Breaking Russia: A Strategic Plan to Dismantle Putin’s Empire and End Military Aggression

Russian Pres. Vladimir Putin today on Russian-controlled State-TV...Fox News::

""Comrades, today is April 1st, known as "April Fool's Day" in some western democracies (Peh! Democracy!). As many of you know, it is traditionally a day for jokes and pranks in those parts of the world. But, as you may have guessed, here in Russia, we are far too serious for such childish things. Too much abuse and tyranny by our leaders, I suppose. Anyway, instead of tricking each other with foolish antics, we prefer the high stakes of abusive statecraft, geopolitics, and invading other countries .

"So, no, I will not be pulling any pranks today. Comrades, the matter I am about to discuss is no laughing matter. I understand the complexity of what I am suggesting, and I fully recognize the difficulty of the situation. However, the challenges we face require serious consideration. Now, let us address the pressing issues of Russia’s future and the obstacles before us. Even if it was I who created this mess.

"Though, truth be told, I’ve been thinking... Perhaps it’s time for me to retire? Maybe I’ll open a vodka distillery and pub—who wouldn't want a drink after dealing with all this...khren [crap]? Just kidding. But managing Russia? It’s getting a bit too hard. Especially at my advanced age. Losing my Macho, I think. Breast sagging, ass sagging...anyway...uh, I’m even considering opening a Siberian yoga retreat. It sounds peaceful, doesn’t it? But, alas, the reality demands we face these challenges head-on. Ahhhh, der'mo, nevermind..."

OK, Have a fun and pleasant April Fool's Day! 

A perfect day I think, for such a consideration as the following. While this is NOT a joke, it does seem impossible. 

And yet, we need to consider such things, for we have put them off too long, and we ARE still America! Not some pansy-ass, right-wing, pretend wannabe Macho Autocratic overly blusterous Christian nationalist state of some convicted criminal. Right?

Mark Twain said: "Never put off till tomorrow what you can do today."

Oh really? Yes...really.

Benjamin Franklin said before him: "You may delay, but time will not."

Ain't that the truth!

OK, here we go...

Life is only absurd if we allow it to be. 

Like electing someone as President of the United States who is clearly unqualified, improper, and incapable, while also being a convicted felon with a history of BEING a career criminal and leader of a criminal enterprise known as the Trump Organization. It really raises serious concerns, people.

Putin presents a unique and pressing case. While he leads a nuclear power, that does not exempt him or his country from accountability. We must prevent Russia from exercising unchecked power, abusing its position, and committing war crimes, particularly given the potential for future atrocities against other nations. While past actions do not necessarily predict future behavior, history offers valuable lessons, especially when it comes to despots like Putin.

And time has not. Putin invaded Ukraine in 2014, and we did little to nothing, so they were emboldened to attack again more seriously in 2020, expecting success in short order.

Ukraine felt differently.

The majority of humanity must take decisive action against Russia. It is way past time to start dealing with these despots and aggressive nations.

Proposition:

Russia must return part of Ukraine’s territory, severing the land bridge to Crimea. Ukraine should retain any territory it has gained within Russia, with the possibility of a negotiated land exchange that both sides agree upon. Additionally, Russia must be placed under international constraints similar to those imposed on Japan after World War II, ensuring the permanent limitation of its military and the cessation of aggressive actions against other nations. Meanwhile, Ukraine should proceed with its integration into both the European Union and NATO.

Reaction:

Your proposal outlines a potential resolution to the conflict, but several major geopolitical and practical challenges would need to be addressed for it to become viable:

1. Crimea and the Land Bridge – Breaking Russia’s land bridge to Crimea (which connects it through occupied territories in Ukraine’s south) would be a significant blow to Russia’s strategic position. Moscow has repeatedly stated that Crimea is non-negotiable, making this a major sticking point.

2. Territorial Exchanges – Ukraine has taken some territory in Russia (mostly in border regions like Belgorod in recent raids), but it's unlikely to hold them long-term. A negotiated land swap would require both nations to agree, which seems improbable given the current hostilities.

3. Demilitarization of Russia – Forcing Russia into a Japan-style military restriction would require overwhelming international pressure and enforcement, likely through military defeat or economic strangulation. Given Russia’s nuclear arsenal and permanent UN Security Council seat, enforcing such a condition would be far more complicated than it was for post-WWII Japan.

4. Ukraine’s NATO & EU Membership – Ukraine’s aspirations to join NATO and the EU are widely supported in the West, but NATO membership remains a red line for Russia, which was a key justification for its invasion. The process would also require unanimous approval from all NATO members.

