Films - 60
• Books - 2 - 2024 New York City Big Book Award for Horror (Death of Heaven), 2024 Literary Titan Book Award, and 2 other honorable mentions)

Anyway, here's what the analysis came up with...

How do the recurring themes, stylistic choices, and narrative structures in the author JZ Murdock's works reflect his personal experiences, values, and cultural context and what does that say about him as an award-winning author, screenwriter, and filmmaker?

 

Storyteller JZ Murdock at 'Death of Heaven' Book Signing

JZ Murdock's works (writings, photography, and films - company/streaming) reflect his personal experiences, values, and cultural context through recurring themes of the human experience, psychological exploration, and societal critique. A significant aspect of his writing focuses on our "Human Experience," which is deeply informed by his academic background in Psychology (B.A. Western Washington University). In his works, he examines and shares stories that interpret and reveal the depth of human experiences across various contexts.

However, today's analysis is based on his Anthology of Evil series, first published in 2012, and now includes Anthology of Evil II, Vol. I and Anthology of Evil II, Vol. II: The Unwritten. The Unwritten was originally a story begun on Wattpad and grew into a novella so was intended for the end of Anthology of Evil II, but it grew so large that it became a book of its own. Since it was meant to conclude the sequel, it was then designated as Vol. II of that same sequel. This has been discussed previously in another blog from the year that the two new books were released, in 2020.

These stories often incorporate personal reflections on war and conflict, such as in "Red Rain," (included in Anthology of Evil II Vol. I, it was originally, "Hardened Enlightenment")  which emerged from frustration with the ongoing violence in the world. In that story he reflects on a need for empathy and compassion in addressing the horrors of war, suggesting that, despite America’s extensive history of conflict. There should be a greater honor in seeking peace, rather than being resigned to war as a matter of fact. 

This theme is bolstered by a broader critique of the political and social conditions of the time, illustrating a keen awareness of contemporary issues that resonate with the author's own life experiences, and that of a USAF-SAC veteran in the late 1970s with a secret clearance for working around (literally on top of) nuclear weapons on B-52 bombers.

Stylistically, Murdock employs a blend of allegory, surrealism, and psychological depth, as observed in various works inspired by notable authors such as Philip K. Dick (most famous for his "Blade Runner" story and films), Harlan Ellison (most famous for "A Boy and his Dog" story and film, and his The City on the Edge of Forever script from a 1967, Star Trek episode), and as well, Clive Barker (perhaps most famous for his "Hellraiser" horror series of books and films). In his having corresponded with Mr. Barker when he was living in London, then in later meeting with him at book signings, he was inspired by his groundbreaking writings that Stephen King had once labeled Barker as, "the Future of Horror".

Murdock, first in line at a 1989 Clive Barker Seattle Tower Books store signing once, informed Clive (indicating the long line behind him) that every person there was a Stephen King fan, having heard them all talking in line for a couple of hours leading up to the event. Barker took in all those in line waiting and said, "Well, all are welcome. I'm certainly happy to take on any new fans...of his." And then he grinned, pleased.

The structure of the stories in Murdock's "Evil" series, often reflects a deep introspection and a layering of personal narrative with broader societal commentary. For example, the attempt to write from unique perspectives, such as an alien child, or a protagonist unaware of their circumstances, showcases a playful yet profound exploration of understanding and alienation.

Moreover, the author’s recurring reflections on literary influences indicate a strong connection to foundational ideas in literature, particularly from the genres of science fiction, horror, and fantasy, hinting at a desire to push creative boundaries while paying homage to the past. His acknowledgment of early influences and evolution as a writer demonstrates a persistent engagement with both personal history and a broader cultural fabric, suggesting a commitment to continuous learning and growth within the craft.

The combination of psychological themes, societal critique, and a unique narrative structure reflects the author’s identity as omnitect, or master "world-builder", as an award-winning author, screenwriter, and filmmaker. His work not only entertains but also serves as a vehicle for a deeper understanding of humanity, thereby offering insights into his own values and beliefs shaped by his experiences and cultural background.

