Weird CFPOTUS47 Trump's Weird Broligarchy is different than Putin's Oligarchy

The oligarchic structures under convicted felon CFPOTUS47 Donald Trump and war criminal Vladimir Putin exhibit notable differences, particularly in their composition and the nature of their alliances.

First up, CFPOTUS47 Donald Trump's EOs:

Tracking Trump's executive orders: What he's signed so far (from Axios).

Oh, and this: Female Bishop Calls Out Trump to His Face at Church Service

Moving on...

Jon Stewart on The Daily Show, on weird Trump's weird "broligarchy" and more.

Putin's Oligarchy: In Russia, the oligarchy primarily consists of individuals who capitalized on the post-Soviet economic turmoil to amass wealth, often through acquiring state assets at undervalued prices. These oligarchs typically have backgrounds in traditional industries such as oil, gas, and minerals. Their relationship with Putin is symbiotic; they support his regime and, in return, receive protection and opportunities to maintain and expand their wealth. However, this alliance is precarious, as any dissent or miscalculation can lead to severe repercussions, including loss of assets or imprisonment.

Financial Times

Trump's Oligarchy: In contrast, the emerging oligarchy in the United States under Donald Trump's leadership is characterized by the involvement of tech magnates and billionaires from the technology sector. Figures such as Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg have shown significant support for Trump's administration, attending private events and making substantial financial contributions. This alliance suggests a potential shift in American politics, where ultra-wealthy tech elites hold considerable influence over government policies. Unlike the Russian model, this oligarchy is deeply intertwined with the technology industry, potentially affecting areas like federal regulations, government spending, and the dissemination of information.

The Atlantic

Key Differences:

• Industry Focus: Russia's oligarchy is rooted in traditional industries like energy and minerals, whereas the U.S. version under Trump is heavily influenced by the technology sector.

• Nature of Alliances: In Russia, oligarchs often emerged from the privatization chaos of the 1990s, forming alliances based on mutual survival and benefit. In the U.S., tech billionaires are aligning with the government to potentially shape policies that favor technological advancement and deregulation.

• Stability of Relationships: Russian oligarchs operate in a more volatile environment, where falling out of favor with Putin can lead to dire consequences. In contrast, U.S. tech magnates engage in a more stable political climate, using their influence to steer policies without the same level of personal risk.

These distinctions highlight how different political and economic contexts shape the formation and operation of oligarchies in Russia and the United States.

So, Trump has less control of his?

In Russia, President Vladimir Putin exercises substantial control over the oligarchs. During his tenure, he restructured the power dynamics established in the 1990s, ensuring that oligarchs operated under the state's influence. This transformation led to a system where oligarchs serve at the discretion of state officials, consolidating wealth and power within a close-knit circle. Notably, 110 individuals control 35% of Russia's wealth, reflecting the concentration of economic power.

Wikipedia

Trump's Relationship with Tech Billionaires:

In contrast, during Donald Trump's presidency, the relationship between the administration and tech billionaires like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg was more collaborative than controlling. These tech magnates actively supported Trump's administration, participating in private events and making substantial financial contributions. For instance, Elon Musk contributed $200 million to Trump's Super PAC and was prominently featured during the inauguration ceremonies. This support suggests a mutual alignment of interests rather than direct control by the state over these individuals.

AP News

Comparative Analysis:

While Putin maintains a hierarchical structure where oligarchs are subordinate to state authority, Trump's interaction with tech billionaires indicates a partnership model. In this model, both the administration and the tech leaders pursue shared goals, such as reducing federal bureaucracy and influencing policy directions. Therefore, it can be inferred that Trump has less direct control over his allied billionaires compared to Putin's authoritative stance over Russian oligarchs.

Tech Billionaires' Influence in Trump's Administration

AP News
Elon Musk's prominence during inauguration ceremonies stamps tech titan's place in Trump's orbit

The Atlantic
The Tech Oligarchy Arrives

AP News
As Biden warns of an 'oligarchy,' Trump will be flanked by tech billionaires at his inauguration

Which is more dangerous for their country?

Elon Musk, January 20, 2025

Putin's Oligarchy:

Characteristics:

• Centralized Control: Putin's tight grip over Russian oligarchs creates a system where dissent is punished, leading to reduced checks on government power.
• Economic Dependency: A significant portion of Russia's wealth is concentrated in traditional industries (oil, gas, and minerals), making the economy vulnerable to external shocks like sanctions or fluctuating commodity prices.
• Suppression of Dissent: This system stifles political opposition, independent media, and civil society, fostering authoritarianism.
• Global Risks: The reliance on state-controlled oligarchs allows Putin to weaponize economic resources (e.g., gas supplies to Europe), affecting international stability.