This proposal would likely require a decisive Ukrainian military victory and a significant shift in Russia’s political landscape—either through internal upheaval or external pressure. While theoretically appealing, such an outcome would be incredibly difficult to achieve given current realities.

Then how to provide a concrete plan to strip Russia of its power and dismantle its military, ensuring it can no longer pose a threat. This strategy should include measures to break Russia into smaller, independent nations, as its vast size makes it unmanageable and prone to authoritarian rule. Additionally, Putin must be removed from power and held accountable for war crimes through an international tribunal or other means.

A more actionable and phased approach to dismantling Russia’s aggressive power and ultimately breaking it into separate nations would require a combination of military, economic, political, and internal destabilization strategies. Here’s a structured plan:

---

Phase 1: Immediate Strategic Objectives

1. Complete Isolation of Russia

   • Strengthen and expand existing sanctions to ban all trade with Russia, including critical resources like oil, gas, and rare metals.

   • Enforce secondary sanctions on any country (like China or India) that aids Russia’s war economy.

   • Sever all Russian banks from the international financial system.

   • Freeze and confiscate all Russian sovereign and oligarch assets held abroad and use them for Ukraine’s reconstruction.

2. Military Superiority for Ukraine

   • Supply F-16s, ATACMS, and long-range drones in larger numbers to neutralize Russian logistics and infrastructure.

   • Allow Ukraine to strike deep inside Russia, targeting fuel depots, command centers, and transport hubs.

   • Expand NATO’s military footprint in Eastern Europe to deter further Russian aggression.

3. Undermine Russian Stability from Within

   • Actively support separatist and independence movements within Russia (e.g., Chechnya, Tatarstan, Siberia, Bashkortostan).

   • Amplify discontent among Russian elites through cyber warfare, media infiltration, and direct support for opposition figures.

   • Expose war crimes and corruption among Russian leadership to weaken internal support for the regime.

---

Phase 2: Breaking Russia’s Military & Economic Power

4. Total Military Defeat in Ukraine

   • Push for Ukraine’s full liberation of occupied territories, including Crimea through direct military and intelligence support.

   • Destroy Russia’s Black Sea Fleet and deny it any further naval dominance.

   • Establish a demilitarized buffer zone on Russia’s western border enforced by NATO-aligned states.

5. Permanent Military Restrictions on Russia

   • Russia must be forced to sign a treaty reducing its military to a self-defense force, similar to Japan post-WWII.

   • International enforcement mechanisms, possibly UN/NATO military oversight, should be put in place to prevent future aggression.

   • Complete denuclearization of Russia by seizing or neutralizing its nuclear arsenal through international intervention.

6. Remove Putin & Hold Russian Leaders Accountable

   • A war crimes tribunal (similar to Nuremberg) should be established for Putin and top military officials in The Hague.

   • Targeted assassination or coup support to remove Putin and dismantle his power structure.

   • Confiscate all personal and state assets linked to Putin’s regime, redirecting them toward Ukrainian rebuilding efforts.

---

Phase 3: Breaking Russia Apart & Restructuring

7. Decolonization & Fragmentation of Russia

   • Support referendums and independence movements in various Russian regions to dissolve the Russian Federation into multiple smaller, more manageable states.

   • Establish a NATO-enforced no-fly zone over breakaway regions to prevent Moscow from using military force to suppress them.

   • Set up international peacekeeping forces to oversee the transition and prevent power vacuums that could lead to further instability.

8. Integration of Newly Independent States

   • Encourage new states to join economic and security partnerships with the West, reducing Chinese and Iranian influence.

   • Provide reconstruction aid and democratic institution-building support to ensure stability.

   • Guarantee security for former Russian regions through defense pacts with NATO-friendly nations.

---

Final Outcome: A Weakened, Non-Aggressive Former Russia

By executing these steps, Russia will be:
✅ Militarily crippled and incapable of future invasions.
✅ Politically fragmented, ensuring no single leader can dominate the region again.
✅ Economically dependent on Western-backed institutions, preventing another authoritarian resurgence.
✅ Under international oversight, permanently restricting its ability to build a threatening military.

This is a long-term process requiring relentless Western coordination, strategic military victories, and internal subversion—but it’s the only way to permanently neutralize Russia’s threat to global stability.

However, this highlights the ongoing and future challenges posed by Russia.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Trump, Putin, and His GOP (Whose REALLY?): A Legacy of Revisionism, Regression, and Ongoing American Ruin

There's a lot to get to here...