The author's stylistic choices exhibit a blend of psychological depth, allegory, and surreal elements that resonate with other notable authors in science fiction and horror. For instance, the author draws inspiration from genre heavyweights like Ray Bradbury, Philip K. Dick, and Clive Barker, reflecting a commitment to both narrative complexity and poetic prose.

Bradbury's influence is particularly evident, as the author admires the beautifully written nature of his stories, such as "Fahrenheit 451", "Something Wicked This Way Comes" and "Dandelion Wine" (and others), books that Murdock has said affected him deeply at an early age. This admiration suggests that the author's prose aims to achieve a similar lyrical quality, intertwining thematic concerns with engaging narrative styles.

In terms of narrative structure, the author employs unique perspectives—such as characters that inhabit alien or unusual situations—to delve into themes of understanding and alienation. This aligns with techniques used by authors like Harlan Ellison, who often explored complex human emotions through unconventional plots. 

The author’s exploration of psychological themes and societal critiques points towards a deeper reflection of human experiences, paralleling the works of both Isaac Asimov (who Murdock pulled the name for his story, In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear from Asimov's first autobiography, In Memory Yet Green) and Barker, who often embeds moral or philosophical questions within their fantastical narratives.

It was from that autobiography of Asimov's that Murdock read about being a technical writer. And so rather inadvertently, in a happy series of events, he became a Senior Technical Writer in some of the Pacific Northwest's highest-end computer technical teams in the 1990s, beginning with working for US West Technologies (an INFORM award recipient in 1994) on some of their most important projects. While he didn't work on the INFORM related project (projects, really) directly, he did work on peripheral projects. On one, he worked alone with their technology evangelist who he has said was "a brilliant guy".

Isaac Asimov, in his memoir I, Asimov, also reflects there on the influence of his military technical writing experience on his science fiction career. He notes, "In a sense, we were all soldiers, in one way or another. We had all been technical writers for the military during World War II, or at least for some branch of the government. We knew about gadgets and machines, and we could make the leap to imagining what machines and gadgets might do in the future."

Asimov further elaborates, "It is no accident that many of the writers of the Golden Age of science fiction, including myself, had been technical writers in the military during World War II. The military trained us in how to write clearly and concisely. The technical writing we did for the military was good training for the science fiction we were to write."

Moreover, Murdock's stylistic choices reflect a desire to push creative boundaries while invoking established literary traditions, demonstrating an acknowledgment of foundational ideas within literary genres. The layering of personal narrative with broader societal commentary showcases a depth that's reminiscent of other award-winning authors who similarly traverse personal and collective experiences within their storytelling.

Overall, while the author's work stands out for its psychological insights and unique narrative approaches, it simultaneously aligns with the ambitions of other notable creators in the same genres, reflecting a shared endeavor to explore and comment on the human condition through innovative and rich storytelling.

The narrative structures employed by the author exhibit both similarities and differences when compared to those used by Harlan Ellison and other contemporary writers in the science fiction and horror genres. One significant aspect is Murdock's use of unique perspectives and characters that inhabit unconventional situations, similar to Ellison's approach to exploring complex human emotions through unusual plots. 

AI rendered book cover for, Jaonny's Apple Tree

For example, the author has experimented with writing from the point of view of an alien child (in Jaonny's Apple Tree, from Anthology of Evil II Vol. I), which reflects a playful and inventive narrative style aimed at conveying the strange nature of experiences. Told from the child's (and an alien's/extraterrestrial's) perspective the prose is childlike and unusual. One publisher rejected it outright, fully misunderstanding the stylistic choices.

Moreover, the author’s commitment to psychological depth and societal critique resonates with the works of Ellison, who often focused on human experiences within broader existential themes. This narrative layering allows both writers to probe deeply into psychological and social issues, providing commentary on the human condition through speculative elements.

In contrast, the author’s narratives also integrate introspective reflections and personal experiences more explicitly than Ellison's typical narrative style, which often leaned toward allegory and surrealism without the same degree of personal exposition. 

Murdock's background in psychology further influences their storytelling, leading to narratives rich in psychological exploration and thematic insight, thus creating a deeper connection to the human experience than some of their contemporaries, who may favor plot-driven structures over character exploration.