Dangers to Russia:

• Concentrated power undermines democratic development.
• Economic stagnation due to corruption and lack of innovation.
• Long-term instability if the system collapses without Putin's centralized control.

---

Trump's Oligarchy:

Characteristics:

• Decentralized Influence: U.S. billionaires like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg exert influence independently, often shaping policy through lobbying, donations, and media ownership.
• Focus on Technology: The dominance of tech magnates introduces risks of monopolization, privacy violations, and algorithmic manipulation.
• Weaker Government Control: Unlike Putin, Trump does not directly control these individuals but aligns with them on policies that benefit their interests, such as deregulation and tax cuts.
• Polarization: The relationship between wealthy elites and government may exacerbate political polarization and inequality, undermining public trust in institutions.

Dangers to the U.S.:

• Increased inequality and erosion of public trust in democracy.
• Greater influence of unelected billionaires on public policy.
• Potential manipulation of information ecosystems (e.g., social media algorithms) to shape public opinion and elections.

---

Which is More Dangerous?

1. To Their Own Country:

   • Putin's oligarchy is arguably more dangerous to Russia due to its suppression of political freedoms, economic stagnation, and reliance on authoritarianism, which can lead to long-term instability and collapse.
   • Trump's oligarchy presents a subtler danger through the erosion of democratic norms, increasing inequality, and empowering tech giants to influence policy without accountability.

2. To Global Stability:

   • Putin's oligarchy poses a more immediate threat to international stability through aggressive foreign policies and economic weaponization.
   • Trump's oligarchy might destabilize the global tech landscape, raising concerns about privacy, monopolization, and the spread of disinformation.

Conclusion: While both systems have significant risks, Putin's oligarchy appears more dangerous in the short term due to its authoritarian grip and international aggressiveness. 

However, Convicted Feon POTUS Trump's model could well have longer-term ramifications for democracy and global governance, particularly if left unchecked.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

 

America in 2025: Democracy to Oligarchy (& Kakistocracy)

With the inauguration of convicted Felon Donald Trump today, we have to consider where we are at. And it does not look good. While some praise it as a New America. Something we have heard criminals claim at various times in the past, always proven to be untrue. Those like Joseph McCarthy with his "red scare" who, as with Trump, is just a calling of others to arms to empower himself, first and foremost. 

Donald Trump as POTUS47. It this the beginning of the end for us? Or the end of the beginning? Is this the beginning of an authoritarian America, or simply growing pains to strengthen America from ever again going down this anti-democratic and authoritarian path of disingenuity, disinformation, disruption, and destruction?

Kakistocracy. by the way, refers to a system of government in which the leaders are the least qualified, most corrupt, or most incompetent individuals available. The term comes from the Greek words kakistos (meaning "worst") and kratos (meaning "rule" or "power"), and it describes a government run by those who are corrupt, inept, or unfit to govern. In a kakistocracy, power is typically held by individuals who act in their own self-interest rather than for the benefit of the public, often leading to mismanagement, widespread corruption, and poor governance.

Why? Because this IS what (and who) Trump is, in nominating to lead our government institutions people lacking proper qualifications for their nominated positions. 

Why?

Putting unqualified individuals in positions of power and institutions can happen for a variety of reasons, often influenced by political, economic, or ideological factors. Here are a few common reasons why this might occur:

1. Political Patronage and Loyalty: In some cases, leaders or political parties may prioritize loyalty and personal connections over qualifications. Appointing friends, allies, or political supporters, regardless of their competence, helps maintain power and solidify political support. This can lead to positions being filled by individuals who lack the skills or knowledge required to perform effectively.

2. Ideological or Partisan Goals: Political leaders might appoint individuals who share their specific ideological or partisan views, even if they are not qualified for the role. The goal may be to advance a particular agenda rather than ensuring competent governance. This is often seen in the appointment of judges, agency heads, or other key figures in the administration.

3. Cronyism and Corruption: In some cases, the appointment of unqualified individuals is a result of cronyism or corruption. Individuals may be chosen because they are willing to engage in corrupt practices or because they offer financial or personal benefits to those in power. This often undermines the effectiveness and integrity of institutions.

4. Political and Business Influence: Large corporations, interest groups, or wealthy individuals may influence the appointment of unqualified people to positions of power to protect their own interests. By placing their allies in positions of influence, they can shape policies that benefit their business or financial goals, sometimes at the expense of public welfare.

5. Lack of Accountability: In some systems, especially those with weak checks and balances, leaders may be able to appoint unqualified individuals without facing significant public scrutiny or consequences. In such environments, there may be little to no pressure to ensure that the most qualified individuals are appointed to positions of power.

