Taking A Look At Just Who And What CFPOTUS47 Donald Trump IS

Let's take a brief look at just who and what CFPOTUS47 (our 1st and only Convicted Felon POTUS in history).

Donald Trump actually IS, aside from the propaganda and lies about him (so unnecessary as he's actually pretty despicable all on his own), a poor example of a human being, or a leader. Simply tell the truth about the man. There's absolutely no need to exaggerate or lie about him. Because he already IS a...

• Convicted Felon
• Civilly Liable for Sexual Abuse
• Indicted Defendant
• Fraudster Racketeer
• Obstructionist
• Tax Cheat
• Defamer
• Election Interference
• Seditionist
• Insurrectionist
• Corporate Criminal
• Charity Fraudster
• University Scammer
• Classified Documents Hoarder...

Now take a look at his psychological makeup:

• Malignant Narcissist
• Malignant Pathological Liar
• Megalomaniac
• Sociopath
• Gaslighter
• Delusional
• Grandiose
• Vindictive
• Paranoid
• unEmpathetic
• Compulsive Manipulator
• Attention-Seeker
• Extreme Projectionist
• Obsessive Grudge-Holder
• Impulse-Control Deficient...

For a bit more on this... 

The Link Between Early Trauma and Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Also...

How to Spot a Narcissistic Sociopath - Is a Sociopathic Narcissist the Same Thing as a Narcissistic Sociopath?

Now, let's consider what kind of a childhood environment leads to building an adult of such a pathetic character:

• Cold
• Authoritarian
• Absent Parenting
• Excessive Praise/Grandiosity Indoctrination
• Exposure to Deception & Corruption
• Lack of Consequences for Bad Behavior
• Extreme Sibling Rivalry/Isolation
• Early Signs of Manipulative/Antisocial Behavior
• Obsession with Status/Power...

This is who just enough Americans were fooled (MaGAFooled) into believing was a swell idea as the man to hold the most powerful office in the history of Humanity.

Mary Trump, a clinical psychologist and Donald Trump's niece has extensively discussed the dysfunctional nature of her uncle's childhood, particularly in her 2020 memoir, Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man. 

She describes the Trump family as "malignantly dysfunctional," attributing this dysfunction to their patriarch, Fred Trump Sr., whom she characterizes as a "high-functioning sociopath" who lacked empathy and used his family members as pawns.

theguardian.com

Mary notes that Donald Trump's mother, also named Mary, was "emotionally and physically absent," and his father, Fred, was even more so. She writes that Fred "seemed to have no emotional needs at all."

vogue.com

In her book, Mary Trump also discusses how Fred Sr.'s treatment of his children, including Donald, led to lasting psychological impacts. She observes that Fred Sr.'s cruel influence ensured that Donald would have limited access to his range of emotions.

en.wikipedia.org

These insights suggest that Donald Trump's upbringing was marked by emotional neglect and manipulation, contributing to the complex personality traits he exhibits today.

So what IS needed to be POTUS?

Being President of the United States requires a unique blend of qualities and emotional health to handle the immense pressures and responsibilities of the role. Here are some essential qualities:

1. Emotional Resilience: The ability to manage stress, setbacks, and personal challenges while maintaining focus and composure. The president must make tough decisions in high-pressure environments and stay calm under fire.

2. Empathy and Compassion: Understanding and connecting with people across diverse backgrounds and issues is essential. This emotional intelligence helps in leading a nation and building relationships with citizens, world leaders, and lawmakers.

3. Emotional Stability: Presidents often face criticism, loss, and difficult decisions. An emotionally stable individual can maintain their focus, avoid overreaction, and lead with a clear vision despite external pressures.

4. Self-Confidence: Confidence in one's decisions is necessary, especially when faced with uncertainty. The ability to trust your instincts and not second-guess decisions in critical moments is essential.

5. Integrity: Ethical decision-making and trustworthiness are core to the role. The president must be able to stand by their beliefs, even in the face of public or political adversity.

6. Adaptability: Flexibility to adjust to new challenges, domestic and international situations, and the changing needs of the country. This includes handling crises effectively.

7. Communication Skills: The ability to inspire, educate, and lead the nation through speeches, meetings, and public appearances is vital. Clear, persuasive communication helps in rallying people and explaining difficult issues.