Donald Trump's longstanding admiration for Vladimir Putin—a war criminal in Ukraine and a ruthless despot in Russia and beyond—aligns with Putin's revisionist and regressive beliefs, mirrors those of the now Trump "Republican" Party. 

Here I would like to reflect forward to an upcoming blog.for Monday, March 31, 2025: "Would the Founding Fathers Be Republicans Today? A Look at the Constitution's Signers and Modern Conservatism"

The once Republican Party's alignment with Trump (and therefore, Putin) has been evident not just recently, but for decades leading up to the Trump 2016 election, and then his 2024 return as POTUS47, despite his status as a convicted felon—a reality as absurd as it is alarming.

First, let's share, from the Marsh singing family at @marshsongs (music video):"The people of Europe stand with Ukraine against the threat of a false peace as much as a brutal war. Because of our shared history. Because of our shared future. Because it is just. Because it is necessary. And because they deserve nothing less. Don't abandon them. #SlavaUkraini"

Remember Project 2025?

From Julie B(rooklyn) BABY WOKE AF 🇺🇸🇯🇲 @JMeanypants - It’s Project 2025. Every single fuck up, including the signal chat breach, is plucked from the pages of Project 2025. It’s a DOOMSDAY INITIATIVE:

Moving on...

It's important to recognize one very serious issue about Donald Trump:

Donald Trump is still POTUS45, who worked hard to normalize his purposeful chaos & autocratic bigotry. Playing out now as convicted felon POTUS47, we are witnessing his now normalized version of a fascist POTUS, reshaped, hidden in plain sight, to overtake and diminish this country. But all still Donald. The guy who is not our friend. Not an American "President" in the historically understood version of the office. 

Unless you're a person of very questionable orientation. Or utterly deluded. Fooled by the charlatan, the career criminal, Donald Trump.

Trump, as POTUS45 and now POTUS47, has worked to reshape the country in his own toxic image, bringing change that challenges the status quo in ways his supporters seem incapable of recognizing. While his approach may be unconventional, it's important to recognize how his vision and leadership continue to resonate with a significant portion of disaffected, if not mesmerized, Americans. 

Who voted for this clown? This career criminal? It has to do with how such bad ideas spread across the nation and the world. For an examination to give you an idea, just in case you're still unaware of this kind of thing...

The Rise and Fall of Terrorgram - FRONTLINE & ProPublica investigate how an online network known as Terrorgram spread extremism & violence. This traces the rise of a global community of white supremacists & the anonymous, loosely moderated platforms used to spread hate & promote terror attacks.

So...

Regardless of differing opinions, we must remember that we are all part of the same nation and that the future of America, as founded and intended, relies on open dialogue and mutual respect, even amidst strong disagreements. We must also listen to our international friends, while realizing that listening too closely to our international (and domestic) enemies will lead us to ruin, and to their decades long struggle for success over and against US..

​If Vladimir Putin had a U.S. president under his influence, he might pursue the following actions to undermine America:​

1. Weaken NATO Alliances: Undermine commitments to NATO, creating divisions within the alliance.​

2. Reduce Support for Ukraine: Halt military and financial aid to Ukraine, allowing Russian aggression to proceed unchecked.​Chatham House+1Institute for the Study of War+1

3. Lift Sanctions on Russia: Remove economic sanctions, bolstering Russia's economy and geopolitical standing.​

4. Undermine U.S. Intelligence: Discredit and weaken U.S. intelligence agencies to reduce their effectiveness.​

5. Promote Isolationist Policies: Encourage withdrawal from international agreements and organizations, diminishing U.S. global influence.​

6. Foster Domestic Division: Exploit social and political divisions to destabilize internal cohesion.​

7. Compromise Cybersecurity: Allow vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, exposing the U.S. to cyber threats.​

8. Weaken Trade Alliances: Dismantle trade agreements that counterbalance Russian economic interests.​

9. Reduce Military Readiness: Cut defense spending or reallocate resources away from strategic priorities.​

10. Control Energy Policies: Implement energy strategies that increase dependence on Russian resources.​Business Insider

Since his inauguration in January 2025, convicted felon and insurrectionist (absurdly) Pres. Donald Trump has undertaken several actions:​

1. Imposed 25% Tariffs on Auto Imports: Aimed at boosting domestic manufacturing but criticized for potential global trade repercussions. ​AP News

2. Paused Foreign Aid Programs: Ordered a 90-day suspension of U.S. foreign development assistance for review, affecting global aid projects.​Wikipedia

3. Reinstated the Mexico City Policy: Restricted U.S. funding to foreign organizations that provide or promote abortions. ​Reuters