6. Short-Term Political Gains: Some leaders may prioritize short-term political or electoral gains over long-term governance and effectiveness. Appointing individuals who can mobilize a certain voter base, or who are seen as symbols of a particular movement, may be seen as more beneficial in the short run, even if they lack qualifications.

7. Ideological Disregard for Expertise: Some populist or anti-establishment movements deliberately place unqualified individuals in power as a rejection of traditional elites, experts, or institutions. This is often framed as a way to "drain the swamp" or challenge the establishment, though it can lead to ineffective governance.

In all these cases, the decision to place unqualified people in power can harm institutions, diminish the quality of governance, and erode public trust in the system. It may also result in poor decision-making and the mismanagement of critical issues, potentially leading to long-term damage to a country's political and economic health.

While some may believe that Donald Trump is saving them from our government (apparently by destroying it), it is an irrational and disreputable view regarding our most immoral (and effectively nearly our worst) POTUS...a convicted felon who was re-elected under circumstances of delusion and frankly, criminal intent. 

In presidential rankings, Abraham Lincoln rated #1. Barack Obama rated #10. Donald Trump...#41 out of our 46 presidents as of today (with tomorrow being convicted felon Donald Trump's inauguration as POTUS47.

The image above illustrates themes of power dynamics and collective action. It depicts a transformation from oppression to liberation: initially, a figure wields a whip over a submissive group, but the group eventually rises against the oppressor. The image suggests that solidarity and collective action can overpower tyranny.

In the context of the past 20 years in America, and particularly with the framing of Donald Trump as either a savior or a manipulator, interpretations vary depending on political alignment. But it's quite obvious to anyone paying close, or even distant attention (as with our friends worldwide) that Donald Trump is part of a tyrannical orientation with an easily uncovered disreputable career.

Conservative Perspective:

Many conservatives see Trump as the figure fighting against entrenched elites, "saving" the people from oppressive systems like "the swamp," big government, or globalist agendas. To them, Trump represents the individual who breaks the whip held by these powers. "Conservatism" today, is not what it once was. Or as it's still claimed to be.

While both forms of conservatism value national identity, personal liberty, and tradition, Trump’s conservatism has brought a more combative and populist tone to the forefront, often challenging the status quo and the institutions that traditional conservatism sought to preserve.

Opposing Perspective:

Critics argue that Trump himself embodies the authoritarian figure, concentrating power and leveraging divisive rhetoric to maintain control. From this perspective, his actions and policies (e.g., tax cuts for the wealthy, environmental deregulation, and alleged undermining of democratic norms) disproportionately serve elites rather than ordinary citizens, contradicting the notion of him as a liberator.

Overarching Theme:

The image underscores the potential for manipulation of collective belief systems. Trump's supporters might view themselves as the liberated group, but critics could argue that their alignment with Trump perpetuates systemic oppression under the guise of populist rhetoric. The image invites reflection on how leaders use narratives of "us versus them" to wield influence and whether true liberation is achieved or if the cycle of oppression continues under a different guise.

Pointing out how the objective view about Donald Trump is not a good one as he is a convicted felon and has been a lifelong and career criminal.

The claim that Donald Trump is a "convicted felon" is inaccurate as of now. While he has faced numerous legal challenges, including indictments and civil lawsuits, none have yet resulted in a felony conviction. However, he has been found liable in certain civil cases, including one involving sexual abuse and defamation. It is critical to distinguish between criminal convictions and civil liabilities when discussing his record.

That said, Trump has faced significant legal and ethical controversies over the years that invite scrutiny. Here's an objective overview of some of the major issues often cited by critics:

1. History of Fraud and Business Misconduct

• The Trump University case resulted in a $25 million settlement after allegations that the program defrauded students.
• The Trump Foundation was dissolved in 2019 following a lawsuit alleging misuse of charitable funds for personal and political purposes.
• Multiple contractors and employees have accused Trump of failing to pay for services rendered.

2. Tax and Financial Irregularities

• Trump was the first president in decades to refuse to release his tax returns voluntarily, raising questions about transparency.
• The New York Times' investigation into his taxes revealed years of aggressive tax avoidance, claiming substantial losses to offset income and paying little to no federal income tax in some years.

3. Criminal Indictments (2023–2024)

• Trump has been criminally indicted four times in connection with:
  • Classified documents case: Mishandling sensitive national security documents after leaving office.
  • 2020 election interference: Allegations of attempting to overturn election results in Georgia and on a federal level.
  • Stormy Daniels hush money case: Alleged falsification of business records to conceal payments.
  • January 6th Capitol attack: Charged for conspiring to defraud the United States, obstructing an official proceeding, and inciting insurrection.