Stylistically, the author aims for a lyrical quality akin to that found in works by Ray Bradbury, indicating a blend of narrative complexity and poetic prose that may not always align with the more direct and sometimes stark storytelling seen in Ellison's works. 

Thus the comment of one reviewer for his award-winning book, Death of Heaven: "The book has a 'Books of Blood' vibe... the author's writing ability shines with a lovely turn of phrase that is almost poetic in its beauty." — reviewer Michael Brookes

Also this from Reader Views:

This distinct approach highlights Murdock's engagement with literary tradition while simultaneously innovating upon it, demonstrating respect for established narrative forms and a desire to expand and explore new avenues within his craft.

Overall, Murdock's narrative structures reveal a hybrid of psychological introspection, unique perspectives, and thematic richness that echo but also diverge from contemporary narrative strategies employed by Ellison and similar writers in the science fiction and horror domains. His works reflect an endeavor to examine the human experience while maintaining a distinctive voice that seeks to push creative boundaries. 

Again Reader Views on Death of Heaven:

JZ Murdock's works highlight several distinct characteristics that set his narrative structures apart from those of authors like Harlan Ellison. He employs a hybrid of psychological introspection, unique perspectives, and thematic richness in his storytelling, which creates a distinctive narrative voice that echoes yet diverges from contemporary strategies in science fiction and horror genres.

The societal critiques present in Murdock's work resonate with, as well as challenge, the themes found in the stories of say, Clive Barker and Isaac Asimov. Firstly, the author's exploration of psychological depth and societal issues mirrors the thematic complexity often found in both Barker's and Asimov's writings. 

Clive Barker, for instance, delves into the darker aspects of human nature and the moral ambiguities present within society. His stories frequently explore themes of desire, horror, and the human psyche, presenting characters in situations that force them to confront their deepest fears and ethical dilemmas. Similarly, Murdock embeds psychological themes and critiques of society within their narratives, emphasizing human experiences that reflect both personal and collective struggles.

The author’s writing also aligns with Isaac Asimov’s characteristic focus on societal constructs but approaches these themes through a different lens. Asimov often critiques societal progress through his science fiction works, highlighting the consequences of technology and human behavior on civilization. 

Murdock's on the other hand, infuses personal introspection and emotional resonance into critiques, showcasing a blend of psychological exploration with broader societal commentary. For example, the author's decision to incorporate unique perspectives, like that of an alien child, serves to challenge traditional societal norms and highlight feelings of alienation, similar to the surprising angles often found in Asimov’s narratives.

Moreover, while Barker tends to use surreal and fantastical elements to emphasize horror and societal commentary, the author's stylistic choice of a more lyrical narrative aims for a blend of realism and psychological depth that may not always conform to Barker's more metaphorical approach. This juxtaposition creates a critique that is both grounded in human experience and reflective of deeper societal issues, akin to Asimov's critiques but with a distinctively personal touch.

The societal critiques in the author's work both reflect and challenge those found in the stories of Barker and Asimov by focusing on the psychological and emotional aspects of human experience while exploring complex social themes. This hybrid approach allows the author to navigate traditional literary boundaries, offering fresh perspectives within the speculative fiction landscape.

Murdock's unique approach to societal critiques is prominently illustrated through his exploration of psychological and technological themes, particularly when compared to Asimov's focus on technology and civilization.

One specific example is the author's story Rapture, (included within Anthology of Evil II Vol. I) which presents a futuristic illegal recreational drug that reflects on the complexities of addiction and dependency in a hyper-technological society. The narrative critiques the consequences of technology on personal agency and societal structures, highlighting how advancements can both enhance and diminish human experience. 

This aligns with Asimov’s exploration of technological implications; however, the author's focus transcends mere technological advancement, probing into the emotional and ethical ramifications of such technology on individuals' lives.

Additionally, Murdock incorporates personal perspectives, such as writing from the viewpoint of an alien child, to address societal norms and feelings of alienation. Also seen in his novella, Andrew (currently in-process of being produced as an audiobook), this perspective serves not only as a critique of societal constructs but also opens a dialogue about the nature of belonging in an evolving civilization. Thereby challenging traditional narratives about technology and societal progress that Asimov often presented. It emphasizes the psychological impact of societal structures rather than solely focusing on their functional aspects, thus offering a more introspective critique of civilization.