8. Judgment: The ability to make sound decisions that balance many factors, including short-term and long-term consequences, national security, and public welfare. The president must prioritize and make tough choices without personal bias.

9. Patience and Perseverance: Political and legislative progress can be slow, and working with Congress or foreign leaders can be frustrating. The ability to persist through these challenges while keeping the ultimate goal in mind is crucial.

10. Humility: A strong president recognizes the power of the office is derived from the people, not personal entitlement. This involves a willingness to learn from others, admit mistakes, and work collaboratively.

Emotional health is vital to maintaining these qualities. Presidents who are in touch with their own emotions, can navigate stress, and make thoughtful decisions tend to lead more effectively.

Moving on from the sheer and utter nightmare that IS our current POTUS...

 Dealings with Dictators: A Ceo's Guide to Defending Democracy

‘If You Compromise With Totalitarian Systems, You Pay a High Price’

Mathias Döpfner's new book urges US & Europe to join in a “Freedom Trade Alliance” against China, Russia & other autocracies.

'Threat to the republic': How Trump squandered goodwill and sent Dems into resistance

OK, OK, but what about the Trump supporter? Republicans turning on their Party and country, MaGA (Undeserving of a capital "A" in America until they stop their sedition and support of insurrection and their chief insurrectionist). Let's take a quick look at what and who would support such a defective person and criminal leader.

What does this say about MaGA & Trump supporters who relish support of such a "person"? Such a mental patient and criminal?

The steadfast support of Donald Trump's base, despite his controversial actions and statements, has been the subject of extensive psychological and sociopolitical analysis. 

Several factors contribute to this phenomenon:

1. Perceived Mythical Leadership

Many supporters view Trump as a larger-than-life figure endowed with extraordinary abilities to combat perceived societal threats. This perception fosters a deep emotional connection and unwavering loyalty.

sesp.northwestern.edu

2. Authoritarian Personality Traits

Research indicates that individuals with a preference for clear hierarchies and strong leadership gravitate towards Trump. Traits such as right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation are prevalent among his supporters.

jspp.psychopen.eu

3. Shared Psychological Dynamics

The concept of "shared psychosis" suggests a psychological alignment between Trump and his followers, characterized by a mutual reinforcement of beliefs and behaviors. This dynamic can lead to a collective dismissal of opposing viewpoints and facts.

scientificamerican.com

4. Cultural and Economic Factors

Economic hardship, cultural displacement, and a sense of lost status contribute to the appeal of Trump's message. His rhetoric resonates with individuals who feel marginalized by societal changes.

newlinesmag.com

In summary, the fervent support for Trump among his base is a multifaceted phenomenon, rooted in psychological predispositions, cultural identities, and perceived existential threats.

But how about as related to the great narcissist's personality defects and criminal behaviors?

The unwavering support for Trump, despite his well-documented personality defects and criminal behaviors, suggests several psychological and sociological phenomena at play among his followers:

1. Cult of Personality

• Many supporters see Trump as a "strongman" who can break the rules for a greater cause.
• His narcissism, lies, and bullying are reframed as "strength" rather than defects.

2. Shared Narcissism & Projection

• Some followers identify with Trump's grandiosity and self-victimization, seeing their struggles reflected in his defiance.
• His refusal to admit fault aligns with their own aversion to accountability.

3. Cognitive Dissonance & Motivated Reasoning

• Instead of acknowledging his faults, supporters rationalize them ("he's fighting for us," "he's being unfairly targeted").
• The more he's accused, the more they dig in, seeing him as a victim of corruption.

4. Authoritarian Psychology

• Many supporters value dominance, rule-breaking, and loyalty over ethics or truth.
• Trump's disregard for the law is perceived as a necessary tactic against "the enemy."

5. Desensitization & Normalization of Corruption

• Scandals become white noise, and his behavior seems less shocking over time.
• His constant legal troubles are spun as proof of a corrupt system, rather than evidence of his own wrongdoing.

6. Parasitic Relationship with a Demagogue

• Trump provides his followers with identity, meaning, and purpose.
• To abandon him would mean admitting they were deceived, which is psychologically unbearable.

Would we like to make a deeper analysis of any of these points?

Good grief! Not really.