4. Evasion of Accountability

• Critics argue that Trump's tactics often involve delaying and deflecting through lawsuits, appeals, and public attacks on institutions like the judiciary, FBI, and DOJ. This behavior erodes trust in the rule of law and democratic norms.

5. Ethical Concerns During His Presidency

• Emoluments clause violations: Accusations of profiting from the presidency by promoting his properties for official government and foreign delegations.
• Nepotism: Appointing his children and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, to key advisory roles despite their lack of qualifications.
• Use of presidential power for personal gain: Pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden (which led to his first impeachment).

6. Patterns of Manipulation and Deception

• Trump has a documented history of making false or misleading statements, with fact-checkers counting tens of thousands during his presidency. Critics argue that his frequent use of misinformation undermines public trust.

7. Social and Political Impact

• Trump's divisive rhetoric has exacerbated polarization, emboldened extremist groups, and fueled distrust in democratic institutions.
• His role in the January 6th Capitol insurrection marked a low point in American democracy, with many viewing it as an attack on the peaceful transfer of power.

The Broader Implications

While Trump’s supporters delusionally view him as a fighter against corrupt elites (which he is himself), critics and most rational thinkers argue his actions consistently reflect self-interest, authoritarianism, and a disregard for democratic norms, the US Constitution, and the law.

Controversies surrounding Donald Trump and those from his inner circle, suggest patterns of prioritizing personal and political gains over accountability, ethical governance, or public service. To wit, a career of criminality and abuse.

With convicted felon Donald Trump's inauguration on Monday, January 20, 2025, a new era of America arises under the auspices of an authoritarian and convicted criminal as POTUS47. 

US institutions and the US Constitution, aside from the Department of Justice (recognizing its own failures in holding Trump accountable after he left office in 2021), politically swelter under the weight of the Trump crime organization, now being assimilated within the US Government as it reforms it from an oligarchy or plutocracy, with elements of kleptocracy, into a kakistocracy.

As of January 19, 2025, the most fitting description of the United States, based on current political and economic trends, could be oligarchy or plutocracy, with elements of kleptocracy and meritocracy also being relevant, depending on the specific issue being discussed.

• Oligarchy: Many critics of the U.S. system argue that power is increasingly concentrated in the hands of a small number of wealthy individuals, corporations, and interest groups, who influence policy through lobbying, campaign contributions, and media ownership. This has led to concerns that the government serves the interests of the elite rather than the general population, especially on issues like tax policy, healthcare, and corporate regulation.

• Plutocracy: With the growing influence of wealth in politics, such as the rise of super PACs, the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few individuals, and the outsized impact of billionaires on elections, the term "plutocracy" is often used to highlight the role that wealth plays in shaping political outcomes. This has raised concerns that economic inequality has reached levels where the rich can effectively control government policy.

• Kleptocracy: While the term "kleptocracy" generally refers to the outright theft of state resources for personal gain, there have been instances where government officials or business elites have been accused of corruption, embezzlement, and self-dealing, particularly in relation to issues like government contracts, tax policy, and regulatory capture. Critics of the current system sometimes use the term to suggest that corruption is pervasive at the highest levels of power.

• Meritocracy: Despite its ideal, the U.S. is increasingly criticized for not functioning as a true meritocracy, especially with regard to social mobility. Structural inequalities related to race, class, education, and geography have made it difficult for many Americans to succeed based purely on merit. However, meritocratic ideals are still often used to justify policies, particularly in education and employment.

As of January 19, 2025, the most fitting description of the United States IS, based on current political and economic trends with Donald Trump's inauguration tomorrow, is that of a plutocracy or oligarchy, where wealth and concentrated power shape the political landscape, limiting true democratic representation. 

However, aspects of kleptocracy (with lingering remains of an ever-decreasing meritocracy), still play roles in the broader discussion of American governance, depending on the specific issue being discussed.

Much of the problem is Donald Trump's divisional tactics to divide and conquer America. WE can do better together. We all need to see that.

We can do better. But not if one cannot see beyond one's partisan, especially when delusional, beliefs.

Do we even want to do better anymore? Because it doesn't seem like it as those on the right denigrate democracy, praise authoritarianism and autocratic enemies of Western democracies, and continue to confuse reality with fantasy and tribalism.

We CAN do better. Easily. 

Reality still matters. While we are welcome to our own opinions, we are not welcome to have our own personal (or tribal or partisan)...facts.

Let's end with these two thoughts:

Twenty Lessons On Tyranny, From the Twentieth Century - Timothy Snyder.

And finally...