4. Reduced DEI Initiatives: Issued executive orders curbing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs within federal agencies.​

5. Negotiated with Russia on Economic Deals: Discussed potential joint ventures and lifting sanctions in exchange for cease-fire agreements in Ukraine. ​Business Insider

6. Adjusted Immigration Policies: Implemented stricter immigration controls and revised asylum procedures.​

7. Restructured Federal Agencies: Initiated plans to reorganize agencies to increase efficiency, including dissolving USAID.​

8. Revised Environmental Regulations: Rolled back certain environmental protections to promote energy independence.​

9. Addressed Election Integrity: Signed executive orders focusing on election security measures.​Ballotpedia+2Federal Register+2AP News+2

10. Granted Clemency to Devon Archer: Issued a pardon to the former business associate of Hunter Biden. ​Ballotpedia

Comparing these lists, certain actions by President Trump, such as negotiating economic deals with Russia and adjusting foreign aid, align with strategies that could potentially benefit Russian interests. However, it's important to note that these actions are part of broader policy decisions and may not directly indicate foreign influence. The motivations and implications of each action require careful analysis to understand their impact on U.S. interests and global relations.

​Now...if we redraw that with comparisons of similarities and list in order if importance of damages to America, here’s a structured comparison, ranked by potential damage to America, with similarities highlighted.

Most Damaging Actions (1-5)

1. Weaken NATO Alliances (Putin Goal) ⇄ Reduced NATO Commitments (Trump Action)

   • Trump has signaled a decrease in U.S. support for NATO, questioning its value and suggesting European nations should pay more.

   • Weakening NATO directly benefits Russia by undermining Western military cooperation.

2. Reduce Support for Ukraine (Putin Goal) ⇄ Negotiated with Russia on Economic Deals (Trump Action)

   • Trump has explored lifting sanctions on Russia in exchange for potential cease-fire agreements.

   • This aligns with Putin’s objective of securing control over Ukraine with minimal Western resistance.

3. Lift Sanctions on Russia (Putin Goal) ⇄ Eased Sanctions Discussions (Trump Action)

   • Trump’s administration has debated loosening restrictions on Russia to encourage economic collaboration.

   • This would strengthen Putin’s economy and geopolitical leverage.

4. Foster Domestic Division (Putin Goal) ⇄ Reduced DEI Initiatives & Election Integrity Actions (Trump Action)

   • Policies reducing diversity programs and focusing on election security have fueled internal debates and division.

   • Social instability and political polarization weaken national unity—key to Russian disinformation goals.

5. Control Energy Policies (Putin Goal) ⇄ Rolled Back Environmental Regulations (Trump Action)

   • Rolling back environmental protections encourages fossil fuel dependence, potentially reducing renewable energy investment.

   • A less energy-independent U.S. could lead to future reliance on global (including Russian) energy markets.

---

Moderate Damage Actions (6-8)

6. Undermine U.S. Intelligence (Putin Goal) ⇄ Restructured Federal Agencies (Trump Action)

   • Trump’s moves to reorganize intelligence and government bodies have created uncertainty about their future operations.

   • Discrediting or limiting intelligence agencies aids foreign adversaries by reducing U.S. counterespionage capabilities.

7. Weaken Trade Alliances (Putin Goal) ⇄ Imposed 25% Tariffs on Auto Imports (Trump Action)

   • Tariffs disrupt global trade partnerships, potentially alienating allies and strengthening rival economies.

   • Disrupting international trade agreements benefits Russia by diminishing U.S. economic leadership.

8. Compromise Cybersecurity (Putin Goal) ⇄ Paused Foreign Aid Programs (Trump Action)

   • Halting aid may include cybersecurity-related support to allies, weakening digital defenses against Russian cyberwarfare.

   • A weaker digital infrastructure exposes America to cyber threats from foreign adversaries.

---

Less Immediate but Still Harmful Actions (9-10)

9. Reduce Military Readiness (Putin Goal) ⇄ Reprioritized Defense Spending (Trump Action)

   • While not explicitly reducing military funding, Trump’s redirection of defense priorities could impact readiness.

   • A less agile military benefits adversaries like Russia in strategic planning.

10. Promote Isolationist Policies (Putin Goal) ⇄ America-First Immigration and Aid Policies (Trump Action)

• Limiting foreign aid and focusing inward could lead to diplomatic disengagement.

• This creates a power vacuum Russia (and China) can exploit.

---

​Several of these overlaps between Pres. Trump's actions and policies that align with Russian President Vladimir Putin's interests have raised concerns about prioritizing personal or foreign interests over those of the United States. 