I think we know all we need to know about him, and them.

Ending on something humorous...

Trump Names Himself Principal Ballerina of Kennedy Center Ballet
from The Borowitz Report
"Announcing a purge of the company’s ballerinas, Trump declared on Truth Social, “I will soon be announcing a new roster of ballerinas, with an amazing principal ballerina, DONALD J. TRUMP.
"He said he was “disgusted” to discover that all of the company’s current ballerinas were women, a state of affairs that he blamed on DEI." More

Why is America "Trumpomuskovia"? A New Name for a New Regime - Timothy Snyder (from Dec 09, 2024)

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Would Pres. George Washington Shake Donald Trump's Hand?

I wondered, what an AI might think of Donald Trunp and how Pres. George Washington might view what we're going through, now that Trump has been re-elected with all the baggage and issues he brings along with him.

George Washington

And no, I'm not going to talk about Pres. Washington shaking Donald Trump's hand. Make up your own mind at the bottom of this article. I find it either interesting or entertaining to see what ChatGPT thinks of things. So...

What would Pres. George Washington think of POTUS47 Donald Trump just re-elected with all the baggage he brings along with him?

"In God We Trust" is Christian Nationalism unacceptable

ChatGPT said:

If George Washington were to look at Donald Trump’s actions, particularly through the lens of his own principles, he would likely find many aspects troubling. Washington was deeply committed to ideals of integrity, humility, and respect for democratic principles, seeing them as critical to the success of the new American republic.

Washington valued truthfulness and saw public service as a selfless duty, not as a means for personal aggrandizement. His farewell address famously warned of potential threats to democracy, such as the dangers of political factions (or parties) and foreign interference in national affairs. He would likely see Trump’s approach, particularly with its intense partisanship and divisive rhetoric, as undermining national unity and stability. His reported praise of adversarial leaders like Vladimir Putin over U.S. intelligence would especially have jarred Washington, who emphasized loyalty to the nation and independence from foreign influence.

Washington was known for refusing excessive power, famously stepping down after two terms to reinforce a precedent of limited executive authority. Trump’s approach, marked by assertions of strong executive power and a disregard for certain institutional norms, could likely strike Washington as authoritarian. Trump’s public statements, including his prolific use of falsehoods as documented by fact-checkers, would likely trouble Washington, who held honesty in high regard and believed a leader should embody moral virtue to inspire and uphold the nation's values.

In sum, Washington would likely have found Trump’s conduct in office at odds with the ideals he fought to instill in America’s early government—principles intended to foster a fair, humble, and principled democratic system.

"The Paradox of Tolerance"

Right-wing authoritarian leaders celebrated Trump's win. That SHOULD give everyone pause, not celebration here. Ben Franklin would be throwing a FIT:

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

America is like the Ferrari of world democracies—powerful and complex, but under someone like Trump, whose lack of focus or understanding, impulsiveness, and emotional decisions could derail long-term success, it risks being ruined when it could thrive with the right leadership.

I then asked:
What action would Washington have taken if Trump were say, the 2nd/3rd President?

ChatGPT said:

If Trump had been the second president, following directly in George Washington's footsteps, it’s likely that Washington would have taken firm and immediate action to protect the young republic from any perceived threats to its stability, integrity, and foundational principles.

1. Public Denouncement and Cautionary Warnings: Washington would almost certainly have publicly condemned any actions that he believed threatened the republic, just as he did in his farewell address, where he warned of factionalism, foreign alliances, and the corruption of democratic principles. He might have delivered a formal address or written an open letter urging the nation to reject any authoritarian tendencies or disregard for truth and the law.

2. Private Advice and Guidance: Washington valued diplomacy and caution, so he might initially have tried to privately advise Trump, as he did with some political contemporaries. Given Washington’s belief in a moral and principled presidency, he would likely have counseled Trump on the importance of humility, unity, and honesty. If Trump ignored this advice, Washington’s approach could quickly become more direct and public.

3. Support for Institutional Checks and Balances: Washington had immense respect for the Constitution and the separation of powers. He might have advocated strongly for Congress and the judiciary to exercise their powers fully to check Trump’s actions if he perceived them as dangerous or autocratic. Washington believed in the rule of law and the importance of each branch of government acting independently to safeguard the nation. This could include encouraging Congress to investigate any misconduct, hold Trump accountable for any abuses of power, or even consider impeachment if serious violations occurred.