Why I remain hopeful about America Even as darkness falls - Robert Reich

Compiled with the aid of ChatGPT

The TikTok Ban: Exploring Early Benefits & Shifts in our Social Media Landscape

As of January 19, 2025, the United States has implemented a ban on TikTok, citing national security concerns related to data privacy and potential foreign influence. 

This action has led to several notable developments:

Migration to Alternative Platforms

In response to the ban, many former TikTok users have transitioned to other social media platforms. Notably, the Chinese app Xiaohongshu, known internationally as REDnote, has experienced a significant influx of U.S. users. This migration has fostered increased interaction between American and Chinese users, with the hashtag "#tiktokrefugee" trending on REDnote.

Wikipedia

Impact on Content Creators and Small Businesses

TikTok has been a vital platform for content creators and small businesses, offering substantial income opportunities. The ban has disrupted these revenue streams, prompting creators to seek alternative platforms to maintain their audiences and income.

CBS News

Potential Benefits to Competitors

The ban has opened avenues for other social media platforms to attract former TikTok users. Companies like Meta (Facebook and Instagram), YouTube, Snapchat, Pinterest, and Roblox are positioned to benefit from the shift in user engagement and advertising revenue. Analysts estimate that nearly $10 billion in ad revenue and 32 billion hours of user engagement could be redistributed among these platforms.

Investopedia

National Security and Data Privacy

The ban addresses concerns over data privacy and national security, aiming to protect American user data from potential foreign access. The Supreme Court upheld the law banning TikTok, citing threats to U.S. national security.

AP News

While the ban has led to significant shifts in the social media landscape, its long-term effects on user behavior, content creation, and the broader digital economy remain to be fully seen.

Developments Following TikTok Ban in the U.S.

New York Post

Trump pitches 50% US takeover of TikTok, says he will issue executive order to save it - as GOP hawks say it can't be revived unless it's sold

Today

Barron's

TikTok Appears to Come Back Online After Trump Says He'll Delay the Ban

Today

The Sun

TikTok is SAFE in Britain as 'posting videos of cats' does not threaten national security, Cabinet Minister says

Compiled with the aid of ChatGPT 

Art of JZ Murdock: Unlocking Beauty in Greeting Cards & More, More, More...

Welcome to my world of creativity!

I’m very excited to share that my artwork is now available as beautiful greeting cards and other unique products on platforms like Zazzle and Redbubble.

Original Photo, Frank Ruman, 1914, my grandfather

My initial reason for starting a media catalog on Redbubble was about my film posters and books. My reason for starting a store on Zazzle was about my grandfather's photos of early racing cars he had been a mechanic on. He died in 1974. 

When my mother died a few years ago, I received some of her old photo albums. Some included her dad's old photos and negatives. I was fascinated by his photos of old racing cars from the 1910s in Brooklyn, New York. 

Photo as a greeting card on Zazzle

So I looked for the best venue for greeting cards as I thought they might be most accessible to the public. Redbubble was lacking in that but Zazzle, though the platform is not as well thought out as I'd like (in making it easy to use I think they made problems for creators), it does work out better than Redbubble.

When I first bought my Cannon 80D camera in 2016, I had to learn to use the camera in order to shoot my own films. Which I wanted to do toward turning my writings into independent films. I've now done that with films like "The Rapping", shot with my oldest adult child. "Gumdrop", a short horror, my first narrative film with a cast of actors. I also used pieces of "The Rapping" in that film. This film is a prequel to my previous true crime fictionalized story, "Gumdrop City". 

My most successful project to date is a "filmic poem" and historical WWI documentary, "Pvt. Ravel's Bolero" (a film I shot to help me recover from long covid). The "Bolero" film, based on "Bolero" composer, Maruice Ravel's experiences in WWI, exceeded my greatest expectations at now over 60 national and international film awards.

From my screenplay

First I had to learn my camera. As I looked for things to shoot, I discovered that my new city of Bremerton, Washington, had amazing sunsets and photo opportunities. After fifteen years of raising my kids while living on some idyllic acreage in the forest behind Suquamish, Washington (where Chief "Seattle" is buried), on the waters of Puget Sound, I moved to Bremerton, a Navy town. 

I thought shooting still photos was a good beginning so I spent months shooting pictures. I saved them all thinking that one day perhaps, they could be useful. I was pleasantly surprised recently when I reviewed all those photos to find some were very professional. My youngest child, now in their early 30s, is a photographer and was an intern to several professional photographers (one who shot the first world-famous "Marlboro Man" photos). 

Whether you're looking for the perfect card to express your feelings or a one-of-a-kind item to brighten your day, there's something special waiting for you. I've been on Redbubble for a while. I found Zazzle has far better capabilities for creating greeting cards. I may create other products on there over time, but for now, it's mostly greeting cards. And some very interesting ones.