Notable instances include:​

1. Advocating for Russia's Reentry into the G7: President Trump expressed a desire to see Russia reinstated into the Group of Seven (G7), stating, "I'd love to have them back. I think it was a mistake to throw them out." This stance aligns with Putin's interest in regaining a platform within this influential group, potentially easing international isolation. ​POLITICO

2. Praising Putin Publicly: Throughout his tenure, President Trump has consistently offered commendations to President Putin, referring to him as "highly respected." Such public endorsements can bolster Putin's international standing, serving Russian interests by legitimizing his leadership on the world stage. ​Representative Swalwell

3. Negotiating Economic Deals Favorable to Russia: In recent discussions, President Trump and President Putin have explored significant economic collaborations, including joint ventures in Arctic exploration and space projects. These initiatives could lead to the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Russia, directly benefiting the Russian economy while raising questions about the strategic advantages for the United States. ​Business Insider

4. Brokered Agreements Undermining European Security: The Trump administration has facilitated deals that, while presented as ceasefires, have been criticized for heavily favoring Russia over Ukraine. These agreements risk compromising Ukraine's strategic advantages and pressuring European allies, aligning more with Russian geopolitical goals than with reinforcing U.S. alliances and commitments. ​Latest news & breaking headlines

These actions have been perceived by too many analysts as aligning more closely with President Putin's interests, potentially at the expense of U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. The extent to which these overlaps serve President Trump's personal interests over those of the country remains a subject of ongoing debate and analysis.​

Conclusion?

Oh my God! What in the Hell were we thinking re-electing a malignant narcissist, career criminal, recidivist adjudicated sexual abuser, convicted felon, and fascistic revisionist bigot to the highest office not just in OUR land, but in the most powerful and richest country in the history of Humanity?

Seriously. What is Wrong with US?

While not all Trump actions directly align with Putin’s goals, there are significant overlaps in policies that weaken U.S. alliances, benefit Russian economic and geopolitical interests, and increase domestic divisions.

 Whether intentional or not, these policies shift global power dynamics in ways that Russia could exploit.

With Trump prioritizing personal gain and favor with Putin over national security, democracy, and global stability, America is teetering on the edge of authoritarian demagogery, continuing intentional fascist division, and irreversible decline.

Unless we do SOMETHING. In 2026 we can (and likely will) vote Republicans out. Then in 2028, we can end the Trump MaGA/Republicans' political personality cult and return America to Americans. But we then need to never, ever return to this nonsense. Including never, ever again electing a Trump family member, or any of the Trump Seditionist/Insurrectionist Party members, many of whom are still in Congress today.

Who?

​Several current members of Congress have demonstrated strong allegiance to former President Donald Trump, aligning closely with his political ideology and supporting his initiatives. 

Notable Congressional figures include:​

Senators:

1. John Cornyn (Texas)

2. Ted Cruz (Texas)

3. Josh Hawley (Missouri)

4. Mitch McConnell (Kentucky) – Supported Trump in many areas, though with occasional tensions.

5. John Kennedy (Louisiana) – A consistent supporter of Trump’s policy agenda.

Representatives:

1. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Georgia, 14th District)

2. Matt Gaetz (Florida, 1st District)

3. Lauren Boebert (Colorado, 3rd District)

4. Jim Jordan (Ohio, 4th District)

5. Paul Gosar (Arizona, 4th District)

6. Scott Perry (Pennsylvania, 10th District)

7. Andy Biggs (Arizona, 5th District)

8. Louie Gohmert (Texas, 1st District)

9. Kevin McCarthy (California, House Speaker)

10. Jim Banks (Indiana, 3rd District)

These individuals represent a faction within the Republican Party that has worked to support and advance Trump’s vision, some more vocally than others, but all aligned to varying degrees with his policies and influence.

If we want America back from right-wing extremists, we have to see who they are, recognize what is being done to us, and eliminate them from political or public office, ever again.

Including Trump and his 1st family of criminals. 

Brief aside...

Seeing clearly what must be seen
Steve Schmidt
"2025 marks the beginning of a splendid season of American anniversaries that come in a time of American crisis that is growing greater by the day."

Another...

Toxic Christian Nationalist Evangelicalism has made it into the WH, unseparating it with gov. WH cuts health/vaccinations, adds..."Faith"? America's worst donation to the world, Evangelicalism, already in government & elsewhere, yeah, this is bad.

Remember all those warnings about maintaining a separation between Church and State?
Yes, the attached image is just as crooked as this nonsense from Trump, now also in our WH: The Great Grift Expansion.