4. Active Role in Political Organization: Though he personally disliked political parties, if Washington saw Trump’s actions as fundamentally threatening, he may have even reluctantly endorsed the organization of a political movement or faction aimed at protecting the Constitution and the values he held dear. While distasteful to him, this step could be seen as necessary to ensure the survival of the nation’s democratic institutions.

5. Appeal to the Public’s Sense of Duty: Washington deeply trusted the wisdom and patriotism of the American people, often urging them to prioritize national interests over personal loyalties. He would likely make a powerful public appeal to Americans, urging them to remain vigilant and uphold the principles of honesty, unity, and democracy in the face of any leadership that threatened these values.

In essence, Washington would likely feel morally obligated to do everything in his power to protect the integrity of the office he once held, using his reputation and influence to rally Americans and their leaders against any attempts to undermine the republic.

I asked:
If Trump continued his presidency into an autocracy and refused to ever step down what might Washington have done?

ChatGPT said:

If Trump had continued his presidency in defiance of democratic norms, even refusing to step down or attempting to establish an autocratic rule, George Washington would almost certainly have viewed this as a severe betrayal of everything he and the founders worked to create. Given Washington’s commitment to safeguarding the republic against any semblance of tyranny, he would likely have taken decisive action.

1. Mobilizing the Armed Forces: As a former general, Washington understood the importance of military loyalty to the Constitution rather than any one leader. If Trump attempted to use military power to retain control, Washington might have rallied patriotic military leaders to uphold the Constitution and refuse unlawful orders. Washington’s personal influence and legacy would likely inspire high-ranking officers and soldiers to resist any autocratic power grab.

2. Supporting Congressional Action and Impeachment: Washington respected the balance of powers established by the Constitution, which included Congress's authority to impeach and remove a president. He would likely encourage Congress to act swiftly and decisively, including impeachment and, if necessary, removal by force. Washington’s support of such actions would add moral weight and legitimacy, galvanizing lawmakers to act against Trump’s autocratic intentions.

3. Encouraging State Action and Unity: Washington believed in a union of states, and if Trump were attempting to maintain power unlawfully, Washington might appeal to governors and state leaders to uphold the Constitution. He could urge states to resist any unlawful federal directives, leveraging their local authority to ensure that the rule of law, rather than one man’s will, governed the land. In this scenario, Washington would likely champion states as protectors of democracy against autocratic overreach.

4. Calling Upon the American People: Washington trusted the American people’s sense of civic duty and moral judgment. He would likely call upon citizens to peacefully but firmly resist any attempts at autocracy, uniting them under the values of liberty, justice, and self-governance. He could encourage widespread, nonviolent protests and civil disobedience as a demonstration of the public’s rejection of tyranny.

5. Forming a Coalition of Former Leaders and Founding Figures: Washington might also rally fellow founding figures, like John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, to speak out collectively. This united front of respected leaders, all advocating for the preservation of democracy, would be a powerful message that Trump’s actions were an attack on the entire legacy of the American Revolution and the rights it guaranteed.

6. Open Rejection and Civil Disobedience if Necessary: Should all else fail, Washington could lead a national movement of civil disobedience, mobilizing Americans and institutions to reject Trump’s legitimacy as president. This might include legal petitions, organized resistance to Trump’s directives, or supporting initiatives to paralyze his administration until a lawful transfer of power was achieved.

In short, Washington would likely do everything in his power to rally Americans against autocracy. He would consider Trump’s refusal to step down as an existential threat to the republic and a complete abandonment of American ideals. Washington's actions would be motivated by a steadfast commitment to preserve the democratic system he helped create, even if it required unprecedented measures to remove an autocratic leader.

I asked:
What if Congress and SCOTUS then, were as they are now, supporting Trump?

ChatGPT said:

If Congress and the Supreme Court were to fully support Trump’s continued presidency, even as he attempted to establish an autocratic rule, George Washington would likely consider this an even greater crisis, as it would mean the essential safeguards of checks and balances had broken down.