My cover artist for my books and other things, Marvin Hayes has been there for a very long time now. He is the greatest artist I have ever even met. While my covers are very interesting, his own art is far beyond those.

Warren Avenue Bridge to East Bremerton with an legal from my backyard

Why Choose My Art?

1. Original Designs: Each piece reflects my passion for art, bringing unique and heartfelt creations directly to you.

2. Versatility: My designs aren't just limited to greeting cards. Explore them on a range of products, from home decor to accessories.

3. Quality: Both Zazzle and Redbubble ensure high-quality prints and materials, so your chosen items look stunning and last.

Seagull over Silverdale, WA headed to the Olympic Mountains

Greeting Cards for Every Occasion

Whether you’re celebrating a birthday, sending holiday cheer, or simply saying "thank you," my collection has the perfect card for every occasion. Choose from vibrant illustrations, serene landscapes, or whimsical designs to match the mood you want to convey.

What I like about Zazzle is, when you purchase one of my cards, you can edit it to add your own message inside, or delete my area for your heading and message and simply writing in my hand what you wish to say.

Taken from my home front window

Beyond Greeting Cards: Explore the Possibilities

• On Redbubble: Discover my art as movie posters, on tote bags, t-shirts, stickers, mugs, and more. These items make fantastic gifts or can be a fun way to treat yourself.

• On Zazzle: Customize my designs on calendars, planners, or even invitations to make your special moments unforgettable.

How to Support My Art

1. Visit My Zazzle Store collections.

2. Explore My Redbubble Collection

3. Share With Friends: Spread the word by sharing my work on social media or recommending it to others who love art.

Stay Connected

Follow me on social media for updates on new designs, special promotions, and a behind-the-scenes look at my creative process.

Thank you for supporting independent artists. 

Every purchase not only brings joy to you and your loved ones but also fuels my passion to create more. Let’s celebrate the beauty of art together!

Bremerton Sunset

Compiled with the aid of ChatGPT

Turning Tragedy Into Strength: Building Homes for a Safer Future

It's time.

Rebuilding homes going forward...in flood zones, in hurricane/tornado zones, in wildfire zones, all of which have expanded, needs to be re-evaluated and standards rectified so homes remain viable after disasters.

Or we continue to suffer the consequences.

In this aerial view taken from a helicopter, burned homes are seen from above during the Palisades fire in Malibu, Los Angeles county, California on January 9, 2025

It's long passed time for a major shift in how we approach building homes in disaster-prone areas. As climate change intensifies, the risks from floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, and wildfires have grown, making it critical to rethink construction standards, urban planning, and rebuilding strategies. Here's why and how this should happen:

Why Change Is Necessary:

1. Increased Risk Areas: Flood zones, wildfire-prone regions, and hurricane paths are expanding due to rising temperatures, changing weather patterns, and sea-level rise.
2. Economic Costs: The repeated cycle of rebuilding after disasters drains resources, increases insurance premiums, and often leaves families in financial turmoil.
3. Safety Concerns: Lives are at greater risk when homes are not built to withstand extreme weather events.
4. Environmental Impact: Rebuilding without proper planning often leads to further deforestation, habitat destruction, and increased carbon footprints.

Solutions to Reevaluate and Rectify:

1. Stricter Building Codes: Require disaster-resistant materials and designs (e.g., hurricane straps, elevated foundations, fire-resistant materials).
2. Smart Zoning Laws: Restrict rebuilding in the most hazardous zones or mandate significant safety upgrades.
3. Incentives for Resilience: Offer tax credits or subsidies for homes built to higher resilience standards.
4. Community-Level Planning: Invest in resilient infrastructure like flood barriers, firebreaks, and sustainable drainage systems.
5. Relocation and Buyouts: For areas at extreme risk, consider voluntary buyout programs to move residents to safer locations.
6. Green Building Practices: Incorporate renewable energy, water catchment systems, and eco-friendly designs to adapt to and mitigate climate change.

Long-Term Benefits:

• Reduced loss of life and property.
• Lower long-term costs for governments, insurers, and individuals.
• Greater environmental sustainability.
• Stronger, more resilient communities.

The key lies in shifting from reactive rebuilding to proactive, resilient planning. Without these changes, the consequences will only grow more severe.

Cost Considerations in Disaster-Resilient Construction

1. Upfront Investment:

   • Building disaster-resistant homes typically costs 10-30% more than standard construction.
   • Features like elevated foundations, fire-resistant materials, hurricane shutters, reinforced roofing, and floodproof basements add to initial expenses.