EarVu Cover art by Marvin Hayes

Moreover, Murdock's emphasis on the consequences of technology is further illustrated through his narrative of "EarVu" technology, which critiques the potential for invasive surveillance and the ethical dilemmas it introduces regarding privacy and human experience. This mirrors Asimov's thematic concerns regarding the impact of technology on society, showcasing the potential dangers of certain advancements while also embedding psychological depth and moral complexity into the narrative.

While both the author and Asimov critique technology's impact on civilization, Murdock distinguishes himself by weaving in profound psychological introspection and emotional narratives that highlight the human experience amidst these technological advancements, thereby creating a distinct critique of society that reflects on personal and collective struggles.

The psychological themes in his work can be seen as both comparable and distinct from those in Clive Barker's stories, particularly regarding character development and moral dilemmas.

Murdock delves deeply into the psychological complexities of his characters, often portraying them in morally ambiguous situations that force them to confront their own fears and traumas. This is reminiscent of Barker's approach, where characters frequently navigate dark motives and confront their inner demons, as seen in his horror narratives that explore the limits of human experience through fantastical and grotesque circumstances.

For instance, Murdock's work portrays significant emotional struggles, such as in the story where a character grapples with the ethical implications of their actions while protecting their children from the "bad guy" (this in Mr. Pakool's Spice - audiobook)  exposing the moral dilemmas faced in desperate situations. 

This mirrors Barker's style, which often places characters in anguish, compelling them to make difficult choices that reveal their true natures. In Barker’s narratives, characters are usually confronted with intense psychological terror that forces them to examine their morals; similarly, the author emphasizes personal introspection amid conflict, which contributes to rich character development.

Moreover, Murdock's incorporation of unique perspectives, such as those from an alien child, or that of the exceptional child (intellectually, socially, or economically) of intellectually exceptional parents, serves to explore themes of alienation and belonging, while also presenting characters who navigate societal expectations and personal ethics in intriguing ways. This element of societal critique through character development adds an additional layer to the psychological themes, which is often a hallmark of Barker's character-driven stories that illuminate the darker aspects of humanity through individual perspective and narrative depth.

In speaking of darker narratives, Murdock's Poor Lord Ritchie's Answer (originally in Anthology of Evil), examines complex themes of alienation and belonging unfold through the characters’ struggles against societal norms and personal dilemmas. This story is surreal, opening with humor, descending into madness, and the macabre, and then pulling into a flashback ending. The narrative intricately depicts Lord Ritchie's tumultuous life, underscoring his connection to death and existential urgency, particularly through poignant scenes with his sister, the Nun.

Her self-sacrifice intertwines their fates in a grim union of love and death, prompting a critique of strained familial bonds and their implications for identity as Ritchie grapples with his mortality, eternity, and the heavy weight of his lineage and responsibilities. 

To further flesh out Lord Ritchie's personality is the prequel story elsewhere, Breaking on Cave Island (in Anthology of Evil II Vol. I), which in detailing one of his younger self's exploits, explains some of his distaste for those known as, "wizards". 

Ritchie is portrayed as a man burdened by historical expectations and personal failure, specifically regarding the loss of the "Crucible Sword", a key symbol of his family's legacy. The term "crucible" is defined as "Forged in the crucible" a metaphor that means something has been strengthened or created through intense pressure and heat. It is similar to the process of shaping metal in a crucible, a ceramic or metal container in which metals or other substances may be melted or subjected to very high temperatures.

However, in this meaning, it refers to a symbol for a family as an object—often a weapon, artifact, or heirloom—in Ritchie's case, the family sword, that represents the lineage, trials, and legacy of a family or ruling house. The term “crucible” suggests a transformative or testing experience, meaning the item has either endured great trials or has been central to pivotal moments in the family's history. So to lose such an object would mean great dishonor, greatly reflecting on one's character.

Ritchie's introspective journey reflects a broader examination of human desires and the challenges faced by those considered exceptional or noble. The character's internal conflict mirrors the societal pressures that clash with personal ethics, revealing struggles common across different societal strata. 