Here’s how Washington might have responded in such a scenario:

1. Appealing Directly to the People and State Leaders: With federal institutions compromised, Washington would likely emphasize the importance of state governments and the American people in upholding democratic values. He might appeal directly to governors and state leaders to maintain the principles of democracy, urging them to resist any unlawful federal overreach.

2. Leveraging the Military’s Constitutional Loyalty: Washington was clear that the military should serve the nation, not any single individual. If a president were attempting to hold onto power unlawfully, Washington would likely remind military leaders of their oath to the Constitution rather than to the president. He might encourage military leaders to act independently and refuse any orders that contradicted the law.

3. Rallying Former Leaders and Influential Figures: Given his respect for unity and the nation’s founding principles, Washington would likely convene other prominent leaders, even retired figures, to condemn the erosion of democracy. This coalition could exert significant influence over public opinion and reinforce a collective commitment to the rule of law.

4. Promoting National Civil Resistance: Washington might endorse widespread civil resistance, encouraging citizens to demonstrate peacefully but resolutely for the preservation of democracy. He would likely view civil action as a critical means to defend democratic values without resorting to violence, uniting the populace against autocracy.

5. Documenting and Defending Democratic Ideals: Washington would likely take steps to ensure that, if an autocratic regime took hold, the ideals of democracy would survive to inspire future generations. He might work to preserve democratic principles through written appeals and public statements, hoping to rekindle the ideals of liberty and self-governance in future resistance efforts.

Washington’s commitment to the integrity of the young republic was paramount, and he would view an unchecked autocracy as a dire threat. In such a scenario, he would likely use his reputation, influence, and moral authority to rally every 


available resource, from state leaders to citizens, in defense of the democracy he helped create.

I asked:
Would this lead to a coup?

ChatGPT said:

In this hypothetical scenario, George Washington’s actions, combined with widespread public resistance and the support of state governments or the military, could indeed lead to what might resemble a counter-coup or an uprising aimed at restoring constitutional order. However, Washington would likely avoid advocating any outright "coup" in the sense of a violent overthrow, as he was fundamentally committed to lawful governance and wary of armed rebellion after leading the country through the Revolutionary War.

Still, certain actions could escalate in a way that could resemble a power struggle to restore democracy:

1. Military Refusal to Follow Autocratic Orders: If the military leaders were to side with Washington, this refusal to follow autocratic orders might effectively isolate the autocratic leader, creating conditions where a peaceful or forceful resignation could occur. Washington would likely emphasize constitutional duty rather than encouraging military aggression, hoping that simply withholding military support would pressure the leader to step down.

2. Widespread Civil Disobedience: Washington might encourage a form of peaceful "coup" through massive, coordinated civil disobedience, effectively shutting down the government’s ability to function under autocratic rule. If enough of the population and state governments refused to recognize the authority of a self-appointed autocrat, the resulting paralysis could eventually force a resignation or restoration of democratic processes without armed conflict.

3. State-Level Resistance and Nullification: Washington would likely urge state governments to act independently to protect their citizens' rights, essentially forming a coalition of states that function as a counter-government until constitutional order could be restored. This type of state-led resistance, backed by Washington’s influence, could prompt a crisis that ends in the removal of the autocratic leader, either through resignation or a return to elections.

4. Ultimate Use of Force if Necessary: Though Washington would prioritize peaceful means, he might eventually endorse the use of limited force if no other option remained to restore constitutional governance. This would likely be a last resort, pursued only if all other methods had failed and the only way to protect democracy was through direct intervention.

In essence, Washington’s leadership could catalyze a broad-based, peaceful resistance that might resemble a coup in terms of its outcome—a change in leadership—but his guiding principle would be to restore constitutional governance, not to impose power by force. The emphasis on civic duty and lawful governance would make this an effort to preserve the republic, aiming to avoid the chaos and long-term instability that violent coups typically bring.

Well. There it is. It's not a time of giving up. But of bringing together. Of fighting for what we are and should be, against all that is brought to bear against us in attempting to make us into what we aren't and shouldn't be.

I wish us all well.

By the way...

What Trump did the other day in mimicking fellatio with his mic on stage at a rally was not original for a questionable national leader.

 

Another autocrat in the Philippines, Pres. Rodrigo Duterte made headlines for such an incident in 2018.