​The principle of separating church and state is fundamental to ensuring religious freedom and maintaining a fair, pluralistic society. For a comprehensive exploration of this topic, you might find the following article insightful:​

• "Five Reasons To Be Thankful For Separation Of Church And State" by Americans United for Separation of Church and State

This article outlines key reasons why this separation is vital, including:​

1. Freedom from an Official Religion: Preventing the establishment of a state-sponsored religion protects individuals from potential oppression and ensures that religious institutions remain independent from governmental control.​

2. Promotion of Pluralism: A clear boundary between church and state fosters a diverse society where multiple faiths and beliefs can coexist peacefully, enriching the cultural fabric of the nation.​

3. Protection of Individual Belief: By keeping government out of religious matters, individuals retain the right to choose, change, or abstain from religious affiliations without state interference.​MSUToday | Michigan State University

4. Secular Public Education: Ensuring that public schools remain free from religious endorsements creates an inclusive environment for students of all backgrounds and upholds the integrity of educational content.​

5. Counteraction of Christian Nationalism: Maintaining church-state separation challenges the notion that any single religion should dominate governmental policies, thereby safeguarding democratic principles.​

For a historical perspective, the National Park Service provides an overview of how this principle has been integral to American democracy:​NPS.gov

• "Separation of Church & State History" by the U.S. National Park Service

This resource delves into the origins and evolution of church-state separation, highlighting its role in protecting individual rights and preventing governmental overreach into religious affairs.​

These articles offer a thorough understanding of why the separation of church and state remains a cornerstone of freedom and equality in society.​

Look. We can do better. We just have to want to, to even see that we need to, but it will require ongoing effort to educate and reintegrate those who have lost their way in the great American experiment that has endured for over 200 years. Meanwhile, one major political party has actively worked to undermine it, pushing for Christian Nationalist ideals, fringe beliefs like "accelerationism," dangerous conspiracy theories like "replacement theory," and the misguided goal of transforming our democratic constitutional republic into a fascist, oligarchic, kakistocratic state—one defined by abuse, inequality, and toxic capitalism where only the powerful hold control.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Tyranny of the Executive

We are currently suffering under the "Tyranny of the Executive" as Connecticut Representative John Larson said in blasting convicted Felon POTUS47 Donald Trump, his cohort Elon Musk and those autocrat's DOGE device to disable the American Government. Listen to his comments in the video, they are amazing, needed, and demand a response.

For what? Brief aside, see the section below at the bottom for a conjectured comment by our Founding Fathers on what might be their consideration of Donald Trump.

VIRAL: Trump exposed in SCATHING takedown

From the Foreign Affairs article, The Renegade Order: "Here, unfortunately, lies the real problem with the optimistic framing: it requires assuming that Trump, a man who assiduously nurses his personal and geopolitical grievances, will discover—at the very moment he feels most empowered—the best, most globally minded and most diplomatically savvy version of himself. All those in the United States and elsewhere with a stake in the survival of the liberal order should hope that Trump rises to this challenge. But they should probably brace for the prospect that Trump’s world could become a very dark place."

As I mentioned this week in another blog on the 25th Amendment or impeachment of Donald Trump, today, our first career criminal and actually convicted felon POTUS...things are exactly what they seem to most of the world about Donald Trump while being ignored by those who support him. 

In his interview with NPR's A Martinez, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, associate dean at the Yale School of Management, discussed how business executives are coping amid economic policy whiplash. Sonnenfeld noted that some executives choose to remain silent, waiting until situations worsen before speaking out. He emphasized that this approach can be detrimental, as early engagement is crucial for effective leadership and navigating uncertainties.

National security experts have expressed concerns regarding the impact of economic policy fluctuations on global stability. For instance, Ian Bremmer, a political scientist and founder of Eurasia Group, introduced the concept of a "geopolitical recession" to describe the current environment where the traditional U.S.-led global order is unraveling. He argues that deteriorating relations between the U.S. and its allies, coupled with China's rise and the creation of alternative political and economic structures, contribute to a fragmented approach to global governance. This fragmentation increases geopolitical risks and hampers effective responses to international crises.

Additionally, recent political and economic actions, such as cuts to government agencies and strained alliances, have raised investor concerns about the erosion of trust in U.S. institutions and assets. This erosion threatens America's "exorbitant privilege," a term referring to the benefits the U.S. gains from high global demand for its assets. While no major fractures are evident in long-term U.S. borrowing costs, declining equity prices and a weakening dollar signal growing unease.