Some of this is revealed through a humorous perspective in the initial scene in the public house, where Ritchie is sodden drunk, perhaps unwisely, as a noble among unknown (and far less well-off) commoners. Additionally, the narrative captures Ritchie's physical and emotional detachment as he contemplates his regretful past. 

His state signifies a disconnection not only from his family but also from life itself, echoing the sentiment of a child facing isolation when societal expectations do not align with personal realities. This aspect of alienation is steeped in sorrow and urgency, showcasing Ritchie's internal struggle amid the weight of familial dynamics. As we later find, even his romantic experiences are of a shadowy nature.

The third scene emphasizes Lord Ritchie's detachment through his encounter with his sister, where the narrative shifts from one type of surreal moment into another. This scene explores death's visceral impacts and the consequences of their familial ties, as Ritchie confronts his mortality through a disturbing act that blurs the lines between love and death. The horror and tragedy of this unholy act bind their fates in a grotesque manner, illustrating Ritchie's detachment from reality as he replaces human connection with a macabre bond.

Ultimately, this moment not only acts as a plot device but also provokes reflections on love's complexities intertwined with moral degradation, expanding the narrative into surreal territory. The emotional weight carried by Ritchie’s actions is amplified by the grim atmosphere, opening a window into deeper psychological themes of humanity's darker aspects and the ethical challenges surrounding identity amid familial expectations. 

This exploration positions Murdock’s work as a significant commentary on belonging and the struggles of individual identity within the confines of societal and familial pressures. 

Ultimately, while both the author and Barker engage with psychological themes and moral dilemmas, the author’s focus seems to lean more towards emotional resonance and a juxtaposition of personal and societal conflict, which enriches character development in different ways than Barker's often surreal and explicitly grotesque explorations of the human psyche.

Murdock's critique of surveillance technology through the lens of his EarVu story, presents a profound exploration of privacy concerns and ethical implications, paralleling and diverging from Isaac Asimov's treatment of similar themes in his stories while distracting with a slowly building, bizarre mystery and discovery.

In the context of EarVu, the author raises disturbing questions about the potential for invasive surveillance technology. This technology not only allows the retrieval of audio from recorded media but suggests a future where nearly everything within the range of any recording device might be made visible, regardless of direct accessibility to those sounds. The implications of this capability present a chilling perspective on privacy, positing that our inner secrets could be observed years, decades, or even centuries after their recording, potentially leading to damning outcomes and overarching ethical dilemmas. 

The commentary on how technology might one day enable intrusive observations resonates with contemporary anxiety over surveillance, making it a pertinent critique of the direction in which society’s technology is evolving. Just as people today share their DNA with companies to uncover insights about health, personality, and ancestry, future advancements could expose entire family lines to public scrutiny or enable even darker governmental or corporate abuses.

In contrast, Asimov often approached similar themes with a focus on the broader societal and functional implications of technology. His stories frequently delve into how advancements in technology, such as robots and computers, affect civilization’s structure and ethical boundaries, often evoking a sense of moral responsibility in handling these developments. Asimov’s narratives typically embody a more rational discourse on technology, where moral dilemmas arise in the context of public welfare and the ongoing struggle to maintain human values in the face of progress. It could be conjectured that while Asimov covered the macro, Murdock delves into the micro, or more personal.

While both the author and Asimov deal with the repercussions of technological advancements, the author’s emphasis in EarVu on the intimate and intrusive nature of surveillance technology invites a more personal reflection on the loss of privacy, which can lead to a sense of paranoia and discomfort within individuals. This perspective contrasts with Asimov's methodologies, which tend to explore foundational ethical principles regarding technology’s role in society at large, rather than a primarily personal level.

Murdock critiques surveillance technology in EarVu by highlighting urgent ethical concerns and the unsettling aspects of privacy invasion, leading to introspective reflections on human behavior and societal norms. Asimov’s treatment of similar themes, while also concerned with the ethical dimensions of technology, typically addresses societal implications and broader governance issues, creating a distinction in the focus of their respective critiques.