During August of that year in an incident in Tuguegarao, fmr Pres Duterte had placed the microphone between his legs mimicking the act of oral sex. This behavior was widely criticized for its vulgarity & inappropriate nature, especially coming from a sitting head of state.

The act was widely criticized for its inappropriate & disrespectful nature, esp. given Duterte's position as a head of state. It was seen as part of his often controversial & outspoken/vulgar style, which frequently included offensive jokes & remarks, particularly about women.

Duterte, known for his irreverent, blunt, & at times misogynistic behavior, often faced backlash for his comments and actions, though he remained a popular figure among certain segments of the Philippine population. His actions during this event drew condemnation both domestically & internationally for their crudeness & lack of decorum.

In 2021, Duterte withdrew the Philippines from the Rome Statute, which is the founding treaty of the ICC, in an effort to shield himself from an investigation into his administration's human rights abuses.

Lot's more to come from Trump, however. No matter how disgusting we think it is. Because it's all about him now.

"POTUS47" Donald Trump? - Once in Office, the 25th Amendment and... He's Gone?

It's been conjectured as unfit as Donald Trump is NOW for POTUS, his own campaign may be planning on getting him elected, then as soon as they can, use the Amendment to remove him and put VP JD Vance in as his replacement.

POTUS47 JD Vance? 

JD Vance with Josh Hawley

Will you be voting for a Vance presidency, if you vote for Donald Trump? Some seem to think so.

One could compare Donald Trump to a cancer cell in the body politic, highlighting how his influence has disrupted established norms and institutions, much like cancer cells grow uncontrollably and invade healthy tissues. His political style is seen as polarizing, weakening civil discourse and making it difficult for the political "immune system" to function effectively. 

Just as cancer cells can develop resistance to treatment, Trump's supporters often reject mainstream criticism and accountability, fostering a cycle of misinformation. Ultimately, if unchecked, his influence could have lasting detrimental effects on American democracy, akin to how untreated cancer can spread and harm the body.

It's been conjectured and I fully agree, that once Donald Trump loses the 2024 election, his remaining supporters for the most part will abandon him, like they were holding onto a red hot, cast iron pan off of a range top. I suspect, as election day approaches, we're seeing that already gearing up, as lifelong Republican, and GOP leader after leader are already queuing up to abandon him.

Donald Trump's current standing reflects a complex political reality. Many Americans express concerns about his qualifications for the presidency, especially given his legal troubles, such as his recent felony convictions, which raise questions about his capacity to serve effectively.

Key Points of Consideration:

1. Public Perception: Polls indicate a significant portion of the electorate believes Trump is unfit for the presidency. A survey from The New York Times/Siena College found that 61% of voters consider Trump unqualified, which could impact his re-election efforts​

   . This sentiment aligns with concerns about his comments and behavior, which some perceive as undermining democratic norms.

2. Mental and Physical Health: Discussions about Trump's mental acuity have persisted, especially among political commentators. Observers have noted changes in his speech and behavior, suggesting potential cognitive decline. This has fueled speculation about the wisdom of electing someone with such challenges​.

3. The 25th Amendment: The potential use of the 25th Amendment to remove a sitting president has been a topic of discussion since Trump's presidency. Some officials within his administration reportedly considered this route in light of concerns over his behavior. However, invoking the 25th Amendment requires consensus among the vice president and a majority of the cabinet, which poses practical and political challenges​.

4. Political Strategy: The GOP's strategy to support Trump's candidacy despite these issues can seem paradoxical. Some party leaders may view him as the best option to galvanize his base, while others worry about long-term repercussions for the party's image and electoral viability​

In summary, while Trump's candidacy raises numerous concerns, both legal and personal, the GOP's approach reflects a complicated balancing act of maintaining party unity and addressing public apprehensions. For further reading on this topic, you can explore articles from sources like The New York Times and Politico.

Pres. JD Vance?

Donald Trump's presidency has been characterized by significant controversy and division, which many argue has had long-lasting impacts on American politics and society. If J.D. Vance were to become President, some analysts suggest he could exacerbate these issues, given his alignment with Trump’s more extreme policies and rhetoric.