2. Long-Term Savings:

   • Insurance Premium Reductions: Homes built to withstand disasters may qualify for reduced premiums.
   • Fewer Repairs: Resilient homes avoid repeated reconstruction after disasters, saving tens of thousands of dollars per event.
   • Energy Efficiency: Many resilient designs incorporate energy-saving technologies like solar panels and better insulation, lowering utility bills.

3. Cost of Inaction:

   • Rebuilding repeatedly due to destruction leads to higher cumulative expenses.
   • Delays in rebuilding affect livelihoods, housing availability, and community stability.

---

Making Resilient Rebuilding More Affordable

1. Scaling Costs:

   • Focus on cost-effective measures like fire-resistant siding, impact-resistant windows, and storm-proof roofs rather than luxury finishes.
   • Modular construction and prefabricated homes can significantly cut labor and material costs.

2. Government Incentives:

   • Expand grants, tax breaks, and low-interest loans for rebuilding to higher safety standards.
   • FEMA and HUD programs can subsidize resilience upgrades in disaster-prone areas.

3. Community Planning:

   • Cooperative housing projects and community-wide resilience programs (like flood barriers or fire breaks) can reduce individual costs.
   • Group purchasing of materials can drive down costs for neighborhoods rebuilding together.

4. Innovative Materials and Technologies:

   • Use affordable, durable materials like concrete, metal roofing, and treated wood.
   • Explore recycled and locally sourced materials for cost efficiency and sustainability.

5. Educating Homeowners:

   • Raising awareness of long-term benefits can encourage homeowners to prioritize resilience over aesthetic upgrades during rebuilding.

---

Examples of Affordable Resilience Measures

• Flood Zones: Elevating homes just 2-3 feet can drastically reduce flood risk at a relatively low cost.
• Hurricane/Tornado Zones: Installing hurricane ties and reinforced doors/windows can be done for under $5,000.
• Wildfire Zones: Clearing defensible space and installing metal roofing costs less than a luxury kitchen remodel but provides priceless safety.

---

The Bottom Line

While the upfront costs of building resilient homes may seem high, they are a necessary investment in safety, longevity, and community stability. With better planning, government support, and cost-efficient measures, it’s possible to make disaster-resistant homes affordable for everyone. In the end, the cost of preparedness is far less than the cost of repeated rebuilding or loss of life.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Contending Stupidity Harms, Absurdism Delights...

 I would contend, stupidity harms, but absurdism delights...and indeed, I DO contend that!

Stupidity Harms, Absurdism Delights: A Reflection on Human Experience

In the tapestry of human behavior, two forces often stand out for their profound impact: stupidity and absurdism. Though they may seem like distant cousins in the realm of irrationality, their consequences could not be more different. Stupidity, often rooted in ignorance or the rejection of reason, leaves a trail of harm in its wake. Absurdism, on the other hand, revels in defying logic, bringing joy and wonder to the world.

Stupidity: A Dangerous Indifference

Stupidity is not merely the lack of intelligence. It is a state of willful disengagement—a refusal to question, learn, or think critically. It clings to simplicity in a complex world and often becomes the catalyst for harm. Consider the spread of misinformation, fueled by individuals too complacent to verify facts. Or think of the societal divisions exacerbated by an unwillingness to empathize or understand another’s perspective.

History offers ample evidence of stupidity’s destructive power. Wars have been waged on faulty premises, environmental crises ignored due to short-sighted greed, and innovations stifled by those who feared change. Stupidity, in essence, thrives on neglect—neglect of responsibility, curiosity, and collective well-being.

Absurdism: A Celebration of the Unexpected

Absurdism stands in stark contrast to the harm of stupidity. While stupidity stems from a refusal to engage, absurdism is deeply engaged with the peculiarities of existence. It invites us to laugh at the chaos and embrace the nonsensical aspects of life. Rooted in philosophy and art, absurdism challenges the rigidity of logical structures and finds beauty in paradox.

Think of the works of Albert Camus, who suggested that life’s inherent lack of meaning does not lead to despair but to freedom. Or recall the surreal humor of Monty Python, whose sketches remind us that the world’s oddities can be a source of joy rather than frustration. Absurdism encourages us to see the unexpected not as a threat but as an opportunity for delight.

The Key Difference: Intent and Impact

What separates stupidity from absurdism is both intent and outcome. Stupidity harms because it ignores the consequences of inaction or poor decisions. Absurdism delights because it acknowledges those same consequences and responds with creativity and humor. Stupidity closes doors; absurdism opens windows to new perspectives.