These perspectives highlight the intricate link between economic policies and national security, emphasizing the need for stable and predictable economic strategies to maintain global stability.

SRSS POLL: More Americans Support Ukraine Than Support Donald Trump 68% of Americans support aid to Ukraine. 46% of Americans Approve of Trump. 

Recent polling data indicates that a majority of Americans continue to support aid to Ukraine, while former President Donald Trump's approval ratings are lower. A CNN/SSRS poll conducted from March 6 to March 9, 2025, found that 55% of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of the situation in Ukraine, with only 41% expressing some level of approval.

Politico

Additionally, a Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed that over half of Americans, including 27% of Republicans, believe Trump is too closely aligned with Russia.

Reuters

These findings suggest that public support for Ukraine remains strong, while Trump's approval ratings on this issue are comparatively lower.

National security experts have raised significant concerns regarding President Trump's actions since his inauguration in 2025, highlighting potential threats to democratic institutions and national security:

Undermining Election Integrity: The Trump administration has been accused of efforts to destabilize free and fair elections. These actions include voter suppression initiatives, challenges to election protection measures, and the appointment of officials who have previously denied election results. Such measures are viewed as direct threats to the democratic process.

Trump Is Still Trying to Undermine Elections

Now that Trump has installed election deniers throughout his Administration, he has been busy dismantling the guardrails protecting voting and voters.

Weakening Cybersecurity Infrastructure: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has experienced significant staff reductions and leadership challenges under the current administration. The loss of key personnel and the disruption of critical projects have weakened the agency's ability to defend against cyber threats, posing risks to national security.

‘People Are Scared’: Inside CISA as It Reels From Trump’s Purge

Employees at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency tell WIRED they’re struggling to protect the US while the administration dismisses their colleagues and poisons their partnerships.

Authoritarian Governance Proposals: The introduction of "Project 2025" has alarmed many experts, who argue that its implementation could lead to an authoritarian takeover. The plan proposes restructuring federal agencies and consolidating power within the executive branch, actions that could undermine the rule of law and civil liberties.

en.wikipedia.org

Foreign Policy Concerns: President Trump's approach to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has raised alarms among national security analysts. His willingness to negotiate directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin, potentially without Ukrainian involvement, and the suggestion of imposing tariffs and sanctions on Russia if a ceasefire is not accepted, have been criticized as undermining traditional alliances and emboldening adversarial nations.

Trump threatens sanctions if Russia does not accept ceasefire — as it happened

Trump administration adds to pressure on Russia to agree to truce after President Zelensky of Ukraine welcomed the US minerals deal and 30-day ceasefire

Collectively, these actions are viewed by experts as eroding democratic norms, weakening institutional checks and balances, and compromising the nation's ability to respond effectively to internal and external threats.

Top diplomats from G7 countries meet in Canada as Trump threatens more tariffs on US allies

The agenda for the G7 meeting includes discussions on China and the Indo-Pacific; Ukraine and Europe; stability in the Americas; the Middle East; maritime security; Africa; and China, North Korea, Iran and Russia.

National security experts and former officials have expressed deep concerns regarding President Trump's actions since his 2025 inauguration, highlighting potential threats to democratic institutions and national security. While there is no unified call for his removal, the apprehensions center around several key issues:

Authoritarian Governance Proposals: The introduction of "Project 2025," developed by the Heritage Foundation, proposes significant restructuring of federal agencies and consolidation of power within the executive branch. Experts argue that its implementation could lead to an authoritarian takeover, undermining the rule of law, separation of powers, and civil liberties. Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a scholar of fascism and authoritarian leaders at New York University, described it as "a plan for an authoritarian takeover of the United States that goes by a deceptively neutral name."

en.wikipedia.org

Influence of Private Individuals in Governance: Elon Musk's prominent role in the current administration, despite lacking an official position, has raised alarms about the influence of private individuals on national policy. Musk's support for controversial policies, such as withdrawing from NATO and the UN, aligns with the ultraconservative Project 2025 plan. Experts warn that this could lead to increased unpredictability and danger in global affairs.

‘Crumble before our eyes’: Scary hint of what Donald Trump will do next

Billionaire Elon Musk wants the US to make a huge and “troubling” change – and the President shows every sign of agreeing.

Erosion of Democratic Norms: Analysts have observed a culture of sycophancy and fear within the administration, where loyalty to President Trump is enforced through blind obedience and cronyism. This environment suppresses criticism and manipulates facts, drawing parallels to historical authoritarian practices. Such dynamics are seen as detrimental to democratic institutions and the nation's international standing.