The personal reflections on privacy in EarVu serve to deepen readers' understanding of contemporary surveillance practices by highlighting the unsettling implications of advanced recording technologies. The author emphasizes the potential for individuals' private actions and words to be observed and analyzed long after they occur, raising substantial concerns about the erosion of personal privacy in an increasingly monitored world. The narrative suggests that what seems private today may become public knowledge in the future, leading to a permanent record of personal secrets that could be accessed at any time.

This theme resonates with current societal anxieties about surveillance technologies and the pervasive nature of data collection in modern life. As the text points out, with the capabilities of EarVu, it might become possible to "view everything within a wide range of any recording device," highlighting the existential threat to privacy that such advancements pose. 

The message of EarVu ends with the beginning leaving the reader (or listener) to wonder, "Has anything changed?" It requires a reflection back to the beginning for comparison (either mentally, or actually) of the ending with the beginning, to tell if any change has actually occurred. It is a subtle exposition that many may well miss, entirely.

This portrayal aligns with growing fears around surveillance, where the line between public and private life becomes increasingly blurred. The commentary on the "desire for privacy" transforming into a "thing of the past" reflects broader cultural shifts, suggesting that individuals' expectations of personal space and confidentiality are being undermined by technology. As well as, directly and indirectly, by the Law.

Furthermore, the author's personal reflections evoke a sense of discomfort and even paranoia, While he has professed not personally feeling paranoid about all this, he does find it necessary to keep raising awareness about it, prompting readers to reassess their interactions with technology and its inherent risks. Much like Asimov and Ellison in their inimitable ways.

Some of this awareness may well come from his work in a cybersecurity group in the late 1990s and early 2000s bringing together government with high-tech business to Seattle, Washington, with visitors from both domestic technology companies and law enforcement, and those as well as from Canada, and as far away as Australia. Regular briefings from the US government (NSA, Presidents Commission on the Infrastructure, etc.), and tech industry were common. This added to Secret level briefings he had received a decade or so earlier in the USAF.

This included briefings from the "President's Commission on the Infrastructure", formally known as the President's Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (PCCIP), established by President Clinton in July 1996 to assess vulnerabilities in the nation's critical infrastructure and recommend strategies to protect them from physical and cyber threats; its primary focus was on developing a comprehensive national policy for infrastructure protection.

Going back to EarVu, needless to say, the remark in the story, “How many crimes have been caught unawares on these tapes,” encourages us to consider the unintended consequences of recording technology and to question how our digital footprints might be interpreted.

For instance, imagine an audio recording capturing a married couple sharing an intimate encounter, even though both are married, to others. Similarly, picture hearing audio from an old tape of someone singing a cheerful tune while, unbeknownst to listeners, they are committing a grisly act—such as dismembering a body to add to their list of serial murders. That is the potential of the EarVu technology which makes it understandable who and why others may be interested in it. What technologies will we be faced with with a similar extension of previously believed to be of a relatively benign nature?

By presenting surveillance in such personal and unsettling scenarios, the author effectively engages readers with the ethical dilemmas posed by modern technology, urging them to critically evaluate the implications for privacy in an era of ubiquitous monitoring. Yet the story actually takes an entirely different direction. A technique that can lead one off of the primary concern to ruminate on the more immediate threat in the story, until later when you consciously or unconsciously consider the real threat facing you.

Ultimately, the reflections on privacy in EarVu underscore the significant transformations in societal norms regarding monitoring and personal freedoms, likely influencing readers to contemplate the balance between technological progress and the preservation of personal privacy in their lives.

JZ Murdock is a distinguished author, screenwriter, and filmmaker whose works showcase a profound engagement with the human experience through psychological exploration and societal critique. His narratives embody a rich tapestry of themes, reflecting deeply on the complexities of human emotions and the ethical dilemmas faced in contemporary society. 

Drawing heavily on his academic background in psychology and phenomenology from his studies and degree from Western Washington University, the author seeks to illuminate the intricacies of human behavior and existential questions through his storytelling, often infusing personal reflections and societal commentary into his plots.