Why This Matters

In an increasingly polarized world, understanding this dichotomy is more important than ever. Stupidity often thrives in echo chambers, where ignorance is reinforced and critical thought discouraged. Absurdism, however, can act as a bridge, using humor and unexpected insights to challenge assumptions and bring people together.

To combat stupidity, we must foster a culture of curiosity and learning. To embrace absurdism, we must allow ourselves the freedom to play with ideas and revel in the unexpected. Together, these approaches can transform how we navigate the complexities of modern life.

Conclusion: A Call to Delight in the Absurd

If stupidity is the shadow that darkens progress, absurdism is the light that illuminates new paths. By rejecting ignorance and celebrating the whimsical, we can create a world where harm is minimized, and delight abounds. In this, the choice is ours: to let stupidity harm or let absurdism inspire.

So, let us laugh at life’s absurdities, challenge its injustices, and find joy in the unexpected. After all, as the saying goes, “Stupidity harms, absurdism delights.”

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Tell me about when things are arbitrary and people think their choice isn't...

As an adjunct to my last blog post: United We Stand: Bridging America's Divides...

A talk my son had this week with an AI:

Tell me about when things are arbitrary and people think their choice isn't.

AI:

Ah, the fascinating world of human decision-making! There are many instances where people believe their choices are based on solid reasoning, but in reality, they might be more arbitrary than they think. Here are a few examples:

1. Brand Loyalty

People often stick to certain brands, believing they offer superior quality or value. However, studies have shown that brand loyalty can be influenced by arbitrary factors like advertising, packaging, or even the order in which they encountered the brands.

2. Voting Behavior

Voters might think their political choices are based on careful consideration of policies and candidates. Yet, research suggests that many voters are influenced by factors like a candidate's appearance, name recognition, or even the weather on election day.

3. Consumer Choices

When shopping, people might believe they are making rational decisions based on price and quality. However, factors like product placement, store layout, and even background music can subtly influence their choices.

4. Personal Preferences

People often have strong preferences for things like food, music, or hobbies. While they might think these preferences are deeply personal, they can be shaped by arbitrary factors like cultural exposure, peer influence, or even random experiences.

5. Risk Perception

Individuals often believe they are making rational decisions about risk, such as in financial investments or health behaviors. However, cognitive biases like the availability heuristic (relying on immediate examples that come to mind) can lead to arbitrary risk assessments.

6. Social Conformity

People might think they are making independent choices, but social conformity can play a significant role. The desire to fit in or be accepted by a group can lead to decisions that are more about social dynamics than personal preference.

In many cases, our brains are wired to seek patterns and make quick decisions, which can lead to arbitrary influences creeping in. It's a reminder of the complexity and sometimes unpredictability of human behavior.

Ever noticed any of these in your own life?

What's the name for a political viewpoint that includes both liberalism and conservativism situationally instead of just one or the other.

The political viewpoint you're describing is often referred to as "centrism" or "moderate". Centrists or moderates tend to adopt positions from both liberal and conservative ideologies, depending on the issue at hand. They aim to find a balance between the two extremes, advocating for pragmatic and practical solutions rather than strictly adhering to one ideology.

Centrism can vary widely, as it depends on the specific context and the individual's personal beliefs. Some centrists might lean more towards liberal policies on social issues while favoring conservative approaches to economic matters, or vice versa.

It's a flexible and situational approach to politics, focusing on what works best for a given situation rather than sticking to a rigid ideological framework. Does this align with what you had in mind?

How do you compare progressive and moderate in relation to these political points?

Progressives and moderates often differ in their approach to political issues, even if they might share some common goals. Here's a comparison:

Progressives

• Social Issues: Progressives typically advocate for rapid and significant changes to address social inequalities. They support policies like universal healthcare, free college education, and strong environmental regulations.

• Economic Policies: They often favor higher taxes on the wealthy and large corporations to fund social programs and reduce income inequality.

• Government Role: Progressives believe in a more active government role in regulating the economy and providing social services.

• Change: They push for transformative changes and are often seen as more radical in their approach.

Moderates

• Social Issues: Moderates tend to support incremental changes and seek a balance between progressive and conservative views. They might support some social programs but prefer more gradual implementation.

• Economic Policies: They often advocate for a balanced approach, supporting both market-driven solutions and some level of government intervention.

• Government Role: Moderates believe in a limited but effective government role, focusing on practical and achievable solutions.

• Change: They prefer pragmatic and incremental changes, aiming to find common ground between different political ideologies.

In essence, progressives are more likely to push for bold and sweeping reforms, while moderates seek a middle path, balancing progressive and conservative ideas to achieve practical solutions. This situational approach allows moderates to adapt their views based on the specific issue at hand, rather than adhering strictly to one ideology.

 Compiled with the aid of AI