Using Barbara F. Walter’s framework on autocracy and civil conflict, etc.;, how can we understand Donald Trump's actions in terms of democratic backsliding in the U.S.? Is there a list of authoritarian strategies he's employing — such as provocation and manipulation — to incite division and consolidate power?
Yes, Barbara F. Walter’s work — particularly her book How Civil Wars Start: And How to Stop Them — provides a useful framework to understand the tactics and trajectory of democratic backsliding and autocratization. She identifies warning signs and mechanisms that tend to appear in countries on the path to internal conflict and authoritarian rule. Donald Trump's behavior aligns with many of these red flags, especially through the lens of how autocrats gain and consolidate power.
Below is a structured breakdown based on Walter’s insights and comparative political science research on autocracy:
🔥 Trump’s Actions in the Context of Walter’s Autocracy Paradigm
1. Provocation to Incite Political Violence
Walter’s framework identifies the activation of ethnic or identity-based factions and provocative rhetoric as tools to polarize and destabilize democracies.
Trump’s actions:
-
Regularly uses dehumanizing and violent language (e.g., “vermin,” “bloodbath,” “poisoning our blood”).
-
Provokes his base with threats of civil war or violence if he is prosecuted or loses.
-
Calls for armed resistance ("Second Amendment people" remarks, Jan 6 encouragement).
✅ Matches authoritarian playbook: provoke chaos to justify a crackdown or delegitimize opposition.
2. Weaponization of Identity Politics
Walter emphasizes “factionalism” — when political parties divide along racial, ethnic, or religious lines, weakening democracy.
Trump’s actions:
-
Racial scapegoating of immigrants, Muslims, Black Americans.
-
"America First" nationalism as a proxy for white Christian identity politics.
-
Demonization of "Democrat-run cities" as lawless, foreign, and corrupt.
✅ Uses identity to fuel tribal loyalty and frame opponents as existential threats.
3. Delegitimizing Democratic Institutions
Authoritarian leaders often undermine trust in elections, the press, and the judiciary.
Trump’s actions:
-
Lies about 2020 election being stolen; tried to overturn results.
-
Calls the press the “enemy of the people.”
-
Threatens judges and courts ruling against him.
-
Plans to “destroy the Deep State” — code for neutral institutions.
✅ Attacks accountability mechanisms so only loyalty to him remains.
4. Purging the Government / Loyalty Tests
Walter and other scholars point to how autocrats replace civil servants with loyalists.
Trump’s plans for 2025 (via Project 2025):
-
“Schedule F” to fire tens of thousands of career federal workers.
-
Loyalty oaths or ideological tests.
-
Plans to staff DOJ, intelligence agencies, and military with allies.
✅ Turning a neutral state into a personal instrument of power.
5. Authoritarian Signaling: Promising Retribution and Control
Walter notes the importance of signaling intent to violate democratic norms to test the public’s reaction.
Trump’s actions:
-
Calls to "terminate the Constitution."
-
Promises mass deportations, internment camps, and military crackdowns on protests.
-
States he'll be a "dictator on day one."
-
Says he’ll pardon Jan 6 rioters.
✅ Testing the Overton window — normalizing authoritarianism.
6. Creating a “Cult of Personality”
Personalism — the concentration of loyalty and power in one leader — is a red flag in Walter’s analysis.
Trump’s actions:
-
Demands total loyalty; turns on anyone who criticizes him (Barr, Pence, etc.).
-
Portrays himself as victim, messiah, savior.
-
Symbolism of golden statues, Trump flags replacing U.S. flags.
✅ Centralizing identity of movement around one man.
Summary: Trump’s Authoritarian Playbook (Based on Walter’s Paradigm)
| Tactic | Action Taken by Trump | Walter’s Warning Sign? |
|---|---|---|
| Provocation of Violence | Jan 6, civil war talk, “bloodbath” threats | ✅ Yes |
| Identity-Based Factionalism | Racism, Christian nationalism, scapegoating | ✅ Yes |
| Delegitimizing Institutions | Attacks on courts, FBI, elections | ✅ Yes |
| Installing Loyalists | Schedule F, DOJ purges, HHS takeovers | ✅ Yes |
| Authoritarian Signaling | “Terminate the Constitution,” dictator vows | ✅ Yes |
| Cult of Personality | Loyalty tests, martyr/victim narrative | ✅ Yes |
Bottom Line:
Trump is following the textbook path of a modern would-be autocrat. According to Barbara Walter and other democracy scholars, his tactics are not about conservatism or populism — they are about eroding democratic norms and consolidating personal power through provocation, identity division, delegitimization, and autocratic promises.
The MAGA Debt Bomb
How Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” Turns America’s Fiscal Crisis Into a Weapon for Authoritarian Looting
Mary Geddry’s argument is rational, well-sourced, and historically grounded. It dismantles the illusion of MAGA fiscal responsibility and frames Trump’s policies not as misguided, but as part of a deliberate strategy of authoritarian wealth extraction. Even readers who don’t agree politically can’t dismiss the factual and economic concerns she raises.
One final thing...Trump in his first POTUS45 term, made bad decision for America to make Louis De Joy Postmaster General which I've long railed against. He's gone now. Resigned a few months ago, finally.
🚨 DOGE and White House Push Quiet USPS Overhaul 🚨
Internal documents reveal a series of behind-the-scenes meetings that could drastically reshape the U.S. Postal Service.
Since Postmaster General Louis DeJoy’s resignation in March, the White House—through its Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—has ramped up efforts to push major price hikes and structural changes at USPS. Treasury officials, White House attorneys, and Trump-aligned operatives are involved, raising red flags about attempts to treat the Postal Service like a for-profit business.
But USPS was never meant to be a business. It was created as a public service, grounded in the Constitution and championed by figures like Benjamin Franklin—to ensure universal, affordable communication for all Americans. Privatization risks abandoning rural communities, raising costs, and undermining a cornerstone of our democracy.
While DeJoy implemented some structural reforms, the damage to USPS operations and public trust far outweighed any gains. His ties to private logistics firms that benefited during his tenure only deepen the ethical concerns.
Bottom line: USPS exists to serve the public—not to enrich private interests.
- Personal wealth increased about $20M–$30M while serving as Postmaster General.
- His annual compensation more than doubled compared to his base pay, including generous bonuses—even during times USPS performance was widely criticized.
- When combined with ongoing investments and potential gains from logistics contractors, the financial surge suggests that his term benefited him personally in a way that merits scrutiny.
Louis DeJoy’s tenure at USPS reflects a broader pattern under Donald Trump: using government power to serve private interests and undermine public institutions. While DeJoy’s personal wealth grew by an estimated $20–30 million, the Postal Service—vital to American democracy—was hollowed out through service cuts, price hikes, and political manipulation.
Like so many Trump-era appointees, DeJoy advanced an agenda that prioritized profit and loyalty over public good. Under Trump’s watch, even the mail became a battleground in the effort to weaken trust in government and tilt the system away from the people it was built to serve.
Pay attention—this is how democracies die: not with a sudden collapse, but through calculated provocations like DeJoy’s, where public trust is eroded, institutions are repurposed for private gain, and the machinery of government is quietly turned against the people it was meant to serve.
Pay attention—this is how democracies die: not in one blow, but one provocation at a time. DeJoy hollowed out the Postal Service. Betsy DeVos attacked public education. Scott Pruitt sabotaged environmental protections. Michael Flynn undermined national security. And now, with Trump poised as POTUS 47, the same corrupt playbook returns—only this time, the guardrails are weaker, and the intentions even clearer.
No comments:
Post a Comment