Trump's Impact as POTUS45

1. Polarization: Trump's presidency deepened political and social divisions in the U.S. His approach often involved inflammatory rhetoric and personal attacks, which alienated large segments of the population. According to a report by the Pew Research Center, the partisan divide widened significantly during his tenure, with both Democrats and Republicans expressing heightened animosity toward the opposing party​.

2. Democratic Norms: Trump's disregard for established norms raised concerns about the health of American democracy. His attempts to undermine the 2020 election results and the subsequent January 6 Capitol riot illustrated a troubling trend toward authoritarianism. Experts have noted that these actions not only threatened democratic institutions but also emboldened far-right extremism​.

3. Policy Consequences: Trump's policies, particularly on immigration, healthcare, and environmental regulations, faced widespread criticism. His administration's handling of issues like the COVID-19 pandemic has been labeled as ineffective and often chaotic, leading to significant public health and economic ramifications​.

Potential Impact of J.D. Vance as POTUS47

1. Continuing Extremism: If J.D. Vance were to succeed Trump, there is concern that he would continue and even intensify the extreme elements of Trump’s agenda. Vance has openly embraced many of Trump’s controversial policies, particularly around immigration and cultural issues, which could lead to further polarization and conflict​.

2. Authoritarian Tendencies: Vance's rhetoric often mirrors Trump's, suggesting a willingness to pursue authoritarian-like policies. He has been critical of certain democratic institutions and has shown a preference for populist nationalism, which some argue could further erode democratic norms​.

3. Economic and Social Policies: Vance's approach to economic issues often emphasizes protectionism and a rejection of globalism, which could have detrimental effects on trade relations and economic growth. His views on social issues, particularly those affecting marginalized communities, could exacerbate social tensions​.

In summary, while Trump’s presidency has left a legacy of division and controversy, a potential Vance presidency could amplify these issues, leading to even greater challenges for American democracy and societal cohesion. Analysts urge vigilance in observing how such a political shift might affect the country, emphasizing the importance of restoring norms and unity​.

Let's remember all of Trump's top administration have turned against him and his fascist leanings, love of Adolph Hitler, and so on. Trump's mental ill health, his narcissistic turning on a dime: "I love Trump for being Pro-Life", as some say. Except that if you told Trump being "Pro-Choice" would guarantee him the election, he'd switch in a second and THAT'S NOT "Pro-Life"...that's opportunistic narcissism.

So...who'd be "Pres." JD Vance's VP?

If J.D. Vance were to become president, the choice of a vice president would be crucial, especially considering the political landscape and his alignment with Trump. Several potential candidates have been mentioned, each bringing different strengths and dynamics to a Vance administration:

1. Kristi Noem: The Governor of South Dakota has been a prominent figure within the GOP, known for her strong support of Trump-style policies. Her conservative stance on social issues and experience as a governor could make her an appealing choice for Vance​.

2. Mike Pence: While Pence has had a complicated relationship with Trump following the January 6 Capitol riots, he remains a significant figure in the Republican Party. His traditional conservative values might appeal to Vance's base, although there could be hesitance given their recent tensions​.

3. Ron DeSantis: The Governor of Florida has garnered considerable attention for his handling of COVID-19 and cultural issues, positioning himself as a leading figure among Trump allies. If Vance wanted a strong ally who could energize the party, DeSantis could be a compelling choice, although his own ambitions may complicate the decision​.

4. Nikki Haley: The former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and Governor of South Carolina is known for her foreign policy experience and appeal to moderates. While she has occasionally distanced herself from Trump, her expertise could be attractive to a Vance administration looking to balance Trumpism with broader appeal.

5. Josh Hawley: The Senator from Missouri has gained notoriety for his strong alignment with populist and nationalist sentiments within the GOP. His appeal to the base could resonate well with Vance's platform, making him a potential candidate for the vice presidency​

In summary, Vance's VP choice would likely reflect his need to maintain Trump’s base while appealing to broader Republican interests. Candidates like Kristi Noem, Mike Pence, Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, and Josh Hawley could all play significant roles in shaping the administration's direction. For more insights on this topic, consider checking sources like Politico and The Hill.

We have only one choice in this 2024 election and she is, Kamala Harris. This is clearly exemplified by so many Republicans crossing the aisle to support, endorse, and vote for her as our 47th President of the United States of America.

ChatGPT used to compile