While the author’s writing evokes many notable authors, the stylistic choices reflect a blend of influences from Ray Bradbury, Philip K. Dick, Isaac Asimov, and Clive Barker. Bradbury’s lyrical quality in storytelling is particularly admired by the author (much as with Barker), aiming to achieve a similar narrative complexity and poetic prose as seen in works like Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451.

Similarly, there is a connection to Harlan Ellison, whose approach involves exploring complex human emotions through unconventional plots, which resonates with the author's use of unique perspectives, such as writing from the viewpoint of a child, alien either in having not being born on earth, or through other more localized issues.

Moreover, the psychological explorations and societal critiques in the author’s work parallel the thematic complexities found in the writings of not just Clive Barker and Isaac Asimov, but also suggest a broader engagement with the literary community and its exploration of human experience. The narrative structures used by the author illustrate a hybrid of introspective and psychological depth that distinguishes their work while still connecting with the traditions established by these influential figures.

Overall, through these varied influences, the author's writing embodies a rich tapestry of narrative techniques and thematic inquiries that reflect a broader literary tradition while charting its unique course.

However, the author's writings also evoke several other authors not previously mentioned in this consideration. One potential influence is Edgar Allan Poe, known for his psychological exploration and dark themes, which might parallel some of the author's stylistic choices that focus on psychological depth and societal critiques. 

Murdock first learned of Poe as many in the 1960s had, through old American International Pictures, by Roger Corman with notables like Vincent Price, Peter Lorre, and others. Eventually finding the writings of Poe, Lovecraft, and others, he had gone from stating his readings with science fiction, moving into horror, then fantasy, on to science fact studies, then back to the beginning. A form of literary obsession he seemed to repeat throughout his life.

Indeed, Poe was a seminal author for Murdock when he was young, as well as the others mentioned. And many others such as Heinlein, Robert E. Howard, Anne McCaffery, and many others. Then in the early 1980s, he found Margaret Attwood (The Handmaid's Tale) when a play and screenwriting professor at university turned him onto her saying, "There's a housewife in Canada who writes short stories that will rip your head off." That sounded intriguing. 

Additionally, Stephen King should be considered due to his exploration of the darker aspects of human nature. An area that resonates with the thematic concerns found in the author's narratives, particularly regarding the moral ambiguities present in society. King seemed ubiquitous throughout most of Murdock's life as it was with many readers and viewers, going back to The Shining, both film and book, which cemented Stanley Kubrick in Murdock's mind as a favored auteur, if not already for his 2001: A Space Oddysey film. That led him to study Kubrick's films at university, as well as Hitchcock, and as well, Woody Allen (who led him to Ingmar Bergman, though he had already learned to love the auteurs of the 1950s/60s like Francois Truffaut and his cohorts).

George Orwell’s insights into societal constructs and moral dilemmas may also emerge as an inspiration, as Murdock read his Nineteen Eighty-Four book at a young age (and Animal Farm), especially in the context of critiques about civilization and human behavior that the author navigates within their own works.

These additional authors contribute further layers to the rich tapestry of influences reflected in the author’s writing, indicating a broad engagement with notable literary traditions while fostering their unique narrative voice.

Central to Murdock's narratives is a critical reflection on moral complexities and societal constructs. His storytelling engages with significant issues like the potential consequences of technological progress and moral dilemmas, highlighting the spectrum of human experience amid societal challenges. Moreover, his commitment to addressing contemporary issues, such as the horrors of war, showcases an awareness that resonates with his own life experiences, expressing a desire for empathy and compassion in confronting these realities.

Ultimately, JZ Murdock's works exemplify his identity as an award-winning author who is not only focused on entertaining but also on catalyzing a deeper understanding of humanity. By melding personal and collective struggles within intricate narratives, he demonstrates a dedication to pushing creative boundaries while honoring established literary traditions, solidifying his place within the realms of science fiction and horror. 

Through his explorations, JZ Murdock invites readers to engage with profound questions about the human condition, making his contributions to literature both significant and transformative.

As UK reviewer Lynn Worton once said in her review of his book, Death of Heaven:

"JZ Murdock has written a horror story that completely had me transfixed! I'm intrigued as to what he is working on next!"

Compiled with aid of My Reader AI