Sycophancy and toadying are de rigueur in Trump’s court of self-aggrandizement

Gestures of servility from administration members and world leaders alike are sickeningly common in the mad king’s court.

Collectively, these developments have led experts and former officials to voice concerns about the potential erosion of democratic norms and national security under President Trump's leadership. While discussions about the implications of these actions are ongoing, there is no consensus or coordinated effort among national security experts and former cabinet members advocating for his removal from office.

Donald Trump and Elon Musk Are Driving America Over the Edge

The president and his billionaire sidekick turned the White House into a makeshift Tesla showroom amid a recession scare—a perfect encapsulation of the Trump-Musk regime.

Billionaire Elon Musk wants the United States to quit the United Nations - And President Donald Trump shows every sign of agreeing.

Donald Trump and Elon Musk Are Driving America Over the Edge

The president and his billionaire sidekick turned the White House into a makeshift Tesla showroom amid a recession scare—a perfect encapsulation of the Trump-Musk regime.

Trump’s actions, particularly his erratic foreign policy and efforts to weaken alliances, align with the interests of international adversaries like Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump's undermining of NATO, his praise for authoritarian leaders, and his disdain for traditional alliances create openings for Russia to exert more influence in global affairs. Putin has long sought to weaken Western unity, and Trump’s rhetoric and policies play into this by fracturing international cooperation, which benefits Russia’s geopolitical goals.

National security experts and former officials warn that Trump’s actions since his 2025 inauguration pose serious threats to democracy, national security, and global stability. Concerns include efforts to undermine elections, weaken cybersecurity, appoint controversial officials, and alienate allies. While there isn't a unified call for his removal, many argue that his leadership—along with the GOP’s support—risks long-term damage to democratic institutions.

We all need to come to present and come together to save America as well as Western democracies and turn our backs firmly on these current Trumpian forms of toxicity in his autocracy, abusive capitalism, foolish kakistocracy, and its eventual fruition...Fascism. This isn't about tribalism or hatred of liberals by conservatives or conservatives by liberals or progressives.

It's about saving a long-respected nation, and all of Western democracy which as we all know, Winston Churchill mentioned in a 1947 speech:

"Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others."

Donald Trump and his silent partner, Vladimir Putin, need to be stopped in their attempts to undermine our previously great country. Their actions are a threat to our government and the values we hold most dear.

All others which benefit most greatly, the worst of us and the truly worst of all forms of government.

A Statement in the Spirit of the Founding Fathers on the Leadership of Donald Trump

First, how might they have referred to Donald Trump?

The Founding Fathers had a formal and often biting way of referring to those they disapproved of. If they were to name Donald Trump, they might use language reflective of their era, such as:

• "Donald the Dissembler" – A dissembler was someone who deceived or manipulated the truth, a term they often used for demagogues.
• "Trump the Pretender" – A reference to monarchs who falsely claimed a throne, as they deeply opposed rulers who sought unchecked power.
• "Donald of the House of Falsehoods" – They often framed names in a way that conveyed a person's character or legacy.
• "His Excellency, the Demagogue of Mar-a-Lago" – A sarcastic nod to his self-styled grandeur, much like they mocked those who sought to elevate themselves beyond republican principles.
• "Citizen Trump, the Profaner of the Republic" – They used "citizen" to emphasize equality, but in a critical tone when addressing those they saw as threats to democracy.

If they were feeling particularly cutting, they might even invoke comparisons to figures they despised, like calling him "Donald the Destabilizer, Heir to George III in Spirit."

Their statement on Donald the Destabilize, Heir to George III in Spirit:

We, the architects of this Republic, having studied the histories of fallen democracies and the rise of tyrants, issue this solemn warning: A leader who places personal ambition above the common good, who seeks to govern by division rather than unity, and who undermines the rule of law for his own benefit, is a danger to the liberties of a free people.

A republic survives only when its leaders uphold truth, respect institutions, and serve the public with virtue and restraint. A man who wields power through falsehoods, sows distrust in the very foundations of governance, and seeks to bend the law to his will, bears the hallmarks of the demagogues we so greatly feared.

The Constitution was designed to guard against such men—those who would inflame passions for personal gain, who disdain the limits of authority, and who, in the pursuit of power, endanger the fragile experiment of self-government. It falls to the citizens, and to the institutions we forged, to resist the creeping shadow of despotism, lest liberty be lost to the ambitions of one man.

Let history judge not by the fleeting passions of the moment, but by the enduring principles of justice, reason, and the rights of all to live free from the tyranny of a would-be monarch.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT